On September 13, 2023, another high-profile open conference
was held in the EU Parliament building.
The team of experts also included the well-known American doctor, patent examination expert, mathematician, scientist and inventor Dr. David Martin.
He is also the founding Managing Director of M∙CAM Inc. M∙CAM is the international
market leader in the field of intellectual property-based financial risk management.
This involves examining patent quality for governments and patent offices and far beyond.
Listen to the speech of the highly qualified Dr. David Martin.
Well, the translators are gone and the livestream is decreasing, which means if we just listen to our colleague Matthias:
The best thing would be to leave it to you, the people.
Now it's up to you to share it, which, given the cavernous emptiness we see in all these spaces, is clearly only audible if you share it.
So it seems very fitting that I should be the one with the quietest voice.
But let's let this lion roar ... shall we?
I'm tired of talking about Covid and I'm tired of talking about SARS-CoV-2 for one very simple reason:
For 110 years, people around the world have been lied to.
A group, a very small number of criminal industrial conspirators, decided to subjugate the entire human
population for their sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity.
I'm tired of being polite. We have long since gone beyond politeness.
When the words acceptable mortality rate become part of an industrial norm, we
have lost the foundation of humanity. And these are not my words.
Those were the words of the World Health Organization and those of Pfizer and Moderna when they were
given permission to start killing people to further their goals.
And I'm not going to sugarcoat it. This is a criminal cartel.
We pretend that somewhere in some esoteric layer there is some kind of
salvation that must benefit the World Health Organization in one way or another.
Now I will tell you that since its inception in the 1940s, the WHO has been
nothing more than a criminal cartel with a single and singular purpose.
I will show you the document that proves what I am saying. That is not a reproach.
This is even verifiable, in their own words, in their own hands.
And they use a four-stage process to put each of their nefarious plans into action.
You start by planning an exercise. Then they dedicate themselves to financing this exercise.
Then they create the scientific rationale for what they are going
to do, and then they implement it and profit from it.
And that is a violation of US Code 15, Section 19 of the US Health Care Act, which,
for those of you listening closely, happens to be related to the Clayton Act [US federal
law, part of antitrust law, designed to give further substance to US antitrust law;
The Clayton Act is intended to prevent anti-competitive practices] began in the same year that the forerunners of the World Health Organization began.
That's why I find it fascinating that we passed the Clayton
Act in 1913 and 110 years ago created the criminal conspiracy
we now call the World Health Organization. 110 years later.
And in violation of the TFEU [Treaty on the Functioning
of the European Union],
which I believe must now be referred to as the Treaty on the Dysfunctional
European Cabal, Article 101 clearly sets out the conditions that
this was never a matter of public health. Point.
It was blackmail, with the aim of inciting terror in order to adjust the behavior of a population. Point. That was it. It always has been.
And we can put forward any theoretical argument we want to put forward about things.
But even with the theory that we had an outbreak of something, the problem is refutable
because the data from Zurich shows us that in the year of the global pandemic,
health insurers paid out 30 billion US dollars less in claims.
Now, if a medical doctor, a social expert or anyone else wants to discuss the fact that
we could develop a virus that can cleverly find out your bank account, the details in your insurance
policies and the amount of your insurance premiums, then that's a big problem.
It turns out that the data is unique. We didn't have a pandemic. We had a genocide.
And we have to name it for what it is. [ PLAN IT!
Secure Liability Shield for Acts that Kill/German: PLAN IT! Secure liability protection for homicides
] When I say they have it planned, let's make sure we understand the not-so-small print of the small
print exactly. And I would first like to draw your attention to the right-hand column of this slide.
This is the 2011 data produced by the World Health Organization, the
Wellcome Trust PATH and the Gates Foundation on their wonderful global program
for a malaria vaccine for children under six months of age.
And in their clinical trial, it is helpful to point out that they
murdered 66 children in the vaccination group and then cleverly used
the term control for a control group in which they murdered 28 children.
Well ... the reason I said murdered and why I use that term is because that's exactly what it was.
This is because it turns out that this control group did not receive an injection or saline solution.
It was actually a cocktail of other known disease-transmitting
injections.
The control group was known to kill people.
And the experimental control group should theoretically even kill people. And it actually killed them all.
And smartly, under Article V, Section 13, which I put on this
slide, I want you to understand why I said that:
When it was formed in 1947, when the WHO was funded and founded, it was funded and founded
by people who, in their own words, deliberately wanted to commit a crime.
Section 13 of Article 5 ends with the following statement: immunity in case of personal
arrest or detention, blah, blah, blah ... immunity in court proceedings of any kind.
Now, if they had no intention of committing a crime, why would you
give yourself permanent and absolute immunity from any prosecution and,
even worse, even from investigation for prosecution of any kind?
People sit there and pretend it's like diplomatic immunity ...
Do you realize that this does not even meet the standard of diplomatic immunity?
This is a criminal organization that enacted their own law to protect
themselves from their own crimes that they knew they would commit.
And when I say they knew they were going to commit it, I mean they knew it.
Its first Director-General, none other than Dr. René Sand (who happened to be a guest of the
Germans in Dachau in 1940), had previously been mysteriously nominated as the first Director-General
of the WHO in 1947 with the help of the Rockefeller Foundation.
And within just five years, René Sand decided to have the WHO's true purpose approved in writing
by then Director-General Dr. Brock Chisholm, who advocated population control as the WHO's primary goal.
Does that sound like public health to anyone in this room? This is not about public health.
This is the evolution of the same genocidal program that began with the
Carnegie Foundation's funding of the eugenics offices at Cold Spring Labs in 1913
under the philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie. People, stop fooling yourselves!
We debate the leaves of the tree we call a pandemic, but we don't go to the root.
It is an organized criminal group set up to first create absolute immunity
and then implement its plans to ensure that it controls who lives,
who dies and who gets any chance at all to live.
And if you think I'm somehow inflating the numbers, let me be clear:
If I tell you every time I discuss a tax provision that
there is an 88% controlling interest in some organization, you might
conclude that this is indeed a controlling interest.
And it turns out that if we look at the foundation's
donations to the World Health
Organization, 88% of them come from a single organization: the Gates Foundation.
This is a violation of every competition law in Europe and all competition laws in the United States.
This is absolutely not an independent, charitably funded donation, but more
importantly, under the tax laws on both
sides of the Atlantic, it is targeted donations, which are expressly prohibited
and nowhere to be found in the charter
of the World Health Organization or any of the UN affiliated organizations.
When I say that this is criminal,
I mean tax crime, organized
crime, a crime of money laundering.
And now the crime of organized crime, which leads
to murder and terrorism: I told you that the second thing, after they plan it, is to finance it.
And why don't we use their criminal language
in their own words?
Because that's the best way to express it.
And when they actually planned to release
the use of a biologically modified chimera in conjunction with the coronavirus-derived
model, they said this: To sustain funding
beyond the crisis, we need to increase public understanding of the necessary
medical countermeasures such as a pan-influenza
or pan-coronavirus vaccine.
Let me pause for a moment
and remind you that the crisis you spoke of was a
crisis of dwindling funding.
There was no health crisis. This was a crisis, as their coffers were gradually running dry.
This is the crisis. And let's read on:
The media are a key driver, and the economy will follow the hype.
We need to use this hype
to our advantage to tackle the real problems.
Investors will react if they see a profit at the end of the process.
That's the official word from the conspiratorial cabal at this point
in the decade of vaccines set in motion by
the WHO's Global Preparedness Monitoring Board in 2011.
And it was the funding basis for
Peter Daszak's partnership with the chimera production of pathogens, both
in North Carolina and in Wuhan.
So don't tell me we need to investigate where this is coming from.
The criminals have admitted it in their own words.
And now we come to the funny topic that nobody in Congress wants to address,
namely the elephant in the room.
On October 21, 2014, despite the numerous conversations between Senator
Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci, which we
were told Rand Paul did everything in his power to corner Fauci.
He was in possession of the letter you see on the left-hand side of the slide.
And it's the letter, conveniently on NIA letterhead, that was sent to the University of
North Carolina Chapel Hill that states unequivocally
that during the gain-of-function moratorium [legally or contractually mandated suspension
of gain-of-function research], which by the way, when we use the word moratorium, it feels
like it means: Thou shalt stop...
Let's take a look at two parts of this letter:
Firstly, the second bullet point under Project 1, which
was not part of the original grant. The novel functions of viral pathogenesis in vivo were to be investigated.
Do you know what that means? In living systems.
The grant was actually intended to be used for clinical simulations;
but this grant was amended in this letter to say: We intended to
approve functional gain research in living systems during the moratorium.
And then, we love the last paragraph
of this letter, which conveniently states:
As your grant is currently funded, this pause is voluntary. How often have you heard of a voluntary moratorium?
And the best part is when we look at the very last line: ... or continue to conduct
applicable gain-of-function research until the end of the current current budget period.
Here comes the problem. Do you know who is providing the budget?
An indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract
from DARPA [Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency]
and NIH [National Institutes of Health].
Isn't it practical to have a permanently financed project that has to be stopped when the money runs out?
When you find out that there is no point at which the money is used up, because there
is no end to something that has no end?
And lest you think I'm making an assertion, which I'm not.
I am making an accusation, let's get that straight. That is a big difference.
I'm not claiming anything.
They actually took the trouble to tell us that it would be the Wuhan virus that would get us.
As you can see on the right side of the screen, published on March 14, 2016:
The SARS-like WIF1 coronavirus, and I quote: is about to appear in humans.
Does that sound like we're just surprised that something went haywire
in Wuhan in December 2019?
Or does it feel as if we are being told:
Look at Wuhan, and look at what we've done to manipulate the coronavirus
in Wuhan and the University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill ..., and lo and behold? We can tell you now that we are ready to publish it ... in 2016.
We are almost finished.
[CREATE IT! And then
they created it ...
Now you all know that I am criticized worldwide for using the term biological warfare.
I do this because I am authorized and qualified to do so.
In the early 2000s and late 90s, I was a person sent around the world for the US government
to investigate the proliferation of biological and chemical weapons.
I am very familiar with the definition of a biological agent in the 18th U.S. Code, the
criminal code for biological weapons offenses.
In this respect, my assessment is professional and correct.
And the reason is that I'm the one who gets to make that decision for the United States
government, and I have for many years.
That's why I say that.
But let's pretend for the moment that I'm just a crazy person.
Maybe I don't know what I'm talking about.
So let's look at what the criminals themselves have said.
In 2005, at a conference sponsored by DARPA [Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency] and the MITRE Corporation,
a non-governmental organization that operates research institutes on behalf of the United States: Department
of Defense Agency for the Armed Forces and Space Projects] and the MITRE Corporation, a non-governmental
organization that operates research institutes on
behalf of the United States, Ralf Baric, the architect of the deadly DNA strand
injected into the arms of millions and billions of people, gave a presentation
entitled Synthetic Coronavirus Biohacking: Biological Warfare Enabling Technologies.
Does that sound like something that is inadvertently misinterpreted
and actually means something else?
Do biological warfare technologies sound more like countermeasures
or pandemic preparation?
To me, this sounds like technologies that enable biological warfare.
And the reason I have this suspicion is that in addition to his NIAID [National Institute
of Allergy and Infectious Diseases] grants, he also received non-competitive DARPA
grants totaling more than $140 million that
went to his and related programs for synthetic technologies to
enable biological warfare.
So do I have a problem with calling the injection a technology
to enable biological warfare?
Absolutely not, because that's what they called it.
And we know that they knew they would call it that on September 18, 2019.
Because on September 18, 2019, the criminal conspiracy cabal of interlocking
directorates known as the World Health Organization declared that it will create
an experience for the world that will be a fast-spreading pandemic caused by a
deadly respiratory pathogen.
It is the lethality in this statement that is the problem.
They didn't say: We might get a bit of a cold ...
They said we will actually see the spread of a deadly agent.
And the reason given: in
September 2020, according to the progress indicator, the world would accept a universal vaccine.
NOT ... We will look at other treatment options ... a
NO to ... We
will take a look at what early intervention could be, as Dr. McCullough has
so clearly advocated in many, many cases ... NOT, as we stated on
September 18, 2019, before had to kill ... and there was the
intent to kill ... to create the fear that would lead people to accept something that without
coercion no one would have accepted.
And this is published ... from the criminal crooks.
Deploy & PROFIT FROM IT! [German:
Use it and benefit from it!
] We have been told that investors will respond if they see a profit at the end of the process.
And guess what they saw?
Profit at the end of the process.
2022: 100 billion dollars for Pfizer ... from public funds.
Moderna, after lying to Congress in October 2021 when they were
asked to review whether the NIAD was actually funding an injection
that would enrich the NIAD, and Antony Fauci and the entire NIH team
said they had no financial interest in their recommendation,
they receive a back royalty payment
of $400 million
for the first royalty payment, $400 million ...
That is more than any health institute in the history of American medical research has ever received for a single invention.
And lo and behold, what do we get afterwards?
A request by the WHO to increase its budget by 11% to ensure that the
people who benefit from it donate to it.
And guess what they just did?
They laundered the money straight away.
That's what they did.
Keep it simple
- antitrust laws are the key ] This is not a public health crime.
This is not actually a constitutional crime.
This is a criminal act committed by a criminal institution that has been designed
to enable criminal behavior since its inception in 1947.
That's it.
And we shouldn't be debating the merits of democracy or freedom or anything else
that would be as irrational as if we were at a bank robbery debating
the printing of dollar bills.
The problem is not the dollar bills.
It's the bank robber.
And the problem here is not health, and
it's not public health, and it's not
the suppression of information and the suppression of dissent, and the absolutely unconscionable
treatment of doctors and academics around the world who have spoken
out against this.
That's
not the crime ...
The crime is that we had criminal crooks who conspired and developed a, and I quote, emergency code.
The same criminal crooks planned, orchestrated and executed all the regulatory
captures to make sure you will use the terms they tell you to use: Vaccine,
face mask, health, social distancing - none
of which had a normal use by definition.
So we simply
used you ...
Criminal racketeers set prices with interlocking directorates where known competitors came together and
set prices in direct collusion, in violation of European Union standards as well as the Sherman
Act and the Clayton Act in the United States.
This was organized crime, and we should treat it as such.
Criminal crooks have publicly lied under oath, leading to the death and destruction of freedom
and, above all, the death and destruction of the integrity of well-meaning people who
are sitting here today doing everything in their power to mitigate the disaster
caused by this catastrophe.
I will not for a moment denigrate the multiple contributions of great academic
and medical professionals who have
desperately tried to jump into the gap and stop the corrupting consequences of these
crimes, but I will without a doubt
Here's the thing: Until we treat this as a criminal conspiracy of criminals leading to global terrorism
and murder for the purpose of maximizing profits,
we're having the wrong conversations.
Because we are not here to discuss the merits of an amended agreement for a criminal organization
of organized crime ... We are here to
put an end to the criminal organization itself.
This is my call to every single person on this planet:
Don't just limit the power of the WHO, destroy the WHO!
Thank you very much.