Dear ladies and gentlemen, obviously KLATV hits the core of the problem more and more
with its well-researched and revealing broadcasts.
Only a few hours after our broadcast, Scandal Surrounding Swiss TV SRF and Robin Rehmann
Satanic Panic was aired, a threatening letter by the SRF legal department reached KLATV.
In this email which reached KLATV Sunday afternoon, June 18th, shortly before 4pm, the deputy
director of the SRF legal team demanded KLATV to remove the broadcast from its main website
and all other platforms by 6pm that same Sunday.
Does SRF fear more could be revealed?
That the broadcasting station reacts with such panic?
As fast as the SRF's reaction, the satanist designation of Rehmann's Facebook friend
disappeared on the website of the named satanist community.
Suddenly this Francis Dollarhide is no satanic high priest anymore, but only a usual CEO.
Luckily there are good web archives where you can follow up well on what happened on
the internet during this short time after the KLATV broadcast Scandal Surrounding Swiss
TV SRF and Robin Rehmann's Satanic Panic had been aired.
Once again it proved very rewarding that KLA.TV professionally secures its well-researched sources.
By the way, please save this broadcast now on your computer and make sure that it is
uploaded as quickly as possible on as many independent channels as possible.
For, as our KLATV viewers may well have noticed, the named broadcast was removed from our website
after another ultimatum by the SRF legal department.
Following this report here now, KLATV is airing this broadcast again.
Our legal service has carefully examined all the threats listed by the SRF and the broadcast's
author commented on the accusations.
The facts named in this broadcast are very essential and substantiated, so they certainly
may not be withheld from the public.
Additionally, it is also our journalist's duty, according to the Journalist Press Code
Guideline 10.5, to publish the threats SRF sent to KLATV.
I quote the guideline, journalists defend freedom of information in the event of actual
or threatened interference by private interests.
Threats or boycotts are to be made public as a matter of principle, end of quote.
The public needs to gain knowledge on how KLATV is being threatened by SRF due to this revealing broadcast.
That's why we also publish the SRF legal department's threatening letter and the answers given by
KLA.TV author Lois Sasek.
Be a witness to the unfounded accusations of SRF and listen to KLATV's rebuttal that
adds even more significance to the following documentation.
Please help to debunk this injustice by informing as many acquaintances of yours as possible
about this Swiss TV scandal and by spreading this broadcast.
Also do investigative research into this matter yourself so that
this network of criminals can no longer cover for each other.
We at KLATV say thank you for doing that.
At the beginning of 2023, Swiss radio and television SRF aired part 6 of a series with the title Satanic Panic.
In it, the Swiss TV journalist Robin Rehman disputes that
there is a satanic cult exercising ritual child abuse.
I quote Robin Rehman, there's no such thing, such nonsense.
According to Rehman, all victims, witnesses, policemen and therapists have fallen prey
to a conspiracy theory or have been talked into it by therapists.
In this broadcast, KLATV investigates the background of Satanic Panic journalist Robin Rehman.
We look at how he is networked and which goals he has by order of the Swiss TV.
KLATV has been presented extensive image material in which Swiss TV journalist Robin Rehman
shows himself in make-up as a devil character for example.
With his band Krank, which means sick, he sings about violence and with obscene content
in a loud screaming voice and partly bloodsweat.
Robin Rehman sings, having always been victims, we can understand the perpetrators well, with
a laughing face when the bomb explodes.
Rehman likes to present himself with a Baphomet symbol.
This is a symbol all Satan worshippers or members of Satan cults use.
He stretches out his tongue between his spread fingers and poses with a meter-long penis, among other things.
Does this raise trust in the journalism of the Swiss TV when their journalist presents
himself in such a scandalous way?
And how should one interpret Robin Rehman wearing a T-shirt with a skull in his Swiss
TV program on the topic Satanic Panic?
How trustworthy does his vehement denial of a Satanic cult that exercises ritual abuse seem in this light?
Who is this Swiss TV journalist Robin Rehman really?
KLATV got an answer to this question after the KLATV documentary about 27 victims and
27 witnesses of Satanic ritual violence went on air.
Hajar, another victim of ritual violence, contacted KLATV.
Hajar had already given some interviews to independent media outlets about all the Satanic
ritual atrocities she had to experience since her early childhood days.
She courageously showed her face and name in it.
So a journalist of a big broadcasting station in northern Germany held an extensive interview with her.
I had to drive to Berlin for the interview.
It was ready to be aired.
The viewers and subscribers to this channel, a really large channel, were welcome to also
ask questions and I was finally able to tell about my childhood and what had happened to me.
Then Robin Rehman intervened by name.
The broadcasting station assured me that this was very
unusual, as well as what he was accusing them of in his text.
Then I was told it would be too risky to publish my interview, although they believe my story.
And then I unfortunately was turned down and the interview was not aired.
I think this has only happened to them once and of all things it was just with this very important topic.
And I thought this was just awful, it really gave me a hard time.
I didn't even know him, Robin. Wait a minute.
Robin Rehman, isn't this the seemingly insignificant journalist of Swiss television?
What does this guy have to do with Northern Germany and how does it come about that he
even has success with his demand to stop this broadcast?
Maybe he is not as insignificant as it seems.
How is it possible that he has such an influence when he doesn't even have a solid education
in journalism according to his official LinkedIn profile?
The police and the public prosecutor's office were even put out on to the violated and harassed victim Hajar.
Maybe in order to frighten her and to put pressure on her.
Interestingly enough, the public prosecutor's office was activated by journalist Bernd Harder,
which we will speak about in a moment.
By the way, Hajar had this experience with another public broadcasting station too.
After the okay had been given by the executive floor to produce a documentary about her gruesome
story, suddenly the top boss of this television station's boss intervened and stopped the
planned broadcasting.
The same also happened to Anneke Lukas, a Belgian victim of ritual violence, and many
more abused victims experienced the same.
Back to Swiss TV journalist Robin Rehman.
In the light of this, what about the credibility of Rehman's vehement denial that a satanic
cult exercising ritual abuse exists?
On Facebook you find a satanic high priest in Rehman's official friends list.
He is listed as high priest of this satanic cult on their official website.
In public web appearances, he never shows his face and hides his true identity behind a pseudonym.
This Facebook friend of Rehman's uses an alias which, interestingly enough, is the name of
a cruel serial killer, Francis Dollarhyde.
This is a movie character that brutally kills his victims at night by slitting their throat,
biting his sharp teeth into them, strangling them to death,
and doing other things that we do not want to mention here.
Kalei TV has footage in which this satanist high priest Dollarhide very officially poses
with disturbing satan mask and diabolic fangs.
In one of these pictures you see him sitting below the title Our God Reigns.
He sits there as a horned devil between two masked satan figures that hold baby dolls in their hands.
Directly next to the right baby doll you read a signature Black Blood on the t-shirt.
On the YouTube channel of the satanist community you also find a video with the title Adonochrome Basement.
What is Adonochrome?
According to witness testimonies, blood of tortured children is drunk as an intoxicating drug.
This blood is enriched with adenochrome through the tortures.
In the video Adonochrome Basement, underground corridors are shown that lead to a dark basement room with candles.
It is underlaid with threatening music. Crosses are burned.
In the post of the satanist community, Jesus is condemned as a warmonger and instigator of mass murder.
This satanist high priest Francis Dollarhide is well
networked, among others, with German activist Lydia Boehnecke.
Criminal psychologist Lydia Boehnecke has been giving talks for years in which she disputes
the existence of satanic ritual abuse.
In one of her events, Francis Dollarhide appears as expert, as usual masked.
As a front-rider of the scene, criminal psychologist Boehnecke vehemently represents the viewpoint
that satanic ritual abuse is just a conspiracy theory and satanism just a harmless philosophy of life.
However, amongst the books she has published you find titles like Satists, Deadly Love,
Stories from Real Life and Vampires Among Us.
In the advertising for her books, Boehnecke promises the reader that real vampires will have a say.
And exactly she is on the Swiss journalist Robin Rehmann's friends list as well and should
not be missed as an expert in his Swiss TV series Satanic Panic.
In her interview she provocatively wears a necklace with the symbol of a raven's skull,
which plays a vital role in witchcraft and voodoo.
It's worth knowing that a little necklace with a cross pendant worn by a TV presenter
was banned by Swiss TV with the statement the broadcasting
station does not deem religious symbols as appropriate.
Criminal psychologist Lydia Boehnecke officially poses next to journalist Bernd Harder in front
of a picture showing a naked woman being cut to pieces.
It seems like a cannibal orgy. Cannibalism is an important part of satanism.
Witnesses of testimonies and abuse victims credibly describe cannibalistic rituals.
Why do these people who deny satanic ritual tortures and killings pose in front of pictures
that show abhorrent practices like cannibalism?
Back to Rehmann's questionable contacts.
In his broadcasting series Satanic Panic he interviewed a witness who claimed in the Swiss
TV broadcast that his psychiatrist had always tried to talk him into satanic ritual abuse.
This witness insists on this in that broadcast, without any proof.
And it's exactly this witness who wrote the book titled The Dictionary of Belzebub.
Belzebub is another term for devil.
How credible can such a witness be?
While the forcibly financed Swiss television ridicules the cries for help of hundreds of
victims and muzzles important victims, the exact same Swiss TV slanders the founder of
KLA TV and OCG, Ivo Zasic, in a very malicious way.
It was this self-same Swiss TV that triggered a large-scale
persecution campaign against him several years ago.
The same pattern becomes obvious all over the world.
Sincere truth movements are being discriminated against and a
thousand-fold testified-to satanic cult is being trivialized.
Help to bust the dark entanglements of our mainstream press and give a voice to the victims.
During this report, watch the documentary 27 Victims, 27 Witnesses of the Blood Cult
and share it with your friends and acquaintances.
Because mainstream media does not.
They hush it up, keep silent, trivialize and ridicule the victims.
We owe it to the victims and our human dignity that truth comes to light and these crimes be prosecuted.
Swiss Scandal, Swiss Television and Robin Rehmann's satanic
panic series with KLA-TV statements to Swiss TV threats.
SRF Legal Service, thank you for your response in the above mentioned matter.
It is surprising that a legally trained person could not ascertain any violations.
We are very astonished about which so-called violations you have supposedly discovered in our broadcast.
While your finger points towards us, all other fingers point towards you.
I would like to briefly explain some relevant points in
respect of media legal and media ethical points of view.
In the contribution it is said that mainstream media hush
up, are silent about, trivialize and ridicule the victims.
KLA.TV includes SRF in this and shows journalist Robin Rehmann in the image.
This statement is false and constitutes a personal injury and violation of honor.
SRF hushes up, is silent about and trivializes satanic
ritual abuse in any respect and with every opportunity.
The victims are not even listened to.
I'll name just three examples in which Robin Rehmann ridiculed the victims on Swiss Television.
The daughter of Gabriele Hagar reported that her father and her mother, so Gabriele Hagar,
would sacrifice children in cemeteries.
They would hack off their hands and heads and practice cannibalism.
SRF does not let this victim speak, doesn't even try to get into contact with her, but
goes straight to the apartment of the alleged perpetrator and together with her laughs about
how one could believe such a thing.
In the end however, you don't even know the name of the victim that would enable you to
do some investigative research yourself on this case.
Yet Gabriele Hagar's dog is presented to the SRF viewer by name.
His name is Merlin.
The figure Merlin, by the way, is a well-known wizard who is reported to be the son of the
devil, by nature an evil being that came into the world to cause harm.
So the SRF journalist Rehmann pays more attention to Gabriele Hagar's dog than to her daughter,
who it seems is extremely desperate and has, according to SRF statements, sought for help
in the trauma station of Littenheide Clinic.
This complaining daughter is not shown to the viewer.
The victim therefore has been rendered ridiculous by public television station SRF.
Did SRF really believe Gabriele Hagar would say in front of running cameras, oh yes, I
cut off babies' hands and heads with my husband, great that you've come over with your camera
and I can finally admit it.
When a girl makes a statement about her parents, and many people in her direct surrounding
believe and protect her, what she says should really be taken into account.
Because all over the world there are thousands of such testimonies about satanic mutilation
rituals in which limbs are cut off, human blood is drunk and human flesh eaten.
Robin Rehmann, Swiss television journalist, verbatim, I quote,
The top structure of satanism, so that the elite in the underground are pulling the controlling
strings and misusing children and drinking blood, this does not exist.
Rehmann continues,
This is about a conspiracy tale about elites that torture children in the underground and
program them so one can abuse them again and again and the whole thing never comes to the light.
This is such absolute nonsense. End of quote.
A journalist should give facts and leave it to the viewer's task to decide whether this
could be existent or not.
Robin Rehmann takes this task from the viewer and makes all the victims giving such statements ridiculous.
Exactly the same happens in the video Satanic Panic 3.
The Swiss television presents all victims of satanic ritual abuse as untrustworthy when
they are verbally taken apart by Robin Rehmann with these words, I quote,
YouTube is full of women who say they've experienced satanic abuse and have had to kill their children,
partly to eat them, so really totally crazy. End of quote.
In this context specifically the victims Hajar and Chantal Frey were shown in the screen content.
Neither the program Satanic Panic nor other publications of SRF hush up or conceal.
In no way victims are made ridiculous.
The research Satanic Panic criticizes the concept of ritual violence mind control as
well as a form of therapy for mentally unstable people which is based on many speculations.
SRF shows that the mandated investigative reports by the Kentons Thurgo and Byrne concerning
the trauma station Littenheit and the psychiatric center Münzingen confirmed the researches by Rec.
Both reports state that the conspiracy stories of ritual violence mind control was involved
in the treatment of several mentally ill people.
I quote you here, the conspiracy stories of ritual violence mind control, end of quote.
The SRF, Robin Rehmann and also you dear lawyer Barbara Lehmann, always only speak
of ritual violence in the same breath as conspiracy story.
With that you push all victims and witnesses worldwide who report of ritual violence through
perpetrators and mind control into the corner of conspiracy stories. This is a journalistic scandal.
With this you have breached the journalistic code of honor.
You do not listen anymore.
Your journalists have their said opinions and exert propaganda, which must not and cannot be happening.
They do not listen anymore to what people everywhere are testifying to.
You did not take the psychotherapist Regula Schwager seriously, nor the high school teacher
Daniel Villiomene.
You portrayed them as not to be taken seriously.
The same with primary school teacher Marianne Lander.
Both teachers lost their jobs due to this Swiss television documentary and their reputation
has been defamed all through the press as Satan teachers.
You gravely betrayed the president of the Chara association Fritz Bammert and just pretended friendliness.
Does this correspond with journalistic honor?
The SRF also dealt with Thomas Werner in a very depreciating manner and ushered in
a medial smear campaign against him.
He is, after all, the head of criminal investigations in matters of child protection with the police
municipality Zurich and he testifies to alarming things.
The SRF journalist Rehmann exposes him degradingly and compares the reporting of atrocities of
ritual abuse with the landing of extraterrestrials in the garden.
The SRF presenter even shows great lack of understanding that this investigator even
investigates such notices of ritual abuse at all.
And the legal services of SRF protects this journalist who raises himself above this experienced
police investigating service and thereby suggests one should not even investigate such harassing reports.
Yet it is definitely the duty of a policeman to investigate.
And added to this, Robin Rehmann laughs about the statement that investigators may often
be involved as perpetrators themselves.
Also the founder of the association Chara, Ruth Mautz, who at her age has collected a
rich expertise in this area, you treated very dishonorably.
Robin Rehmann presented himself as an understanding journalist, but then deluded and publicly disgraced her.
The leading senior physician, Matthias Kohlmann of Littenheide Clinic, was laughed at by SRF
journalists in front of running cameras.
Robin Rehmann did not take the shocking statements of this senior physician seriously at all.
After this underhanded reporting, Dr. Matthias Kohlmann was exempted from office and later dismissed.
Matthias Kohlmann verbatim. So there is ritually organized satanic abuse. Yes.
My greatest teacher is no book or congress.
My greatest teacher are those affected by this.
I am in contact with numerous therapists, also internationally.
It is noticeable that these portrayals absolutely match each other.
These are organized structures who know exactly what they do.
What do they do? What happens there?
So one can imagine.
Since you want to air this, I must be a bit careful here.
These that are unthinkable occur with bodily injury with the help of all imaginable instruments.
What we know of the Third Reich as torture methods from the concentration camps is being used here.
It is like a parallel kind of world that knows how to protect itself extremely well, so that
it is very hard to get a hold of these people.
We are speaking of human sacrifices, right?
The drinking of blood, I heard of.
Yes, really, all kinds of atrocities that humans can think of do take place there.
Matthias Kohlmann is an important witness in the front lines who deals with these victims
and he is internationally networked.
According to statements from SRF, he is Gabriella Hager's daughter's therapist.
In the comments section of your SRF documentary, a victim is complaining heartbreakingly about
having lost her therapist now.
These victims are now still standing completely alone.
Was this the goal you aimed at reaching with this documentary?
You have long since stopped fulfilling your journalistic duty and for this every Swiss
citizen is paying his mandatory fee to finance you.
Never before have I seen so much criticism under a program as with the SRF documentary Satanic Panic.
Hundreds of outraged viewers let off steam and expressed their indignation about the
journalist's prefabricated opinion.
You yourself know exactly how much indignation was roused in the population through this series.
After it had been aired, many people who were mentioned in the series filed suit with fair
media because of the dirty, unfair journalistic methods.
They felt they had been tricked by the journalist.
The Consultation and Information Agency for Sexually Exploited Children, Kastania, represented
by Regula Schwager in the SRF documentary, publicly objected to the unfair procedure of SRF.
They should reveal these crimes, that is their job for which we pay them.
The people are no longer satisfied with them.
Today, I mailed you these 162 regular pages of viewer criticism by registered mail.
And this is only a small part of the negative responses I copied out of the fullness.
And for our dear viewers, I link this document below in the broadcast.
It is an important read for you and every SRF staff member.
Every single one of you should at least read these 162 pages of viewers' feedback.
It is the people's voice. Here is a small sample.
This presenter is a catastrophe, unbearable, and I am financing such a person with the mandatory fees.
Someone else wrote, unbelievable that I pay fees for such a contribution, what a shame.
Yes, and while you read all of these things, think of the
fact that these are the people who finance your living.
It would have been terrible enough if you had continued to remain silent on all those
crimes and had left the education to us, the independent and voluntary media outlets like KLA.TV.
But you even try to render any informative education about it impossible by exempting
such valuable investigative people in the front lines like Matthias Kohlmann and by ruining their reputation.
I recommend to you that you finally let the real victims speak and empathize with them.
If you really do not want to hush up and trivialize, do air the program about the 27 victims and
27 testimonies of the bloodsack in full length on SRF.
You can download this documentary, also in English, under the link www.klatv-26296.
This documentary is based on a 10-year-long research, which would have been your job,
and we do it on our weekends and in our free time and voluntarily.
But one thing is clear, whether with or without you, these horrible things which are taking
place in the underground will still be fully revealed and be brought to the light, even
if you will continue trying to keep the lid on it. But that's no longer possible.
In the named publications it is always being clearly differentiated that sexual abuse,
organized crime and severely traumatized people are existent.
But wherever possible, you claim that all the witnesses' statements are supposedly false.
Namely, there are reports that a well-organized network of influential and elite people exist,
who have lots of money and know very well how to protect themselves.
Atrocities like the drinking of blood and human sacrifices you deny continuously, even
though Satanists openly confess to bringing blood sacrifices.
The well-known Satanist Aleister Crowley writes in his book, Magic in Theory and Practice,
Volume 4, page 87, I quote, the bloody sacrifice has, from time immemorial, been the most considered part of magic.
For the highest spiritual working, one must accordingly choose that victim which contains
the greatest and purest power.
A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim.
And for nearly all purposes, human sacrifice is the best. End of quote.
You speak of dark entanglements of mainstream media.
The way you staged the contribution gives the viewers the impression Robin Rehmann is
moving in a surrounding of Satanists.
This is false and defamatory and insulting to character.
The dissemination of true facts is fundamentally covered by the freedom of expression and media.
So let us take a closer look at some facts.
First, Robin Rehmann presents himself publicly with the Baphomet symbol.
Baphomet is a portrayal of Satan and widely spread in Satanism.
Satanism is the embodiment of evil, also known as the devil or Lucifer.
Second, the Robin Rehmann entertainment logo is a portrayal of the Celtic god Cernunnos.
He is depicted with deer antlers and in the Celtic language Cernunnos means the equivalent of horned one.
In witchcraft he was honored as a light bringer, which earned him the name Lucifer or Satan.
As Lucifer is the direct translation of the Greek word for light bringer.
The god Cernunnos is also brought into connection with the Satanist portrayal of Baphomet.
Third, the logo of Robin Rehmann´s band, Krunk, which means sick in English, shows
a scythe with a large animated blood spatter.
The Grim Reaper is a personified allegory of death.
Death is often portrayed as a skeleton figure that mows people down with a scythe.
Fourth, the practice of ritual child sacrifices for Satan have been testified to for thousands
of years amongst others, for example in the Bible.
Excavations and findings worldwide verify this.
In countless cultures children were sacrificed to Satan.
Excavations of the Mayans, the Incans, the Aztecs proved ritual child sacrifices.
As well as current reports.
Even Georg Otto Schmid reported this on SRF in 2015, I quote,
The adherents to religious Satanism really believe in Satan.
They worship Satan and they bring sacrifices for him and
this de facto then leads to cruel rituals, end of quote.
Fifth, Robin Rehmann disputes the existence of a satanic cult in the underground which
commits such horrible things.
KLATV simply openly presented the superficial SRF viewer with some questionable facts as
a counter voice to Rehmann´s massive media presence.
And these are all officially accessible.
In contrast to SRF and to Robin Rehmann, we with scandal surrounding Swiss television,
SRF and Robin Rehmann, satanic panic, did not place any personal opinion into the program
but simply showed officially accessible pictures and connections.
Moreover, the newspaper 20 Minutes quoted Rehmann and I quote,
I have already had sex with 90% of my Facebook friends, end of quote.
Why shouldn't one show some of these official Facebook friends of Rehmann?
All the more when he maintains such active public exchange with his Facebook friend
and fan Francis Dollarhide, who especially praises his broadcasts.
Wasn't the suspicious profile of this satanic high priest striking to Rehmann at first glance?
Here is another post of this satanist community.
It looks like a bloody ritual with a cult, tarot cards, alcohol and candles.
And I'm going to read this post in full length to you, dear Mrs. Lehmann from Swiss Television SRF Legal Services.
In case you plan to file a lawsuit, do not forget to bring this document.
We will certainly take it with and still several others as well.
I quote, urgent message, five years full of work to bring this association to a fall.
We told them in 2017, we tell them today, we will win, you will lose, end of story.
And then they post the two articles, Bistro Münster closes counseling center,
organize sexual and ritual violence.
And should one report about satanism and ritual violence?
Let's also have a look at this post from the same satanist community from June 19, 2023.
Brotherhood of Samael offers all Facebook users the structural formula of adrenochrome as a download with the title,
and I quote, we feast on your fear, end of quote.
Satanists are known for hiding openly what they do in secret.
Sixth, for you here also in the language of law, paragraphs, there are not only personal rights which you mentioned,
but also freedom of the media, Article 17 Federal Law, as well as freedom of information and speech, Article 16 Federal Law.
The dissemination of true facts is fundamentally covered by freedom of expression and media.
Additionally, in this case, a predominant public interest is existent, see Article 28, Paragraph 2 Swiss Civil Law.
In short, personality rights cannot be violated through true assertions of facts.
Additionally, Mr. Rehmann, as well as Swiss Television SRF,
move in the so-called social sphere of personality rights in which the protection is significantly reduced.
The pieces of evidence numerously mentioned in the broadcast
show that Mr. Rehmann presents himself with satanist symbols
and questionable connections which he maintains to the satanist scene.
To be informed about this through media coverage lies in the protective interest of the public.
Conclusion. You complain that the impression is created for the
audience that Robin Rehmann moves within the environment of satanists.
What kind of impression is created with the viewer is the viewer's decision.
When you finally start leaving the mature drawing of conclusions to the audience who are supposed to do research themselves,
in its documentary KLATV simply presents facts and leaves the audience to conclude for themselves.
Maybe you could try this again too. Trust the instinct and intuition of the audience,
that they with voice and counter-voice will find the way to truth themselves.
This is by the way would be the job of any TV channel.
Unfortunately though, the counter-voice has almost completely disappeared from the mainstream.
You write that Robin Rehmann was successful with his demand to stop a broadcast at a public television channel
and you have a protagonist speak to enhance this statement.
At no time did Robin Rehmann demand anything from another TV station.
Your statement is false and cannot be left standing.
KLA.TV simply allowed a witness to speak.
However, this is not the only witness who confirmed the facts of this matter in the same way to KLATV.
These witness statements are in the archives of KLATV in written as well as verbal form, besides further evidence.
Robin Rehmann really made an effort to prevent the interview from coming out.
He threw all kinds of stuff at the TV station, accused them of all kinds of really terrible things,
amongst others even anti-semitism, which has absolutely nothing to do with the issue at all.
He even claimed that the victims had all been talked into believing what had happened to them.
For me as a victim, that really deeply hurt me that someone uninvolved could say such things that are just not true.
And, well, he basically destroyed a lot.
For the sake of protecting the witnesses, we will not present the SRF with further witness names.
It is not seldom that witnesses have accidents or similar occurrences in connection with such uncovering affairs.
And I remind here of the witness Romant who wanted to speak out in the Belgian Dutroux case
and was found dead shortly before he could testify.
27 further victims lost their lives in the Dutroux case.
Exactly the same thing happened to the politician John de Camp
shortly before he wanted to expose the child trafficking ring around the Franklin abuse scandal.
Also, the private detective Gary Kawadori was found dead shortly before the uncovering of the Franklin scandal.
The same happened to Chief Investigator Franz Kroll.
He was found dead in his home shortly before he was able to bring to light
his investigation results in the case of Natascha Kampusch in Austria.
His investigations would have gravely incriminated some Austrian politicians.
Balz Bruder, the well-known editor-in-chief of the Swiss Solothurn newspaper,
died in a mysterious way after he had reported much about the Nathalie case.
Investigation in connection with child abuse and satanic ritual violence was done.
Balz Bruder was found dead in 2021 after he had reported to the public concerning this case.
Chantelle Frey, another victim of ritual violence, reports in her book I Speak
on page 177 of the unexpected death of her lawyer of heart failure.
In conclusion, why did Robin Rehmann not want the interview with a victim of ritual violence to be made public?
What is his motivation to turn against a broadcasting station and threaten it?
The victim did not receive any voice with public media.
This complaint to Mediaklagemauer TV, KLATV short, was a main cue for the research about Robin Rehmann.
Otherwise, this broadcast would not even have come into existence.
You help yourself to photos from private Facebook pages.
KLATV does not have consent to use these.
You also harm the rights of third parties with the publication of these photos.
Your letter becomes all the more entertaining towards the end.
On Facebook, there are certain authorizations you can choose from.
As the target group for your contribution, you can choose
Friends, so your own friends on Facebook can see your post.
Or you can choose Public, so anyone on or off Facebook can see what you posted.
Rehmann, for his contribution, has chosen as his target group for his posts,
all his posts, which we photographed, Public,
meaning everyone on or off of Facebook can see his posts.
In the broadcast, we only and explicitly showed publicly shared contents,
which are publicly accessible worldwide.
The publication of the images is covered by the right of quotation,
according to Article 25, Paragraph 1 of the Swiss Copyright Law.
Published works may be quoted if the quote serves as an explanation,
as a reference, or an illustration, short image citation.
Since the pictures on Facebook that were used in the broadcast are publicly accessible,
and not just for friends, we are absolutely on firm grounds legally.
Despite this, KLATV was so fair as to film the pictures from an iPad,
so it would be totally clear that everyone can directly access them.
This way you wouldn't have to endure the very obscene scenes in full format picture.
By the way, we did not play other highly controversial songs by Rehmann,
it would have taken too much time.
But even if the pictures from Mr. Rehmann had not been public,
we would still be allowed to cite them,
since the information interest of the public
is clearly predominant due to the controversy around this explosive topic.
On the one hand, the SRF and Mr. Rehmann in the broadcasting series Satanic Panic
lay claim to the journalists' bonuses like reputation and objectivity.
On the other hand, with Mr. Rehmann a journalist was commissioned,
who especially with this subject does not even come close to neutrality and is obviously biased.
And here we have it, dear viewers.
Swiss television, SRF themselves, never asked when they showed any kinds of pictures
in a defamatory connection or used excerpts
that without the corresponding content created a wrong picture.
You freely help yourselves to any publicly available image or video material and have never asked.
No, you even aired non-public, so explicitly internal video content
and picture material that was gained in unlawful ways.
This would be something equivalent to us breaking into Rehmann´s house
and stealing his hard drive to publish private video recordings.
He does things like this constantly without being called to account,
because none of those who were stolen from could have afforded the court costs.
Vice versa, however, the SRF can afford top lawyers for any case of dispute
financed with our mandatory fees.
And now suddenly, of all things, the SRF wants to appear as upholder of moral standards.
I can tell you one thing, Swiss television, people are starting to see through this.
They see through you and your dishonest games.
When accusations against people are made, the accused must be given a possibility
to give a statement, see Press Council Journalism Code Guideline 3.8.
Neither Robin Rehmann nor SRF were able to take a stand concerning the reproaches in the broadcast.
And this, by the way, quite the opposite to the broadcast about Evil Sussex by SRF, which you mentioned.
SRF presented Evil Sussex with the reproaches and gave him the possibility to give a statement.
You know as well as I do that the Journalism Code of the Press Council in Switzerland is a voluntary self-commitment.
Since you so vigorously refer to that, I'm giving a statement here on it.
Swiss television never presented Evil Sussex with the opportunity to give a public statement.
Yes, as a matter of form.
You send him questions so he can take a stand concerning the constructed, defamatory reproaches.
But these answers are always suppressed or torn out of context to his absolute disadvantage.
SRF has defamed KLATV founder Evil Sussex to the uttermost for over 20 years,
in the worst possible ways, and has never truly let him speak his mind.
They always choose small excerpts that they can twist well.
And if you can't twist anything of it or misinterpret it, you do not bring it at all.
And as his daughter, I can testify to this underhanded game.
You are demanding things here that you yourself did not hold yourselves to.
Robin Rehmann is a person of public interest.
He stands in the public eye and his side is well known to everyone.
The whole internet and YouTube is filled with it.
He is very present medially.
None of the witnesses, however, that he has attacked and ruined,
had the slightest possibility to medially defend themselves.
All the victims that he, together with SRF Television,
ridicules and pushes into the conspiracy corner, never had the possibility to be heard,
because literally, according to recent SRF wording, they have alleged remembrances,
and were talked into this by therapists.
There is nothing more evil than suggesting to such victims,
who experienced such cruel things, that it did not happen,
or that they have alleged remembrances, and so on.
Strictly speaking, the guideline 3.9 of the Journalism Code can be applied in regards to
the program scandal surrounding Swiss television, SRF and Robin Rehmann,
when there is a predominant public interest, a hearing is indispensable by way of exception.
I don't know what could be of greater public interest than to
uncover possible motives of concealment in regard to satanic ritual abuse,
and to give the victims a voice.
And speaking of the Journalism Code, I would like to remind you of guideline 10.5.
Quote, Journalists defend freedom of information in the event of actual or
threatened interference by private interests.
Threats or boycotts are to be made public as a matter of principle. End of quote.
In light of this, it is our duty to publicize the threats that SRF has made against KLA-TV.
We are convinced that, with the production of the series Satanic Panic,
SRF violated the guideline 2.4 themselves.
This guideline states that in case a journalist's private activities
overlap with his information activities, this fact must be brought to the attention of the public.
According to this fact, the respective networks of Mr. Rehmann would have to be made public.
And by the way, guideline 7.1 of the same Journalism Code prohibits the unmasked
intruding into the private sphere of people that are to be reported about.
I'll remind you here of the fact that SRF ambushed our family, Ivo Sasek,
several times in front of his house and molested his family, especially on Sundays.
And so SRF has violated this guideline.
We maintain our demand that you refrain from publishing the publications on KLA-TV as well
as further publications immediately. We set you a final timeline by this evening 6 pm.
As we already told you on Sunday, we are examining taking legal steps against
KLA-TV and the responsibles if you don't adhere to our demand.
We uploaded the broadcast scandal surrounding Swiss television SRF and Robin Rehmann
again on KLA-TV after we diligently examined every aspect of your threats together with
our legal service. We, in turn, demand that you take down every defamatory broadcast about Ivo
Sasek and KLA-TV from the internet completely as well as from all social channels belonging
to Swiss television. Additionally, we demand that you allow Ivo Sasek to speak for 20 minutes
at the best airing time and this uncut 20 minutes in which he can explain really,
truly his side to all the defamations. Then you would finally fulfill the journalist code guideline 3.82.
Best regards, Barbara Lehmann.
Best regards as well from Lois Sasek, author of the program
Scandal Surrounding SRF and Robin Rehmann. I'm the daughter of Ivo Sasek,
the founder of KLA-TV, OCG and AZK.