The coronavirus pandemic ushered in a new era in 2020.
Since then, the world has witnessed unbelievable state crimes.
Because these have not yet been dealt with, the AfD parliamentary
group organized the 2nd Corona Symposium on 11 and 12 November 2023.
KlaTV has edited together the most concise
statements from scientists, lawyers and police
officers from over 11 hours of footage, documenting
massive criminal offenses.
1. false incidences and utilization lies
Ladies and gentlemen, we have had some dark years.
First, the most important points in five bullet points:
Firstly, hospital occupancy in Germany fell to an all-time
low in 2020, according to the Federal Ministry of Health.
Secondly, there were no more severe respiratory diseases in 2020 and 2021 than usual.
Corona came, influenza temporarily disappeared, according to the RKI's sentinel data.
Thirdly, no more people than usual died in 2020, age-standardized.
Mortality has only been increasing since 2021, according to data from the Federal Statistical Office.
Fourthly, people who died with or from corona were on average 83 years old and the other
deceased were on average 82 years old, say the RKI and the Federal Statistical Office.
Fifth and finally, the mask- and lockdown-free Sweden
performed better than Germany, says the WHO.
So none of this was due to the measures.
And now let's take a look at the official incidences of corona here.
We can see that even in these lie cards, which
are dark red, there is still a lot of truth.
Because the iron curtain has survived Corona.
The virus didn't get over it.
Or to be more precise, there seems to be an intelligence gap from East to West.
How can it be that a virus only rages in certain regions?
Of course it can't be.
Medicine has raged.
These were the clinics that treated according to the WHO protocol.
They gave early artificial respiration and administered lethal
doses of hydroxychloroquine, an antimalarial drug.
They were killed in March if they worked according to WHO protocol.
The overburdening of the healthcare system has come up again and again in virtually
every decision, in every emergency ruling, in every judgment.
So if you look at the legal databases on overloading the healthcare system,
you will see that this is the magic word, the magic formula.
It worked with that.
Yes, we actually had 217,000 fewer cases in intensive
care units in Germany in 2020 than in 2019.
And that already includes Covid patients.
And we had 370,000 fewer cases in German intensive care units in 2021.
To be honest, nothing is happening here either.
The RKI itself has said that there was no nationwide overload for the
period in which the capacities of health authorities were surveyed.
Yes, there is also the fact that the majority of corona deaths
were not caused by Covid, but died with it.
There is a wonderful city in Germany, the city of Halle an der Saale.
They have differentiated in their statistics from the outset and in the end it
comes out that only 40 percent of corona deaths actually died from corona.
So at no time was there an epidemic situation of
national scope and therefore all measures are unlawful.
2. Deliberate misleading with PCR test Abuse
In summary, clinically in terms of real
illnesses and deaths, there was nothing special.
Everything was normal.
These are facts and that is the most important point.
The idea of a pandemic was based exclusively on new types of
mass testing without cause, the results of which fluctuated
enormously and led the public to believe that there
were more sick and dead people than usual.
Which was not true.
Secondly, in February 2020, textbooks and WHO guidelines advised
against measures such as lockdowns and school closures.
At the time, the RKI announced that masks were useless
and that coronavirus was usually mild, which was true.
Mr. Drosten also emphasized this in interviews.
The same Mr. Drosten told today's Federal Chancellor Olaf Scholz in a talk show that the
pandemic would not even be noticed without the PCR test, which is also true.
But what have we done here?
Anyone who had a positive PCR test was COVID.
And if he had no symptoms, what was he?
An asymptomatic case.
And that doesn't exist anywhere.
But you have these tricks, it's not that the test, I want to tell you
something, the PCR test is not particularly good or not particularly bad.
Many tests in our laboratories are no better and no worse.
But it is the way in which they have been used to
specifically drive up the figures, so to speak.
And every PCR test kit states that these tests are not approved at all.
I also worked in immune laboratories with PCR during my studies.
And they simply can't do that.
So they can only be used as support.
So to claim that PCR is the new gold standard is either a sign of
complete ignorance or simply deliberate misleading of the public.
3. coercion to wear a mask
Children had to wear masks for hours at school.
In my opinion, this is clearly a criminal offense of coercion and bodily harm.
It has been clearly proven by numerous large publications in renowned
journals, including several meta-analyses, which summarize the results of several
studies and all come to the conclusion that wearing a mask in this context
not only does not help, but also involves considerable health risks.
Why is wearing a mask so harmful to health?
The airway resistance is more than doubled.
Wearing a mask prevents the supply of oxygen.
After a very short time, the masks are contaminated with numerous
bacteria, viruses and fungi, which in turn can cause infections.
The greatest danger, however, comes from the increased carbon dioxide rebreathing
when wearing a mask, with the risk of carbon dioxide poisoning, known as
hypercapnia, and the associated respiratory acidosis, i.e. the acidification
of the blood with many other metabolic disorders that occur as a result, which
can lead to headaches, nausea, vomiting, concentration problems, dizziness and
circulatory problems, all of which the mask wearers have of course told us
can lead to circulatory collapse and death, and of course very often also cause
permanent neurological and psychological damage.
4.
Intentional harm through lockdown measures Ladies and gentlemen, for me the red line was crossed
when a lockdown was imposed at a time when the famous incidence figures were already falling.
We saw the figures and then it
emerged that masks would be compulsory.
I thought what, how and looked it up at the WHO and found that ten randomized
studies showed that the masks do nothing for infectious diseases.
I was quite reassured and then, to my amazement, I
found out that masks were compulsory in Germany on April 29.
My first thought was that this was a humiliating gesture of submission.
If the test was positive, the children were locked in their room for a week.
Put the food outside the door.
Only go to the toilet when the corridor was free.
And if communication was necessary, then
of course the open door, but both with masks.
You could also call it isolation torture.
At a hearing of the Children's Commission, as I have already mentioned, here in the Bundestag,
Professor Klund spoke very clearly of a serious form of child endangerment.
And that was back in September 2020.
We members of parliament, I was in the state parliament of Baden-Württemberg at the
time, we received worried emails from parents, educators and teachers.
In an email that I will never forget, a mother wrote that my daughter
no longer wanted to wake up in the morning, that school was hell.
That was in November 2020, when we received these emails, all members of parliament.
And so I repeat myself, they all knew and
therefore they must all be held accountable.
5. bodily injury through experimental vaccination and compulsory vaccination
The effectiveness and safety of the vaccines were largely
unknown at the time of the major vaccination campaigns.
And today we know that the vaccines are neither effective nor safe. Thank you very much.
Why have politicians not only allowed the administration
of an experimental vaccine, but have in fact forced people
to take the substance through 2G, 3G and sectoral vaccination
obligations?
Why were there emergency approvals without necessity?
Why do countless vaccine injuries have no consequences?
There were no data on duration of action, no data on sterile immunity,
no sufficient safety data, no data on long-term safety and no data
on efficacy and safety in children, pregnant women and immunodepressed
patients, all of whom should be vaccinated. Unbelievable.
And now the Pfizer contract, which was already blacked
out, has recently been leaked in its entirety.
And it clearly states that the member states acknowledge that the long-term
effects and efficacy of the vaccine are currently unknown and that
there may be side effects that are currently unknown.
It was all perfectly clear and it was signed by a German politician.
And he should be brought to justice.
Yes, then we also made observations with the
dark field microscope and we saw that there were a lot
of small crystals in the vaccine, so-called polyethylene
glycol cholestesterol crystals.
And these cholesterol crystals were quite large.
So some of them were larger than an erythrocyte, a blood platelet,
and that means that they are of a size from which one can draw the
conclusion that the batches themselves did not comply with "good
manufacturing practice" in their processing at all
In other words, it is almost certainly the case that the filter
was not filtered as required for medical devices.
You can see that such cholesterol crystals [...] were
regularly found in the blood of all vaccinated people.
And from this we concluded that liver damage probably occurs
regularly as a consequence of vaccination [...] in all vaccinated people.
Because in all the samples we examined, we found these
crystals in quite high numbers, along with other metallic
impurities, particles that are toxic in nature,
some of them even radioactive like caesium.
Tom Lausen posted a video on January 14 2021.
This is a press conference from the Paul Ehrlich Institute, in which
the person responsible for suspected deaths, Ms. Keller-Stanislavski, is already
talking about nine suspected deaths 14 days after the start of the vaccination
campaign, and just as she says it, the tenth comes in.
The fact that approval has not already been stopped
is a scandal of the first order, I call it a crime.
Yes, the Cheyenne died on November 16th, after the second vaccination, causally.
So I'm sorry that I signed it.
I would never do that again.
But we didn't really have any other choice under the pressure.
I'm not a lawyer, but in my opinion it's coercion anyway,
if not blackmail, what happened to the people.
Ladies and gentlemen, anyone who praises mRNA vaccines
as safe and effective, anyone who claims that
vaccination rarely causes serious side effects, is either
incredibly ignorant or infinitely evil.
And he makes himself liable to prosecution.
Just like all those who actively or passively promote and advocate this vaccination.
This is because it is now scientifically proven that vaccination can
only have a negative effect, and a life-threatening one at that.
And this plasmid derivative vaccine has never been approved. Never.
And was administered to millions of people.
So if that's not one of the greatest crimes
against humanity, I don't know what is.
6. obstruction of justice (failure of the rule of law)
How did politicians react to this normal clinical situation?
It closed daycare centers, schools, stores, churches and businesses for months on end,
isolated the elderly and left them to die alone, destroying livelihoods.
The police banned people from reading books on a park bench, hunted down young
people outdoors and children in the snow, and beat up peaceful demonstrators.
Politicians excluded anyone who asked about the purpose of the measures.
Usually, the power of the government is limited by the courts, the media and science.
This time they all failed.
Courts did not examine the proportionality and only believed
two witnesses to this day, namely the RKI and PEI.
In this way, the government was able to self-certify the necessity of lockdowns and
vaccination obligations because the RKI and PEI are authorities bound by instructions.
Over the last three and a half years, we have
seen a massive criminalization of citizens from the
middle of society who have no criminal record whatsoever,
who have no entries in police records.
Interestingly, very, very many of them are doctors.
Since March 2020, we have seen a massive increase in
the execution of search warrants, coincidentally to
the detriment of the extra-parliamentary opposition,
or to the detriment of certain political parties.
For reasons where I was actually still an active police officer at the time, I would
never have gotten a search warrant for, the subject of the judge's reservation.
With all these executions and search measures, there is the initial suspicion [...] that it is
not about evidence for criminal proceedings, but about the targeted intimidation of the opposition,
about the targeted intimidation of certain parties represented in the Bundestag and all state
parliaments, about the demoralization of the population and the intimidation of these people.
According to the textbook, the government must reassure the population at the beginning
of a really dangerous pandemic in order to avoid consequential damage.
Why did politicians instead have a shock paper written that made
children afraid of killing their grandparents by suffocation?
So the protagonists are announcing pandemics with viruses
that they themselves have created artificially, so to speak,
in order to sell new vaccines that have probably already existed
for a long time, these two viruses.
That's what I mean by organized crime.
...the number of vaccine doses sold.
And you have to ask.
So all these pharmaceutical companies, they actually live in a market economy.
They thrive on competition.
It must be clear to them that if they develop
something great and perhaps are the only ones to do
so, because it's very difficult and everyone has
a need, then the stuff will sell itself.
So why did such high purchase volumes have to be guaranteed in these contracts?
So I see a lot of opportunities for manipulation here as far as these prices
and therefore the profits of the pharmaceutical companies are concerned.
Now there is a second dimension that is only possible when large monopolies
and large networks have so much power that it is now even possible to invent
diseases in order to earn a lot of money with drugs that are useless at
best, but also very dangerous in terms of the Covid vaccine.
That is organized crime.
The director of the Paul-Ehrich-Institut, Professor Cichutek, and
others should be brought to trial for involuntary manslaughter.
Is Mr. Cichutek a bad person? No.
It's just that [...] breaking the rules in medical
science has become the norm.
And why does Professor Cichutek now have to stand trial?
Not because he is a bad person.
Not out of revenge. Not out of dogmatism.
But because we need to understand that this persistent rule-breaking can kill people.
Mr. Cichutek has become accustomed to this rule-breaking.
And now I come to our Mr. Harbarth, who became President
of the Federal Constitutional Court at the age of 48.
Four months after the first measures began in March
2020, he stands up in public and says some things
that he, as President of the Federal Constitutional
Court, is never entitled to say.
Do you know what he says, ladies and gentlemen, on June 22, 20 "The
exercise of fundamental rights in corona times [...] is partly
done in a different way than before the pandemic."
And then he goes one better.
"Fundamental rights apply, but they apply differently than before the pandemic."
Ladies and gentlemen, he has opened Pandora's box.
All the evils of these measures, which we now know are unconstitutional.
All these evils crawled out of this box after he opened it.
And it would be no wonder that Mr. Scholz would then
say, as a politician, as a steep pitch here, if everything
applies differently now, Mr. Scholz said, yes, after
the pandemic there are no more red lines.
Red lines, ladies and gentlemen, are fundamental rights.
Do you see what Mr. Harbarth has triggered here?
A violation of the principle of separation of powers.
The bottom line of the epidemic story is that pandemics
don't just arrive from Asia, from Wuhan or anywhere else.
They come when they are needed.
But I can also give you a positive message from all of this.
Such pandemics also go away, namely when they are no longer believed.
And I can only hope that this look into the history of the epidemic
will lead to the next time being like a war:
After all, a pandemic is nothing more than a war by other means
waged by the state and the rich against the population.
And when it comes to war, they know what to do.
It's best not to go.
And you should also avoid going there during a pandemic if possible.
Thank you for your attention!