The so-called "Taurus leak", misleadingly called the "Taurus wiretapping affair" in the mainstream media, made the headlines.
What happened and who benefits from all this wiretapping?
From the front:
The Taurus is a German-Swedish air-to-ground cruise missile with maximum accuracy.
It can fly under enemy radar and can destroy bunkers and other well-protected installations such as ammunition depots.
With a range of more than 500 kilometers, the cruise missiles could also reach Russian territory.
This is precisely what makes the weapon system so valuable for Ukraine.
In the summer of 2023, the Ukrainian government asked Germany to supply Taurus cruise missiles.
The Bundeswehr owns 600 of them. One copy costs around one million euros.
The Taurus controversy
A fierce controversy over the delivery of Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine has been raging since the summer of 2023.
The government, parliament, parts of the SPD, the AfD and the Left Party spoke out against it.
At the beginning of March 2024, 61% of Germans surveyed rejected Taurus deliveries.
Federal Chancellor Olaf Scholz speaks out categorically against deliveries.
As recently as March 13, he said in the Bundestag that the delivery of weapons required
that there was no involvement of German soldiers.
Scholz verbatim: "As Chancellor, I have the responsibility to prevent Germany from becoming involved in this war."
On the other hand, politicians from the Greens, FDP and CDU/CSU parties as well as parts of the SPD are
calling for the delivery of the Taurus cruise missiles.
The Taurus bugging case
On February 19, 2024, the inspector and three high-ranking officers of the German Air Force discussed a possible delivery of
German Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine during a web conference.
The key issues were whether the Crimean bridge and Russian ammunition depots could be attacked and
whether this was possible without German involvement.
The conversation was tapped and secretly recorded.
The federal prosecutor's office assumes that it was a Russian secret service.
It was published on Russian broadcasters and channels on March 1, 2024.
The German government confirmed the authenticity of the recording on March 2.
The Swiss military expert Ralph Bosshard pointed out that caution should always be
exercised with intercepted telephone conversations.
Bosshard studied military history, worked as a professional officer for 25 years and spent 6 years with the OSCE.
Bosshard wonders how anyone could be so careless and discuss such things on the phone.
German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius spoke of an "individual application error".
According to the minister, one of the participants had dialed in via a "non-secure data line" from Singapore.
Can it really be that high-ranking officers accept the risk of making a phone call from abroad via commercial providers?
Bosshard sums it up as follows:
"Skepticism is called for here, because such conversations can also be staged."
The German political scientist and publicist Hermann Ploppa said that the conversation was real, but that it was perhaps even
accepted by certain circles in the West that this conversation be leaked, so that facts could be created, so to speak.
German lawyer Peter Schindler shares this view.
This raises the question of who or what this supposed incident serves.
In a thesis paper published on March 4, 2024, Schindler speaks of a "strategically directed leak as
part of cognitive (i.e. psychological) warfare".
Here are some excerpts from it:
The Bundeswehr's Taurus leak is intended to test whether the German population reacts negatively to this.
At the same time, the population is to be mentally prepared for the supposedly "inevitable" - open war with Russia.
The whole thing has been following the same pattern for two years, a theater play with fixed roles:
A dithering Federal Chancellor Scholz, a reasonable opposition in his own ranks (Roth SPD, Baerbock Greens,
Strack-Zimmermann FDP) and a real opposition (Röttgen, Kiesewetter), reinforced by the tabloid media.
For the public, it looks like this:
All opposition parties and NATO foreign countries want the Taurus delivery and later ground troops to take the war to Russia.
Only Scholz is still hesitating, as always. At some point, Scholz always gives in and delivers.
At the latest after the first hit of a Taurus missile in Russia or the deployment of more real NATO combat soldiers in
Ukraine, Germany will find itself in an open war with Russia.
Because taking the war to Russia, as Roderich Kiesewetter (Member of the Bundestag, CDU) demanded in an interview at the beginning
of February 2024, also means taking the war to German cities.
Or a reason is sought for going to war: for example, in 1964, the alleged attack by North Vietnamese
speedboats on two US warships in the Gulf of Tonkin.
This never took place, but led to the USA intervening in the Vietnam War.
It was a false flag operation.
Confirmed false flag operations can be found in the program "False flag operations confirmed!"
This is the assessment of the German lawyer Peter Schindler.
According to this, the German population is to be manipulated into accepting Germany's involvement in the Russian-Ukrainian war.
Schindler also points out that such a scenario makes perfect geopolitical sense.
This would allow the USA to spare its resources for conflicts in Israel and Gaza, with Iran and with China.
In January 2023, US Air Force General Michael Minihan predicted in a short message that the USA and China would be
facing each other on the battlefield in just two years' time.
This is because China could try to invade Taiwan.
Minihan said: "I hope I'm wrong. My feeling is that we will be fighting in 2025".
According to Schindler, it is therefore in the interests of US geostrategists to keep Russia busy
and weaken it in a hard and long war in Europe.
In addition, Schindler believes that Europe will ultimately eliminate an economic competitor to the USA.
The fact that US American string-pullers had a hand in this is also clear from the intercepted
conversation between the German air force officers:
In the first few minutes, Brigadier General Frank Gräfe tells us that he is at an event in
Singapore and has met General Schneider there.
This is the successor to Wilsbach.
What sound like German generals are anything but German generals.
Both of them are US generals.
The plans were presented to General Wilsbach back in October 2023 and are also the subject of further discussions.
The rest of the conversation is about how to bring Defense Minister Boris Pistorius closer to a Taurus delivery to Ukraine.
How can it be that top German generals have already presented these plans to a US general beforehand?
The fact that German defense policy is influenced, if not controlled, by the US military can hardly be disputed.
Prof. David Vine of the American University in Washington D.C. speaks of 119 (!) military locations of the US Army in Germany.
It has also been known since US geostrategist George Friedman's Stratfor speech in 2015 that the USA sees its
greatest threat in a possible German-Russian alliance.
From this perspective, a divisive relationship between Germany and Russia, even to the point of
war, serves the interests of US supremacy policy.
It is not yet possible to say whether Scholz will allow himself to be carried away and agree
to the delivery of Taurus missiles to Ukraine.
Nor is it possible to say whether the war will spread to Europe.
What can be said, however, is that the population is increasingly frightened and confronted with the likelihood of war.
The Taurus wiretapping case or the statements made by French President Emmanuel Macron are just two examples of many.
Macron does not rule out sending Western ground troops to Ukraine.
What should not be ignored is that all the war rhetoric and generation of fears is
neither a coincidence nor a necessary evil.
Kla.TV has shown in many programs that there are deliberate and sophisticated strategies behind scaring the population.
The British newspaper "The Observer" used the term "Strategy of Tension" as early as 1969.
Covert operations are used to unsettle and frighten the population.
According to the principle "It can happen to anyone."
In this way, the people are made to accept political decisions that they would otherwise never accept.
Kla.TV also showed how deliberately planned terror management can put resources and powers into the hands of governments
in a way that would never have been possible without it.
Whether the fears are caused by potential or real threats of war, alleged pandemics, suspected terrorist attacks or wiretapping
scandals, ultimately it is always about the same thing:
Citizens' rights are being further restricted and the powers of governments and
international organizations are being steadily expanded.
Finally, to achieve certain goals that could not otherwise be achieved.
In particular, it is about the creation of a centralized world government - or in other words, total
control and power over every single citizen of the world.
In the midst of these aspirations for a centralized world government, there is a next step that is of grave importance:
namely the WHO pandemic treaty and the adaptations to the International Health Regulations.
These are to be presented for adoption at the 77th World Health Assembly from May 27 - June 1, 2024 in Geneva.
The WHO's power of control and definition is to be standardized, regulated worldwide and
transferred to all countries in a legally binding manner.
A two-thirds majority is required for the pandemic treaty to become legally binding for all WHO member states,
while only a simple majority of the WHO World Assembly is needed to adapt the health regulations.
By signing the pandemic treaty, the WHO could dictate medical treatments, monitoring or censorship measures worldwide.
A so-called "Implementation Committee" would have to check whether the states are actually implementing these adjustments.
The WHO would have the authority and means to exclude from public life, sanction or punish any
citizen who does not wish to be vaccinated, for example.
In view of this explosive situation, is it possible that loud war cries, wiretapping scandals or other distractions are being
used to try to break any resistance to the WHO pandemic treaty?
Finally, see a quote from Kla.TV founder Ivo Sasek from his introductory speech to the
19th AZK, which he gave on November 4, 2023:
"But first and foremost, I must appeal to all of us to be vigilant.
Nothing seems more important to me at the moment than not letting all the new problems that have emerged in the
world distract us from a thorough reappraisal of the Covid world scam that we have just gone through.
That is the central issue today.
The would-be world rulers who have crept in (I'll call them highly criminal) have provided us with an
unparalleled opportunity to expose them down to the ground.
Do you understand?
That's why it seems to me that some current world events are nothing more than a huge diversionary maneuver
that we should refrain from consistent (that is) worldwide prosecution of this Covid genocide gang.
I say, therefore, please let nothing and no one distract us from our duty to get to the bottom of this Covid genocide in a world
court case; and if necessary, in a completely independent one.
We don't even allow ourselves to be distracted by newly emerging wars, as is the case again right now.
Not even from bacterial attacks or bioweapon attacks.
Yes, not even, I would like to say, of natural disasters or, at best, suddenly appearing aliens or even fantastic new discoveries,
the lure of self-sufficiency and all sorts of things.
We return again and again to this urgently needed reappraisal."