Do animals really not die for artificial meat?
And is eating tumors a healthy alternative for your own body and the environment?
Or should toxic biowaste, which is produced artificially, really do no harm?
How exactly is the food that is supposed to end hunger in the world and ensure food
security according to the 2030 Agenda produced?
EVERYONE should know the answer to these questions!
Did you, dear viewers, also notice during your last shopping trip that almost every supermarket, whether it's called
Rewe, Aldi, Lidl or whatever, now has entire veggie departments?
McDonalds, Burger King and Co. also offer plant-based burgers or nuggets.
Vegetarians and vegans should be pleased about this development:
More choice, a more conscious diet, can only be good for people, animals and the environment - you might think.
However, the 2030 Agenda, which is being vigorously pursued by the UN, the WHO and the WEF, and the
systematic approach to implementing their plans, proves that this is anything but caring and prudent.
As Kla.TV already made clear in the program Food as a Weapon, the 2030 Agenda is a huge fraud.
To reiterate: Goal 2 of the 2030 Agenda supposedly aims to end hunger, achieve food security and
improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.
However, starting with the already discouraged farmers, it can be observed that natural, small-scale farming is being destroyed,
while at the same time multinational corporations are increasingly controlling global food production through
industrial agriculture, genetic engineering and agrochemicals.
One of the many announcements on how Bill Gates and his cohorts want to end hunger in the world and ensure food
security lies in synthetic foods and vertical farming, which is supposed to offer nothing but advantages.
In October 2023, however, Uncut-News published an article with the following title:
Why synthetic foods are very dangerous.
We summarize the most important statements for you and address the following questions:
What about animal welfare in the production of artificial meat?
One example of synthetically produced food is cultured meat.
Proponents of this meat substitute insist that this product is not artificial meat, but real meat, with the only difference
being that no animals have to be slaughtered to produce it.
Many people are switching to cultured meat precisely because of animal welfare and a conscious approach to nutrition.
Unfortunately, they are falling for a huge PR scam.
The claim that no animals are killed in this process is simply false. Currently, most cultured or cell-based
meats are produced using fetal bovine serum (FBS), which is derived from the blood of unborn calves.
In short: Pregnant cows are slaughtered to remove blood from the unborn fetus, according to the Uncut News article.
Are synthetic meat substitutes safe for consumers?
To make the cell cultures grow, for example, some companies use immortal cells, which are technically
precancerous, i.e. basically completely cancerous.
Other companies use embryonic stem cells or cells from living animals.
The meat substitutes grown on cancerous cells could therefore be considered tumors, as
the meat consists entirely of cancerous cells.
The reason for using immortal cells is that cells that behave normally cannot divide forever.
So it doesn't work if you want to grow thousands of pounds of tissue with normal muscle cells from a small number of cells.
What do experts say about contaminants in artificially produced meat?
In terms of safety, it could also be argued that natural beef could be contaminated during processing, packaging,
transportation, storage or during the cooking process.
But with cultured meat, every ingredient and processing step carries the potential for contamination, and any of the hundreds
of ingredients could have toxic effects alone or in synergy.
A thorough analysis of available data published in May 2023 by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations (FAO) and a WHO expert panel concluded that at least 53 potential health risks are associated with lab-grown meat.
These include the possibility of contamination with heavy metals, microplastics, nanoplastics and chemicals,
allergenic additives, toxic components and antibiotics.
This also applies to the plant-based substitute products already available on the market.
In this regard, it must be pointed out that even the product declared as plant-based is anything but healthy.
These are also elaborately chemically produced and contain questionable amounts of mineral oil, among other things.
Does the production of artificial meat produce toxic bio-waste?
As briefly mentioned above, the production of cultured meat also generates toxic biowaste.
The biowaste from these synthetic, biological fermentations must first be deactivated and then disposed of safely.
It must not end up in a landfill site. Dear viewers, you have to let that melt in your mouth:
The manufacture of products that we are supposed to eat produces hazardous waste that cannot be disposed
of conventionally, but is completely harmless to us?
What are antibiotic-resistant organisms doing in artificial meat? The meat-like mass grown in the nutrient solution must be
antibiotic-resistant, as it must survive the antibiotics used to kill other undesirable
organisms in the vat in which the mass is grown.
As a result, antibiotic-resistant organisms are also integrated into the final product, and one can only guess
what types of foodborne illnesses could be caused by genetically modified, antibiotic-resistant E. coli.
At the same time, Gates is investing a lot of money in researching and modifying the microbiome, a complex ecosystem of
bacteria, fungi, archaea and viruses that, under the collective term of intestinal flora, significantly controls digestive
processes and has a major influence on a child's mental and physical development, especially in the first year of life.
Does the production of artificial meat save CO2?
It is also propagated that cultured meat and other synthetic foods are more environmentally friendly.
This is also incorrect: not only does production generate hazardous waste, but the laboratory meat industry also produces
4 to 25 times more CO2 than traditional animal husbandry.
Because this whole agenda regarding food security etc. is based on a CO2 lie, which justifies the
supposedly necessary reduction of natural agriculture.
In some other programs Kla.TV dealt with the so-called climate killer cows and the Green Deal.
As described above, the 2030 Agenda makes it difficult for farmers to provide for us, the people who
depend on them, let alone maintain their livelihoods.
As you have now seen, synthetic and processed foods are not being pushed out of genuine concern for sustainability.
No, synthetic biology is being used to build a powerful control mechanism.
Those who own all synthetic food production will literally rule the world.
Here is a quote from Henry Kissinger: "Whoever controls the food supply controls the people;
Whoever controls energy can control entire continents; whoever controls money can control the world.
Kissinger was also the one who wrote a secret strategy paper for the National Security Council in 1974, declaring,
in other words, food to be an instrument of national power.
In short, the globalists already own and control most of the natural agricultural products grown in the world today.
By replacing real animal foods with patented, laboratory-produced protein alternatives, we are heading
for unprecedented power over the world's population.
It is also well known that the consumption of ultra-processed foods contributes to disease,
and the beneficiary is of course Big Pharma.
For many decades, the food industry has promoted chronic diseases that are then treated
with medication instead of better nutrition.
However, our original food is a perfect creation and in its natural form is 100% tailored to the needs of all living beings.
And when Bill and Co. tinker with it, they create a Frankenstein's diabolical buffet with a disgust factor.
However, we at Kla.TV would be happy to document the globalists, Big Pharma and the profiteers of Agenda 2030 over a
longer period of time so that they can prove to us on their own bodies what advantages their products offer.
Please spread the word about this program and stay on the ball with us so that the plans of the 2030 Agenda for the
peoples of this world can be uncovered and thus thwarted.
Together we break through the wall of complexity and ignorance.