There was sparse coverage in the leading media of
the May 21-28, 2023 WHO pandemic treaty meeting.
This is reported by Deutschlandfunk:
With an international treaty, the World Health Organization aims to provide more
equity for poorer countries and better data sharing in future pandemics.
That sounds very positive.
But unfortunately, what exactly this WHO pandemic treaty is about is not reported.
The NZZ publishes, the World Health Organization
has declared the Corona Emergency over.
Now it wants to strengthen its role with a pandemic treaty.
Critics fear that member states will lose their decision-making authority as a result.
ZDF writes on its website: Lateral thinkers and conspiracy
believers are creating a mood against planned reform projects
of the World Health Organization with alarmist statements.
The campaign reaches the Bundestag.
According to ZDF, there is massive public concern about this WHO academy
treaty in terms of loss of sovereignty of nation states, but this
is dismissed as dangerous misinformation from a very small but agile group.
So much for some mainstream voices.
The alternative website multipolar-magazin.de reports in its article
What's behind the pandemic treaty very detailed, differentiated and critical.
She writes as an interim conclusion:
If a new system of globally binding rules is to be legitimized on
the basis of questionable, even false premises, vigilance and doubt are in order.
The International Health Regulations are governed by Article 21 of the WHO Constitution.
As the name suggests, these are binding regulations
that apply to every WHO member country.
State sovereignty would be limited.
Austrian lawyer Dr. Roman Schiessler writes on report24.news:
WHO is currently trying to exert direct legal
influence on states in the health sector.
The intention is to put rules into force which allow
legislative and thus sovereign action in the respective state.
Attention, Reichelt! Team writes on its website pleiteticker.de:
- Opposition to the WHO pandemic treaty is stirring in the UK.
- Government representatives and Conservative MPs in the House of Commons are
up in arms against far-reaching concessions to the WHO, which would deeply
encroach on national sovereignty in the event of a new pandemic.
According to a report from reclaim the net, Dr.
Abdullah Assiri, the co-chair of a WHO working group
looking at changes to international law, went even further.
He urged members to prioritize measures
that could restrict individual freedoms.
Compact-online.de headlines:
Pandemic Contract: US politician warns against world government. You write:
In a year's time, the WHO's so-called pandemic treaty should be in the bag.
Now a former Republican congresswoman is warning
of the consequences of this dictatorship pact.
Ansage.org writes:
PARLIAMENTARY SELF-DISEMPOWERMENT IN FAVOR OF THE WHO: 45 MINUTES OF EMBARRASSMENT.
Ansage.org continues literally on its website:
Unfortunately, the 68 "no" votes of all AfD members, the two
non-attached members of the Bundestag and even one parliamentarian who -
how long do you think? - belongs to the CDU parliamentary
group (but who deserves special thanks for this very reason) as
well as the 25 abstentions of the Left Party were not
enough to reject the vote on the traffic light motion 75
years WHO- Strengthening and reform of the World Health Organization:
497 voted in favor of this WHO
Enabling Act - whether informed or uninformed,
whether traffic light male/female/miscellaneous or whether members
of the alleged opposition CDU/CSU
In twelve months, we will finally be slaves of the WHO,
because in May 2024, its absolute takeover will be sealed.
A race against time has begun, while the
WHO is already setting all the course.
For all opponents of the global dictatorship we are facing,
there is now one year left to bring the issue
to public attention and to make those responsible in the
member states give in - according to lawyers Dr. Silvia
Behrendt and Philipp Kruse in an interview with Elsa Mittmannsgruber.
This small selection of reports alone shows a
large discrepancy with information from the leading media.
This makes us sit up and take notice, and reinforces
the impression that the leading media are once again not
fulfilling their investigative role as the fourth estate of the
state, but are instead obfuscating an obvious global-strategic arbitrariness.
Dr. David E. Martin even testifies in his speech at
the 3rd Corona Summit of the EU Parliament on May
3, 2023, in a clear and verifiable manner for everyone
that corona viruses have been configured variously for 30 years
and are thus in the drawers ready for retrieval.
This is precisely what makes the WHO pandemic treaty seem all the
more questionable against the backdrop of the demonstrably staged Covid 19 pandemic.
It is therefore not surprising that there
is massive opposition from the population worldwide.
There were demonstrations against the WHO pandemic treaty in many places around the world.
Here are a few highlights:
PROTEST in front of the WHO in Geneva.
The organizer writes: MASS FULL! fights on the front line against the WHO pandemic pact!
This would be the end of all our freedoms, the demise of fundamental rights.
With the sovereignty initiative we will prevent the WHO
dictate, protect our constitutional rights and save Switzerland.
Fight with us for the sovereignty of the people
and the state and join the purple movement.
In the same way in Vienna, The Hague and Sidney.
Elevator in Frankfurt - FRANKFURT FOR WHO-EXIT❗ ️
Frankfurt therefore demands withdrawal from WHO and demonstrates on 27.05.2023
Likewise in Hamburg: No WHO world government through the back door
In the name of health Stop WHO pandemic treaty.
But also in Fulda, Bochum, Stuttgart, Heilbronn.
Kettner-Edelmetalle.de reported already on
26.04.2023. WHO pandemic treaty:
Petition to prevent possible takeover gains momentum.
Citizens in Germany and the United Kingdom are opposing
the World Health Organization's pandemic treaty with a petition.
They fear a takeover by the WHO and an
erosion of freedom of expression and personal rights.
The petition has already collected 290,000 signatures.
In the USA, Senator Ron Johnson has introduced a bill with 17 other members of parliament.
According to the bill, in favor of transparency and sovereignty,
each agreement from the WHO pandemic treaty would have to
be approved separately by the Senate as an individual bill.
Johnson literally said, "WHO, along with
our federal health agencies, has failed
miserably in its response to COVID-19.
This failure should not be rewarded with a new international treaty
that would increase WHO's power at the expense of U.S. sovereignty.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr, chairman and founder of Children's Health Defense
called on the public to sign a petition opposing the WHO's
threatened takeover of power through changes to international health regulations.
These are closely linked to the pandemic contract.
WHO seeks power and dominance in all
health matters through the proposed changes.
In doing so, it would even override the sovereignty of its 194 member states.
In Germany, a petition was recently submitted demanding that German
politicians not approve the pandemic treaty with the WHO.
The reasoning is as follows: Conclusion of the
pandemic treaty with the WHO is accompanied by
considerable restrictions and loss of fundamental rights.
This power does not belong in the hands of an institution that finances itself through the pharmaceutical industry and private individuals, as well as businessmen.
There is a conflict of interest.
Giving WHO the power to violate human rights worldwide is contrary to every constitution.
The deadline for signing this petition is June 20. 2023.
The Hippocratic Oath Medical Association calls for
A pre-written letter can be downloaded from the website.
The Swiss Association
Aletheia compiles key arguments against the WHO pandemic treaty in a flyer.
Here is an excerpt: The Pandemic Treaty provides
for the global harmonization of prevention, preparedness and
response measures in the event of a pandemic.
WHO would dictate the roadmap in the future with lockdowns, school closures, masks, and mandatory vaccinations.
A deviating policy, such as the one successfully pursued in Sweden during Corona, would not be possible (anymore).
State independence in health policy is abandoned and the WHO thus acquires global power.
In the source note you will find the link to the flyer.
Conclusion: the WHO pandemic treaty is obviously
a red hot potato, forged as a
shackle on all nation states under the
guise of humanity and health care.
Here it is worth taking a closer look and - as long as it is still possible - to use one's veto and to demand this veto from the WHO also from politics.