Only one sentence is important to me, and it's at the front here.
And I want you to keep repeating this sentence to everyone who still doubts.
A state must not kill innocent people.
Most people believe that such a sentence only applies to cases of war
or to war, but that is not true.
This sentence also applies when the state obliges people to take a substance into their bodies
where even the official institutes, such as the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the Robert
Koch Institute, say it can ultimately have fatal side effects.
A state is not allowed to kill people, innocent people.
That is our message and let's get it out there.
Thank you very much.
Today, Sunday, December 10, 2023, on the 75th Human Rights Day, an unprecedented
and very special historical event is taking place here in Karlsruhe.
In the course of a large demonstration with rallies and a procession, 599 criminal charges are filed with the
Federal Public Prosecutor's Office in Karlsruhe.
This is directed against those responsible who have campaigned for the legal introduction of
compulsory vaccination in the health professions and for members of the armed forces.
This is because accepting vaccine damage and vaccine deaths
is a violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
and Section 7 of the International Criminal Code.
According to the organizer, there will be no reconciliation as long as the perpetrators of the unlawful corona measures remain unpunished.
High-ranking, competent speakers have announced their attendance at the rallies, whose
contributions will underline the scope of the crimes and the absolute need for action.
Tobias Pörsel - German lawyer
As a lawyer, one would like to say, dear public prosecutor, that is at least enough for an initial suspicion.
And I would also like to take this opportunity to thank the doctors who
had the courage then and now to say that Mr. Lauterbach was lying.
And Mr. Lauterbach not only lied, he knowingly lied.
There were and are side effects.
There is vaccine damage
and nobody will be able to seriously deny that.
And those who do want to shirk their responsibility.
And in a functioning constitutional state, this should actually be investigated and acted upon.
And there's someone here, who probably hardly anyone knows, who
sometimes hangs around in buses.
Whoever indexed this, it's best if he introduces himself, he's a bit shy sometimes.
I would like to ask Ralf Ludwig to join me for a moment.
Yes, hello.
Thank you all for being here, for supporting this cause.
I said in Stuttgart in the spring of 2021 that we would set up this center and that
we would work on it and that we would not stop until those responsible for the coronavirus
measures were held to account.
And we will start this today with the criminal charges.
We have many great colleagues on the stage today, many lawyers who have been representing your interests
for many years, who have been traveling from court to court for many years, trying to save and
secure the rule of law to some extent.
I would like to thank these colleagues who are here on stage today.
Many of them are standing in front of the stage and have done an incredible job.
So we have lots and lots of great people
and I always think that in a state where a large number of lawyers stand up and say that
what is happening here is not right, there must be something wrong.
I myself would like to hold back a little today, because I think the focus today should
be on our colleagues who have been fighting for your rights, for our rights, for
years, not only in Germany, but also in Austria and Switzerland.
And only one sentence is important to me, and it's right here at the front.
And I want you to keep repeating this sentence to everyone who still doubts.
A state must not kill innocent people.
Most people believe that such a sentence only applies to cases of war or to war, but
that is not true.
This sentence also applies when the state obliges people to take a substance into their bodies
where even the official institutes, such as the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the Robert
Koch Institute, say it can ultimately have fatal side effects.
A state is not allowed to kill people, innocent people.
That is our message and let's get it out there.
Thank you very much.
We didn't have a crisis because of coronavirus, but the crisis was the result of the coronavirus measures.
The real crisis was not triggered by a virus, but by politics.
It was a time of a legal state of emergency, although the Basic Law does not recognize a state of civil
emergency due to natural disasters or epidemics.
While the legislative and executive branches have outbid each other in excessive encroachments on fundamental rights,
the courts have almost consistently failed in their function as guardians of freedom and fundamental rights.
The judiciary has therefore sooner or later uncritically approved almost all legal impositions, even
though there was no excess mortality in Germany.
At least not until the start of the vaccination
campaign with a vaccine that was not a vaccine but an experimental gene therapy.
My favourite sentence from that time in the plenary of the German Bundestag is
that the walkers are defending the rule of law and their criminalization is wrong.
Since March 2020, everything that had previously characterized a democratic constitutional state and
the state of medical science has been overturned.
Anyone who spoke out against this was defamed, insulted and persecuted.
Doctors lost their license to practice medicine, were dismissed from the university and were arbitrarily
persecuted by the disciplinary authorities of the medical associations in accordance with
government power and the bought media in order to ultimately silence them.
Anyone who did not go along with the narrative and marched in unison with the mainstream
was at best an outsider, ultimately excluded from public life, threatened
in his existence and slandered.
The resulting damage is enormous.
All events and all injustices must be dealt with and those responsible
must be held liable and accountable.
The critical judges and public prosecutors in Germany have put it in a nutshell.
The state order for a Covid-19 vaccination is deliberate killing.
It is incompatible with the fundamental rights
and freedoms of our constitution, the right of peoples to self-determination.
To give a WHO that has not been democratically elected by any
citizen of this world, its Director-General,
and thus the self-appointed arrogant elites behind it, unrestricted powers in the event of
a potential or actual global health emergency, control, monitoring and sanction
rights without the possibility of review, without accountability and without
liability.
This globalist project, which is being driven by Big Pharma, corporations and autocratic power elites,
must be brought down in order to safeguard the sovereignty of states and the
sovereignty and inviolability of the dignity of each individual citizen.
We are gathered here on Human Rights Square because 75 years ago today, the UN
General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
This should actually be a reason to celebrate, but
unfortunately we have to realize that 75 years is a good time for a state, but you could also say that
it hasn't even been 100 years yet and these human rights are already being trampled underfoot.
At the very beginning of this catalog, the UN states that all people have the same inalienable
rights and fundamental freedoms from birth.
Life, liberty and personal safety
are the values at stake.
We will come to individual values later, but the point is that we have the same inalienable
rights and fundamental freedoms from birth.
And why do we have these same inalienable rights and fundamental freedoms?
Because we are human.
Because we are human beings, we have human rights.
It goes on to say that all people are equal before the law and are entitled to equal protection
under the law without distinction.
But do you remember how someone on TV said that if you don't keep
up, you're out of social life?
That's outrageous.
We are allowed to participate in social life because we are human beings.
Why are we allowed to participate in social life?
Exactly. It also states that no one may be arbitrarily arrested and detained.
But we are realizing that the judiciary has become a political weapon.
Let's think of Michael Ballweg,
nine months in prison and in the end not even enough for a lawsuit.
Dear friends, we must not simply cover the injustice of the last three and a half years with
a cloak of silence or a cloak of oblivion.
That's what you would like, these forgetful Scholz politicians,
these sovereigns of the illegal Conference of Minister Presidents.
Illegal because not provided for in the Basic Law.
This wave of criminalization against critical doctors must stop.
I therefore call for all criminal and fine proceedings to be dropped, including for Germany.
The years 2020 to 2023 must never
be repeated in Germany.
Never again will we resist the beginnings and continuations.
This is what we stand for today in Karlsruhe.
We have learned a lot over the past few years.
We learned what fear does to people.
We learned how fear can turn people against each other and
make them irreconcilable.
We learned how a policy of fear was directed against our own people.
And we learned how fear even cast a spell over the judiciary.
The victims of this politics of fear were not only those who criticized the government and
were insulted by it, abused by the police and criminalized by the judiciary, but above
all those people who, in the face of fear, surrendered their
will to assert themselves.
We stood up with the truth, not with
our truth against the truth of others, but with an army of scientists from all over the world,
against a handful of experts whose opinions were not allowed to be questioned.
We have gathered here in Karlsruhe, in the so-called residence of law.
And I gave my speech the title "Where right becomes wrong, resistance becomes duty".
Human dignity is inviolable.
This ethical and legal principle is timeless as a basic principle.
Human dignity is a central value of the German constitution and is absolutely inviolable in perpetuity
on the basis of the eternity clause in Article 79(3) of the Basic Law.
Respect for human
dignity prohibits the state from turning people into mere objects of state action.
But when does the state treat people as mere objects?
If he denies him his own thinking, self-determined action and free decision.
If the state abuses the trust of its citizens and justifies its measures with misleading
or even deliberately false assumptions, then law becomes injustice
based on the unscrupulous assertion of pandemics by the WHO, international law not only becomes
international injustice but, to my great concern, even international pandemic terror.
We want clarification.
We want to ensure that the injustice of the last three years does not simply remain undone
and that, above all, those responsible are truly held to account.
Thank you all for being here today and
now I'll click on send message.
Dear fellow campaigners, dear friends, it's wonderful to be up here and see you all.
You are the ones who helped to prevent this general vaccination requirement, even if we were
unable to prevent the facility-based vaccination requirement at the time.
Thank you for being on the road and
thank you for being here again today.
We have now made a start with these criminal charges.
Now the whole thing is turning.
We will hold the people who did this to account and
I think Hubert Aiwanger said it, we are
taking back our democracy.
Thank you so much for being there.
We have the obligation for states to cooperate
and, above all, we have the immunity of the WHO, the Secretary-General, who
really will be the sole ruler, so to speak.
We have no means of control, no means of legal review and, in
the end, criminal immunity.
All of this must be very worrying for all of us.
We will be in permanent crisis mode.
It will be a pandemic situation,
pandemic situation comes from the German Bundestag, is then an even
softer formulation for a pandemic than the pandemic itself in the IHR or in
the treaty, where only vague legal terms are used.
Of course, such a system is incompatible with human rights,
violates the European Convention on Human Rights, the UN Treaty, the
UN Social Covenant, the EU Treaty, human rights in general and,
above all, human dignity.
I therefore take the view, as does my colleague Mrs. Beate Bahner,
that such a set of rules can never become a standard, because it
undermines all human dignity.
It is so easy to say, one sentence, human dignity is inviolable.
But it is not for nothing that this sentence is at the top of the Basic Law, of which everyone is so proud.
In Germany it is always said that he is leaving the ground of the constitution
and so on in order to punish someone.
But if a government says, yes, we are now sacrificing 10 in order to save 1000, then it is the government
that has lost the ground of the Basic Law.
And we have to hold them to that.
And we must not differentiate between valuable and unworthy life.
That is the arc to this criminal complaint.
That is what my colleague Claudio Zanetti said.
The state is not allowed to kill people.
No consideration of life.
That is the red line.
The state does not have the right to decide that there is valuable and unvaluable life.
The state can't say we'll accept 0.02 percent.
We do not accept this.