What do you, dear viewers, know about weather manipulation?
Is this topic also controversial in your environment and often dismissed as a conspiracy theory?
The following presentation by a doctor of natural sciences at the 2022 Summer WEFF in Davos is very informative in this regard.
Philipp Zeller studied physics at ETH Zurich and holds a doctorate in natural sciences.
As a recreational pilot, Zeller has been studying the weather in detail for over three decades.
As time went on, he noticed more and more anomalies in the sky.
He began to carry out his own investigations and research.
In particular on the topics of SRM (Solar Radiation Management), SAI (Stratospheric Aerosol Injection) and
HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project).
A former university lecturer, Zeller worked in the field of patenting for a long time.
That's why he knows this area very well.
Through his research, he has found around 1,000 patents for weather manipulation technologies - dating back to 1892.
The following presentation is not intended to stir up fear.
The manipulation of the weather happens with or without our knowledge.
Rather, the fact-oriented uncovering of facts is intended to counteract the denial of
these events and provide fact-based arguments.
Therefore, spread this video to ignorant but truth-seeking people.
The following is Dr. Philipp Zeller's presentation at the 2022 Summer WEFF in Davos
So, what's the deal with geoengineering and health?
As I said, I would like to give a non-exhaustive overview of a few government documents and laws, about patents.
You don't just apply for patents for fun, they cost a lot of money.
And you also have to prove that they work, otherwise they will not be granted and published research papers, not by myself,
because, as I said, it should also show the focus of health.
As I said, it's just an overview, I'm researching almost constantly.
I don't claim to be giving a scientific lecture here, in the sense of a scientific conference, in terms of
structure and so on, but as I said, it is an overview.
And of course I can also be wrong, I can make mistakes or I can also quote something that is perhaps on
shaky ground, I would just like to say that up front.
So what is geoengineering anyway?
Ms. Weichelt mentioned chemtrails earlier. I try not to mention this term, because the term chemtrail always immediately puts you
in the corner of conspiracy theorists, even though the term itself was coined by the US Air
Force in the 1970s. That's the funny thing about it.
Geoengineering is certainly the more neutral term and geoengineering mainly involves weather manipulation, which is
actually the most important thing, by releasing particles into the atmosphere, but also by emitting
electromagnetic waves into the atmosphere at high power.
Then, of course, earth probing, it's all about changing, engineering the earth, geo, the earth.
In other words, they are probing for cavities, oil deposits, gas, etc.
And you can actually, I almost didn't want to believe it at first, you can actually artificially trigger earthquakes with
these activities. And finally, you can also manipulate the Earth's magnetic field, especially
with these aforementioned electromagnetic rays.
Why is geoengineering being done at all?
That actually goes back to the whole Cold War, which began directly after the Second World War.
It actually started earlier, at least with efforts to influence the weather. But large-scale
geoengineering actually began after the Second World War.
And I would like to quote former US President Lyndon B. Johnson here. He said at a conference in 1962,
literally: "He who controls the weather controls the world."
And these are the aspirations of these superpowers, above all the USA.
Incidentally, this speech is available on YouTube, you can find it and listen to it in its original wording.
In the past - the funny thing is, it is always denied that geoengineering is done at all -
but in the past there were many such projects.
I would like to mention a few very prominent people who are also publicly acknowledged today.
The Cumulus project, which led to a major flood disaster in the United Kingdom in 1952, when clouds were inoculated
in order to produce them artificially and make them rain.
There was a very dramatic flood disaster, 34 people died and many houses were swept away.
Of course, there are even worse disasters, but the connection was very obvious.
Of course, it was hushed up for many years until it really came to light.
Then there was the Stormfury project, from 1962 to 1971, where attempts were made to influence hurricanes
with so-called seeding, i.e. by spreading particles.
This is done much more professionally today than it was back then.
At that time, it was just a project, still being researched.
And then, probably most people are aware of Project Popeye, where large amounts of rainfall were deliberately
provoked during the Vietnam War in order to muddy and prevent the Viet Cong's supply routes.
And finally, I would also like to remind you that there have been over 2,000 nuclear bomb tests. So why is it necessary
to test such a devastating and polluting bomb so and so often?
I mean, if you want to build it, and I'm already putting a question mark behind it anyway, then two or
three tests are enough, then you know how it works.
And all this radioactivity can still be detected today, in the water, in the soil and in the atmosphere.
There are dozens, if not hundreds, of official documents, some of which have always been publicly accessible, some of
which were later declassified, especially in the USA, so you can really spend hours researching and downloading them.
I would just like to show one of them briefly here, which is a weather modification proposal before the US Congress.
It is a very comprehensive document with almost 200 pages.
And it says in there - I translated it specially, it's from 1978 - and it says that in the past 30 years, from 1947 to 1978 - I'm
not talking about today, the past 30 years - 110 weather manipulation programs were
presented to the US Congress and also approved.
In 1978, Congress then initiated and funded a national, i.e. cross-national, research program.
The criticism at the time was that there was no national law in the USA that would have regulated all of this.
They had to make do and they wanted to do something about it.
And of course people were already afraid back then, because they had already done it - in Vietnam, for example - they were
naturally afraid that the enemy could do the same, or that they would suddenly be accused somehow as a nation if there
was a storm somewhere or a drought, that it could then be said:
"That was an attack", and of course they wanted to prevent that. That's why it had to be regulated by law.
And as a result, in 1978 - i.e. initiated as early as 1976 - and in 1978 a legislative resolution was introduced in New York.
The UN was behind this, i.e. the UN treaty banning the use of weather manipulation in
warfare or any environmentally damaging technology.
And this law has also been ratified by Switzerland, so many, many countries around the world have ratified this law.
Switzerland 1988, that is, this has now been passed into federal law, which you can look up in
the Federal Collection of Laws, number 515.06.
This law actually sounds good, and as I said, the USA introduced it between 1976 and 1978
out of fear that its enemies might do the same.
Such a law does not mean that you have to abide by it.
It sounds very good, the first two main articles also sound very good, it's really about the fact that this is forbidden.
But then there is the third article of this law, and this third article states first of all that
use for peaceful purposes is of course permitted.
However, it is not defined what peaceful purposes are.
And then there is a second sub-article in this Article 3, and it says that the contracting states even
undertake to support this: to engage in knowledge exchange, to participate financially in it.
They do not have to actively participate, but they must support it and make a contribution.
And then there is the icing on the cake, because there is a so-called agreement on this Article 3, and it says that it does
not deal with the question of whether or not such an environmentally modifying technology
violates the applicable provisions of international law.
It reminds me a bit of a law that is to be introduced to combat the pandemic.
You may know this too, but we Swiss ratified this back in 1988.
That is actually frightening.
I will now go back to the USA and show you another document that was published, which was a proposal to
the U.S. Air Force for the outlook for the year 2025.
The document itself is from 1996, and the title of this document is: "Weather as a Force Multiplier".
And the subtitle is: "We own the weather until 2025".
A short excerpt from this document: on the left-hand side, so to speak, how to harm the enemy, and on the
right-hand side, how to support yourself and your partners.
Just a few keywords: damaging the enemy with rain, with tidal waves, which are also supposed to worsen the
morale of the soldiers - on the other side, so to speak.
But you can also provoke a drought, a water shortage, until people are so badly off that they surrender.
You can provoke storms, you can manipulate the ionosphere - I'll come back to this later - in such a way that the enemy
can no longer establish radio communications, or with radars you can virtually no longer see your own aircraft.
You can either let fog and clouds dissipate so that the enemy cannot hide, or you can form them to surprise the enemy.
And you can also recognize whether or not the enemy itself is using such techniques.
And our own practices are virtually the exact opposite.
Yes, so if you have a large transport yourself, you make sure that there is no rain, that the roads are dry, storms as
required, also optimize the ionosphere if you need radar signals yourself and need good radio connections, and so on.
In this document - it is still the same document - it still says, as a summary, that once the conditions are in place, we must also
be able to spread coal dust - this document clearly states coal dust, and fine coal dust at that - in the desired
region, i.e. in the hostile region, in a controllable, safe, cost-effective and reliable manner.
It evaluates methods and states that countless spraying techniques have already been studied. The document is from 1996.
The safest and cheapest method is a type of afterburner for jet engines, i.e. a spray device fitted behind the
engine to inject this carbon dust into the exhaust jet.
And while the aircraft is flying through this area, it is activated or can be deactivated again.
Why coal dust? That's exciting. There is another document that was published under the
Freedom of Information Act, FOIA, i.e. later.
This used to be a confidential, secret document.
This comes from the Philips laboratory of the head department for geophysics.
They have of course always advised the American government and also the military, etc.
It says how you can increase the rain, decrease the rain, increase cirrus clouds, so to speak, these veil clouds
that we now have all the time - they are simply not natural, but we have them - or how you can dispel fog.
And the whole thing - this is basically just chapter four, I've just pulled it out - with black carbon, weather
modification with black carbon is clearly stated there.
I'll skip that. There are many, many such documents.
It is frightening what kind of weapons are being researched and tested.
I would like to briefly quote a book, a very exciting book. I found it in the original - antiquarian.
This book is called "Unless Peace Comes", which is of course to be hoped for.
This was edited by a Nigel Calder in 1968, so it's been a few years in the making.
And this Nigel Calder was a very influential and renowned science journalist.
And he has asked leading military advisers and top scientists to each contribute a chapter to this book about their work, how
they advise the government and what research they are conducting.
And the craziest or most exciting chapter in this book - there are 17 chapters - is
called "How we are destroying the environment".
That is the title of the chapter and this chapter was written by a Professor Gordon MacDonald, who is no longer
alive, who was the head of geophysics and planetary physics at the University of California in Los Angeles.
And he was a member of President Lyndon Johnson's advisory staff, whom I have already quoted.
Excerpt from this chapter, the chapter is frightening to read and he writes what was just done in 1968 in current research.
You can create cold clouds by forming ice crystals, you can create warm clouds by artificially
enlarging the existing droplets with particles.
You can create dry clouds that don't rain, as we've had a lot of these days. You can deliberately increase the
size of clouds around a thunderstorm in order to change, strengthen or weaken the storm.
You can drop metal foils or metal particles - in his day they were still metal foils - to generate more lightning.
In other words, lightning, which then also occurs without it actually raining, without it thundering.
We also know this well enough.
You can create hurricanes, you can prevent water surfaces from evaporating with polymer layers so that
there are no clouds, even if the temperature rises.
More water would actually evaporate.
You can change the global climate, and he writes that it does so naturally, and so you can hide these activities well.
No one will know if it is natural or if someone is behind it.
That's not all, I have a second page.
You can create ozone holes.
1968, just to do the math.
There's a great trick for carrying out a nuclear detonation, an underground nuclear
detonation test under the Antarctic ice sheet.
The Antarctic ice sheet is around 100 kilometers thick, which is an incredible amount of ice.
Then a film of water is produced by the heat under this layer of ice and a large part of this
ice will slide into the sea as if on a slide.
This could provoke a global ice age.
This is relatively simple. You can blow up coastal strips and then trigger a tsunami.
I don't know who knew what a tsunami was in 1968.
I've only known about it since 2006, I have to admit, although I studied physics before that.
But I was not aware of tsunamis. You can generate earthquakes by activating the water layer,
which is about 10 kilometers deep underground.
This is very close to the so-called triple point. I don't want to go into the states of aggregation
of water in detail now, purely for reasons of time.
Close to the triple point means where the water is most dense, where it can go into transition relatively
quickly, into supercooled water or vapor form, etc.
When you hear that an earthquake had its epicenter at a depth of 10 kilometers, you should always be alert.
What is exciting is that all the major disasters, such as Fukushima, where the epicenter was 10 kilometers deep.
I can't prove anything, but it's an interesting coincidence.
You can redirect the jet stream.
I'll show that briefly later. For those who don't know what the jet stream is: these are high winds
about 10 kilometers high that go around the whole world.
You can trigger tornadoes. I think I already mentioned that on the previous page.
And then the quintessence of this book chapter by Professor MacDonald is that you can
recognize and exploit instabilities of the earth.
In other words, where something is always on the edge, you only have to put a little energy into it
to be able to steer it in one direction or another.
And finally, he also talks about mind control. That electromagnetic waves can be
used to exert mind control over humanity.
I believe that this is also increasingly coming to the surface, that this has actually been intensively researched over decades.
There are also many patents for this.
It's frightening what has already been done.
Especially in the MK-ULTRA program, for example.
It is also used for good. This is measured via EEG - electroencephalograms.
You measure what brain waves there are in which state.
And then you can sort of play it back and get people into very special states.
I won't go into this in detail, again purely for reasons of time.
It's a huge barrel, I can't open it all up.
In 1999, the Council of Europe drew up a 35-page report. A special commission of the Council of Europe.
This is about the so-called HAARP project. With two A.
This is called the "High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program".
This is called High Frequency Active Aurora, a northern lights research program.
This takes place in Alaska. There are now stations like this almost all over the world.
Of course, these are all research stations "in quotation marks".
I'll come back to what it is later.
This is about manipulation systems for the ionosphere.
The ionosphere is a very high part of our atmosphere.
From about 80 kilometers and higher.
It is ionized because we constantly have electrical charges there that are ionized and then deflected by the solar wind.
Up there, a current is constantly flowing through this plasma.
It's electric up there and of course you can manipulate things particularly well there.
The Council of Europe or the Commission writes that it is part of electromagnetic weapons and represents a highly dangerous threat
to the entire environment and, of course, to human health, because the project aims to penetrate the
highly sensitive energetic area of the entire biosphere.
So not only in the ionosphere, but also down here.
It is an extremely dangerous activity.
There are now many such radio wave transmitting stations and they certainly have an impact on the health of us all.
I have just come to this HAARP project and the basic patent for it.
This was granted in 1987.
The title is: "Change of a region in the atmosphere, ionosphere or magnetosphere".
The magnetosphere is even higher up than the ionosphere.
The ionosphere is our magnetic protective belt, which is directly connected to the Earth's magnetic field and
is directed around the world in a kind of torus shape.
In this respect, as I said at the beginning, you can manipulate the earth's magnetic field.
The patent says you can heat plasma.
This pushes it up and then there is a vacuum where it has risen.
When I heat air and it rises, I have a negative pressure at the bottom.
This provokes a horizontal movement, i.e. wind.
I can then also use this electromagnetic radiation to confuse, deflect or even destroy a missile.
This is a weapon system. This is the war of the stars that was propagated by the USA in the 1990s.
The same patent also states that the ozone or nitrogen concentration can be changed.
You can change the carbon dioxide concentration. Carbon monoxide - even more dangerous.
Nitrogen oxides and other substances can be concentrated or diluted to manage environmental flows.
It also states that the earth's magnetic field can be reduced or even switched off.
The aim is of course to deflect missiles, but not only that.
And what's really crazy is that you can manipulate these plasmatic particles that are high up in the
atmosphere to form a lens, an optical lens, so that you can focus a beam of sunlight onto a point on the Earth.
Many of you may have already tried to light tinder with a magnifying glass.
I did a lot of that in my childhood. It can then be done on a grand scale.
Keyword forest fires or other fires or heat problems etc.
This is what this original antenna forest in Alaska looks like.
These are cross-diagonal antennas, i.e. typical radio antennas.
Frequencies from 30 kHz to 300 MHz can be generated with these antennas.
These are typical radio waves. What I explained before looks something like this.
The upper part of the atmosphere is pushed to the height of the ionosphere.
This creates a negative pressure. There is then a horizontal movement and corresponding wind movement.
If you convert these frequencies, which I mentioned earlier from HAARP, to the wavelength, if you look at the
Herz wave, then you get wavelengths between 10 m and 15 km.
A wave trough, a wave bulge, is half of this, i.e. 5 m to 7.5 km When you see cloud formations like this, you have to ask yourself
whether these are standing waves from a foehn valley, if you see this in the Central Plateau or even in southern
Germany, or whether there isn't another excitation behind it.
That's exactly what it looks like to me.
This is also from a research report from this HAARP research on how radio waves can also be reflected at the ionosphere.
Because it is electrically conductive, it can be used as a mirror and can provide much
better radar surveillance and radio communication.
Here is also an excerpt from a research paper.
Here you can see that there are different conductive layers.
Naturally, you only have the ionosphere to guide you.
There are still conductive layers down here. How do you achieve this?
By spreading conductive particles further down in the atmosphere.
They are very helpful in achieving certain effects with these HAARP waves.
Now I come across exactly these particles that are used there.
I'm bringing you another patent here. It's a very old patent that was granted in 1966.
And to the US Navy, not to a private company, but to the state.
I would like to mention that at that time, according to American patent law, a patent
could be maintained for a maximum of 17 years.
But that costs a lot. The older a patent gets, the more you have to pay to keep it protected.
So it was paid for the whole 17 years.
This patent, even though it is so old, I find it so relevant. It stands as an example for dozens, if not hundreds of
patents, a metallic mixture for producing hygroscopic smoke.
In other words, smoke that attracts water, attracts water vapor.
And since it says you need a metallic mixture, and it contains the following, please hold on tight:
Lithium, sodium, potassium, caesium, rubidium, calcium, magnesium, strontium and barium carbonates and also mixtures of these.
In addition, light metals such as aluminum, magnesium, zinc or zirconium or mixtures thereof.
Also an inorganic oxidizing agent such as nitrates, perchlorates, sodium, lithium, potassium, calcium, barium and strontium.
And then, in addition, a polyhalogen compound, which I will come to later, such as hexachloroetane or octachloropropane was
patented, granted and maintained for 17 years by the US Navy.
Another such patent that says you can deploy stratospheric Welsbach particles to reduce global warming.
They were already on the climate change bandwagon back then, in 1991.
Welsbach was a researcher, hence the Welsbach particle.
This is one of the people who came up with the idea.
I'm only showing this because it says here that aluminum oxide or thorium oxide is best suited.
So aluminum has already been mentioned as one of the most common pollutants in the atmosphere today.
There are many patents, including one that says that sand-like particles can be brought into the upper atmosphere.
It is relatively easy to convert a Boeing 737 to carry 25 tons of cargo to an altitude of 18,000 meters.
This patent was granted in 2018. It also states that the particles remain this high up in the atmosphere for around two years.
I'll show you another one, I hope it's not too boring. This is a patent from the company GelTech Solutions.
There are countless YouTube videos about this. They're called "chasing hurricanes".
They filmed from airplanes how they either strengthened or weakened hurricanes.
They have invented something really great, a polymer, i.e. a plastic compound. It is sprayed into a cloud,
the cloud dries out and then a gel falls from the sky.
This can also prevent rain.
And then back to the health aspect. Another relatively new patent was granted in 2015 to some law firm.
This is usually a sign that the inventors or the real owners want to remain unknown.
It says here that this is a flying application system for toxic mosquitoes using drones, i.e. unmanned aircraft.
If you look at the patent figures, you might not be able to see them so well here, I've zoomed in especially.
I didn't put that in, that's the patent figure there with the skull in the drone's cargo.
You hear and read more and more in the mainstream media about what is really being done.
But they always say it's not being done, we should, we should, it's urgently needed because of climate change.
That's an even bigger scam than Corona, but I can't open that barrel either due to time constraints.
In any case, there is a very interesting book by Professor David Keith. I don't recommend buying it, but if
anyone is interested, I can provide excerpts from it.
I have it, "A Case for Climate Engineering", so we have to do climate engineering.
In my eyes, he is currently the research leader for geoengineering, who of course always says it is not being done.
We know exactly how to do it, but it's not being done. They're all conspiracy theorists, he claims.
He describes in detail that he wants to bring together microparticles of 5 nanometers of aluminum oxide, 30 nanometers
of metallic, i.e. pure aluminum and then 15 nanometers of barium titanate, like a sandwich, because they
would optimally reflect the sunlight back into space.
Then there is another book, which you may have already heard of, How we can prevent climate catastrophe by a
certain Bill Gates. I certainly don't recommend buying it.
It simply says that this is a super worthwhile investment.
I won't say any more about that. I will now turn to the effects on health, because that is the central issue.
So, fly ash. I had previously shown documents that talked about coal dust.
Fly ash as a risk factor for lung cancer.
This is a review article, i.e. an article that summarizes many research papers.
It appeared in the "Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research".
It has been proven that aluminum silicates, iron oxide, magnetite, radionuclides, i.e. radioactive nuclides, even alpha
emitters, which are the most dangerous if you inhale them, silicon, pure silicon is not healthy, arsenic, also known as
poison, cadmium and chromium are present, so that they can clearly cause increased lung cancer or increased
oxidative cell stress, cytotoxicity, i.e. cell toxicity, and genotoxicity, so that they also alter the genome.
Asbestos is interesting, everyone knows it as a very toxic substance.
This is a fibrous silicate that also contains a lot of iron oxide in so-called bioavailable form. We
know what serious cases of lung cancer this has caused.
Another review study from 2019, also from the "Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research",
exposure to iron oxide nanoparticles leads to heart disease, also because oxidative stress occurs again.
This article states that exposure to iron oxide can also lead to heart disease.
The authors of this study, a certain Marvin Herndon, who works very intensively on this topic, together with colleagues, also
write in this article that it is essential to end geoengineering by spreading aerosols, especially fly ash, very
fine ash dust, in order not to destroy the entire biosphere.
By the way, this is one of the few pictures that I didn't take myself, it's by Lilian Anselmetti from
Aufrecht Bern. Thank you very much for making it available.
I think they are incredible cloud images that she saw in the Bern area.
Another study from 2017 states that the contamination of the biosphere by mercury is increasing massively and that
this must also be a consequence of climate manipulation.
This was published in the "Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International".
It was a study, not a review.
Mass spectrometry was used to measure rainwater and snow. Extremely high mercury
levels of 2 micrograms per gram were measured.
Although RoHS legislation has greatly reduced lead and mercury over the last 20 years, this pollution is increasing.
This also has health risks of a neurological, cardiovascular and urogenital nature.
It can cause infertility, affect the immune system and also damage DNA.
Another study I want to mention, from Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, is the redwoods,
the sequoias in California, these redwood forests.
Some of them are over 3,000 years old. They experienced a much warmer climate than we claim or actually have today.
They have experienced incredible dry periods, wet periods, cold periods. They are still alive and now they are all dying off.
A closer examination of these shows that the artificial drought has been caused over decades,
in California over decades by geoengineering.
The toxic nanoparticles are clearly causing the trees to die. The aluminum content in these nanoparticles in
particular causes the trees to close the stomata, i.e. the stomata in the needles or leaves.
Then they no longer have the moisture exchange and can no longer absorb CO2.
Incidentally, CO2 is the gas of life par excellence. There would be no green plants without CO2.
There is even a relatively new study from NASA that says that in the last 15 years the earth has become
greener. They write, probably because of the increased CO2.
What's wrong with that? But that's just a subordinate clause.
One very important factor is the hole in the ozone layer, which is getting bigger and bigger.
You don't hear about it anymore. CFCs were already banned in the 1980s.
Now we can no longer be bullied with anything. So they don't say that the hole in the ozone layer is getting bigger and bigger.
We now know how it can be enlarged.
The US government has already admitted this itself in the many documents.
This hole in the ozone layer means that we can measure UVB and UVC on the earth's surface.
Mainstream science also admits that we have much higher levels of UVB and UVC. This is the dangerous UV, from 100
nanometers wavelength to about 400 nanometers wavelength.
This is the really dangerous UV. We didn't have that on the earth's surface in the past.
This is coming down on us through the hole in the ozone layer.
This is of course just as dangerous for us humans as it is for these sequoias.
I'll skip the next few studies now, because it always leads to the same thing.
What all that triggers. Catastrophic bee mortality, insect mortality, all the algae problems.
These toxic algae blooms that actually occur because the plankton is dying. Due to all these
nanoparticle pollution and the hole in the ozone layer.
Bird populations are declining, also indirectly, because insects are disappearing, as are bats.
These are all studies that I have read. They are really frightening in terms of the effects they have
on the whole environment, not just on our health.
Which could be a major driver of all these particle emissions. I still can't tell if only airplanes are
being converted to spray only, as described in the patent.
B-77 with 25 tons of tanks. Or does every passenger jet also spray? I'm not sure.
I suspect, but that's just a guess, that both are being done in parallel.
The current NATO fuel Jet Propulsive 8, JP8, has an incredibly large number of dangerous additives.
NATO does not disclose to its member states what all these additives are.
They provide frost protection, explosion protection, good storage and temperature resistance.
It can be used in arctic regions as well as in the desert. You can also use it to power a camping stove, a
ship or an airplane. It needs additives without end.
There is a very good study by a Marion Hahn. You can also find it on the Internet.
She got sick herself because she lived near an air force base. She's pretty good at
showing that she must attribute it to the JP8.
Here you can see that I found dozens of military research documents from the US Air Force.
Here is an example of a research paper. I think it's from the 90s or 00s.
In any case, the fuel was examined here within the US Air Force. Aluminum, barium, beryl, lead, cadmium, chromium, cobalt,
iron, copper, molybdenum, sodium, nickel, strontium, titanium, vanadium, zinc and tin were detected in this JP8.
And then, of course, there are the oxides of all these metals and also polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons such as naphthenes and
alkyl-substituted naphthalene, all incredibly healthy additives.
And if you look now, this NATO fuel is military. There is a pipeline system in Europe and this picture is from Wikipedia.
Everything I have written here is from Wikipedia. I don't usually quote Wikipedia, because most of it isn't true anyway.
But here is this picture from the 70s. Interestingly, they haven't updated it.
And here you can see this pipeline system throughout Europe. Switzerland is not yet included here.
But the Wikipedia article states that 90% of the transported fuel was already sold to
civilian customers in 2009 - from this aviation fuel.
And the largest civilian customers include Frankfurt, Cologne, Bonn, Zurich and Munich airports.
NATO fuel for civilian airliners. In 2016, 12 million cubic meters were sold to civilian customers in Europe.
I said earlier that the mainstream is also publishing more and more articles on this
topic and then says, yes, that can't be right.
Another article that made incredible headlines in the mainstream two weeks ago. Everywhere, including
SRF, Watson, even in the English-speaking world, etc.
Rainwater is no longer of drinking water quality anywhere on earth, it was said.
Even in the Antarctic or in the highlands of Tibet, it is still 14 times higher than the limit
set by the US Environmental Protection Agency.
And above all it is about so-called PFAS and PFOA.
These are poly- and perfluorinated hydrocarbons, i.e. hydrocarbons containing fluoride. These are
found in - and then of course in the mainstream - make-up, shampoos, packaging and cleaning products.
So now we're to blame again. But this Air Force study has just said that there are
fluorinated compounds in it, and on a large scale.
So the worst thing about these fluorinated compounds comes from the top.
This is the original study that was quoted in the mainstream.
I then always look for the original studies.
I want to read what the researchers have done.
It is also interesting that the Tagesanzeiger quoted a researcher from Denmark.
Martin Scheringer from ETH Zurich is even involved.
Then perhaps I could contact him and ask whether they had also taken atmospheric components into account.
I then did a bit more research and came across a book. It's called "Forever Chemicals", i.e. chemicals that don't degrade
and remain in the earth's circulation for a very long time.
It's mainly about these PFOA and PFAS, i.e. these perfluorinated and polyfluorinated hydrocarbons.
It says that only four of them are actually known and have been examined to see how dangerous and poisonous they
are. And that only these four can really be detected so well.
But there are 6,500 listed alone and there are probably over 10,000 of these substances.
I can see Alex is there, so I'll skip the rest now.
I would have liked to briefly mention that non-ionizing radiation and electromagnetic fields can
also cause genetic disruptions of an indirect nature.
But I know there's another speaker coming, so I can skip that with a clear conscience.
That it's not just the substances sprayed up there that pose a health risk, but also all those radio
waves and microwaves that are showering down on us.
And I'm just talking about these weather manipulation things.
I'll leave 5G and even 4G, 3G etc. out of the equation for now.
Yes, the last pictures I took myself in March and April.
You can't see it so well on the projector.
Really in the mountains, it looks like smog over Los Angeles.
It simply can't be natural. And I'm done with that.
I skipped a few things. I hope I haven't gone overboard too much. Thank you very much for your attention.