Hello dear friends!
Once again, a federal vote is coming up in Switzerland and It's not so easy to understand what I'm supposed to vote on.
So it's all about the AHV - which means old-age provision or pension, as it is called in Germany.
It is about a 13th monthly pension, which is to be paid out, namely For a better life in old age - and there is a
second one called There is a second one called For a secure old-age pension, which is about raising the retirement age.
What should I vote for? - YES or NO? - Both sound somehow plausible. Ah, thank goodness!
I have received some mail: Personal mail for me, from former Federal Councillor Doris Leuthard and the
famous former Federal Councillor Adolf Ogi - wasn't he a Federal Councillor when I was very young?
It says: Urgent appeal to protect our AHV. No to the 13th AHV pension!!...
Am I privileged to receive voice recommendations from famous personalities?
Oh no, probably not - this is definitely addressed to the entire Swiss population!
So it seems about something very important.
And now I have to to expand a little:
My first thought, however, before I blindly accept this long warning letter and the appeals to vote
blindly: What kind of federal councillors were they?
During their time in office, did they look after the of the Swiss population?
Were they real representatives of the people or were they just as WEF-WHO-, UN- and
NATO-loving, like our current Federal Councillors?
Well, I remember Doris Leuthard's time: wasn't she the Federal Councillor Federal Councillor
who had strong ties to the mobile phone lobby?
There are even people who claim that she was promoted to her high position by the mobile phone
companies to her high position and not by the people.
That's a bit strong stuff... I don't know exactly.
But what I know for sure is that she once gave instructions to cheat a little with the limit values by
manipulating values through night measurements or similar in order to circumvent resistance to 5G.
What kind of decision was that?
Was it close to the people?
Federal Councillor Adolf Ogi, what characterized his time in office?
I remember a famous saying from him: We are surrounded by friends.
In plain language, does this mean that armed neutrality neutrality should no longer be so important?
In these progressive times, war would no longer be a threat?
For example, Ogi promoted Switzerland's accession to the NATO sub-organization Partnership for Peace and
ensured the deployment of Swiss soldiers to Kosovo in 1999.
Or another famous saying of his was: Seckle statt chriege.
That means: Do sport rather than war!
Yes, does he really think that any Swiss, German, Austrian or American citizen ever wanted to go to war voluntarily?
Wasn't it always those at the top, those in power, who saw the need for war?
This is of course a difficult topic for a housewife and mother.
But do you really think that the Americans had to defend their own borders in Iraq, Afghanistan or Vietnam?
Wasn't it about completely different interests in each case?
I heard with my own ears how President Obama admitted on SRF news at the time that no nuclear weapons were found in Iraq...
But that was the real reason for the war.
Aha, only about a million people died horribly.
Aha, only one country was contaminated with uranium ammunition and destroyed.
Only countless babies have been born horribly crippled as a result
and and and... Sorry - unfortunately we were wrong...
There are no consequences! Only profits!
Crisis profits for the arms lobby, crisis profits for the financial complex through all
the reconstruction loans and thousands more!
Or, for example, the war in Afghanistan: Was it perhaps about was it about national defense or fighting terrorism?
No, insiders report: It was a drug war, because the Supreme Leader Mullah Omar had banned opium production in July 2000.
Afghanistan is the source of 75% of the world's heroin.
The war won the day - in 2002 the media reported the media reported a record harvest - bigger than ever!
Because the very rich do their billion-dollar business at the expense of the people...
Well, Mr. Ogi: None of us ever wanted war!
So what was that truism from them! (Seckle instead of chriege...)
But now I finally have to get back to the topic: Should I NOW in this situation believe my Federal Councillors
and follow this urgent appeal for a NO to the 13th pension?
Well, I realize that it's not that simple, because the 2. Pension initiative has major consequences for many Swiss people:
Namely, having to work longer and longer and yet receiving ever smaller pensions.
It seems to me that I can vote for what I want, it's all about me because there are other plans afoot...
Ladies and gentlemen, I don't think I can recommend a vote today, because there are much more extensive more
extensive problems that cannot be solved with a YES or a NO.
But with what then?
We must learn to understand the overall context and stop thinking that our father state only means well with us.
We need to wake up! Why is the AHV no longer enough? Where is all this money going?
Where do all the pharmaceutical companies' crisis profits go?
The pharmaceutical companies Moderna and Pfizer, for example, have generated over 100 billion
dollars with their Covid vaccines by March 2023.
This is 20 times more than the budget of the World Health Organization for the two years 2020 and 2021.
But we pay around CHF 2.8 million a year to the WHO.
In the years 2020-22, there will even be an additional 17 million voluntary core contributions.
How would it be if the gigantic profits of the pharmaceutical companies were perhaps used to pay back
these mandatory WHO contributions to the countries?
After all, the WHO has forced us into vaccination.
But no, no, the profit does not go back, it always goes into individual pockets of private individuals.
And the damage and side effects of the Covid vaccination scandal, for example, such as the countless deaths, the many disabilities,
heart attacks, strokes, myocarditis, autism in children, etc., are financed by the population itself, e.g. through insanely
high health insurance costs or through their own savings.
A health insurance premium, for example, will cost around CHF 360 per month on average
for just one person in Switzerland in 2024!
A medium-sized family can quickly bleed 1500 to 2000 francs a month.
I no longer know how we got our family of 13 through....
Then there are the constantly new contracts worth millions with the pharmaceutical industry for the vaccine doses for the
upcoming pandemics - in Germany I have heard of 6 billion...
The main thing is that it's already paid for - whether you then needs it or not is not so important...
Just like with swine flu, when people simply stopped showing up for vaccinations.
The remaining vaccine doses, worth a few million francs, could then be disposed of...
You see, this big money is all missing from the AHV pension fund....
Incidentally, over 10 million doses of the Covid vaccine had to be destroyed in Switzerland due to non-use.
The total cost of this waste is estimated to be at least CHF 270 million.
Based on 2.4 million AHV recipients (as of 2021), that would be a nice chunk for each individual if it were reimbursed.
In the EU, 55 million vaccine doses are disposed of
And this is just a small example of where some of the missing AHV money is.
Let's do the math and take the cohesion payments (equalization payments) that Switzerland pays to other countries.
Let's take a closer look at this:
From 2007 to 2017, CHF 1.3 billion was distributed here for the development of the eastern EU countries.
That is the equivalent of 130 million francs per year.
Why do we pay huge sums every year for the EU, the UN and the WHO?
Then there is another issue, namely abortions.
We are missing thousands of children; according to official statistics, in 2022 over 11,000
children (excluding unreported cases) aborted every year.
Over the last 20 years, this has amounted to a minimum of 220,000 people, who are then missing from the labor
market - speaking of the shortage of skilled workers - but also from the financing of the AHV.
And all this with the blessing of the government.
Incidentally, Doris Leuthard, who has campaigned for new laws on the freezing of pregnancies, also sends her regards here.
Today it is no longer murder to kill a child in the womb - the unborn child has been renamed cell tissue.
Soon, if some of the my-belly-belongs-to-my-aunts have their way, abortion after birth will even be included in the program.
Are we actually out of our minds?
I still remember well how we were labeled antisocial back then with our large family.
A teacher once scolded me about why we had so many goofs when we couldn't even pay for the
ski camps because we had asked for a discount.
But our children and their cohorts are now carrying the older generation of today's AHV recipients.
Why do we have so few descendants?
In Switzerland, it is such a small percentage per capita.
And the children at school are taught that it is is something noble to do without children - why?
Because children are the biggest CO2 guzzlers there are?
Who issues such twisted and moronic instructions?
That's even worse than the cow fart lie!
Why do foreigners with their families and relatives receive more money from the social security funds than
our elderly, who have worked all their lives and paid into the system for their old age?
A comparison: a Swiss pensioner receives an average of CHF 1500 per month, while an asylum seeker with a wife and 2 children
can receive up to CHF 6500 - all benefits added together.
Is this the hallmark of our Federal Councillors, who are no longer committed to the people's welfare but to
some economic interests, secret societies or whatever?
You see, here you are pulling on a thread that won't break.
And the end of the story is not here, but according to the head of the WEF, Klaus Schwab and his Agenda 2030, called the Great
Reset, [Great Reset, Klaus Schwab www.kla.tv/27928, Agenda 2030 www.kla.tv/18739], the end is where we no
longer receive a pension at all, indeed, have nothing left and yet are still supposed to be happy...
Because a small basic income should be enough for us, which, depending on how obedient we are to his or the New
World Order's New World Order agenda, it can also be curtailed or made completely inaccessible as required.
Do you believe that? It's already a reality in China.
So the general direction is: Everything from your pocket into the pockets of a secret society sect of the super-rich.
Is this the future we want for ourselves and our children?
And you know what?
That is still not the end, because the end that YOU have determined is the population reduction to 500 million people.
This means that 7.5 billion people are superfluous AHV pension recipients.
Instead of a voting recommendation, all that remains is my request: We must wake up.
We need to look our rulers in the eye again and react.
We really need to inform ourselves - but that means but that means: not from the mainstream press!
Because they are all under one and the the same blanket.
And the things we discover, we have to spread them further until a new popular consciousness emerges.
Then something new can prevail, something that comes from the people, from the weakest, from the children, from
the newborns, from the elderly. newborns, from the elderly and I promise you, then we will all be fine.
We will no longer have pension problems.
My conviction is: where injustice, exploitation and lies flourish, I want to stand for justice, truth and love.
All the best to you - and goodbye!