At the 28th UN Climate Change Conference from November 30 to December 13, 2023 in Dubai, the course was set
for the first time to take greater account of the food sector and agriculture in climate protection.
More than 130 countries signed a declaration stating that emissions from the agricultural sector
should now also be included in the climate targets.
This applies above all to livestock farming.
At the end of 2023, the WHO then called on global governments to take action against agriculture and food production!
According to the Director-General of the WHO, Dr. Tedros, our food system is damaging the health of people
and the planet and contributes to 30% of greenhouse gases. A change is therefore essential.
As livestock farming in particular is classified as especially harmful to the climate, Tedros called on the world's
heads of government to severely restrict the consumption of meat and dairy products in their countries!
Instead, the diet is to be switched to plant-based products and lab-grown meals such as lab-grown meat and insect-based foods.
The whole thing is being pushed forward even though it is known that the US scientist Dr. Frank Mitloehner, professor and air
quality expert at the University of California, and scientific studies by the University of Oxford, among others, have proven
that methane from livestock farming remains in a perpetual cycle.
The argument that livestock farming must be reduced to combat climate change is therefore completely unfounded.
It also ignores the fact that in the so-called Dublin Declaration in 2022, 650 scientists from all over the
world took a clear position on livestock farming on the basis of 1,000 scientific papers.
They came to the conclusion that livestock farming plays a key role in a sustainable food system.
She is far too valuable to society to be the victim of fanaticism.
However, these extremely important voices are clearly not being heard, let alone taken into
account when making such momentous decisions.
Animal husbandry is the main source of income for many farmers. This means that in the long term, the planned
change in diet is nothing other than the destruction of agriculture as we know it today.
Ernst Wolff, the well-known financial and economic expert, reveals in the following program that this is precisely the plan.
It is clear from his remarks that big money is once again behind this, which is now attacking agriculture through the
UN, the WHO and the governments that are compliant with it.
This is not about saving the planet or the environment.
It's not just about gigantic profits for a few super-rich people, it's about much more!
Henry Kissinger summarized the strategy of global strategist David Rockefeller as follows:
"If you control the oil, you control entire nations; if you control the food, you control the people; if
you control the money, you control the whole world."
If more and more food is produced in factories and no longer by farmers, then Rockefeller's second
goal is within reach for the global strategists.
It's about controlling us all through food, and not just at the expense of hundreds of thousands of farmers who are
being deprived of their livelihoods. It's about our future!
Hello - Ernst Wolff here.
We are currently experiencing a global upheaval of historic proportions in the financial
system, in the world of work and in agriculture.
More than 130 central banks in the financial system are currently working on the introduction of digital central bank money.
In the foreseeable future, we will all have just one account, and that will be with the central bank.
In the world of work, we are facing a potentially even greater change due to the development of artificial intelligence.
Algorithms and work robots, AI-controlled drones and 3D printers will take over countless tasks across all
industries that were previously carried out by humans.
The most dramatic impact, however, is on agriculture.
Technological progress is opening up possibilities that until recently only existed in science fiction novels.
Two trends in particular will take center stage: vertical farming and lab-grown meat.
With vertical farming, plants are no longer grown outdoors, but in closed halls or containers.
They are stacked on shelves and exposed to artificial light.
Humidity, heat and ventilation are controlled by computers.
The roots of the plants grow on foam plates in containers or pipes through which water enriched with nutrients flows.
The whole process takes place under absolutely sterile conditions.
The plants do not come into contact with the sun, soil, rain or wind, nor with insects, germs or bacteria.
Even the daylight rhythm is artificially controlled to optimize the harvest.
The second trend concerns artificial meat produced by cell cultures in the laboratory.
This meat became known to the public in August 2013 when the first cell-cultured
hamburger was presented at Maastricht University.
At the time, it still cost more than 250,000 euros to produce.
Production costs are now around 10 dollars per hamburger, and the trend is downwards.
This means that lab-grown meat will soon be able to compete with real meat on the market and even
undercut it in terms of price in the foreseeable future.
Both the artificial breeding of plants and the artificial production of meat have attracted major
investors from all over the world who sense a billion-dollar business here. And not without good reason.
With vertical farming, you no longer need fields, agricultural machinery and hardly any staff. You save on water, insecticides
and pesticides, are independent of the weather and, if you place the factories or containers near urban centers,
you can dispense with a large part of the logistics. The only additional costs are for energy.
It is therefore certainly no coincidence that the largest factory of its kind to date was opened last year
in Dubai, where energy is known to cost very little.
As far as lab-grown meat is concerned, the savings are even greater.
You no longer need animals, feed, pasture, veterinarians, animal transporters or
slaughterhouses, and you save immensely on personnel.
It also saves the most expensive thing of all, namely time.
While a fattening bull needs 18 to 20 months until it is ready for slaughter, laboratory meat only needs three
to eight weeks before it can be sold ready for packaging.
The future vision of major investors, which includes asset managers such as BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street as
well as the ultra-rich such as Bill Gates, Google founder
Sergey Brin or Richard Branson, looks something like this:
At some point, there will be a global network of 3D printers producing this meat.
These 3D printers are then operated by licensees who have to pay a fee to the licensors for each piece of lab meat.
So it's no wonder that hundreds of millions have been invested in the development of artificial meat and plants in recent years.
In 2021 alone, the figure for lab-grown meat was 1.9 billion dollars. And politicians are following suit.
Just over three months ago, for example, the EU made 1.8 million euros available to further research the
potential cost reduction in the production of cultured meat.
It has also just launched the first approval procedure for laboratory meat.
None of this bodes well for agriculture.
If these two trends were to prevail, it would be nothing more and nothing less than the end of agriculture as we know it.
But - and this is where it becomes crucial - the whole thing can only work if people join in.
That is, if the majority of consumers accept artificial vegetables and meat.
But this is not the case, at least not at the moment. So what to do? Quite simply.
Take the ideology of climate change and the impending weather apocalypse, scare people and present them with artificial
vegetables and meat as a solution because of their low water consumption, low methane
emissions and reduction of CO₂ emissions.
This is exactly the situation we are currently in.
We are all being put under massive pressure by the media, politicians and scientists through constant horror stories about
the climate to accept this structural change in agriculture as the supposed salvation of the world from climate change.
Just how absurd the whole thing is is shown, among other things, by the fact that the following companies are part of
the alliance of companies founded at the World Economic Forum that have joined forces as global climate leaders:
Allianz, AXA, Bank of America, Barclays, Deutsche Bank and Mastercard. In addition,
Carlsberg, Coca-Cola, Nestlé, Syngenta and Unilever.
Just like the pharmaceutical giants AstraZeneca, Novartis and, to top it all off, the glyphosate manufacturer Bayer.
It really is high time we realized what game is being played here.
It is neither about saving the planet nor about improving the environment, which is actually urgently needed.
It's all about profit for the benefit of a tiny minority.
And not only at the expense of hundreds of thousands of farmers who are being deprived of their livelihoods, but
also at the expense of the future and quality of life of us, our children and all future generations.