In March 2023, American scientists published test results showing that the
mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna are contaminated with foreign DNA.
Kevin McKernan, a top expert in the field of gene sequencing, has extensively analyzed
the content of the vaccines and published initial results on the Internet.
He found that all the Pfizer and Moderna batches he examined
far exceeded the WHO's permitted limits for residual amounts of DNA.
Prof. Phillipp Buckhaults, a molecular biologist and biochemist at the University of South
Carolina, came to similar conclusions.
After Israeli researchers Joshua Guetzkow and Retsef Levi reviewed Pfizer documents that had been
released, they described the scandal in a letter published in the British Medical Journal in May 2023.
The documents revealed that Pfizer used two fundamentally different manufacturing processes
for the mRNA-based coronavirus vaccine.
The pharmaceutical company refers to the two processes internally as Process 1 and Process 2:
Process 1 is the method used to produce the preparations that the 22,000 test subjects
received during the approval process.
In this case, production was cost-intensive in vitro, i.e. mechanically sterile.
Approval was granted on the basis of this procedure.
The key finding from the analysis of the internal Pfizer documents is that a significantly
different manufacturing process was used for the mass production of the vaccine
and its worldwide sale.
Process 2 is not based on sterile machine production, but
on bacteria that copy the mRNA.
This process is not sterile and generates impurities that actually
have to be cleaned at great expense.
The physician Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi said: [...] cost-effective methods for
reliably separating mass-produced RNA from plasmids [DNA from bacteria] do not exist at
low cost.
The complete removal would be far too expensive.
This is why the bacterial chromosomes
have been found in all vaccine batches examined to date.
Remember, contamination with plasmid DNA
will be the rule and not the exception for all RNA vaccines, not
just corona, all RNA vaccines.
German professors warned early on:
The German professors Matysik, Dyker, Schnepf and Winkler raised the first questions about possible
vaccine contamination as early as January 2022.
They demanded clarification from BioNTech-Pfizer and also contacted the Paul Ehrlich Institute.
But in both cases, their questions were not answered adequately.
Even then, they called for greater focus to be placed on
the issue of secondary effects.
They also referred to a Danish study, according to which there were some batches in which
extremely frequent side effects were reported, including increased deaths.
Inadequate test methods at the PEI
The scientists working with Prof.
Matysik rated the safety tests for the mRNA vaccines by the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) as completely inadequate.
Of the more than 20 parameters displayed, the PEI only tested four parameters
per batch - and even these did not comply with the latest standards.
A few months ago, Prof. Hildt, the person responsible for testing at the PEI, explained how the
quality testing of the batches was carried out.
For example, the color of the vaccine was tested by visual inspection.
This means that the samples were held briefly in front of a white and black background.
With regard to the residual quantities of foreign
DNA, the PEI did not carry out any analyses of its own, but relied solely on the information
provided by the manufacturer.
Due to these inadequate test methods, German scientists
also began independent investigations.
The Professor of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Immunology, Dr. Brigitte König from
Magdeburg, came to the conclusion from her own analyses that BioNTech's mRNA vaccines
are heavily contaminated with DNA.
Testing of several batches revealed that the WHO limit value
was exceeded by a factor of 83 to 354.
The biologist and author Dr. Jürgen O. Kirchner presented these findings to the Petitions Committee of
the Bundestag and called for a statement.
However, the Federal Ministry of Health referred to the manufacturer BioNTech and follow-up tests by the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut,
which, according to the Federal Government, found no objections.
The Ministry of Health admitted that the measurement of residual amounts of DNA is not part of the tests that
are repeated in the control laboratories.
In plain language, this means that the PEI did not carry out its own tests for foreign DNA, but
merely compared the manufacturer's test results with the specified limit values.
Scientists, such as immunologist Dr. Kay Klapproth, consider the detected
DNA contamination to be problematic because
DNA can potentially be integrated into the body's own genome.
Prof. Dr. Bhakdi explains this as follows:
Each time a cell divides, the protective shell of the cell nucleus dissolves, so that foreign DNA comes to
lie directly next to the chromosomes and can then be included in the newly
formed nuclei of the daughter cells.
Continued production of foreign proteins can take place, which can lead to long-term inflammation
and organ damage throughout the body.
The critical scientists are therefore urgently calling for further independent investigations.
Conclusion:
The former head of the PEI's Drug Safety Department, Dr. Keller-Stanislawski,
admitted to the Brandenburg Investigation Committee in September 2023 that the authority was
completely overloaded with the recording of the many vaccination side effects.
There were people who only took care of deaths and people who only took care
of myocarditis and thrombosis, we had a
lot more work than before, just because of this vaccine.
At this point at the latest, the Paul Ehrlich Institute should have stopped the
vaccination campaign to protect the population and initiated its own investigations.
With the flood of reports of vaccination complications received, it would be the Institute's task
to hold the manufacturers accountable.
The PEI has thus abused the trust of both doctors and vaccinated people.
The fact that a different manufacturing method was used for the approval studies than for widespread use also
calls into question any vaccination information and vaccination consent from a legal point of view.
In addition, according to §5 of the dt. Drugs Act to withdraw questionable drugs from the market.
The PEI must not break this law!
But instead of holding those responsible for this grossly negligent action to account, the head of
the Paul Ehrlich Institute at the time, Klaus Cichutek, was recently honored with the Order of
Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany.
This shows that the federal government has no interest whatsoever in coming to terms with the situation.
Public pressure has been growing since public broadcasters could no longer
avoid reporting on the issue of coronavirus vaccine contamination.
Other problems with mRNA technology have also emerged.
The professors around Professor Matysik mentioned at the beginning have recently sent a further
list of questions to the Paul Ehrlich Institute and are once again asking for comments and answers.
From their point of view, the lack of transparency shakes confidence in the
mRNA technology and in the PEI itself.
Finally, the scientists are calling on the PEI to draw conclusions from all these facts
and finally stop this mRNA technology.
Will the scientists' questions be answered clearly this time and will their demands be met?
In any case, it must be clarified which conflicts of interest the PEI is subject
to, why it does not fulfill its task, but instead protects the pharmaceutical industry.
Note: Even
if the problem of DNA contamination is solved one day, this does not
mean that mRNA vaccinations will no longer have any side effects.
This will not significantly change the already known and
serious side effect profile.
Because all the mechanisms that Prof. Bhakdi, for example, has explained will also be found in purified mRNA vaccines.