The Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023 escalated the conflict in the Middle East once again.
The images and reports about it aroused emotions and led to division worldwide.
Precisely because the fronts between supporters of Israel and pro-Palestinians seem so irreconcilable,
politicians, journalists and generals have their say in this program.
Their statements not only reveal inconsistencies, they also point to possible
deeper goals in the current conflict.
Who has an interest in abusing people of different convictions
as a shield for inhuman war plans?
First, inconsistencies
As the Israeli journalist Efrat Fenigson reports, Israel has a highly modern,
well-trained military apparatus and the most
far-reaching intelligence services in the world.
The border to Gaza is secured with state-of-the-art technology, where every pigeon
or stork immediately alerts all forces.
Nevertheless, on October 7, 2023, Hamas managed to break through
the fences and openly enter Israeli villages by road for a full 6 hours
without an Israeli response.
In addition, critical observers were surprised immediately after the attack
that the heavily armed Israeli army had been withdrawn from the border with the Gaza Strip shortly beforehand.
According to the BBC, Israel had been warned of such an event by Egypt three days earlier.
The departure of the Israeli head of government to the USA directly after the
outbreak of war is also very strange.
Immediately after his visit, the USA, Great Britain and other NATO member
states began to massively gather fleets
and military aircraft in the eastern Mediterranean and the Persian Gulf.
This indicates the preparation of a comprehensive regional war rather
than merely supporting Israel against Hamas.
Due to the many inconsistencies, the question arises whether
it could even be that the Israeli army deliberately took this attack into account?
Or was Hamas even instrumentalized?
Former Israeli General Yitzhak Segev told the New York Times that Israel
has been supplying Hamas with money since the 1970s.
Ron Paul, American presidential candidate, and Avner Cohen,
former Israeli government official, even
describe Hamas as the creation of Israel.
Particularly explosive: in 2010, Wikileaks published what was actually a secret letter from Israeli intelligence
chief Amos Yadlin.
In June 2007, he wrote to the US ambassador Richard Jones
that he would be "very happy" if Hamas were to form a government in the Gaza Strip.
A few hours after this letter, the formation of the government by Hamas began.
By doing so, Israel's secret service had apparently achieved
its goal of declaring the Gaza Strip a "hostile entity".
Taking these facts together, the question arises as
to what extent both sides are influenced by geopolitical forces.
What is interesting here is the question of the underlying objectives.
Second, deeper goals According
to Salman Rafi Sheikh, Pakistan's international relations research
analyst, it is crucial for the US to derail this Middle East.
This is the only way to prevent it from becoming an important ally of
China and Russia, as well as the other BRICS states.
A military conflict with Iran would set back the politics
of the new Middle East by decades.
German journalist Dr. Milosz Matuschek
also points this out:
There are obvious interests in the Middle East [...]. A conflict in this region has immediate significance for the whole world.
Let's tell it like it is: chaos in the Middle East is most likely to benefit the tottering hegemon USA.
This situation is also extremely explosive in geopolitical
terms, as there were already American war plans for the Middle East in 2001.
Former NATO Supreme Commander Wesley Clark learned of
concrete attack plans from a general in the Pentagon just a few weeks
after the attacks of September 11, 2001.
Over the next five years, the USA wanted to attack seven sovereign states:
First Iraq, followed by Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and finally Iran.
There is now chaos and destruction in almost all of these countries - except Iran.
Hamas of all people could now provide the reason for a war against Iran.
Former French Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin
also told France Info at the end of October 2023:
From Hamas we will move on to Iran, from Iran we will
move on to other targets, and we will then enter the logic of a clash of civilizations.
A letter from Albert Pike shows that there were already plans for this goal before 1900.
Pike, a 33rd degree High Mason and Satanist, wrote a letter to the
Illuminati Guiseppe Mazzini in 1891:
The world will experience three world wars.
The first is to destroy the tsar in Russia and build communism.
The second is to smash National Socialism and strengthen Zionism to such an extent
that a state of Israel is created.
After the two world wars have already taken place, the third world war between
Zionists and Palestinians is to begin and
lead to all-encompassing destruction.
Governments and religions in particular are supposed to wear each other down so
much that in the end all that remains is a world government led by Satanism.
Thirdly, summary
Danish filmmaker David Sorensen sums up what is happening in
front of the world's eyes:
Basically, this is a war between the deep state and all of humanity.
And both the Israeli and the Palestinian people are the victims of this war.
We are all being deceived by a very powerful and very cunning group of people who are operating
behind the scenes and pulling the strings.
Dr. Milosz Matuschek:
It takes little imagination to accept the idea that the current conflict is less
about Hamas-Israel and more about the USA-Iran
(and thus inevitably also China and Russia in the background), with
Israel-Palestine as the hub and stage set for a much larger power conflict.
[...
] Those who are now ammunitioning the rhetorical guns [...] regardless of which side, should not forget that this conflict
could lead to a Third World War, with several nuclear powers at the table and the world's population at stake.
Help to raise public awareness
of these deeper
connections, because:
Perhaps it would be good if the global public were smarter in advance this time than afterwards. (Quote from Dr. Milosz Matuschek)