[Today's Schöning Report will mainly focus on three current topics.
One is the planning of a war of aggression by German military officers.
The second is Ingo Gerhartz and Amy Gutmann.
And the third is the attempt to stop Heiko Schöning's speech at the peace demonstration in Berlin on March 10, 2024.
A conversation had been intercepted, which was perceived or reported in the media as the Taurus wiretapping scandal.
What was it all about?
In fact, and this must be the headline, it is the planning of a war of aggression.
And wars of aggression are forbidden.
On February 19, 2024, a planning meeting for a war of aggression was held by German army generals.
Namely the head of the German Air Force, Lieutenant General Ingo Gerhartz.
So General Gerhartz and General Gräfe and two others specifically planned the bombing of a foreign bridge.
And the bridge is unfortunately like an airfield due to its size.
This means that I may well need 10 or 20 missiles for this. And that is the preparation for a war of aggression.
And according to the Basic Law, Article 26, Paragraph 1 - I have one here, in small form -
acts which are suitable and undertaken with the intention of disturbing the peaceful coexistence of peoples, in particular
the waging of a war of aggression, are unconstitutional.
They are to be made a punishable offense.
So Article 26, peacekeeping, clearly states that a war of aggression may not be planned and must be criminalized.
And what General Gerhartz did with the three other senior Bundeswehr officers was the actual
bombing of a foreign bridge with German Taurus missiles.
It doesn't really matter which rockets they are and what they are called.
The important thing is planning a war of aggression on a bridge.
That would be just like another foreign country wanting to bomb the Elbe bridges near Hamburg or
Dresden, or the Rhine bridges near Cologne or Düsseldorf.
And the concrete planning, because this planning meeting lasted around 40 minutes, that has also been confirmed,
that has not been denied, that was actually the case.
And I convinced myself of this. I'm not just a doctor, I'm also a commissioned officer and
an officer in the German Armed Forces Reserve.
In other words, I can only verify the whole thing from a professional point of view.
And that is the point. And that should be made a punishable offense.
And that is also something that we said after it came out on March 1: Now we will quickly organize a
demonstration and I will announce that I will report the generals, especially General Gerhartz.
Because that is a criminal offense.
Yes, definitely. As an officer in the German Armed Forces, do you ever have a conversation
like that? So what could have been behind it?
And who is this Gerhartz that he can at least discuss such planning?
Yes, General Gerhartz, Lieutenant General Ingo Gerhartz to be precise, is still a relatively young officer for his position.
He is the head of the German air force. There are army, navy, air force and subordinate units.
This makes him one of the highest generals in Germany.
And he planned it together with the other generals.
And since Germany is part of NATO and the USA is of course not only the leading power in
NATO, you have to ask yourself quite clearly:
Can a West German general really plan the actual destruction of a major bridge abroad without the order or backing of the USA?
Certainly not.
And then of course I asked myself: Well, who will be behind this?
Who is the person who actually heads the Air Force?
Who is the person who runs the whole thing in the USA?
Yes, from my point of view it's the classic pattern again.
It is the ambassador of the USA in Germany and her name is Amy Gutmann.
Amy Gutmann - but spelled Gutmann.
And this person, yes, he has a lot on his plate, which even coincides with my forensic, i.e. criminal research.
Because this woman is not only the ambassador of the USA, she was also the chairwoman of the presidential bioethics commission.
In other words, it helped decide on the permissibility of bioweapons within this framework.
This is Amy Gutmann.
And she has been in Germany for some time now and has met with General Ingo Gerhartz several times.
We will perhaps also show photos of it.
And the two of them have a, well, quite close working relationship, obviously.
And it is indeed the case that this post that Amy Gutmann has here in Germany is not just a diplomatic post, but
has been well documented over the decades, and is also a post that includes secret service activities.
And US ambassadors even have parts of the CIA, the Central Intelligence Agency, under them in the country.
And also the, shall I say, civilian, not quite so well-known offshoot of the CIA, the USAID.
This is actually for development aid, so to speak. But this is simply a cover for the CIA.
And that has been the case at least since the Vietnam War.
But the organizational charts are also there so that you know that the ambassador is here and that the CIA, USAID and the
other agencies are underneath her in the organizational chart.
This means that the ambassadors in a country are also something like the leaders.
And Ingo Gerhartz and Amy Gutmann have met several times and worked closely together.
We can prove that.
And what is really even more threatening from my point of view is that Amy Gutmann is actually also
very active in the use and preparation of bioweapons.
And this has actually been proven by several articles, even scientific articles.
Of course that doesn't sound good, especially if the threat is now getting closer to Germany by Germany getting involved.
And perhaps it is to be carried out by Germany because the USA does not want to get its hands
dirty with it directly. Could that be the case?
Yes, the USA is just across the pond.
And here in Europe it is, so to speak, the conflict between Germany and Russia, which
nobody in the German population naturally wants.
And the question is, how is something like this prepared? How does something like this work?
And almost exactly ten years ago, we were able to witness and now understand, i.e. since 2014, how a very similar person to
Amy Gutmann acted in Germany today against Ukraine, in Ukraine.
That was the Maidan attack.
Right, that was the Maidan coup, the regime change, the violent change of the elected government in Ukraine.
And since then, we've only really had all these problems since 2014.
And that person's name is Victoria Nuland.
In other words, there was a similar event in the past, ten years ago, that led to this, this very large
conflict in Ukraine/Russia, which has been playing out or has been quite active ever since.
And that could now have happened again or could happen again.
Yes, in a similar way, you have to say.
And what's the story with the Nuland?
Yes, there is a parallel:
About ten years ago, a conversation with Victoria Nuland was intercepted there.
It was all about who the USA and its NATO allies want to have as the next head of government.
In the Ukraine? In the Ukraine.
Who the US wants in Ukraine. Right, exactly. That's exactly what it was about.
And the EU states wanted to have Klitschko, the boxer. And Victoria Nuland said: Fuck the EU.
So forget the EU. Very crude, very unfriendly.
Victoria Nuland had about 5 billion US dollars at her disposal for this coup.
So it's actually about political corruption. Yes, there was also a lot of violence in the Maidan.
And we have seen the terrible images and the escalation that this has led to with Ukraine's neighboring countries.
Yes, and if you approached it back then with such an attitude, namely 'Fuck the EU', then nowadays you can only fear the
worst, namely that perhaps the EU or Europe will be abandoned.
Or that it is accepted that a war may actually take place on the European side.
Yes, that's right.
So it's quite obvious that war is being accepted. Then let's get back to the specifics.
Yes, a German army general, Gerhartz, really did plan the bombing of the Crimean Bridge in detail.
And it doesn't really matter where this bridge is, it's a foreign bridge.
The Federal Republic of Germany is not at war with any country and the population does not want war either.
And I have to say quite clearly, even as a reserve officer in the Bundeswehr: this is a criminal offense; according to Article
26, Paragraph 1 of the Basic Law, this is a punishable offense.
That was also in the penal code under paragraph 80 - preparation of a war of aggression.
That has been dropped. It was deleted in 2017, but has been continued in an almost similar way
to paragraph 13 of international criminal law.
But it has also been changed a little, in my view somewhat watered down.
Here, too, you have to ask yourself: How can this be?
How can you simply omit such an article of criminal law and then change it so that it looks like a legal loophole?
But in short, I can only say that no matter what legal tricks have been used there, Article 26 of the German
Basic Law on the maintenance of peace applies in any case.
And it clearly states that even the preparation of a war of aggression is a punishable offense.
Okay, that means that the German military officers have actually made themselves liable to
prosecution and should be prosecuted accordingly.
Exactly, that's the important point. And you simply have to see directly, without cover from the USA it would hardly be possible.
You can also see in official meetings, the Federal Press Conference, where Gerhartz
sits next to Gutmann, they sit together.
They meet more often, have agreements and much more.
And such a really questionable character that he gets such a high post is really questionable.
And on top of that, I simply have to say that Amy Gutmann was not only the head of the US President's Bioethics Commission and thus
made direct decisions on bioweapons, but she was also the president of the University of
Pennsylvania for many years. Yes, that is a state in the USA.
It's a relatively large university, Penn University, Pennsylvania.
And I have described in detail in the book 'Attack on the Microbiome' how bioweapons research is
currently being conducted at the University of Pennsylvania.
We don't want to go into too much detail, because we have already done a Schöning report on this.
And there is a bioweapons researcher working at the University of Pennsylvania and that is Henry Daniel.
And then we're already back there again.
This also means that the threads all go in a similar direction and gather there again, so
that we have to pay particular attention to this.
The mainstream media in Germany pay little attention to this, or actually none at all.
This Taurus affair is not about preparations for a war of aggression, i.e. not about anything so explosive in terms of
content, but mainly about espionage on the part of Russia.
Here too, of course, it is concealed that the whole thing may have been initiated with the support of the USA and the like.
And probably also serves to mislead the population.
And in the end, the explosive nature of this has not yet become so widely known in Germany.
And that was the main point, to then quickly call for a demonstration to say: Watch out,
it's close to war if we carry on like this.
The Bundeswehr generals should be removed from these posts accordingly to prevent worse things from happening.
And that is why this peace demonstration was scheduled for March 10 in Berlin.
But - Heiko Schöning was taken into police custody five minutes before the start of the event.
How did this come about or what could have been an obstacle?
Yes, of course I have to assume that my cell phone and my communications are being tapped.
In this respect, it was clear that I would be the first speaker at the demonstration; I would also be the
first speaker to say that wars of aggression are forbidden.
General Gerhartz did it with other generals, I will file a criminal complaint with the police
against Ingo Gerhartz and the other generals.
And you have to keep coming back to it and all the other things are distractions.
We are really dealing here with the game, with fire, with a war of aggression.
Yes, even the planning is punishable by no less than ten years in prison. And carrying out a war of
aggression is punishable by life imprisonment, yes.
And we have to take to the streets and say so.
And that was now on Sunday in Berlin, March 10, 2 p.m. that was supposed to start.
I was already there at 12 noon on June 17th Street.
That's about 100 meters from the Brandenburg Gate, in front of the Soviet memorial.
I spoke to the police officer there in a friendly manner and also showed them my ID.
Had said who I am. I'm the first speaker here and where can we put the information material. That was all good, all fine, yes.
It was due to start at 2 p.m., about two hours later.
And we experienced it, about five to ten minutes before, the police suddenly come and ask
me, really original, it was just a question
- Would you like to come along to a personal arrest? Even though they knew exactly who I was.
And then I said: No, I don't want to do that. I don't have time for that at the moment.
I want to speak here, so the answer is no.
And without them saying that they wanted this personal identification, they wanted my data again and my address.
I had already given them that beforehand, or at least they know it.
That was completely disproportionate. It should be disrupted. I shouldn't be giving this speech.
I was dragged off for over three hours, yes, quite roughly.
And so far away to Hohenschönhausen, 15 kilometers away from Berlin City, yes, very far
away, so that I could have arrived after dark.
Fortunately, we were able to organize it so that I could still give the speech there.
That's why you can listen to it.
Attention! The preparation of a war of aggression is prohibited!
But that's just a tactic, trying to deflect attention.
That people talk about such events, but not about the content.
And I can say once again: no matter what has happened, wars of aggression are forbidden.
I am pressing criminal charges against General Gerhartz and the others.
And I can only call on every citizen to go to the police stations in person.
And also with this video, the data is simply in there, to say: Here, this is a suspected criminal offense,
I'm pressing charges - and simply invoking the Basic Law.
No more, no less.
And it is important that we also inform the civil servants and officers, i.e. the police officers and
police officers, that something like this is happening.
And every citizen is free to do so if the planning of a war of aggression has clearly taken place with this
conversation and with the confirmations that have already been given by the government.
We cannot allow that.
So this also serves the purpose of showing that you are doing this:
We as a population have understood it.
We as a population are not behind it.
We as a population are trying to defend ourselves.
At the same time, the police and possibly politicians and others need to be informed in order to simply get
something going so that a possible war of aggression, which also involves German participation, can be stopped.
That's right. That's simply the important thing, yes.
And not to criminalize the messenger and the person who says it, but to actually focus on what it is, yes.
And that is a criminal offense under Section 11 of the Soldiers Act.
I have to make that very clear again here:
According to Section 11 of the Soldiers Act, an order may not be carried out if it could constitute a criminal offense.
Therefore also to all soldiers, also to all civil servants: Say No! No to aggressive war!
You make yourself liable to prosecution - not to mention the moral consequences and the others.
Because as a doctor I can simply say, what are we talking about here with rockets and explosives and
the blowing up of a bridge if it claims lives again.
When a cruise missile like the Taurus explodes, it's thousands of degrees Celsius.
People are burned to death. They are mutilated and dismembered.
We are talking about that, yes.
I'd really like to say that again to these Rheinmetall youngsters who have no idea:
We are talking about burning and dismembering people when we talk about rocket attacks and that is no joke.
Therefore no!
So, mothers, fathers, we will not give our children. Say no and stand up for peace.