Today, Sunday, December 10, 2023, on the 75th Human Rights Day, an unprecedented
and very special historical event is taking place here in Karlsruhe:
In the course of a large demonstration with rallies and a procession, 599 criminal charges are filed with
the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office in Karlsruhe.
This is directed against those responsible who have campaigned for the legal introduction of compulsory
vaccination in healthcare professions and for members of the German armed forces.
This is because accepting vaccine damage and vaccine deaths is a violation of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Section 7 of the International Criminal Code.
According to the organizer, there will be no reconciliation as long as the perpetrators
of the unlawful corona measures remain unpunished.
High-ranking, competent speakers have announced their attendance at the rallies, whose
contributions will underline the scope of the crimes and the absolute need for action.
We are delighted that you have joined us here today in Karlsruhe, the city of law, to honor
and commemorate all the victims of three and a half years of the coronavirus injustice regime.
Thank you very much!
And if you think we are few, then I have to tell you, or may I tell you, it has always been
the few who have made the difference.
And so thank you to all the people who are celebrating the law and justice with us today
and giving back expression, impact and dignity.
Thank you Karlsruhe, thank you on behalf of ZAAVV
[= goals: Reappraisal, clarification, legal prosecution and prevention], from all organizations and supporters
who have called today for this wonderful day of justice.
First of all, I would like to clearly distance ourselves from any form of left-wing
extremism, right-wing extremism, anti-Semitism or other ideological extremist
ideas and persecution.
The special thing about this event is that you will not only hear speeches from lawyers, the organs of
the administration of justice, but today something special is in the foreground, namely action.
Politicians are still refusing to clarify the coronavirus policy.
That's why we will be filing around 600 criminal charges live and in color here today, with your support.
What is it all about?
Please take a look at the screen.
Green and FDP withdrew a law to strengthen vaccination prevention against Covid-19 and to amend
other regulations in connection with the Covid-19 pandemic on printed matter 20.188 and 20.250,
the following result of the final vote is available.
Voting cards submitted to 689.
571 voted in favor.
Voting no were 80. And 38 abstained.
The bill is hereby adopted.
This federal government has set itself a lot of goals, but our top priority is to protect
the population and these health services.
27 We will
therefore
do everything
we can to end this crisis as quickly as possible.
So to be honest with the unvaccinated, not everyone will
like what I'm about to say.
But unfortunately, with the incidence we currently have, the only alternative
is to close restaurants and cultural institutions.
But we also need to pick up the pace of vaccination.
We must consistently accelerate primary, secondary and booster vaccinations.
be able to administer
1.1 million vaccinations .
That is a record figure.
In no other European country is the booster vaccination and primary vaccination being
carried out as quickly as in Germany.
I would like to take this opportunity to expressly thank all those who work here, the doctors,
those who set up the vaccination centers and those who organize all this.
I would like to thank you very much.
This is the work that will ultimately enable us to successfully fly over this wave.
On the other hand, we also have to communicate the fact that vaccinations
are more or less free of side effects.
That has to be said again and again.
In essence, the group that is now at risk is the 50 to 80-year-olds, they are all unvaccinated,
they are all unprotected and they will die.
And I'm just glad that the new traffic light government is setting out to
introduce compulsory vaccination.
And I expect the preparations to start now.
As a lawyer, one would like to say, dear public prosecutor, that is at least enough for an initial suspicion.
And I would also like to take this opportunity to thank the doctors who
had the courage then and now to say
that Mr. Lauterbach was lying.
And Mr. Lauterbach not only lied, he knowingly lied.
There were and are side effects.
There is vaccine damage
and nobody will be able to seriously deny that.
And those who do will shirk their responsibility.
And in a functioning state governed by the rule of law, this should actually be investigated and acted upon.
And there's someone here, who probably hardly anyone knows, who sometimes hangs
around in buses. Who initiated this.
It's best if he introduces himself, he's sometimes a bit shy.
May I ask Ralf Ludwig to join me for a moment.
Yes hello, thank you so much, thank you so much for being here, for supporting this cause.
I said in Stuttgart in the spring of 2021 that we would set up this center and that
we would work on it and that we would not stop until those responsible
for the coronavirus measures were held to account.
62
And we
will start this today with the criminal charges.
We have many great colleagues on the stage today, many lawyers who have been representing your interests
for many years, who have been traveling from court to court for many years, trying to save and
secure the rule of law to some extent.
I would like to thank these colleagues who are here on stage today.
Many of them are standing in front of the stage and have done an incredible job.
So we have lots and lots of great people.
And I think that a state in which a large number of lawyers stand up and say that
what is happening here is not right, there can be something wrong.
I myself would like to hold back a little today, because I think the focus today should
be on our colleagues who have been fighting for your rights, for our rights,
for years, not only in Germany, but also in Austria and Switzerland.
And only one sentence is important to me, and it's right here at the front.
And I want you to keep repeating this sentence to everyone who still doubts.
A state must not kill innocent people.
Most people believe that such a sentence only applies to cases of war
or to war, but that is not true.
This sentence also applies when the state obliges people to take a substance into their bodies
where even the official institutes, such as the Paul Ehrlich Institute and
the Robert Koch Institute, say it
can ultimately have fatal side effects.
A state is not allowed to kill people, innocent people.
That is our message and let's get it out there.
Thank you very much.
Let's turn to the serious side of life.
I hope that some lawyers, perhaps also
public prosecutors, are here.
If that is the case, I urge you to start doing your job.
And as organs of the administration of justice, we are happy to support this.
And we have just seen in this video that it was about compulsory vaccination.
For many in the care sector, in the hospital, it had fatal consequences.
And there are people who had the courage to vote against it in the Bundestag.
I would now
like to start by welcoming Thomas Seitz.
Thomas Seitz is a member of the Bundestag and one of the courageous people who voted against compulsory vaccination. From a party whose name must not be mentioned.
Hello, Thomas Seitz.
Yes, dear friends of freedom and our fundamental rights.
Thank you for allowing me to speak to you today about the legal and parliamentary review of the coronavirus crisis.
But first a clarification.
We didn't have a crisis because of corona.
Rather, the crisis was the result of the coronavirus measures.
The real crisis was not triggered by a virus, but by politics.
It was a time of a legal state of emergency, although the Basic Law does not recognize a state of civil
emergency due to natural disasters or epidemics.
It was a time when the supposed protection of health was categorically placed
above all other fundamental rights.
It was the time of the coronavirus dictatorship.
While the legislative and executive branches have outbid each other in excessive encroachments on fundamental rights,
the courts have almost consistently failed in their function as guardians of freedom and fundamental rights.
This became particularly clear in the context of freedom of assembly, for example, when
distancing rules only applied, and became merciless, when demonstrations were
held against and not for the government.
The judiciary has therefore sooner or later uncritically approved almost
all legal impositions, even though there was no excess mortality in Germany.
At least not until the start of the vaccination campaign.
With a vaccine that was not a vaccine, but an experimental gene therapy.
The parliamentary investigation to date has been just as unsatisfactory as the legal investigation.
We had already applied for a first Corona Committee of Inquiry in 2020, which
was rejected because the AfD only had less than 25 percent of the seats and the minority right of the
Parliamentary Committee of Inquiry only applies above this quorum.
Perhaps the public pressure of an early committee of inquiry could have prevented
many of the subsequent impositions.
And you don't have to agree with the program and policies of the Alternative
for Germany.
But no one can deny that we were the only voice of freedom in the German
Bundestag during the Corona regime.
And also the only ones who not only consistently argued in favor of freedom,
but also voted that way afterwards.
Because I myself was unvaccinated and unwilling to bow to a fascist principle
to prove my virological innocence, I, like many
other MPs, was only allowed to attend plenary sessions in the visitors' gallery of the
Bundestag from January 2022.
But even as an outcast, you can speak plainly.
My favorite sentence from this time in the plenary of the German Bundestag is:
The walkers are defending the rule of law and their criminalization is wrong.
And we will also do everything we can to ensure that the legal process finally makes progress.
I therefore very much hope that the criminal charges filed today will be successful.
It is a great honor and a great pleasure for me to be able to speak to you here
in Karlsruhe today on December 10, 2023.
Since March 2020, everything that had previously characterized a democratic constitutional state and the
state of medical science has been overturned.
Anyone who spoke out against this was defamed, insulted and persecuted.
Doctors lost their license to practice medicine, were dismissed from the university and were arbitrarily
persecuted by the disciplinary authorities of the medical associations in accordance with
government power and the bought media in order to ultimately silence them.
Anyone who did not go along with
the narrative and
marched in unison with the mainstream was at best an outsider, ultimately excluded
from public life, threatened in his existence and slandered.
The resulting damage is enormous.
All events and all injustices must be dealt with and those responsible
must be held liable and accountable.
Because
we must never forget, never forget what happened.
We owe it to ourselves, our children and the victims of this healthcare dictatorship.
Austria was hit by a total of five pointless lockdowns.
Healthy people were deprived of their freedom.
In order to secure his existence, it was necessary for the working person in the workplace
to submit to a 3G rule that was pointless.
Namely tested, recovered or vaccinated, i.e. gene-treated.
Old, sick and vulnerable people in need of care were forcibly isolated from their families,
friends and acquaintances in cold blood.
People were forced to endanger and damage their health by senselessly
wearing masks. To disfigure their outward appearance like slaves.
Free opinion, once highly valued as a benchmark for discourse and
further development, was banned and censored.
The pinnacle of contempt for human dignity, fundamental
rights and freedoms was the direct or indirect coercion to undergo repeated experimental
and dangerous Covid-19 injections, which had and still has no effect apart from
harmful effects.
In Austria, the attack on the life and health of every citizen culminated in the enactment
of a compulsory vaccination law.
The critical judges and public prosecutors in Germany have put it in a nutshell.
The state order for a Covid-19 vaccination is deliberate killing.
The collateral damage is indescribable.
Psychologically damaged children and adolescents,
an unprecedented number of bankruptcies,
physical and psychological destruction of people's livelihoods,
the division of society, health
or fatal consequences due to medically necessary treatments that were not carried out or not
carried out on time, an incalculable number of vaccination
victims and vaccination deaths.
Those who sleep in democracy wake up in dictatorship.
We must therefore never forget.
The narrative is continued in orchestrated unison by governments and vicarious agents
such as the taxpayer-funded media.
From climate hysteria
to the existential destruction of the middle class for noble goals
to the creation of a neo-absolutist world government in the form of the WHO,
through changes to international health regulations that are not compatible with the constitutions
of civilized states and the conclusion of a pandemic treaty.
It is incompatible with the fundamental rights and freedoms of our
constitution, the right of peoples to self-determination,
to grant unrestricted powers to a WHO that has not been democratically elected
by any citizen of this
world, to its Director-General, and thus to the self-appointed arrogant elites behind it,
in the event of a potential or actual global health emergency.
Control, monitoring and sanction rights without
the possibility of review, without responsibility and without liability.
This globalist project, driven by Big Pharma, corporations and autocratic power elites,
must be brought down in order to preserve the sovereignty of states and the sovereignty
and inviolability of the dignity of each individual citizen.
We have therefore come together here in Karlsruhe today, on the 75th
anniversary of human rights, to set a postulate of reappraisal, accountability and liability.
The positive change brought about by the biggest medical and legal scandal
since 1945 has long since begun.
There are so many of us that this opportunity for a real political and legal turnaround
could be stopped or forfeited.
We are many and we are becoming more and more.
So to conclude.
We must never forget what happened.
We are called to do this now, and we are committed to changing the future
in a positive way and walking this path.
That is our major goal.
Thank you very much.
Hello Karlsruhe!
Hello!
Hello, defenders of human rights!
A very special greeting goes to the Freiheitstriechler.
They have come all the way from Switzerland to drive away the evil spirits
in the tradition of the ancestors.
Let's see what they can do back there!
We are gathered here on Human Rights Square because 75 years ago today, the UN
General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
That should actually be a reason to celebrate.
But unfortunately, we have to realize that 75 years is a pretty impressive time, but you could also
say that it's not even 100 years old yet and these human rights are already being trampled underfoot.
At the very beginning of this catalog, the UN states that all people have the same inalienable
rights and fundamental freedoms from birth.
Life, liberty and personal safety
are the values at stake.
We will come to individual values later, but the point is that we have the same inalienable rights
and fundamental freedoms from birth.
And why do we have these same inalienable rights and fundamental freedoms?
Because we are human.
Because we are human beings, we have human rights.
It goes on to say that all people are equal before the law and are entitled to equal protection
under the law without distinction.
But do you remember how someone on TV said that if you don't keep
up, you're out of social life?
That's outrageous.
We are allowed to participate in social life because we are human beings.
Why are we allowed to participate in social life?
Because we are human.
Exactly.
It also states that no one may be arbitrarily arrested and detained.
But we are realizing that the judiciary has become a political weapon.
Let's think of Michael Ballweg, nine months in prison and in the end not even enough for a lawsuit.
Why is no one allowed to arbitrarily arrest and imprison us?
Because we are human.
Why can't anyone arbitrarily lock us up?
Because we are human.
It also states that no one may be subjected to arbitrary interference in their private life, their
home, their family and their correspondence, or to damage to their honor and reputation.
Everyone is entitled to legal protection against such interference or impairment.
How is it with this denunciation?
Do you remember the restrictions on visiting rights in hospitals, even
in your apartments and houses - they
told us how many people we were allowed to invite.
We had to identify ourselves if we wanted to visit a restaurant.
Why are such restrictions and limitations not permitted?
Because we are human!
Exactly, it works.
Freedom of thought, conscience and religion is guaranteed.
But even there they attacked us.
Even church services were subject to restrictions, small circles and so on.
Why is freedom of thought, conscience and religion guaranteed?
Because we are human!
Then there is another important human right, the right
to freedom of expression and opinion.
The German Basic Law formulates it even more simply.
Censorship does not take place.
It's so simple that even politicians should understand it.
But what about Julian Assange?
Over there is the car and other people who are canceled, who are marginalized.
Why do we have freedom of expression?
Why must we also be able to say things that go against the grain of those in power?
Because we are human! Exactly.
And why are we allowed to gather here on this square without any restrictions?
Because we are human!
Exactly.
And we make use of this right.
Our Swiss Federal Constitution contains this beautiful sentence:
That only those who use their freedom are free.
Perhaps one of the most important messages is that we as humans are not objects.
We are not a bargaining chip that can be pushed to the right or left.
That is also what these criminal charges are about today.
And each of you can support this criminal complaint. There's a bus over there on the other side.
And cards like the one I'm holding up here are also distributed here.
It says I am filing a complaint on suspicion of crimes against humanity.
Anyone who would like to support this can also sign their name at the back of the bus. It is important to add your name and address so that it is complete.
This can also happen in the elevator. Simply as an announcement. Olli!
So, shall we all do one more action together? Are you all there? Karlsruhe.
We do this at almost every major event, at every big appeal. Tobias, I need you for a moment, please.
So, all hands up. All hands up. I hope it holds. So, I call for peace. You call for freedom.
Peace - Freedom. Peace - Freedom. Peace - Freedom. Peace - Freedom. Peace - Freedom.
Peace - Freedom. Peace - Freedom. Thank you! Please! So, everyone awake again? Hello Karlsruhe. Wonderful.
I have just spoken about the fact that there are doctors who had the courage
to do their work in accordance with their oath under the Nuremberg Code.
To this day, many criminal proceedings against so-called critical doctors are ongoing. One comment, because I saw that SWR is here.
Dear SWR, I am very pleased.
And it would be wonderful if the reporting did not focus on one person, who was also standing next to
the stage here, but that what lawyers say here is taken seriously. We don't just say that for fun and games.
There is substance behind it and we can prove it.
And to prevent that, I personally don't care at all whether you call me right-wing, right-wing radical,
left-wing, left-wing radical. I am a human being. I have values and I have human rights.
And I insist on that.
And a courageous doctor came to us today to give us a brief report from her practice on what this
does to people, what actually happens here.
I would like to extend a warm welcome to
Perin Dinekli.
In September 2020, I had a raid, as did most of the critical doctors in my practice.
And eight weeks later I had a penalty order for 150 daily rates, i.e. five months in prison or 22,500
euros, for issuing false health certificates, against my better judgment, for the purpose
of deception in legal matters, i.e. mask exemption certificates.
Most doctors were already refusing to issue mask exemption
certificates at the time.
Even with her own patients with asthma or severe heart disease.
And these patients naturally came from all over Germany to us very few
doctors compared to the many who were adapted, who spoke out.
And have desperately asked for mask exemption certificates for themselves or their children.
And of course we put them on display, as everyone suffers from a lack of oxygen
when wearing a mask for hours on end.
You don't actually need to have studied or have any scientific
knowledge at all.
And at the same time hypercapnia, i.e. too much carbon dioxide.
And he has more or less severe CO2 poisoning, so to speak.
And that causes various symptoms such as shortness of breath, panic attacks, headaches, dizziness,
any feelings of stepping out of the body, whatever.
These are all symptoms that we would not be able to verify with a physical examination anyway.
Nevertheless, we are all condemned because of certificates without a physical examination.
And the judges all say at the beginning of the trial, I've just had my trial, four days
of trial, it's not the subject of the trial whether the
masks are harmful or useful.
At the beginning of my 21st year, I was asked to voluntarily surrender my license to practice medicine
after my penalty notice, as there was a suspicion that I was unworthy and unreliable
in my personality and not suitable for the medical profession.
Of course I didn't do that.
Medical professional code of conduct.
Doctors practise their profession according to their conscience, ethical principles, medical
ethics and to the best
of their knowledge and belief.
They may not recognize any principles or observe any regulations or instructions that
are incompatible with this task or for which they cannot be held responsible.
I will not use my medical skills to violate human rights
and civil liberties.
We were joined by another lawyer, also from the Lawyers for Enlightenment.
One from the front.
Edgar Simon,
welcome.
Thank you.
My dear people, thank you so much for applauding me before I've even said anything.
But I'll say a little something now.
I would like to give you a brief background to when it all started.
My topic today is children, which I would like to talk about here in five minutes,
although I could go on for hours.
Let me start by quoting something from an FDA symposium held on October 26, 2021.
Just to show you the unscrupulousness of the people who started all this, there was
a discussion about whether the vaccine should be given to children between
the ages of five and eleven.
And I am quoting Dr. Eric Rubin here.
This is the editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, which incidentally
also published the Pfizer studies.
He said the following at this symposium.
We will never know how safe this vaccine is unless we start administering it.
That is simply the way of things.
It goes on, my dear friends, and it gets completely unconscionable as I read on.
In this way, we have also learned of rare complications with other
vaccines such as the rotavirus vaccine.
And I think we should vote in favor of approval.
There is a contempt for humanity in these words that is second to none.
And people like that are behind what happened here.
And I can tell you something else.
I spend a lot of time in court protecting children whose parents, and sometimes the children
themselves, are affected by fines.
I will briefly mention a case that I have experienced myself.
I was there defending a 14-year-old teenager and his mother.
And the question was: should the young man wear a mask at school or not?
And the judge said, why?
That's what everyone else does, and it's completely safe.
I then said to the judge, a Bavarian judge in a district court,
I might add, dear Mr. Chairman, the masks don't work
and are also dangerous.
And now comes the sentence that brings this unscrupulousness into the German courts.
This judge literally said, how am I supposed to know if the masks are dangerous before
two children lie dead in front of me.
These are the words of a German judge from Bavaria, I would like to say.
I was deeply shocked, I was speechless,
I couldn't even file a motion for recusal because I was so morally devastated
that I didn't even know how to react.
But that is diametrically opposed to what this judge once swore.
Because there is one aspect here that these judges are now completely neglecting.
And that is their conscience.
You have to judge to the best of your knowledge and belief.
Not only according to what they know from the regulations, but also according to what their conscience tells them.
And when such a judge sits before me and says such a sentence, then I know that he either
no longer has a conscience or that he has been made to say
such things in some way.
What is happening here is unimaginable.
I am also a lawyer who defends soldiers.
And there is the wonderful duty to tolerate.
There is one aspect of this duty to tolerate that has not yet been considered by any court.
And that is the fact that there are two areas of responsibility for soldiers.
Let me turn to the soldiers, because they are also close to my heart.
One area of duty is the relationship between the soldier and his superior.
If he orders him to go get vaccinated, then it may be that the soldier has to go get vaccinated.
But does he also have to be vaccinated if he obeys the toleration obligation?
This is because the obligation to tolerate means that he has to undergo this vaccination
against his will, as the law states.
And now comes the doctor's duties.
If the soldier turns up in the medical area and says that I am fulfilling my duty to tolerate being vaccinated, then
the doctor is not actually allowed to vaccinate me.
This is because he knows that the obligation to tolerate is against the soldier's will.
Otherwise it would be voluntary.
And that is a contradiction that no court has yet addressed.
And that's simply because they slavishly follow the rules.
They simply obey what the law says.
In my opinion, they no longer have a conscience.
Because that is the only thing that saves us from completely perishing
as human beings in this state.
Because what kind of image of humanity is it when a soldier
stands there and says, I'm afraid for my life?
Not because I have to go into a hail of bullets, but because I am being injected with something that, even according to the Federal Constitutional Court, can cause irreversible damage.
This is because such a vaccination is irreversible.
However, I would now like to take this opportunity to ask all the lawyers who are here to take
the stage, those who unfortunately suffer daily setbacks in court, often do not
get a fair hearing and yet do not give up.
Maybe you would just like to come up.
They are real.
They are not fake lawyers,
they are real.
Incidentally, Tobias here is also a lawyer.
We would like to return the thanks to the people who came to Karlsruhe on December 10
in freezing temperatures, showed their faces and supported us in our work here.
A big thank you to all of you.
I'm just going to take the liberty of telling three short stories.
From an office worker who didn't want to be vaccinated, who was advised to go to a psychiatric
institution after all, who was asked to pack her things and disappear
into her home office.
All my colleagues stood by in silence.
Nobody objected.
I would like to remind you of those who still went to school.
A schoolgirl, 17 years old, has had two years of lessons in a Plexiglas box.
In the classroom.
She has lost all her social contacts and is currently rebuilding her life.
17 years old.
And then I always ask you to imagine a seven-year-old girl.
Seven years old .
This girl was wearing a mask.
Developed a rash under this mask, bloody, got a mask certificate. And the teacher didn't recognize it.
The child was sent home.
And classmates of the same age followed her home and shouted after her, murderess.
If that's not incredible. I published this story on Twitter.
And what exhausted and touched me even more were the comments.
None of that would be true. Stories from the Paulaner Garten.
I can assure you as a lawyer that this is true.
At this point, I would like us to pause for a minute and remember the people who are
still suffering from the consequences of these policies and measures.
Dear friends, dear colleagues, hello Karlsruhe!
Many of you are here for the fourth time today.
That's a good thing.
There have already been three of these protest events organized by the Lawyers for
Clarification in front of the Federal Constitutional Court in December 20, on 17 June 21 and in
March 22. Your participation today shows those responsible for the corona measures of the last three and a
half years that we will not give up, that we will not let up, that we will not stop naming
and clarifying state injustice, but also the miscarriages of justice day after day.
And that's why it's a good thing, it's important that we are many today and that we demand exactly that.
On December 19, 2020, we were about 50 lawyers and maybe 150 or 200 participants.
Two years later, there were already 2000. And today there are many of them.
And that's a good thing.
Thank you to all of you who have come here today from near and far.
Thank you, Karlsruhe!
Dear friends, we must not simply cover the injustice of the last three and a half years with
a cloak of silence or a cloak of oblivion.
That's what they would like, these forgetful Scholz politicians, these sovereigns of
the illegal Conference of Minister Presidents.
Illegal because not provided for in the Basic Law.
It remains pathetic what politics has to offer us these days.
And anyone who believed that the judiciary would have intervened to correct the situation in accordance with
the principle of the separation of powers was soon bitterly disappointed and quickly proved wrong.
It is not without reason, dear friends, that in December 2020 and in the years since,
we have repeatedly called for the President of the Federal Constitutional Court,
Stephan Harbarth, to take his hat off and resign.
In 2020 alone, the highest German court in Karlsruhe received 239 constitutional complaints and a further
72 isolated urgent applications against the German government's coronavirus measures.
The judges in Karlsruhe granted exactly three applications this year.
What a devastating, what a devastating quota.
Trust in the judiciary, especially in the Federal Constitutional Court, has
never before been shaken in this way.
It was particularly bad on February 10, 2022, when the Federal Constitutional Court, the first senate, rejected
an urgent application to temporarily suspend compulsory vaccination in the healthcare system.
Two months later, the next breach of the law by the Federal Constitutional Court: the extension of compulsory
vaccination for healthcare professionals.
In any case, the Federal Constitutional Court has destroyed countless professional livelihoods
in the German healthcare sector, caused
countless existential worries, driven
people into despair, driven countless
people into vaccination, some of them fatal, and even caused
a health emergency in Germany.
That is illegal in Germany, Mr. Harbarth!
The time for historical reappraisal will come.
In Germany, critical doctors are still being charged and sentenced to long prison terms today simply
because they protect their patients by issuing mask exemption certificates for free breathing with
reference to their medical, Hippocratic oath.
This wave of criminalization against critical doctors must stop!
I therefore call for all criminal and fine proceedings to be dropped, including for Germany.
The years 2020 to 2023 must never be repeated in Germany.
Never again! Let's fight back against the beginnings and continuations!
This is what we stand for today in Karlsruhe.
That's the way it is in this order-loving country.
I am now delighted that Chris Moser will once again be giving us an insight into the German constitutional state.
Hello Chris.
We have learned a lot over the past few years.
We learned what fear does to people.
We learned how fear can turn people against each other and
make them irreconcilable.
We learned how a policy of fear was directed against our own people.
And we learned how fear even cast a spell over the judiciary.
The victims of this politics of fear were not only those who criticized the government and
were insulted by it, abused by the police and criminalized by the judiciary, but above
all those people who, in the face of fear, surrendered their
will to assert themselves.
We stood up with the truth, not with
our truth against the truth of others, but with an army
of scientists from all over the world against a handful of experts whose opinions
were not allowed to be questioned.
But we learned that the truth is useless if it does not come into its own.
Thousands and thousands of citizens ran up against the walls erected
by the politics of fear of the law.
The courts remained deaf to the fundamental rights of all.
But we must stand firm, because without unity there is no justice, without justice there is no
freedom and without freedom there is no life.
That is why those who abrogate fundamental rights must be held accountable.
Now some of you will say, that's no good, it will be discontinued.
Maybe.
But constant dripping wears away the stone.
Any decision to discontinue a case must be made by a public prosecutor.
And every decision to discontinue such proceedings weighs on the conscience
of this public prosecutor.
Even if he is not aware of it.
We will continue to fight
and bear witness to history that the law is still alive.
The right lives as long as a bearer of the right is still alive.
We are all the bearers of the law of this land.
And we will not rest until this right is restored.
The law lives within us.
If only we remain steadfast, then the law will one day live around us again.
Thank you.
Lawyers have a very important role because they can reach the hearts of judges in the
courtroom with love, dedication and wisdom.
That is our task, to reach the hearts of the judges.
That is our task.
The only way to convince people is through love for them.
If we only submit documents, we will not succeed.
We must reach the hearts that are hardened in the judges.
And we can only do this by constantly lecturing.
And that we naturally use the procedural rules to enter into dialog
and demand dialog with the judges.
That is our task.
And that is what we stand for.
Dialogue is not possible for us in the public media.
We will not be heard there.
The courtroom is the only place to enter into dialog during this time.
That's why they bar the doors, like in Mannheim, for example:
That they photocopy and scan the ID cards in order to create obstacles for the public to find out.
The cell phones are removed.
Everything is done to ensure that the courtroom does not become a tribunal.
But it will become a tribunal if we stand firm there.
And if we are attacked, if the doctors are attacked, the soldiers, the people
who have received mask certificates, then we are in a very good position,
because we have to go to court and the prosecutors and judges
have to hear the case.
And we can all spread out our arguments, even if they don't want to take note.
They fight it tooth and nail.
But we stand up to it.
We have endured this system for four years, four years!
Unfortunately, we have not succeeded in creating institutes that
have achieved nothing at all, such as the Robert Koch Institute
and the Paul Ehrlich Institute.
They do not provide any data.
That's what we have to do.
We have to create these institutions as citizens.
We have to collect donations for this.
And that is what the future will bring:
The fact that we have independent institutes that carry out rat experiments, for example, that can uncover all this, that support pathology.
That is my wish for you.
Support these people who are working scientifically, who are taking us forward, so that
we also have evidence in court proceedings.
Thank you for being there in Karlsruhe in such large numbers.
We will win.
The truth always wins!
Of all the lawyers, the last three years have been extremely stressful, frustrating and annoying.
And now we hear a lawyer who only
really starts when everyone is frustrated.
When everyone thinks it can't go on any longer, along comes a woman with incredible expertise as a specialist lawyer for medical
law, bestselling author, an incredible amount of energy, energetic, clear and, above all, always human.
And above all, she is always people-oriented and incredibly committed to all her mandates.
A hearty round of applause for Beate Bahner.
We have gathered here in Karlsruhe in the so-called residence of law.
And I gave my speech the title "Where right becomes wrong, resistance becomes duty".
When does right become wrong?
When do we citizens
have to resist in order to restore the rule of law?
As the Basic Law itself requires us to do in Article 20 paragraph 4.
Law becomes injustice when a law, a regulation or a court ruling either
fundamentally violates general principles of justice or deeply
offends human dignity.
That should not actually happen in a constitutional state.
This is because both the legislature and the executive are bound by law and order.
At the very least, the courts must then establish such injustice and
draw the appropriate consequences.
How painfully we citizens and lawyers have missed such clear and uncompromising
case law since the coronavirus was declared.
A jurisprudence that declares the law to be unjust, especially when it
profoundly violates human rights, in particular human dignity.
After all, one of the other fundamental principles of law is respect for human dignity.
Human dignity is inviolable.
This ethical and legal principle is timeless as a basic principle.
Human dignity is a central value of the German constitution and, due to the eternity
clause of the Basic Law, Article 79 (3) of the Basic Law, absolutely inviolable forever!
Respect for human dignity prohibits the state from turning people
into mere objects of state action.
But when does the state treat people as mere objects?
If he denies them their own thoughts, self-determined actions and free decisions, for
example, if he no longer allows them to inform themselves freely
from generally accessible sources.
Conversely, if the state does not inform its citizens, or does not inform them comprehensively or even incorrectly,
and citizens therefore make a wrong decision that has a serious impact on their lives and livelihoods.
Or when the state even forces its citizens to tolerate medical treatments
that are neither effective nor safe.
Then the state denies people their value and dignity.
Because then the state deliberately prevents people from making their
essential life decisions on the basis of their own considerations and their own intellect.
In doing so, the state is not only violating people's right to self-determination as one of
the essential manifestations of human dignity.
It also violates the trust that citizens place in the state.
That the state protects him and does not itself violate his basic rights.
If the state violates or even abuses this trust, then justice becomes injustice.
This injustice is then also not binding, not effective, not valid.
Even if it has been used and followed for years, as with Corona.
After all, every constitutional state is fundamentally based on the principle of mutual trust
in addition to the legal principle of justice.
On the one hand, the state must be able to trust in the honesty and integrity of its citizens.
On the other hand, citizens must also be able to trust unconditionally that the state
will act honestly and protect its citizens from human rights violations.
And that there is no deception or untruth in a statement or action of the state,
so that the citizen can act accordingly without any harm.
This means that government action must be based on accurate facts and scientifically
sound information and not on dubious and one-sided speculation, projections,
estimates and modeling to the detriment of citizens.
Trust is therefore both the basis and the essential permanent glue
for all relationships of any kind.
Trust is therefore far more than just a private pleasure or a private risk.
And also far more than a psychological or sociological phenomenon.
Trust is an absolutely essential and constitutive prerequisite for a peaceful society
and a functioning constitutional state.
If the state abuses the trust of its citizens and justifies its measures with
misleading or even deliberately false assumptions, then justice becomes injustice.
And now a few examples that have turned right into wrong for me.
It becomes wrong when the state suddenly forces millions of children, young people and certain occupational groups
to be vaccinated against measles, even though, according to the RKI, there are around 10 cases of measles every year, meaning
that this typical childhood disease has been eradicated and, incidentally, is never
fatal and almost never severe.
It becomes wrong when the state declares a cold virus to be a killer virus and takes
draconian measures, although the RKI itself confirms from the outset that 99% of people
suffering from corona have cold symptoms.
Right becomes wrong when the state declares millions of people to be a potential mortal
danger simply because they are human or have contact with other people, and simply
quarantines them for several weeks.
Right becomes wrong when the state, based on the claim of a pandemic state
of emergency, exempts vaccine manufacturers from all safety measures under pharmaceutical law and
completely conceals this from citizens.
Right becomes wrong when the state obliges millions of people to be vaccinated with
Covid vaccines whose approval has been fraudulently obtained and whose
safety has never been tested.
All such actions, measures and assertions turn justice into injustice, and the politicians,
MPs and judges responsible for this have turned our constitutional
state into a state of injustice.
To make amends for this grave injustice committed by the state and
this unprecedented abuse of trust, I make the following demands.
I call for a relentless investigation into the legality and impact of the coronavirus measures
by independent committees of inquiry and an account of the pandemic
costs of 440 billion euros.
I call for relentless sanctions in every case of lies, fraud and corruption surrounding the coronavirus
measures and vaccinations, and for the establishment of independent public prosecutors in advance.
I call for the abolition of all institutions that have not prevented and possibly
even contributed to the deception and misleading of citizens.
These are in particular: the Robert Koch Institute, the STIKO and the Paul Ehrlich Institute
as well as the EMA as the European regulatory authority for Covid vaccines.
I am calling for the Federal Constitutional Court's decision on the facility-based vaccination obligation
and the Federal Administrative Court's decision on the obligation for soldiers to tolerate the Covid
vaccination to be overturned.
And I call for an immediate end to Covid vaccinations in the Bundeswehr.
I demand the annulment of all criminal convictions and fines related to corona and appropriate
compensation for all those affected, as well as the annulment of all other onerous corona measures,
such as disciplinary measures and similar, against the persecuted teachers, police
officers, pastors, soldiers and doctors.
I call for a complete reversal of the burden of proof for
all Covid vaccine damage at the expense of the vaccine
manufacturers, since their vaccines are still guaranteed to be safe and effective,
i.e. the manufacturers must prove that damage to health is not due to the vaccination
and not the other way around.
I am calling for all EU contracts with vaccine manufacturers on Covid vaccines to be declared null
and void because these multi-billion euro contracts massively violate
fundamental legal principles.
And I call on the vaccine manufacturers to set up a compensation fund of at least 60 billion euros
for the hundreds of thousands of people who have suffered vaccination injuries, some of them extremely
serious, as a result of the numerous breaches of pharmaceutical law by manufacturers.
I am also calling for all this in order to prevent such injustice once and for all in the future.
Corona was by no means a one-off exceptional situation.
Quite the opposite.
Corona was just the beginning of an unscrupulous misuse of the term pandemic
and a hypocritical protection of health by the state and the WHO.
The WHO is already planning to adopt two very far-reaching
legal projects in Geneva next May 2024.
The outrageous dictatorial pandemic treaty on the one hand and the totalitarian tightening of existing international health regulations on the other.
Based on the WHO's unscrupulous claims of pandemics, international law is thus not only becoming
international injustice, but, to my great concern, even international
pandemic terror.
Unless, of course, we citizens of all nations put up determined
resistance to this in the coming months.
I am currently writing a book on this topic myself.
This book will also be helpful for our joint resistance at the beginning of next year.
I conclude my speech in memory of a great man who was also a lawyer when he was young and who
went on to become a formidable role model of the twentieth century
because of his decades of peaceful but relentless resistance.
Mahatma Gandhi said: "Every single person, every single voice in a society is important.
No one is superfluous
or unimportant.
We all form a sound together.
Yes, we all form a sound together.
It is our common sound of truth and honesty and
thus our common great sound of justice and freedom.
Thank you all for that.
Thank you very much, Beate Bahner.
Dear friends, we now ask you all to pause for a moment at this important
historical moment and to join in.
We will now sing the German national anthem and ask you all to join in
before the real historic moment.
And that is why we ask you.
Unity and justice and freedom for the German fatherland!
Let us all
strive for this, fraternally, with heart and hand!
Unity and justice and freedom are the pledge of happiness:
Bloom in the splendor of this
happiness, bloom, German fatherland!
Bloom in the splendor of this happiness,
bloom, German fatherland.
Blossom, German fatherland!
We have just heard it, unity and justice and freedom and not disunity
and injustice and lack of freedom.
It has now been a year in which the movement has sorted itself out, in which many initiatives have
also worked against each other to a certain extent.
I think many people have now understood that we can only work together
and that's why I think it's so great to see so many different initiatives
here today.
Yes, the big challenge in 2024 will be to network again, to network further,
to unite and also to make the demonstrations more centralized
rather than decentralized.
I myself have always said that it has to grow from the bottom up.
I've seen it grow from the bottom up and I
think that's great.
And a big thank you to GERMANY STANDS UP,
who have now taken over the demo organization and are doing a very professional and great job.
As you know, my big topic is 'digital freedom'.
We are experiencing censorship that is really getting worse.
We have this problem of bank accounts being blocked by organizations.
This means that we also have to break new ground in
this area and this topic of 'digital freedom'
is the core issue for me in 2024.
Of course the support from ZAAVV, but also the support from the demonstrations.
And I would like you to be mentally prepared for that too.
We will have to change, including digitally.
This means we may have to say goodbye to Telegram
and choose secure platforms.
We will have to say goodbye to Google and Apple, we can wave goodbye to them
and say you can no longer monitor us.
Well, we lawyers have checked that.
There were several lawyers, there were public prosecutors, there
were judges, there were lawyers.
And today we are filing a criminal complaint for crimes against humanity.
Today is just the beginning.
Because a crime against humanity is committed by anyone who kills
a person in a systematic or widespread
attack on a civilian population; one (!) is enough.
People keep saying that, even the media interviewed me earlier and said, yes, but there are only so few people affected.
Anyone who kills a person in a systematic or widespread attack on a civilian population and
a law is of course systematic and that
it is an attack, the Federal Constitutional Court itself has said.
The Federal Constitutional Court has said that this facility-based compulsory
vaccination is a targeted, indirect encroachment on physical integrity.
Together with the Federal Administrative Court, they then said that it
was not an attack on the right to life because: The intention was not to kill people.
My good friend and lawyer, my colleague Claudio Zanetti, said: "Ralf, I'm coming from Zurich
to Karlsruhe by car and my aim is to drive to Karlsruhe, which means I'm not polluting
the environment, because that's not what I intend to do.
And it was precisely this argument that was put forward by the Federal Administrative
Court and the Federal Constitutional Court.
So it is a targeted, widespread attack, a systematic and widespread attack,
because many, many hundreds of thousands of people were affected, which is why it
was also a widespread attack on a civilian population.
And the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the Robert Koch Institute have confirmed
that people have died from it.
The Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, and we assume that the numbers are far too low, but the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut
has assumed 127 people who have consistently died as a result of vaccination according
to WHO rules on March 31, 2023.
127 people are 127 people too
many, because a state must not kill innocent
people and a state must not do a duty where it knows that in the end
even a single person may be seriously injured or die.
These are the words of the International Criminal Code and
that is precisely why we are filing this criminal complaint.
And if the Attorney General does not investigate here - Article 17 of the international Rome Statute
says that the prerequisite for us to be able to go to The Hague is that we first file
a criminal complaint in the member state, in this case Germany.
And if the Attorney General does not investigate because he is unwilling or unable,
then the whole thing goes to The Hague with support, with international support.
Colleagues from other countries will do the same in their own countries.
Mr. Michael Brunner said that.
Vaccination was compulsory in Austria.
Although it was not implemented, it was made into law.
And even the attempt to commit a crime, dear Michael, is punishable.
And Michael has said that he will support us, ZAAVV.
And he will also file such criminal charges in Austria.
The same will happen in Italy.
The same will happen in France.
Wherever people have been forced to be vaccinated, we will file criminal charges.
And I'm going to click on the 'Send message' button here.
And when I click on 'Send message' and it has been handed over, then
it is with the Attorney General.
And Olli just said we've printed 1,000 postcards.
All postcards have arrived in the mailboxes again.
You will also hand over 1,000 criminal complaints.
Thank you for your participation and for showing the Attorney General that the
public is also behind this.
We want clarification.
We want to ensure that the injustice of the last three years does not simply remain
undone and that, above all, those responsible are truly held to account.
Thank you all for being here today.
And now I click on 'Send message'.
Many thanks to the outside world.
Thank
you, Germany, for taking part.
We want to take a very sober approach.
We are lawyers.
We follow the rules of law and justice.
And those who break the law will realize that the population has a very, very good
sense of what is right and what is wrong.
And a population, as I think Beate said earlier, a government that treats its
population in this way loses trust.
And the most important thing in a state in which we live together as human beings is trust.
And we will
regain this trust.
Thank you all so much for being there.
Members of the Bundestag from various parties voted against it.
Only one person from the Left Party, Ms.
Sarah Wagenknecht.
Two people from the FDP.
From the CDU, I think you will tell me yourself, five people from the CDU.
And not a single one from the Greens.
And I now hand over to my dear friend Clarsen Ratz.
And Clarsen will now pay tribute to the members of the Bundestag who had the
courage to vote against it at the time.
Dear fellow campaigners,
dear friends, it's wonderful to stand up here and see you all.
You are the ones who helped to prevent this general vaccination
requirement, even if we were unable to prevent the facility-based vaccination requirement at the time.
Thank you for being on the road.
And thank you for being here again today.
Even if, as I have already said, we were unfortunately unable to avert the
mandatory vaccination in individual institutions.
But the fact that we were able to prevent this general vaccination requirement is our joint achievement.
That is the success of all of us.
With your help on the streets at the demonstrations and with our resistance
in parliament, we have achieved this.
I am full of confidence that we will soon be entering a new era.
And you are the ones who will shape it.
Because you are strong and courageous.
A time when the focus is no longer on egoism and materialism,
but on living our old values again.
A time in which we are deeply rooted in our homeland and in which empathy
and humanity will replace today's coldness.
Do you believe that your interests are represented by honest,
decent, reliable, intelligent, competent, public-spirited
MPs who are independent of the
established parties and organized crime?
Well, if not, I would like to take this opportunity to refer to Article 20 of the Basic Law, which states that in Germany the people are the sovereign.
This means that if something is wrong in Germany, we as citizens bear the
responsibility and not those at the top.
We have now made a start with these criminal charges.
Now the whole thing is turning.
We will hold the people who did this to account.
And I think it was Hubert Aiwanger who said it: We're taking back our democracy!
Thank you so much for being there.
663