Do animals really not die for artificial meat?
And is eating tumors a healthy alternative for your own body and the environment?
... Or should toxic biowaste, which is produced artificially, really do no harm?
How exactly is the food that is supposed to end hunger in the world
and ensure food security according to the 2030 Agenda produced?
EVERYONE should know the answer to these questions!
Did you, dear viewers, also notice during your
last shopping trip that almost every supermarket,
whether it's called Rewe, Aldi, Lidl or whatever,
now has entire veggie departments?
McDonalds, Burger King and Co. also offer plant-based burgers or nuggets.
Vegetarians and vegans should be happy about this development: more
choice, a more conscious diet, can only be good for people, animals and the
environment - you might think.
However, the 2030 Agenda, which is being vigorously pursued by the UN, the WHO and the WEF, and the systematic
approach to implementing their plans, proves
that this is anything but caring and prudent.
As Kla.TV already made clear in the program Food
as a Weapon, the 2030 Agenda is a huge fraud.
To reiterate:
Goal 2 of the 2030 Agenda supposedly aims to end hunger, achieve food
security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.
However, starting with the already discouraged farmers, it can be observed
that natural, small-scale agriculture is being destroyed, while at the same time
multinational corporations are increasingly controlling global food production
through industrial agriculture, genetic engineering and agrochemicals.
One of the many announcements on how Bill Gates and his
cohorts want to end hunger in the world and ensure food
security lies in synthetic foods and vertical farming, which
is supposed to offer nothing but advantages.
In October 2023, however, Uncut-News published an article with the following
title: Why synthetic foods are very dangerous.
We summarize the most important statements for you and address the following questions:
What about animal welfare in the production of artificial meat?
One example of synthetically produced food is cultured meat.
Proponents of this meat substitute insist that
this product is not artificial meat, but real meat,
with the only difference being that no animals
have to be slaughtered to produce it.
Many people are switching to cultured meat precisely because
of animal welfare and a conscious approach to nutrition.
Unfortunately, they are falling for a huge PR scam.
The claim that no animals are killed in this process is simply false.
Currently, most cultured or cell-based meats are produced using fetal bovine
serum (FBS), which is derived from the blood of unborn calves.
In short: Pregnant
cows are slaughtered to remove blood from the unborn fetus,
according to the Uncut News article.
Are synthetic meat substitutes safe for consumers?
To make the cell cultures grow, for example, some companies use immortal cells,
which are technically precancerous, i.e. basically completely cancerous.
Other companies use embryonic stem cells or cells from living animals.
The meat substitutes grown on cancerous cells could therefore be
considered tumors, as the meat consists entirely of cancerous cells.
The reason for using immortal cells is that cells
that behave normally cannot divide forever.
So it doesn't work if you want to grow thousands of pounds of
tissue with normal muscle cells from a small number of cells.
What do experts say
about contaminants in artificially produced meat?
In terms of safety, it could also be argued
that natural beef could be contaminated during
processing, packaging, transportation, storage
or during the cooking process.
But with cultured meat, every ingredient and processing
step carries the potential for contamination, and any
of the hundreds of ingredients could have toxic effects alone or in synergy.
A thorough analysis of available data published in May 2023
by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
(FAO) and a WHO expert panel concluded that at least 53 potential
health risks are associated with lab-grown meat.
These include the possibility of contamination with heavy metals, microplastics, nanoplastics
and chemicals, allergenic additives, toxic components and antibiotics.
This also applies to the plant-based substitute products already available on the market.
In this regard, it must be pointed out that even the product
declared as plant-based is anything but healthy.
These are also elaborately chemically produced and contain, among other things, questionable
amounts of mineral oil. Does the production of artificial meat generate toxic biowaste?
As briefly mentioned above, the production of cultured
meat also generates toxic biowaste.
The biowaste from these synthetic, biological fermentations must
first be deactivated and then disposed of safely.
It must not end up in a landfill.
Dear viewers, you have to let that melt in your mouth:
The manufacture of products that we are supposed to eat produces hazardous waste
that cannot be disposed of conventionally, but is completely harmless to us?
What are antibiotic-resistant
organisms doing in artificial meat?
The meat-like mass grown in the nutrient solution must be antibiotic-resistant,
as it must survive the antibiotics used to kill other undesirable
organisms in the vat in which the mass is grown.
As a result, antibiotic-resistant organisms are also integrated into the final
product, and one can only guess what types of foodborne illnesses could
be caused by genetically modified, antibiotic-resistant E. coli.
Here is a quote from the program Food as a weapon
At the same time, Gates is investing a lot of money in researching
and modifying the microbiome, a complex ecosystem of bacteria, fungi, archaea
and viruses which, under the collective term of intestinal flora, plays a key role
in controlling digestive processes and has a major influence on a child's mental
and physical development, particularly in the first year of life.
Does the production of artificial meat save CO2?
It is also propagated that cultured meat and other synthetic foods are more environmentally friendly.
This is also incorrect:
not only does production generate hazardous waste,
but the laboratory meat industry also produces 4 to 25 times
more CO2 than traditional animal husbandry.
Because this whole agenda regarding food security etc. is based on a CO2 lie, which
justifies the supposedly necessary reduction of natural agriculture.
In some other programs Kla.TV dealt with the so-called climate killer cows and the Green Deal.
As described above, the 2030 Agenda makes it difficult for
farmers to provide for us, the people who depend on them,
let alone maintain their livelihoods.
As you have now seen, synthetic and processed foods are
not being pushed out of genuine concern for sustainability.
No, synthetic biology is being used to build a powerful control mechanism.
Those who own all synthetic food production
will literally rule the world.
Here is a quote from Henry Kissinger:
"Whoever controls the food supply controls the people;
Whoever controls the energy can control entire continents;
Whoever controls the money can control the world.
Kissinger was also the one who wrote a secret strategy paper for the National Security Council
in 1974, declaring, in other words, food to be an instrument of national power.
In short, the globalists already own and control most of the
natural agricultural products grown in the world today.
By replacing real animal foods with patented, laboratory-produced protein alternatives,
we are heading for unprecedented power over the world's population.
It is also well known that the consumption of ultra-processed foods
contributes to disease, and the beneficiary is of course Big Pharma.
For many decades, the food industry has promoted chronic diseases that
are then treated with medication instead of better nutrition.
However, our original food is a perfect creation and in its
natural form is 100% tailored to the needs of all living beings.
And when Bill and co. tinker with it, they create a Frankenstein's diabolical buffet with a disgust factor.
However, we at Kla.TV would be happy to document the globalists, Big Pharma
and the profiteers of Agenda 2030 over a longer period of time so that they
can prove to us on their own bodies what advantages their products offer.
Please spread the word about this program and stay on the ball with us so that the plans
of the 2030 Agenda for the peoples of this world can be uncovered and thus thwarted.
Together we break through the wall of complexity and ignorance.