Our children were already the main victims during the coronavirus crisis.
The last three years have shown with frightening clarity how little respect
state institutions have for children and young people, but also
for parents as their carers.
According to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the state is obliged to provide educational
measures for children in order to protect them from sexual abuse, among other things.
But instead of being protected from this, our children are apparently
being prepared for sexual abuse!
Because the official documents clearly state that sex education today should
ensure that young children start having sex as early as possible.
At the same time, parents are increasingly disenfranchised as their own educators if they
do not follow these guidelines and want to protect their children from them.
On the initiative of the psychologist and systemic family therapist, Dr. Andrea Christidis, and the
former LKA President of Thuringia, Uwe Kranz, the event took place under the auspices of the MWGFD [
Mediziner und Wissenschaftler für Gesundheit, Freiheit und Demokratie e.V.] under the title: Institutional
Assaults on Our Children on September 28, a long overdue press conference
was held on this topic.
With the kind permission of MWGFD, Kla.TV presents here the 20-minute summary of the
almost six-hour press symposium with expert speakers exposing the system.
It shows in a drastic way how it is precisely the actions of state institutions that
endanger the welfare of children and how little family law has to do with family - because structures
prone to corruption and a questionable system of experts allow youth welfare offices and courts to
arbitrarily remove children.
It is the wish of MWGFD and all those who care about the well-being of our children that this issue
is brought to the attention of all our fellow citizens every day like a red warning light.
This requires all of us to ensure that this information is disseminated on a large scale.
All judges, public prosecutors, teachers, educators and doctors in particular must be informed
and called upon to do their bit to drain this unspeakable swamp and put an end
to pedophilia as a lifestyle.
The conclusion must be: We need courageous people.
The time for silence and ducking away is over.
Now it's up to everyone.
Nothing less than the protection of our children is at stake.
We now have a double need for psychotherapy for children.
The key to power is access to the child.
These children's sex rings are at the highest levels of our society.
This is simply too cruel for the human mind to comprehend.
Instead of normal parental education, teachers and state authorities are to
take over the education of children
... Where is our Article 6 of the Basic Law, which protects parental rights?
And above all, to pull it up from the bottom, where are our children's rights,
the best interests of the child?
How am I supposed to know that masks are dangerous until two children lie dead in front of me?
That was a Bavarian judge.
Children were not only the main victims of the so-called corona pandemic, for example through questionable
school or kindergarten closures, lockdowns, completely unnecessary testing, compulsory
masks that make people ill and life-threatening so-called Covid vaccinations.
For decades, a large number of children here in Germany have been more or less defencelessly
exposed to attacks by various institutions, unfortunately also by the state.
This protection is more than necessary for the most vulnerable in our society - as everyone will be able
to recognize in the course of this symposium - in this completely crazy era of human history
in which we currently find ourselves.
The care and upbringing of children is the natural right, and this formulation is very important,
the natural right of parents and the duty incumbent upon them first and foremost.
The state community monitors the activities.
That is the wording of the Basic Law.
If you take a closer look, it's basically all a waste of time.
Because in reality, reality actually looks different.
Let's just take the example that the consequences of the corona measures still persist
today, especially for our children.
73 percent of all children and young people suffer from mental stress.
After all, the final report of the interministerial working group
Health effects due to Corona detected on February 8 this year.
If the state notices something like this and doesn't react, but on the contrary, immediately calls for children
to be vaccinated again in July, then it shows me that it has nothing to do with World Children's Day.
If it were really about protecting children, completely different measures would
have to be taken, namely bringing those who organized this to justice.
Now we have had, during the Corona period, claims that the children are endangering
their grandparents, their parents, their teachers.
And that's exactly what has happened - this parentification or role reversal on the part of the state.
The idea was that the children should be considerate of the
adults, reduce their fears, wear the masks and so on.
The children were afraid that they might kill someone.
So what was done to children was unbelievable.
The natural right of parents is being removed here by simple legal regulations that are
also so vague that no one knows when and to what extent such an
intervention is justified.
Because when is the physical, mental and emotional well-being of the child at risk?
Because the parents are unwilling to avert the danger.
What danger is that anyway?
And what means should the parents use if the child does not want to?
Reversing responsibility is one thing, but placing blame on a child when I say
it's your fault if this happens to him or her is a completely different story.
This means that the state has committed such a serious secondary endangerment of the child's welfare
that I believe it can no longer be remedied.
And they have absolutely no desire to come to terms with all
the criminal things they have caused.
Speech disorders, contact shyness and depression were just some of the consequences of the
test and mask mania and confinement diagnosed by child psychologists.
And historians, such as Michael Hüther in particular, whom I recently had the pleasure of meeting in person,
state that never before in history has the protection of children been perverted
into protection from children.
We have more than 35,000 so-called "in-custody" cases every year.
During the corona period, a particularly large number of children were taken out because they
did not attend school when school started again because parents refused to have
their children put on the masks or that the test sticks were used.
And then the children were taken out, and not just the one child in
question, but the others as well.
It's unbelievable what happened.
This means that the state can simply stop school, but parents are not allowed to protect their children.
If you imagine how their children are snatched away from them and then placed in institutions,
waved through by lawyers without, mind you, examining the facts, and then I come to the
problem that what the youth welfare offices say is simply adopted.
And they have no options, such as in the Code of Civil Procedure, certainly not
in the interim injunction, and the same problem in the main proceedings.
No witnesses are heard, for example.
Neither process fraud nor anything else.
And what is fatal is that these are non-public proceedings.
This means that the population cannot control what happens in there.
Of course, removing a child from a family can be a good thing.
In this case, of course, the two x-raped boys were taken away from
the model LGBT-gender couple Zulock1.
Of course, the nice couple Zulock, the two nice men, are now being sued.
Well, that will be in the USA ... they don't stand a good chance.
It's going to be tough for them.
So in Germany we will release them again, of course, it's not all that bad.
And this violence does not only occur in the social environment.
This exists in many facilities.
Why is it not the case, which would be self-evident, that they have this in administrative law, why are the
files of the youth welfare office not generally requested and examined by the judges in family cases?
And everywhere we go, there is a climate of fear.
This means that nobody even dares to contradict the court, to show that
what the court claims is not true.
So I mean, when we're dealing with children, we
have various bodies in Poland that look after children, caregivers,
curators, they're often called that in Polish.
And they admit that it is partly different than the court sees it.
But they would never dare to open their mouths here because there
is a climate of fear everywhere.
How can all this even happen, that something like this is possible?
We have corruption-prone structures in youth welfare and in the family law system.
Section 8a SGB VIII was introduced in 2005.
This is so important because this paragraph reverses the burden of proof.
This means that the youth welfare office claims that the child's welfare is at risk from the
parents, and the parents are now forced to prove that they are not a risk to the child's welfare.
You have to think about that.
This paragraph is also known as the protection order.
The protection mandate has taken on excesses that are simply no longer comprehensible.
Since 1989, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child has emphasized the obligation of the
state to provide educational measures for children in order to protect them from sexual abuse.
The opposite is currently happening.
They are prepared for sexual abuse.
We have to deal with physical, psychological and sexual violence in children's homes.
We are dealing with torture and murders, aka perhaps even suicides, which is very questionable,
under the supervision and cover-up of German authorities.
Last year, 15,000 cases of sexual abuse were reported to the BKA.
This is 7.5 percent more than in previous years.
If you go backwards in the time series, you will see that every year there is
roughly a 3-, 4-, 5-percent increase.
This means that the number of cases is not decreasing, these cases are increasing enormously.
And in 149,000 cases of abuse mapping, children are disproportionately involved, the
42 streets, and we have no dark field research, not until today.
The BKA has done nothing in this area.
WHO and UN documents make it clear that they want to criminalize the protection of children
under the pretext that sex is a human right, regardless of age.
And this evidence report can be found on the stopworldcontrol.com website.
To familiarize you a little closer, from 0 to 4 the children should learn masturbation,
masturbation, development of interest in their own and other people's bodies.
From 0 to 4.
This is a standard paper developed jointly by the WHO and the Federal Center for Health Education.
And that was already 2011.
Nobody itched, nobody cared, nobody registered.
And this only became known when Karl Lauterbach struck.
But even back then, people were always careful to say, yes, this is a framework concept.
A framework concept for professionals.
This is not an instruction.
This is not prescribed.
On the basis of scientific findings.
And at the same time, the International Commission of Jurists has issued a statement
that sex between adults and children should be legal if the child consents.
So they try to take this detour.
This agenda that they are now infiltrating or pursuing, they are doing this
by infiltrating elementary school, for example.
For example, by changing international educational and cultural regulations.
Then you all know that I have a brand new document, from 2021, from the Focus, very up-to-date, where
you can read everything, yes. Researchers: This is how the Greens fought for years for free child sex.
And if you look at this ... it's now called the Göttingen Institute for Democracy Research,
so it practically investigates what the Greens have announced at their party conferences.
If you know the writings and books of John Money that I have read,
all in English of course.
That is 1:1 the ideology of this criminal child abuser, who was, however, quite clever.
Pedocriminals are systematically infiltrating institutions, we know that from
the church, I don't have to tell you, you know,
it's constantly coming out that sexual abuse has taken place in the Catholic Church, but also in
the Protestant Church, in institutions in general, that's
where the sex offenders gather.
Kentler has driven a pedosexual network across scientific and educational
institutions and politics.
And everything is based on this, including this standard paper.
And of course this has also been taken up politically.
The Hildesheim study on the activities of education professor Kentler continues:
There is growing evidence that these foster parents were single, sometimes powerful
men from academia, research institutions and other educational
contexts who also practiced pedophile positions.
And I read in the magazine Emma and I think also in the TAZ that they
were also powerful politicians.
For external accommodation.
Of course, John Money was also very much in favor of this.
Clearly, the children were taken away from their biological parents.
Of course, child abuse was common back then, as John Money exemplified.
And the whole thing had been going on since the 70s and 80s under the, shall I say, spiritual dominance
of John Money, under the rainbow flag.
John Money has also quite explicitly and quite clearly,
I have called for pedophilia here
on this scheme, a consensual harmless erotic connection, love relationship between
a same-sex man and a boy.
Here we are talking about the supervision of a person under protection, and then we are talking about consensual sex.
That is how judges can do something like that, which in my opinion can only
be possible at all through political influence.
More than 70 criminal proceedings against those responsible were dropped.
You know that the public prosecutor's offices are bound by instructions,
so I don't have to say much more.
The Haasenburg files have been under lock and key since the closure.
They are shredded after ten years.
December 23 they are shredded.
Who was responsible for these files?
The Minister of Education from Brandenburg, Britta Ernst, the wife of Olaf Scholz.
She recently resigned, presumably to spare her own husband the scandal.
And I'm talking now about board members of banks, for example, the owners of
our news agencies, the owners of our technology companies, well-known personalities,
people we actually trust.
In recent years, David has focused on exposing crimes against humanity
committed by high-ranking government officials.
He has interviewed many eyewitnesses and surviving victims who testify how governments
have been infiltrated by agents of a worldwide network of criminals involved in the
trafficking of millions of children for sexual abuse and ritual sacrifice.
And the official documents clearly state that the aim of sex education today is
to ensure that young children start having sex as soon or as early as possible.
These are actually guidelines for teachers in training.
And they say they have to make sure that their children start having sex in class
as quickly and as young as possible.
And then there is this, which is also in the paper, that there should be no exception rule for parents
to have their children exempted from lessons
if they have objections to the teaching content.
This is where parents and children are divided.
We have seen that compulsory education is the responsibility of the children and the parents are responsible for it.
The court can now choose against whom it takes action.
This can go as far as child abduction, as we heard in detail earlier.
We already see what happens in schools, where drag queens are presented to small, vulnerable
children who can't defend themselves, who have no chance
of even understanding.
And this ideology, this so-called gender ideology of John Money, is behind this
transgender teaching, that children are persuaded at school that
you can be a boy or a girl.
Just have them castrated, take estrogen, right? It's not about inclusion here.
This has nothing whatsoever to do with the inclusion of people who have a different
sexual orientation or orientation.
It's just about aggressively taking over children so that it's easier to get to them.
Ladies and gentlemen, is the aim to separate children from their parents?
Is the goal the destruction of the nuclear family?
Where is the right to sexual self-determination?
To the general right of personality?
Parents' very own educational right?
However, is the child's intellectual well-being, which the state believes should be ensured by teaching at school,
at risk if the child does not attend school and is instead taught by caring parents in small learning
groups, absorbing the learning material in a much shorter time than in a school?
If the child is spared pointless measures because it has enlightened
parents who do not blindly follow every state narrative?
Instead, parents who do not submit to the state narrative and who are otherwise of the opinion
that state schools are not good for their children are criminalized in violation of the
natural law principle of natural law before constitutional law by being forced through
financial pressure to behave in a way that they and their children reject on
the basis of unconstitutional fines.
When you become aware of this dramatic threat to our children in the
face of institutional attacks, including the new WHO plans, it literally
takes your breath away.
And I appeal to teachers not to go along with this agenda, but to reveal it.
I am in contact with several organizations, for example with dismissed police officers and civil servants
who have put their careers on the line to save children because they wanted to collect evidence.
There are people in this world who have dedicated their lives to putting
an end to this perversion.
People who still have a heart, who are still moderate somewhere.
And I would simply like to encourage everyone to stand up.
We have to say no, we have to stand up.
Now I think we have all become aware again of how important it is that we now take action in
concerted campaigns, in cooperation with as many other courageous
fellow citizens as possible.
We now need the support of all media professionals, all journalists, so that the issue
is brought to the attention of our fellow citizens every day like a red warning light.
And I think that all lawyers, all civil servants, especially judges and public prosecutors, all teachers
and educators and all doctors are also called upon to make their contribution here.
I am convinced that we can do it together and drain the unspeakable swamp of these crimes and thus end the machinations of evil, pedophilia as a lifestyle of the elites, as David has taught us, that we can end these machinations of evil once and for all.