What do the UN, WHO, EU and WEF currently see as the greatest threat?
Correct: In disinformation.
This must be urgently combated. In mid-November 2023, the French Senate examined a draft law against disinformation.
Accordingly, people critical of the pharmaceutical industry are threatened with heavy fines and prison sentences.
Anyone who dares to criticize the government's medical narrative may come into conflict with this law.
The CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the German Bundestag took the same line in mid-December 2023.
She submitted a motion entitled: For transparent negotiations on the WHO pandemic agreement -
against misinformation and conspiracy theories.
At the annual meeting of the WEF in Davos in mid-January 2024, the fight against
disinformation was also given the highest priority.
Why?
Since the coronavirus pandemic was declared, the
Public confidence in politics, the media and health authorities has dwindled massively.
Many people suffer from vaccination side effects.
There is also a clear excess mortality rate among younger people.
Nevertheless, advertising for the Covid vaccination continues as if nothing had happened.
The Federal Center for Health Education, for example, still claims that the Covid vaccination is effective and safe.
Although countless voices of vaccine victims, doctors, statisticians, vaccine developers,
pathologists, etc. have long proven the opposite.
What a mockery of all the victims who are left in the lurch, severely injured.
The suppression of precisely these dissenting voices is the aim of the fight against alleged disinformation.
Calls for a legal investigation into the coronavirus crimes alone are getting louder and louder.
Below you can see funeral director Marlies Spuhler from southern Germany.
Ms. Spuhler reports what she has experienced since Corona. She testifies:
Everything has changed since 2021
and concludes: Our politicians cannot escape this responsibility.
No, I think they should be dragged before the courts now.
For me, what they are doing is mass murder!
Watch the slightly abridged interview by Sören Schumann with mortician Marlies Spuhler here.
Spread this information in times of increasing censorship and help uncensored news to break through!
[Sören Schumann: Welcome to today's interview. My name is Sören Schumann and today I'm interviewing Marlies Spuhler
and yes, we talk about what she has experienced over the last three or four years.
Marlies is a mortician
or yes, in a funeral home
and that's relatively exciting, because you get to see how many people die and perhaps from what.
I find it very, very exciting to share her perspective, her experiences and her adventures with you here.
And yes, Marlies, do you want to say something else about yourself and your work
and also how you were confronted with these issues?
[Marlies Spuhler: Yes, it was like this: Yes, I am Marlies Spuhler, exactly, 42 years old.
My husband and I founded an ecological carpentry business with funeral services in 2007.
And that's how I got involved.
My husband is a master carpenter and I am a master mortician.
Exactly. And yes, and now we've been running our small family business ever since.
Since 2007, which is about 16 years.
[Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes.
[Sören Schumann: That means you already have a lot of experience.
You can see what's going on outside by how much (you) have to do.
[Marlies Spuhler: Yes, absolutely.
[Sören Schumann: And yes, how did it start for you?
What were your first experiences or adventures in the area of this plandemic, it has to be said?
What were your first experiences with it?
[Marlies Spuhler: Yes, so we found out about the whole thing from the news, like everyone else.
We didn't notice anything about the deceased at first.
In fact, fewer people died in 2020 than in the previous year or the years before that.
So it was a rather slow year.
[Sören Schumann: Yes, although it officially started at the end of 2019.
So they said: Hey, it's really bad now!
[Marlies Spuhler: Exactly.
And you said you had a little less to do in 2020, so to speak.
[Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes.
We had a variable number of deaths every year.
And we are here in a village with around 8,000 to 9,000 inhabitants
and they actually say - before 2019 at least - that one percent of the town dies every year.
This is approximately the mortality rate.
And it was simply that,
and we share the location with another mortician who has been around longer than us.
And I think we had 45 or 46 funerals in 2019.
That's a lot for a small mortician like us.
And the following year, in 2020, we only had 35.
So that's really very little.
And it was a quiet year.
So you were able to do a lot of private things.
Exactly. And yes, it just didn't match up with what they were saying on TV.
I always thought: Yes, where are they?
Where are they all?
And at some point it was like that in the hospitals, it always said C deceased.
Exactly. That was always on the death certificate.
And at some point we realized that this was only the case in the hospital.
We didn't have that at all with the home collections.
And then there is another mortician here in our area who is also on the ball.
And since then we've been on the phone, or at the beginning we were on the phone almost every day, yes, and we
just talked about these oddities, yes, that we noticed.
Firstly, the one with the death certificates in the hospital.
We think that was also a priority. There was just a bit more money, yes.
If that's what it says, so to speak.
[Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes, not for us, but for the hospital.
Exactly, and yes, it just wasn't at home.
People really died normally.
And these were the first abnormalities that simply made us wonder.
And you didn't do it alone, you were also in contact with colleagues.
And they had made similar observations.
They also observed that, yes. Exactly.
[Sören Schumann: Okay.
And so, 2019, once again to put things in perspective, 2019 was a normal year, 2020 was also a year with very
little to do, even though the one major health crisis was supposedly already well advanced.
And then the next chapter probably started in 2021, right?
That's when we really noticed it.
That even started at the end of 2020.
I made a mistake with Facts Peace Freedom over the years,
You can get confused sometimes.
Yes, that's right, they started vaccinating at the end of 2020.
And there were only three, four, five days left until the year was over.
I can't remember how many times we were in the nursing homes.
So only in nursing homes, not at home at all.
But we didn't necessarily think that this could be the syringe.
Exactly. And yes, that's how it was.
And in January and February it was really bad.
I had another trainee who was actually a palliative care doctor, who then wanted to reorient herself because
she had also experienced strange things in her hospital.
And then I said, you, but I don't know yet how many deaths we have. You can never tell beforehand.
And then it hit me so hard. And I was so glad that she was there. Because she was older and had a driver's
license. She was with me at the offices at the beginning. And then she was driving on her own.
She has extended her internship so that she can help me.
She said she wouldn't leave the internship until we had finished because there were so many of them.
And there really were eight or nine deaths at the beginning of the year, that week.
That was really intense.
That was totally unusual.
We've never had that before.
We've had four or five a week, but not eight or nine.
It really was, you really had to make sure that you didn't forget anything, that you documented everything exactly.
You could hardly keep up, so to speak.
[Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes. That was exciting.
And then, spring was just quiet.
Where most people normally die, it was simply quiet.
There was nothing going on, yes.
Spring 2021 is where we are now, yes?
[Marlies Spuhler: Exactly.
It was suddenly very quiet.
There was very, very little at all.
One, two, so very little.
I think we had three weeks in a row where we had nothing at all.
And that's really unusual.
And we simply think that the people who were previously ill, the old people, that those who would normally have
died in that period, they simply left beforehand, yes.
Just through the injection.
And yes, and when the treatment started for those with previous illnesses, we noticed that again.
Because then we got all the atypical deaths.
Just lying dead in bed like that, yes.
Cardiac arrest then.
Yes, very strange things.
We also had deaths.
I found that rather creepy.
They really bled from every pore, yes.
That wasn't nice.
We haven't even had that in 16 years.
In other words, very unusual things that occurred that weren't there before.
[Sören Schumann: When does the work of a mortician actually begin?
So a death is reported. Then there are probably some other things that still need to be clarified.
And when do you come into play?
So it depends on where the person dies.
In the hospital, the doctor is there to issue the death certificate.
And if you die at home, you have to call the doctor home.
Some GPs give out their telephone numbers and they come.
Or you can call the on-call service when the doctor's surgery is closed. And then they send the doctor at some point.
Provided that the on-call service is manned.
I don't know if there will be a new solution now. Because we're cutting back the on-call service.
[Sören Schumann: Okay.
[Marlies Spuhler: Yes, it's not so nice either.
[Sören Schumann: Yes.
[Marlies Spuhler: Exactly. And yes, when the doctor was there
and the death certificate does not state: Cause of death unexplained, then we can come.
[Sören Schumann: Okay. And that's about when, so that the viewer has an idea?
We discuss this with the relatives.
The deceased may stay at home for up to 36 hours.
[Sören Schumann: Ah, okay.
Because many families also use this to say goodbye.
After that, the changes occur anyway.
And they don't necessarily want to go to the open coffin.
You can understand that. That's all right.
It's a different atmosphere at home.
But we already had the idea that we should come straight away.
Regardless of whether it's at three o'clock at night or when, there are also.
But rather less frequently.
Most people actually wait until the morning to call.
[Sören Schumann: Yes, but that means you said that you also noticed clear differences.
In terms of how you encountered the deceased.
Yes, we've experienced that a few times now, that it was so totally unusual
with all that blood.
From the end of 2020 or the beginning of 2021, so to speak.
That was in 2021 then.
Even in (the year) 2022.
That's what we've experienced over the last two years, more or less, or three years already. Yes.
And what we still find is simply that we sometimes come to the mourning houses,
I have already consulted with other morticians who also experience this.
We sometimes come to mourning homes, where we feel
as if the deceased either no longer have rigor mortis at all or it goes out again very quickly,
disappears and decomposition sets in immediately.
So you have to be careful with the laying out.
Of course, this can no longer be guaranteed for as long as it used to be.
How long does rigor mortis normally last?
[Marlies Spuhler: 48 hours actually.
They are usually kept at 5 degrees cold, the deceased.
Then that's definitely two days.
And now it's much shorter. That means,
It could also be due to the fact that these gene therapy injections that were used there also changed things, so to speak.
Well, we also have contact with a group of doctors and other people.
And there are also some who work a lot with the dark-field microscope.
I can actually recommend this to everyone.
If you know an alternative practitioner or someone with dark field, have it done.
That is very interesting.
We did that too.
And we were shocked to find that our blood was full of heavy metals.
And we've been detoxing the whole time, taking vitamins regularly and so on.
And we are really much better off than before.
Exactly. And yes, in any case, they have already done various tests, with their own
blood, with the different batches and so on.
And they also noticed an extremely rapid decomposition of the blood.
And that, of course, is in line with what we have observed.
So they also explain that it could well be that this is the case.
[Sören Schumann: Yes.
Which I think would be exciting, as you've been active in the profession for around 16 years now.
And one or two pandemics have already hit the country, so to speak. So swine flu, bird flu and so on,
where similar scenarios were played out. How did you react to this when it started three or four years ago?
What feelings did you have back then? Or did you already have certain intuitions about what it might be all about?
It seemed strange to me right from the start. Just the way it was set up on television.
So we found out about it from the news. And it was always our mealtime.
We actually used to watch the news with our meals.
Perhaps not the best idea.
[Marlies Spuhler: No.
We have long since turned that off.
Yes, and we actually had a bad feeling at the beginning because we didn't know what was coming.
But it quickly subsided, simply because of the experiences we had at work.
We've seen that the hospitals apparently just want to cash in, because it was only
there. And strangely enough, nobody died at home.
And the pandemics before that, either our district was always unaffected.
Yes, there was nothing there either.
I think they were experiments gone wrong, I don't know.
Now they just haven't been able to push it through. I don't know.
Yes, in our case it definitely only started when we started the injection.
So everything was quiet before, normal.
Sometimes it was more, sometimes less.
[Sören Schumann: Yes.
It's also very exciting, you've said twice now that you didn't notice anything at the beginning and only the hospital
deaths were given this stamp, so to speak. There is a suspicion that there are also financial interests behind it.
It wouldn't be the first time, so to speak.
We were told by families, I don't want to name anyone in particular, but they were actually offered money by the wards, by
the doctor, if they were allowed to put the Covid entry in there.
I find that really quite blatant.
I think that's already a criminal offense here.
Where should one actually proceed?
That is, yes, a manipulation, offering people money.
I could imagine that many have accepted it, if you don't have anything on the edge anyway.
I really think it's blatant that nobody said anything, nobody took action against it.
[Sören Schumann: Yes, this framing, I would say, is often interpreted in a way that suits,
or where there are certain interests or certain advantages for the person who does it.
For example, if someone has received a gene therapy injection and perhaps suffered certain damage, then it is very
difficult for this to be recognized because, of course, no one is really interested in being liable for it.
Or perhaps the doctor will then hold himself responsible.
On the other hand, if I can put the Corona stamp on people when they're dead, i.e. when I write there, and earn something
from it, then of course some people at least like to use it.
And what has already come through very clearly is that fewer people died at the
beginning, even though it was a huge health crisis,
at least not any more.
And then with the big cure that was advertised, which was pushed through in a very special approval procedure, where all
the alarm bells were already ringing, so to speak, but which was then taken anyway, the death rates went up.
It's also a paradox, because it should actually protect or help.
We actually had a case once where it actually said: died of C.
And the man died 14 days after the third vaccination, so he went back a third time, so to speak - and yes, -
he was already over 80. So he was really, yes, he was ill, tested positive and then died.
And that was the only one we had in there with an C, yes, as a reason.
They don't actually have to write it in.
That's enough if they put a cross next to infectious.
But that wasn't done here.
It seems to be important here that it always says what it is.
[Sören Schumann: Yes. [Marlies Spuhler: I don't know. Yes.
[Sören Schumann: Very exciting.
So you're talking about the doctors who go to the deceased's homes, so to speak. So to speak. Yes.
Okay.
But the man was also in hospital, then.
He was still on a ventilator and so on. He just didn't have it.
[Sören Schumann: Yes.
And what did you experience in the social sphere?
I mean, you're probably in contact with the families, with the people affected.
You're bound to pick up a few things.
Well, before it was like this, we had deaths. They also wanted to see proof from me.
And I have proof of immunity. We had that done.
We actually had corona at the beginning of 2020, we just didn't know it.
We then had it confirmed a year and a half later by the blood test we had done
and then obtained this immunity certificate via Evidence of Reason .
This was also recognized in many cases.
Still testing and so on.
We always did this as a precaution before we went to the customers so that they would be reassured if they wanted to see it.
We have the note and that's that.
Exactly. So that was one.
I have to say. With this campaign, we simply noticed that this division that affects this society has been played
out at the regulars' table or at the family table. This has actually been reflected in the grieving families.
Then there were accusations: ... because he wasn't vaccinated, he just died. That's your fault because you're all not.
And then family members also stayed away at the funeral.
And I thought that was a real shame.
How suddenly this topic somehow accompanied everything.
It was only important whether you were (vaccinated) or not.
I'm just talking so strangely now, because people here would try to avoid a bit of censorship.
Yes, that you still understand what I'm getting at.
Exactly. And I think that's a shame, because you can still really feel it.
Somehow, people can't find a way to get together anymore, so when it comes to dividing up the
inheritance at the latest, you might end up at loggerheads.
We've seen this before.
Only now it was already there.
Where people are excluded from funerals if possible, so that they don't even find out that this or that person has died.
But if someone loses their mother or father, then I have to say.
Well, I don't call him, but if he calls me and asks, of course I say yes.
I can't say: I'm not allowed to say anything because the sister doesn't want me to or something.
I think that's the worst thing of all.
So you also noticed changes like that? Maybe that at the beginning you were even attacked a lot or that
people said: Hey, yeah, it's so bad with this virus.
And were afraid of it, and that maybe it turned around a bit, that maybe it was because of the injection that people died.
We now have that.
People don't talk to me directly during the funeral, but usually when we have the second or third contact.
[Sören Schumann: So a funeral interview is basically the first interview?
The first contact, so to speak, yes.
So not the first contact, but yes exactly, the first conversation you have, where you discuss the whole, so far, everything.
You always have to look at what kind of situation the relatives are in now.
Can you already talk to them about everything?
I also always leave a pad with a few things written on it for them to think about.
These are then arrangements, funeral service and so on.
Exactly. And that's not even mentioning me yet.
But I've often had the case now when I go there for the second or third time and then they say, oh, Mrs. Spuhler.
And then either they know my videos, my interviews. They talk to me directly and say they
think it's so great that I dare to tell the truth.
And then tell me your assumptions.
I often hear: If my wife wasn't ... (vaccinated) ... , she would still be alive.
Or: Mom has been worse since the second time.
Or: From the third time it was foreseeable with dad.
So I'm being told it more and more often now.
And especially with the middle-aged, I'm going to say it's difficult to estimate, they'll all
be between 40 and 60. They're noticing it now.
And they also say quite clearly: So us - never again.
And then you also hear how many people are still in families where either the whole family is not (vaccinated) at all.
So that still exists.
Or there is actually someone in every family who has really gone through with it, who has said: You're not getting me!
So there are more of them than you might think.
Even if we are told here that the vaccination rate is so and so high, I don't believe it.
So I think we are more.
We just didn't know each other at the beginning.
We also felt quite alone.
We also thought, oh God, are we the only ones here now.
We all tried to warn them at the beginning.
We have had the experience that at the beginning of January, February.
And they said: Hey guys, don't go there. A lot of people die here.
So even with that and with facts ... - You've seen it.
Where were they all, the corona casualties?
There were none at all.
They could no longer be reassured with facts.
In the end, they even demanded the approval of all this filth.
They were delighted
as a cure, as a miracle cure in the end.
And I think it's a shame that so many people no longer question this.
Where has the awareness of health gone?
We have an ecological joinery. The majority of our customers are either organic or vegan or whatever.
They live a fundamentally healthy life.
We oil the cabinets with natural oil.
But with the dirt, they run to the doctor.
We don't understand it.
They let themselves be beaten into it.
When it comes to food, they make sure that it is not genetically modified under any circumstances.
They let themselves be gene-therapized ...
[Marlies Spuhler: No idea.
So that's also something we've never really been able to understand.
What is happening in people's minds is that they are simply discarding this critical thinking and blindly
trusting the whole thing that is happening right now.
Don't they all have a gut feeling anymore?
It's not as if we do a job that is so ubiquitous
Yes? If a mortician warns you, then you should actually take it seriously.
I never understood why people still ...
[Sören Schumann: What were the reactions like?
So if you said now: Hey, they say this and that, but we've experienced it the other way around.
When you told someone that, how did people react?
Yes, they listened to it and when you met them again the next time, they were just (vaccinated).
That's when it happened. Even though you more or less warned them beforehand.
And you said that now it's already partly the case that people are realizing that perhaps it wasn't the right choice that
they made. That they are already making certain connections.
Was there perhaps also such a development of: In the beginning not at all...
And then now you say that perhaps people are even making certain connections several times now.
Was that also a certain development over time?
[Marlies Spuhler: Yes, absolutely. Absolutely.
They didn't see that at the beginning.
We have already had deaths. There are also courageous doctors.
They then write in, death by third party (vaccination). And then there is also a post-mortem examination by the police.
Was it so, if that's in there, is there a post-mortem?
[Marlies Spuhler: Yes, then it's confiscated. That's an unnatural death.
If it says death by injection, then
[Marlies Spuhler: Yes, it's unnatural. Exactly.
And then an autopsy is carried out, but by the CID, the police.
And in one particular case, the relatives had their appointment with the doctor for boosters on Fridays.
Exactly. And the autopsy was on Wednesday.
And then they just waited for the result.
And all that came out was cardiac arrest.
The connection has not been investigated.
Yes, they went to (vaccination) on Fridays and got the next shot. That was just the way it was.
Yes, and in the beginning it was more like that, they trusted the whole thing, of course.
And if you were speaking rather to the contrary, then oh well.
And you may have heard the odd conversation in your circle of friends.
I have often been told: I trust the government, it was elected by the people. Yes, and they don't
believe that the government meant the people any harm.
What do you want, you're no good there. Yes,
and we can't compete with the doctors who are in favor and support the whole thing.
We don't stand a chance. As a patient, you trust your doctor.
Yes, and apparently they are still somehow above us.
[Sören Schumann: And were there certain events where it developed in the other direction? Or was it a very gradual process from:
Yes, I trust him and he's definitely died of the virus now, to: Yes, this gene therapy could..., that's probably the reason or?
You notice, as I said, we really do watch everything that is paid for by the GEZ, we don't watch that anymore.
We consistently avoid it because we simply don't want to be bombarded with nonsense.
But when you talk to people on the street, you realize what happened. Because they
always tell or reflect what they heard there.
And people are also exchanging ideas.
And in the meantime, if there's one person who says: Hey, I've been doing so badly since then,
then the next person will dare to do the same.
And that is also a process.
You've just noticed that now.
More and more people are daring to come out and say: Yes, I'm unhappy with it.,
plus the experiences that families have with the deaths. So many families are affected more than once.
Yes, they have now buried five of their family members in the last two years.
So if they don't understand it yet, I don't know what will.
[But there are probably also some who still say: Yes, okay.
[Marlies Spuhler: Not them.
The lady said: Definitely never again. So she is also firmly convinced that this is the result of the whole thing.
Because simply, that can't be, yes.
And two of her siblings, neither of whom were yet 70, yes.
One not 60, the other not 70, and both parents in their early 80s. So somewhere... Yes, especially when you're talking
about a life expectancy of, I don't know, supposedly, yes.
And suddenly everyone dies. That can't be right, can it?
And they do see that now.
As I said, I hear that more and more often.
If it hadn't been for my wife (for the vaccination), she would still be alive, yes.
Or since the third, fourth, fifth, depending on how much, it's gone downhill, no.
Whereby most people actually say that things have been going downhill since the third.
I think if you go even more often, that's just my personal attitude now, right. The worse off you'll be.
Let's talk again about the timeline and the figures.
So let's briefly summarize again.
It was very quiet in 2020, less so than before.
It started at the end of 2020. You can also see a temporal connection to the injection programs.
In 2021, it was definitely significantly more than . .
That's when things really took off. Excuse me?
That's where the post started in 2021.
2021 was the year when things really took off.
And what happened in the years that followed? 2022, 2023?
So 2022 was still tough.
Until 2022, i.e. 2021, 2022, we always noticed the correlation.
Yes, so it was always about two weeks later. And now it's 2023.
So two weeks after an injection appointment. . .
[Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes, exactly.
And now 2023 it seems to be converging again.
We have actually had the most deaths again this year in spring and fall.
Although I have to say right away that things really got going again for us this year
on September 28th, when a lot of people died.
And on September 18th they started again, no, they started again.
To begin with, there was an official recommendation, so to speak, from the ...
Exactly, and we also know from friends, from acquaintances who work for doctors, who are medical assistants
or something, and the appointment books were full. Yes,
People have been waiting for the chance to brush up on that again.
And it was the same there, as I said, it was exactly the same ten days as it started for us.
And what's striking now is that older society is catching up again.
That's when I realize that the focus was there.
Because we have many now in their 30s, where they were born, in their 30s, where everyone
is now. . . Which is not immediately unusual.
Old people die, especially when you're 90.
That should not be misunderstood.
But again, as I said, it is striking:
18 (September) was the beginning.
28 (September) that's when it started.
And right now it's getting quieter.
[Sören Schumann: And you can probably also see it in the condition of the deceased, as you said at the beginning.
[Marlies Spuhler: Unfortunately, you can see it.
So many people also have this gray, this very gray, pale face.
So it's unnatural.
Not the way a deceased person normally looks.
And the others are also squeaky yellow.
So we have lots and lots of yellow ones, yes.
Yellow, does that have something to do with the liver?
In the group of doctors we are part of, many have already said that this spike protein tends to accumulate in the liver.
And that would then create this yellow appearance.
I can now only reproduce what I have heard.
I'm already out of there again.
That's no longer my area of expertise.
But I still have the observation and the decay.
This autolysis starts much earlier.
We pick up a lot of people who have only been dead one day.
And you can't touch them because you'll accidentally pull their skin off or something.
And that shouldn't be the case. Not after just one day.
And they don't all get cortisone and chemotherapy or anything like that. That would be a reason why.
No, they died under normal circumstances, I'll call them normal circumstances now.
And yet the situation is already like this. It can't really be. Not with this frequency.
As I said, this has always happened.
Someone who has previously received chemotherapy for three months or more and has died as
a result, decomposition starts straight away.
We don't need to talk about that. It's super exhausting for the body.
But people die without chemotherapy. Or without being given high doses of cortisone or anything else. Or
morphine of some kind. Like, I don't know what you get.
Yes, and that is very noticeable. And we still see that.
And the stupid thing is, they have the funeral, which is stupid, I don't know yet whether that's good or bad.
They have increased the burial period to ten days. Previously it was seven. Since the start of the pandemic.
And that is of course a problem for us. Especially with burials. When the funeral is a week later.
And that's with cremation. You really have to check whether the coffin is closed earlier.
It's just a different kind of communication that takes place now than before.
Because of the appearance of the deceased.
[Marlies Spuhler: Yes, exactly. You can't expect the relatives to do that anymore.
Yes, that means you also communicate: Hey, if you want to see this person again now, you have to do it by this time,
because otherwise it's no longer reasonable, so to speak.
[Marlies Spuhler: Exactly, yes.
There are also odors and so on.
We can turn them off on a large scale, let's say. But they will reappear at some point anyway.
Decomposition cannot be stopped except by thanatopractic treatment.
But nobody does that.
That's only done for repatriations abroad. Or Michael Jackson or someone who is laid out for a longer period of time.
Exactly. Otherwise it makes no sense.
You said that a few months ago, when the official recommendations were issued again, so to speak, things started up again.
Where do you think the journey is going?
So you once said that some people have already woken up and are questioning it. But you still notice that when
recommendations are given for injections, the deaths increase.
Where do you think the journey is going? What are you preparing for, in your job too?
So I, we just bought a little bit in stock, just to be on the safe side, because you
just can't estimate where it's all going to go.
Of course I hope that at some point people will stop running there all the time.
That would be one possibility.
What I think is a shame is our older society, which can't defend itself.
Especially the people who are in nursing homes.
If you don't have children who are on their toes, then you're completely at the mercy of
the whole thing. There's nothing you can do.
And I think that's a shame. Because right now, when you realize, let me put it this way, that people are demanding a
reappraisal, even if it's not happening from the other side.
Or if contributions, such as the MDR, for example, had a contribution on vaccination side effects
last Tuesday. I thought it was very courageous.
Of course, not everything has been said - it would be too much for ordinary citizens.
But it has already been taken down from the media library.
That you can no longer watch it. I just think it's a shame.
Where does the enlightenment start? Why, what are they afraid of?
Yes, they have made a mistake.
But they also have to own up to it and not try to wriggle out of it and carry on just
because they're still stuck on how many cans
Yes, enough billions have already been wasted on other stuff anyway.
Yes, then it doesn't matter whether it's the same with him. So what?
And yes, a reappraisal would be incredibly important.
I have an incredible amount of grief damage.
Oh, how are you going to give people back the farewell they were denied?
or the grief counseling where they were not allowed to be present?
Yes, even the farewell in the crematorium or this accompanied cremation? That was all forbidden.
Or the best friend wasn't even allowed to attend the funeral because they were excluded.
You mean in general or for people who didn't have a certain status?
[Marlies Spuhler: Yes, you had to be part of the close family circle to be able to
attend the funeral. And that wasn't possible.
Only then, with the compulsory testing and so on, did 3 or 2 Gs apply in the cemetery, depending on the situation.
And yes, the reappraisal would be important.
People have simply had a very important section taken away from them.
And especially when the bond is close.
In other words, the great-grandchild wasn't actually allowed to join her great-grandmother at the funeral.
But it could just as well be that the great-grandchild only spent the first three or four
years of his life with his great-grandmother.
And then there is a strong bond there.
And I can't tell him, no, you can't come.
Yes, how is the child ever supposed to get over this grief properly or have proper grief development?
I mean, you are often confronted with grief at some point.
We are practiced at saying goodbye. We say goodbye every day.
You must not forget that.
But this eternal farewell is something else.
I just think that's a shame.
And I think it's a shame that the truth is still being withheld.
And something is going on.
Everything has changed since 2021, that's just the way it is.
Everything is different. And what is different? Only one thing has been introduced differently.
So it's actually not that difficult to solve the equation, so to speak.
[Marlies Spuhler: No, exactly.
It's a completely normal, simple math problem. And if you can't figure it out, well, I don't know. I mean, so slowly...
And I just think that our politicians cannot shirk this responsibility.
And there's no point in resigning or doing anything else.
No, I think they should be dragged to court now. For me, what they're doing is mass murder!
You really have to use the word now.
Sounds like a strong word, a big accusation.
But if you really look at it in detail, then you should really think about it.
[Marlies Spuhler: Yes, I think, as I said, but that's not an excuse. But many people were simply brought forward (by dying
early). They would probably have died in the near future anyway.
Especially for older people.
They often have all kinds of diseases.
And that just intensified it.
Which is no excuse for the fact that they had to leave earlier.
But I think enough other people would still be alive if they hadn't let that stuff get into them. Yes, really.
And I just don't think that's right.
And they simply have to justify themselves for that.
We also filed a criminal complaint in Karlsruhe. We took part in that.
And I can only recommend this to anyone.
A bit of advertising on the side.
At ZAAVV, Z -A -A -V -V, you can download the card. You can fill it out. You can hand it in at the BGH.
So I can only say to everyone, do it! And I think they should be prosecuted.
And especially our Mr. Lauterbach, who talks so much garbage, yes, as Minister of Health, so honestly.
It has nothing to do with health. For me, this is a minister of illness.
[Sören Schumann: Yes, you don't know whether to laugh or cry. More likely to cry.
[Marlies Spuhler: Yes, I mean, I've never approached the politicians personally. I've always kept a low profile.
But yes, when you see what's happening here. Yes, let's be honest. Then you have to do something.
And people shouldn't just accept everything. That can't be right! I never understand that.
Where has all the fighting spirit gone?
[Sören Schumann: Maybe for you personally. What have the last three years been like?
What have you personally learned again? Where have you seen the light again? Or what do you have that
makes you say: Hey, that's become very clear to me again?
Well, that's how it is for me now, or for us in the family in general. We have learned to be critical of everything.
And not to rely on statements from individuals. And to always convince ourselves first. So I generally only believe
what I see live. So not even here on TV or anything like that.
Today we know that everything can be recreated.
Yes, so this thinking for yourself, doing a bit of research yourself. What could be behind it all?
To mention some positive aspects: We've never had any problems with the lockdown or anything. We've always seen
everything in a positive light. It was actually pleasant.
There was nothing going on in the street. People had to keep their distance when shopping. If you had an appointment
at the doctor's, you had to call, you got it straight away.
You had no waiting time. So you also have to take the positives out of the whole thing.
And what I wouldn't want to do without are all the people I've met over the past three years.
So I think even before the miracle cure came along, you could tell that C (Corona) simply showed people's true character.
And then you also saw how many people you were actually wrong about.
How many basically present an image on the outside that they are not at all on the inside.
And in the last three years, because of the reorientation, the people you've gotten to know and it's just like
that. I'm much, much better now than I was at the beginning.
In any case. And we no longer have any fear at all. We've got rid of it completely.
So we don't let anything throw us off track any more.
Unless someone would go straight for the family or something. Exactly.
But just the people we know now, I'm really proud of them
Is there anything else you would like to say to people at the end?
So I would just like to recommend it to everyone.
Don't always believe everything that is said out there. See for yourself.
Don't forget to be self-critical. Yes, generally critical of everything.
And simply look for your own kind.
And if we are strong and stick together, nothing will happen to us.
So I firmly believe that.
[Sören Schumann: Ok, nice closing words and thank you for your commitment, dear Marlies.
I hope that we can reach a lot of people.
There were a lot of exciting things there.
I was also able to learn a lot. And thank you for your courage and commitment.