The oppressive heat and drought are currently causing a lot of problems for agriculture.
Long-lasting fires keep the fire departments on their toes in many places.
The cause seems clear:
Man-made climate change, i.e. high CO2 emissions, are to blame.
Solar geoengineering is increasingly being brought to public attention as a possible solution.
This involves spraying substances to reflect the sun's rays in order to cool the earth.
Radio MDR takes up a listener's question as to whether there are already flights in which aircraft spray such substances.
Ulrike Niemeier from the Max Planck Institute in Hamburg confirms that it is technologically feasible:
"Of course it has side effects:
Negative effects are that we also reduce the average precipitation on earth.
It would mean that we would no longer have a really deep blue sky, but it would look slightly milky..." and
that it "... could certainly have psychological effects."
However, it denies the use of such flights.
They and other interviewees call for further research into geoengineering.
If we take a closer look at Niemeier's statements, the consequences of spraying substances
would be less precipitation and milky skies.
Both have become increasingly common in recent years.
The question arises as to whether this is really, as claimed, a completely new
technology on which research is only just beginning.
In the following, Kla.tv takes up information from the leading media, according to which the research and use
of climate weapons obviously already has a long history.
Here you can see the main content of the program www.kla.tv/16286 "CO2 - debate as a
distraction from weather manipulation by the military".
We start with the search for clues:
"1 On March 14, 2019, Swiss Environment Minister Simonetta Sommaruga said the following in an interview on the
sidelines of the 4th United Nations Environment Assembly:
[Simonetta Sommaruga: "Yes, Switzerland has tried to put the issue of geoengineering, i.e. the spraying of
particles into the atmosphere, on the table, to gather information, to look at the opportunities and risks.
... These are experiments that are carried out without even knowing the effects.
But we will continue to fight for it.
Sometimes we just have to try twice and that will definitely continue.
The topic is too important and, at best, problematic for us to simply look the other way."
Ms. Sommaruga is talking here about attempts to spray particles into the atmosphere.
But are these experiments new and are they still in the early stages on a small scale?
2 On January 14, 2009, meteorologist Gunther Tiersch made some irritating remarks during the announcement
of the weather report on the German TV channel ZDF:
Gunther Tiersch explains the weather literally on the weather map:
"And then we have something else here that we can't identify as snow or rain, these serpentine lines here in the west, that
probably brought out a few planes, military planes, over the North Sea in the afternoon, at an altitude of
about 5-6 kilometers. Nothing to do with the weather..."
A short time later, ZDF interviews Karsten Brandt, an expert from the weather service, in response to
numerous viewer questions about this weather report.
Here is the heavily abridged version in the original wording:
[Moderator: "A phenomenon that Karsten Brandt from the "Donnerwetter" weather service knows well.
Meteorologists first noticed such strange ghost clouds back in 2005.
Warships also camouflage themselves with such artificial clouds.
Chaff (artificial clouds used to jam radar equipment, for example) was developed as early as the Second World War.
Back then, they consisted of staniol strips, but today they are glass fibers coated with aluminum, 15 to
25 mm long and approx. 100 micrometers in diameter.
If the filaments are half the size of the wavelength of the radar, false echoes occur.
For the enormous ghost clouds from the direction of the Dutch coast, tons of the substance must repeatedly fall over Germany."
[Meteorologist Karsten Brandt: "We are setting up environmental zones and the like and apparently the
environmental zone does not apply four or five kilometers above the North Sea and not above Germany.
It doesn't matter what is being spread. I think it's incredible!"....
[Moderator: "Even if these clouds don't come from the Bundeswehr, the fact that no one feels responsible for substances
that regularly sink over Germany and are actually banned is simply absurd in the opinion of meteorologists."
[Conclusion of the moderator: "Absurd is still a nice way of putting it, the population is being deceived here."
3 The German physicist and television presenter Joachim Bublath made very detailed statements on the subject of
weather manipulation by the military in a documentary for ZDF.
Bublath designed the ZDF science program "Abenteuer Forschung" until 2008.
In one episode, he discusses weather manipulation by the military using huge antenna
systems and the creation of artificial clouds.
Here is also an excerpt in the original wording: "There is a suspicion that the powerful transmitters and
the large antenna systems of HAARP are also being used for these military experiments.
Gakona/Alaska: Far away from any civilization, the American military operates a facility here to manipulate the ionosphere.
The name of the mysterious project is HAARP.
A huge forest of antennas can radiate radio waves into the ionosphere...
Radio waves are used to try to change the ionosphere.
The radio waves pump energy into this layer of electrically charged particles.
The ionosphere becomes charged, expands at these points and shows disturbances.
One way to cause difficulties for the military opponent...
Officially, however, HAARP is only intended for research into the ionosphere.
Bublath also reports on a similar facility near Tromsø in Norway.
This is followed by a BBC segment reporting on the creation of artificial clouds by NASA.
Brief interim conclusion:
More than 10 years ago, ZDF reported on approaches from the military sector to influence the weather for military
purposes by deploying particles and huge antenna systems.
But listen to another voice that reports in great detail on the nature and aims of weather manipulation:
4. the Spanish television station "La 8 Zamora TV" interviewed Josefina Fraile from "Asociacion Tierra SOS-Tenible" on October
19, 2017 under the headline: "Geoengineering pact of secrecy".
Here you can hear some excerpts from the text.
In the beginning, it is about a ban on so-called climate weapons.
Josefina Fraile refers to the ENMOD Convention ("Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other
Hostile Use of Environmentally Modifying Technologies").
This is a treaty under international law that was adopted by the United Nations (UN) as Resolution 31/72 back in 1976.
The following interventions are explicitly mentioned:
Earthquakes or changes in the earth's crust - Tsunamis - Weather phenomena such as cyclones, tornadoes, cloud
formation, precipitation/rain - Disruption of the ecological balance of a region - Influence on ocean currents, etc.
An agreement has been reached that the climate weapon may not be used for armed conflicts.
But in fact it is still in use.
What can you do and what can you do with this weapon?
This weapon can be used to create rain, storms, clouds, lightning and thunderstorms anywhere in the world.
Or the opposite: you can break up rain fronts, stop hail and snowfall and, of course, cause drought.
What happens? This weapon of climate control, whoever has it, has absolute control over
the treasures of this world, especially food.
So in plain language: if a country has this technology, it controls the water tap for the whole world.
Either do as you are told and you get water, or you are against it and your country is undersupplied with water:
Breaking up, fracturing, destroying water resources.
This causes prolonged periods of drought and leads to the inability to feed the population of that country.
The result is famine.
It does exist! There are countries that have this technology and in the USA this technology
has already become part of their foreign policy.
A report by the North American Air Force is called - look at the title! - "Owning the climate by 2025".
This title, which is self-explanatory, leaves us without words and without air.
The fact that you can be so presumptuous as to want to control the world's taps is something that most people don't realize.
This report also states that climate modification is part of US foreign policy.
Whether the world wants it or not.
And this policy is enforced through bilateral agreements, through organizations such as NATO, which is
responsible for us, or through the United Nations.
In fact, in the last United Nations General Assembly, in Section D of the 5th Report on Climate Change, the IPCC was
more or less legitimized for what is called GEO-ENGINEERING.
...Well, it's clear that whoever has this technology can blackmail whoever they want...
...The moment this method of warfare was banned by the United Nations, we logically asked ourselves the question:
A country that can control the climate and thus has power over resources all over the world, will this country
give up this dominance just because it signed a United Nations agreement after a long delay? Hardly.
The only thing left for this country was to give the dog a new collar.
In other words: create a global problem and then offer a global solution.
The global problem was the creation of a new religion: "climate change and global warming".
Now there are such attempts by the mainstream to make interventions in natural weather patterns
acceptable as measures for climate protection? Definitely yes.
In 2015, for example, Swiss radio station SRF 4 presented a type of solar protection for the Earth high up in the atmosphere.
According to Thomas Peter, an atmospheric chemist at ETH Zurich, this could be achieved, for example, with countless tiny particles
that fly around high up in the atmosphere like little mirrors.
They would throw the sunlight right back into space.
...Many experts and environmental organizations are very sceptical about geoengineering.
But global warming is becoming increasingly dramatic.
And so more researchers have recently spoken out in favor of seriously investigating solar protection for the
Earth, e.g. the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the US National Academy of Sciences.
Ken Caldeira from Stanford University in California says that the topic is now becoming socially acceptable.
We summarize:
1 In 2019, the Swiss Environment Minister calls for a debate on the spraying of particles into the atmosphere.
2. evidence of illegal practices to influence the weather, e.g. by spraying particles or interfering with the ionosphere with
extremely strong radio waves, was already being reported in the official media by weather
experts and specialist journalists over 10 years ago.
3 Josefina Fraile shed light on the military interests behind the use of so-called climate weapons, which were banned in 1977.
It sees an attempt to make the banned "climate weapons" acceptable by relabeling them as a "climate protection program".
Against this backdrop of strong military power interests, it is understandable that the official media now unanimously stir up
fear of CO2 and no longer say a word about completely different causes of droughts, floods and weather disasters of all kinds.
Could it be that, taking into account all the facts mentioned in this program, the scaremongering about CO2 is more of a gigantic
distraction and misleading of the population, which is being ripped off, controlled and weakened by
substances that are harmful to health for flimsy reasons?
Effective environmental protection starts with uncovering the serious causes of environmental
destruction and raising public awareness of these issues.
Kla.TV stays on the ball for you.
We are happy to receive witness reports and information from witnesses.