In November 2023, an explosive letter from the European Medicines Agency was published.
The letter was in response to a question from several EU parliamentarians regarding mRNA vaccines and their side effects.
The EMA verbatim:
"You are indeed correct when you point out that Covid-19 vaccines are not approved to
prevent transmission from one person to another.\
According to the EMA, the vaccines have never been tested and approved to protect against infection and further spread.
According to Dutch politician and Member of the European Parliament Marcel de Graaff, all coronavirus vaccination campaigns
to put pressure on the population across Europe to protect themselves and others were therefore unjustified and misleading.
If you remember the vaccination pressure and the political and media propaganda of recent years, it is very
surprising that there is no general outcry in the media following this explosive statement by the EMA.
In view of the many side effects of vaccination, it is more important than ever to come to terms with what
has happened so that such excesses never occur again.
So listen for yourself as MEP de Graaff summarizes the EMA's key responses.
Ladies and gentlemen, last month Joachim Koers and six other Members of the European Parliament wrote a letter
to the EMA, the European agency responsible for authorizing medicinal products on the European market.
And we have asked for clarification about the many problems associated with Covid vaccines.
And these problems are so serious that we have asked the EMA to revoke the marketing authorization.
This month we received a reply to our letter from the EMA and this reply contains shocking facts.
First of all, the EMA expressly clarifies that it has only and exclusively placed the corona
vaccines on the market for individual immunization
and in no way for infection control and certainly not for the prevention or reduction of infections.
And that is devastating for governments that went into the election campaign with the
message that they were doing it for someone else.
None of this is correct.
Not only had the EMA not authorized the vaccines for the prevention of infections at all, the EMA goes
even further and states in its response, and I quote:
The EMA's assessment reports on the approval of vaccines, which emphasize the lack of data on the risk of infection ...
In other words, the vaccines were not intended to prevent infection, and there is certainly no data
to prove that the vaccines help against infection.
In fact, the EMA states that repeated exposure to the virus increases the risk of infection, even in vaccinated people.
The government's massive campaigns to vaccinate people to protect their parents, neighbors and the weakest in
society were not only unauthorized, but also complete nonsense and not based on facts.
But unfortunately it gets worse.
The EMA says: Vaccinations are intended solely for the protection of the vaccinated person and before the person or patient is
vaccinated - and I quote the EMA again - all safety information should be carefully considered
before any vaccination is administered or recommended.
You were therefore only entitled to a vaccination if a doctor had determined that this was appropriate in your case,
and since there was practically no risk of serious complications from the coronavirus in anyone under the age of 60, with a
few exceptions, no one should be vaccinated under the age of 60.
The gyms full of vaccinees were therefore completely at odds with the use for which the vaccines were approved by the EMA.
And it gets even worse when it comes to assessing the safety of vaccines.
It was important for the EMA that side effects were properly recorded, and the EMA says so:
"We expect many reports of side effects occurring during or shortly after vaccination".
And this means that complaints must be reported, especially during the first vaccination phase.
The government supported a policy of not reporting these complaints for the first fortnight after vaccination,
as the vaccine would take 10 to 14 days to take effect.
All complaints during this period were attributed to the coronavirus.
And this is not only fraud, it also deliberately endangers human lives.
And I would like to remind you once again that we are still struggling with an
enormous so-called unexplained excess mortality.
In short, this information from the EMA is devastating for the vaccination policy of Rutte and De Jonge.
The government knew that the vaccines would not protect against the spread of the virus, but
did not pass this information on to citizens.
On the contrary, it has forced the vaccination on our citizens with lies, covered up the side effects and endangered
the health of all those who have received the vaccination.
The vaccination campaigns must be stopped as soon as possible, they are simply not safe
and do not meet the requirements of the EMA.
And the government and all political parties that have supported this should be held accountable for their lies and deceptions.
The EMA confirms in its letter dated 18.10.2023.
COVID-19 vaccines have not been approved to prevent transmission from one person to another.
The indication only includes the personal protection of vaccinated individuals.
Lawyer Markus Haintz says:
According to the EMA, this is clear from the approval documents.
However, the mandatory vaccination for institutions and the armed forces (D) as well as the general mandatory
vaccination (A) were justified with the protection of vulnerable groups from infection.
The justification therefore corresponded to an unauthorized indication and the vaccination
obligation thus fulfills the offence of coercion.
The state-ordered and media-driven vaccination propaganda has forced many people to be vaccinated involuntarily.
Many people have followed the dominant and seemingly ethical appeal to protect yourself and others out of good faith or fear.
And it is precisely these people who now have to live with the consequences of the sometimes severe side effects of vaccination.
Not to mention the exploding numbers of vaccinated people who have died suddenly and unexpectedly as a result of vaccination.
The EMA's statements were available to governments, the WHO and the highest EU authorities from the
outset, which is why we can no longer speak of ignorance.
This is intent.
We remember the enormous pressure that was exerted on the German population alone: *
Former Minister of Health Jens Spahn (CDU):
If you want to do anything more than visit your town hall or supermarket, you need to be vaccinated.
* Health Minister Karl Lauterbach (SPD):
Unvaccinated people are responsible for us not getting anywhere ... The whole country will be held hostage by these people.
We can no longer afford that.
* Health Minister Karl Lauterbach (SPD) attacks unvaccinated nursing staff at a demonstration with the words:
You have made no contribution, and I find it outrageous that you still have the nerve to
abuse a demonstration of those who have worked!
- Your work has made no contribution, let me be very clear here.
* Federal Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD):
Everyone has the opportunity to change the situation by vaccinating themselves
... Vaccinating, boosting, that's the way out of the crisis
- and continues: Unfortunately, not enough people have been vaccinated. And everything
we are experiencing now has to do with that.
* CDU leader Friedrich Merz:
No more unvaccinated people in the office, no more unvaccinated footballers on the pitch, no more unvaccinated MPs in the
Bundestag, no more unvaccinated students in the lecture hall.
*
Prime Minister Markus Söder (CSU):
Let's finally introduce compulsory vaccination in Germany ... Compulsory vaccination is not a violation of civil liberties.
Rather, it is the prerequisite for us to regain our freedom.
* Dorothee Bär, deputy parliamentary group leader of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group for family and culture:
Vaccination saves lives - it is our most important tool against the pandemic.
That is why I am in favor of introducing a general vaccination requirement.
We need to increase the pressure to vaccinate with mandatory sanctions in order to close the
current vaccination gap as quickly as possible.
* Former Green Party politician Boris Palmer suggested:
You could make pension payments, pension payments or even access to the workplace dependent
on the presentation of proof of vaccination.
* Tobias Hans, CDU, former Minister President of Saarland:
You are now out of social life. That's why we are consistently doing 2G\...
We believe that we can use it to break the wave.
* Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier:
The majority of people in our country get vaccinated to protect themselves and others.
Those who don't get vaccinated are putting their own health at risk, and they are putting us all at risk.
* Former Federal President Joachim Gauck towards unvaccinated people:
Then it's also terrible that we live in a country where there are not only people who want to be educated,
but also a sufficient number of people who are crazy.
* FDP politician Rainer Stinner:
No opponent of vaccination is treated like an enemy of the state.
He's just, hopefully soon, no longer allowed to go out among the people because he's a dangerous social pest.
But he has the freedom not to be vaccinated. But he doesn't have the freedom to endanger me.
* FDP politician Strack-Zimmermann:
Unvaccinated people must not be allowed to terrorize the majority as a minority,
and continues: In these times, little can be ruled out
.... * Jessica Rosenthal (SPD youth organization):
A general vaccination obligation does not restrict our freedom, it gives it back to us.
* ZDF presenter Sarah Bosetti:
Would the division of society really be such a bad thing?
No, society would not split down the middle.
Because the people who want to divide society are actually pretty far to the right and pretty far down.
And such an appendix is not strictly speaking essential for the survival of the entire complex.
* Chairman of the World Medical Association Frank Ulrich Montgomery:
Because at the moment we are really experiencing a tyranny of the unvaccinated, who are ruling over the two-thirds
of the vaccinated and imposing all these measures on ...
Yes, I deliberately use the term tyranny
Many other celebrities also took the opportunity to defame unvaccinated people and blame them for the spread of the virus:
However, those who refuse to be vaccinated do not see themselves as perpetrators, but as victims.
We all know who is to blame for this fourth turning point.
Well, many thanks to all the unvaccinated.
According to us, unvaccinated people should not celebrate at all.
Tyranny of the unvaccinated.
Right-wing radicals.
A minority, and these are the unvaccinated.
A pandemic of the unvaccinated.
Conspiracy dialogs.
People who refuse to be vaccinated.
Yes, stupid people
and anti-Semites.
These people are to be beaten.
Why should they have the same rights as us?
Thanks to you, the next lockdown joke is imminent.
If you don't want to be vaccinated, you have a problem.
We have to pay the price for it.
You are now out of social life.
So it's not about compulsory vaccination.
Fines, quarantine, blurred workplace.
Sooner or later, such rules will come for people who are not vaccinated
A thorough legal investigation into what happened is obviously not wanted by politicians or the media,
and so the question inevitably arises as to what legal steps are necessary to hold those responsible to account.
The German lawyer Ralf Ludwig, with his initiative ZAAVV and the support of numerous other lawyers, filed around 600 criminal
charges with the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office in Karlsruhe and is prepared to go all the way to the
International Criminal Court in The Hague to "prevent crimes against humanity due to the Corona measures".
The interview with lawyer Ralf Ludwig follows and provides information on the legal situation.
You can also help in a very practical way by spreading this and other educational programs on the
subject of coming to terms with the corona crimes.
Enlightened people are the most effective counter to the rabble-rousing drivers of the past pandemic.
Enlightened people are the most effective counter to the same initiators of subsequent
pandemics and other deliberately induced crises.