And today we have reached the point where we can say that democracy is a form of government in which
the rulers take into account what the citizens believe or what they have been led to believe.
Well, what happens if you adopt these guidelines ?
Then the Secretary-General can declare a pandemic or he can declare that a pandemic is imminent.
And nobody can check it. There are no checks and balances.
It can set up a system for the verification of vaccinations and for the verification of vaccination status.
The WHO would be authorized to carry out forced vaccinations and forced detentions, lockdowns and lockouts, could
introduce quarantine procedures, have control over travel and mobility of citizens, while undermining national law
and it can even determine which medicines and vaccines you have to take, set the prices and determine the companies.
And it's a question, it's a test run, whether we are still prepared to fight for our freedom, isn't it?
The world is not being destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who stand idly by.
The contracts with GAVI must be disclosed, negotiations with WHO and IHR must be stopped and these contracts and these
descriptions, which are all only available in English, must be translated into all four national languages,
because there must be the possibility of a referendum.
These statements come from none other than Prof. Dr. med. Dr. h.c. Paul Robert Vogt.
Vogt is an internationally recognized specialist in general surgery, cardiac and vascular surgery.
His decades of experience with over 12,000 operations enable him to perform even the
most difficult heart and vascular procedures.
Vogt worked for many years at the University Hospital Zurich and in the cardiac surgery
department of the University Hospital Giessen-Marburg.
He has been operating at the Hirslanden Group's "Klinik Im Park" since 2022. In 2006, Vogt founded the EurAsia Heart
Foundation, a voluntary Swiss foundation that provides surgical support in Eastern Europe, Asia and Africa.
In a 22-page thesis paper published on October 2, 2023, Vogt makes the following demands of politicians:
"The past three and a half years of the pandemic must be dealt with transparently.
A detailed, scientifically sound discussion is expected.
What worked? What went wrong? And why?"
Vogt also speaks plainly about the WHO pandemic treaty and the changes to the International Health Regulations.
These are to be presented for adoption at the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva from May 27 to June 1, 2024.
Vogt cannot deny the impression that the new WHO guidelines are intended to deal the final blow to direct Swiss democracy.
In his lecture on April 13, 2024 in Langenthal, Switzerland, he calls vaccination by name, exposes false claims by the Federal
Council, takes a close look at approval studies, including vaccination side effects,
statistical fraud methods and criminal machinations.
His conclusion is unmistakable:
Negotiations with the WHO must be stopped and its contracts, which are only available in English,
must be translated into all national languages.
In Switzerland, there must be the possibility of a referendum.
You can now watch a summary of his presentation below.
The vaccine is effective and safe. It has been tested just as rigorously as any other vaccine.
I asked myself, well Berset is not a doctor.
I don't think he studied immunology as a minor.
Who put this nonsense in his mouth that this vaccine was studied as carefully as all the others?
You can see a traditional vaccine on the left.
It will be 10 to 15 years before this vaccine is approved.
And you see the Covid-19 vaccine. After 1.5 years, this vaccine has been approved for the general population worldwide.
The recommendation for pregnant women, for vaccinations during pregnancy, is even more extreme.
It took 60 years for the flu vaccine to be administered to pregnant women. And 1.5 months for Covid-19.
So the question is: who put that in his mouth? Was it our task force, yes or no?
Now, in the approval study where 20,000 placebo patients were compared with 20,000 vaccinated patients,
I'll get to that. The deaths were concealed there.
There were 38 deaths in the vaccination group. They died of myocarditis .
They were concealed in the approval study. Otherwise the FDA would never have been allowed to approve it.
Now, when the first 100,000 etc. have been vaccinated, there is so-called post-authorization data.
This means that the drug or vaccination is authorized.
Now you study; what happens if you spread this further.
And you can see here that Pfizer itself reported 1,223 deaths and eight pages of
complications from the vaccination after a short time.
And the New Zealand government, for example, had these papers before they told the population; you have to get vaccinated.
And I would of course be interested to know whether the Swiss, the task force for example, or others also
had this information and why they still wanted to introduce a mandatory vaccination program.
Well, even Pfizer is more honest, isn't it?
That's unredacted. You can find it.
In other words, Pfizer writes: We do not know the long-term effects of this vaccination.
And below for the pregnant women - it says about Spikevax that there is no data for the vaccine in pregnant women.
And this can be found unredacted in the contracts. Incidentally, you will find numerous redactions.
And of course, as a Swiss citizen, I ask myself: why do I know the unredacted contracts of the pharmaceutical
companies with the EU, with Albania, with South Africa?
But why don't I know the unredacted contracts with Switzerland?
What have we paid? And are we, like other countries, obliged to continue paying Pfizer billions until 2026?
These are all things we need to know about.
Which statements regarding vaccinations have been proven to be false?
Not true: - that it is not a gene therapy. - that it was safe and effective and seriously tested.
- that it remains at the site of the injection. For example, if it is injected into the left shoulder and
perhaps only goes into the draining lymph node. - that it does not spread throughout the body.
After 30 minutes, you can detect the vaccine anywhere in the body. - that the mRNA is short-lived. It
is not, because it has been modified accordingly.
It is important to know that in the approval study for the FDA , a different product was
used than the one used for mass vaccinations.
In the pivotal trial, there was a chemically produced mRNA and these vaccine batches had 100% mRNA.
However, because this is expensive, E. coli, a bacterium, was used to synthesize this mRNA for mass production.
And the problem was that it was cheaper and faster and practical for the production of large
quantities. But there was only 45 - 55 % mRNA.
There were pathological mRNA fragments because the transcription in the cell was not correct.
There was an illegally large amount of DNA. And in principle, you have to say that people were actually
given unknown substances that were never declared.
And so there are two essential pillars of medicine that have been completely ignored, namely: informed consent,
not only by the patient, but also by the doctor who administers it. And the primum nil nocere .
The EMA, the European Medicines Agency, knew about the shortcomings of the E. coli-based vaccines.
And instead of Pfizer saying, the quality is not right, you have to adjust the quality again like in the approval
study, they simply adjusted the quality standards to the product instead of the other way around.
Of course, we know that EMA employees were subsequently given jobs by Pfizer.
Well, the statement that mRNA cannot be incorporated into DNA - that it cannot enter the cell nucleus - is not true either.
Why is the vaccination for a respiratory virus in the lungs provided with lipid
nanoparticles that can expressis verbis enter the brain?
These DNA fragments in the E. coli-based batches of this mRNA can of course damage their own DNA.
They can switch off so-called tumor suppressor genes. These are genes that they have in the cells that suppress tumor growth.
And on the other hand, they can activate oncogenes that activate tumor growth.
Why does it have SV40 in these vaccines?
SV40 is the term for a virus that infects Malaysian monkeys, among others. And SV40 clears the way into our own DNA.
The nuclear translocation of spike mRNA and the protein is a feature of COVID-19.
This means that it cannot damage the genetic material in adults and especially in children. That is not true.
Then there is spikeopathy, which means that the spike protein spreads everywhere. We've heard that it's like an infectious
agent, it goes into the brain, it can cause chronic inflammation.
The long-term fate of the mRNA is unknown.
I have just heard a case of a young woman. She had her third vaccination two years ago
and suddenly developed neurological symptoms.
And a cerebrospinal fluid puncture was then carried out. In other words, spinal fluid was taken and
spike proteins were detected there after two years.
In other words, we still don't know how long it will last.
And the clear thing is that the foreign proteins on the cell surfaces naturally cause an autoimmune disease.
And those who get more vaccinations get more COVID-19 and have a certain new form, so-called
IgG4 diseases, which have a broad clinical picture.
IgG4 diseases are diseases, or let's say a disease mechanism, that have been intensively discussed by internists since 2003,
and these diseases occur more frequently after the vaccine.
So what was the result of all these deceptions?
You see here, Senator Johnson asked the Secretary of State, Austin, why do we have so many sick soldiers,
they are young, they are healthy, they are in the army.
And you see an increase in high blood pressure, 2,000 %, diseases of the nervous system, 1,000 %, tumors, almost 1,000 %.
Then you see here carcinomas, almost 500 %, infertility, 472 %, pulmonary embolisms, 468 % and so on and so forth.
In other words, young healthy people who were vaccinated - and there was a mandatory vaccination
program for the American army - developed these diseases.
What you've also seen is, normally they find about 69 sudden cardiac deaths in athletes per year worldwide. You see
here, from January 2021 to August 2023, there were 2,000.
Of these, 600 were saved and 1,400 died. And myocarditis is probably one of the causes.
I have talked to sports cardiologists. They said they actually see a lot more myocarditis in young people.
The fact-checkers, of course, who are all paid by the government, deny this.
Here is an interesting statistic. These are the so-called squawks . In other words, these are absolute emergencies
that are reported by the pilots during a passenger flight.
And you can see here that with the introduction of the vaccine there is a dramatic increase in
the number of pilots in distress in the cockpit.
Of course, the fact-checkers dispute this too. But I know people from this business, from Airliners for Humanity.
And they actually told me that they see many young colleagues, pilots who have always been healthy, who
have a heart attack, a pulmonary embolism or a stroke.
Here, too, what the people who work in the area actually see is probably true.
Well, excess death rate. All countries are seeing an increase in death rates of up to 20% or more.
It does not correlate with the year 2020, when there was no vaccination. It actually correlates in all countries with
the introduction or rollout of the vaccination, as they say.
Of course, it's a statistical phenomenon. It's a temporal association, but if you eliminate all the other
confounding factors that can cause this, then in the end vaccination remains in all these countries.
There is an excessive death rate from malignant tumors that has decreased every year.
But you can see here that the incidence of malignant tumors has increased since the rollout of the vaccination.
And here you can still see the quadruple-vaccinated teenagers and young people who have just died.
It's a study from the UK, and you see the mortality rates as they have increased since the rollout of the vaccine.
What I can recommend to you on the Internet is the presentation by Konstantin Beck.
I heard him myself, I think it was two weeks ago, he did the statistics for Switzerland and Germany for
stillbirths, for excess mortality and for the baby gap.
And the bottom left is interesting, isn't it?
They said, did more people die, yes or no?
And what they simply did at our statistical office in Bern was to take the 0 to 64-year-olds together.
Why? Because there was no need to report on teenagers, on the 0 to 14-year-olds. The 0
to 64-year-olds were simply added together.
And you can see that there is a dramatic increase in pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrest and stroke among 0 to 14-year-olds.
And these are diseases that occur in older people and not in young people.
Whatever you see, here's another statistic.
Here they say every year, what is the expected mortality rate?
It goes down a little, it goes down a little every year, and from that you naturally draw a line that is roughly straight, right?
And now they simply say in 2021, yes, the mortality rate, we are now assuming a different mortality rate, which is 12%
higher and not minus 1% lower every year, and they can say, look, there is no change in the line up there.
In principle, this is nothing more than statistical fraud and it comes from our Federal Office in Bern.
You can see the excess mortality here.
There was excess mortality, but the excess mortality was dramatic after the rollout of
the vaccination. You can see it here for 2022.
What you can also see here is a decline in the birth rate.
Konstantin Beck then brings the figures, the current figures, and you can see that the curves
up here are going up a bit everywhere at first.
In other words, it was Covid time, there was a pandemic, many people postponed having
children, and then there were more births afterwards.
But since then, there has been a massive decline in birth rates in all countries, most dramatically in Germany and Australia.
Well, I want to show this video here.
You find that in all different countries, I have collected these videos. Even the Japanese etc. all say no
boosters until all questions have been clarified and that will probably take a while.
Well, it's interesting that at the end of last year the Federal Office of Public Health of all people recommended that pregnant
women get vaccinated knowing that the spike protein goes through the placenta, that the spike
protein goes to the fetus and that it goes to the brain.
And I wonder how such a recommendation can be made. And the Federal Council has praised itself for now
wanting to invest in mRNA research, in this platform.
Something else interesting.
Look here, at the top left you will find the first and second wave.
That's a dramatic second wave, isn't it? But it's just the number of tests.
They simply tested more in the second wave or in the fall, and because they tested more, they found more positives.
But if you look at it differently here, if you look at the number of positives per test, then you will
see that there is no difference in spring and fall.
And this narrative was published by all the mainstream media in Switzerland and they have no idea about statistics.
And the problem is, we should actually have that, in medical school you should be taught statistics intensively for six years,
because otherwise we can no longer read medical publications.
That is a huge problem.
Now, the question is, why are these questions important?
We must have answers to these questions because there are vaccine-related side effects and diseases. We have to recognize
them, differentiate between them and find therapies for them.
And we want to know more about the production, safety and efficacy of these vaccines. Above all,
whether we can continue with the mRNA platform at all.
The fact is, this is an exponential gene therapy that has been unleashed on the global population far too early as part
of a mass vaccination program that has simply ignored the principles of INFORMED CONSENT and PRIMUM NON NOCERE.
And the question is, what will the media do with it?
Above you see the well-informed citizen who probably consults the news and reads the mainstream media.
And below you see those who dig through numerous publications, through alternative media, through scientific papers and
come to other questions. Not to other claims, but to questions.
And these are the so-called conspiracy theorists.
What is the press doing?
As you know, there was this coronavirus meeting in Bern, where Ueli Maurer made an appearance.
And now you see there were two articles in the Tagesanzeiger. That's typical.
Take a look at the bottom right.
In this article you will only find anti-measures scenes, corona skeptics, Treichler shirts, controversial politicians, "AUFRECHT",
homo-gender mania, extreme views, anti-vaccinationists, right-wing extremists, Jewish world
conspiracy, free churches and anti-abortionists.
In other words, a meeting similar to this one, where people come together, ask questions and want answers, is
denounced right from the start through targeted framing.
And these articles have not appeared now.
It was now April 6. These articles were already published in March.
And that's what the media supports, isn't it?
On the one side, I'm saying nastily now, are the Covid idiots, they're in the trenches, on the other side are
the conspiracy theorists, they're also in the trenches.
And people are no longer capable of simply listening to the arguments of the other side. They are no longer
capable, not for reasons of facts, but for ideological reasons.
And through such media work, people are kept in their trenches and further fortified.
Who lied about everything?
Who lied about everything? - Department of Defense. - Then DARPA is clear, that's the scientific arm. The FDA clearly lied.
- Center of Disease Control too. - The Robert Koch Institute, we know that. - The big TV stations, the
mainstream media. - I'll get to the Medical Association later.
And the question is why the NATO generals were at the head of the corona decision-making bodies, Europe-wide.
It is a politicization and militarization of medicine that the medical profession - which is
once again mute, like the FMH - should not accept.
And you know this new Pfizer law in France. Anyone who asks critical questions about mRNA risks
a fine of 35,000 euros or three years in prison.
And I can say that France has thus become a totalitarian pharmaceutical state.
You should know that the ten most important pharmaceutical companies in America were fined a total of 35
billion for cheating on the introduction of drugs. One of them is Pfizer with 2.5 billion.
Crime
It's also very interesting. Here you can see an MEP, Michèle Rivasi.
What did she do? She investigated how the EU under von der Leyen concluded these billion-euro
contracts with Pfizer, didn't she - on a WhatsApp basis.
And unfortunately you no longer have the WhatsApps etc.
And she has just been found dead in Belgium.
Well, if that's just a coincidence, I don't know.
Well, the doctors, the medical societies and our scientific journals. Drosten, Fauci, Anderson, etc.
There is the so-called Freedom of Information Act in America. And from that you could see how lies have been told.
Here, for example. The conclusion of 100 studies. There is nothing negative about pregnant women.
It was published in the best journals. Even the pharmaceutical companies warned against it.
Here you can see a paper in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Based on this publication, it was said that pregnant women must be vaccinated. They only
vaccinated in the third trimester, in the last third.
What happens if you vaccinate women in the first and second trimester, where the damage is done?
There was no discussion.
And interestingly, the paper states that the most common specific side effect is spontaneous abortion.
And the miscarriage rate among those vaccinated has risen by 80 %.
And the paper comes to a different conclusion.
Now, the question is, what was that? Is this a test run?
Is it just that they want to restrict our personal freedom through fear so that citizens can be comprehensively controlled?
There is the golden billion and when you see Schwab's partner, Yuval Harari, he gave an interview, didn't he,
what are we going to do with all these useless eaters?
The best thing to do is to give them computer games and drugs, and that actually fits in with
Lauterbach, with the release of drugs in Germany.
And it's a question, it's a test run as to whether we are still prepared to fight for our freedom, isn't it?
The world is not being destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who stand idly by.
A dismantling of direct democracy
What is happening in this context is a dismantling of direct democracy in Switzerland.
I don't want to read everything here, you know that, you have the right to speak your mind freely - that's difficult today in
the age of organized shitstorms and censorship - it's forbidden.
Now the question is, where are the Swiss media integrated?
And you see, it's the transatlantic network they're all part of, and it's clear where the
information comes from and what you have to report.
And the same is with this Project Syndicate, you can read about it in Wikipedia.
Our mainstream media are also represented there. It's an organization that is supported by Soros in
Czechoslovakia, it has over 450 different media outlets and they produce a uniform mishmash.
The Federal Council would actually be obliged, would it not, to take measures to safeguard the
internal and external security of our country.
I don't know whether he will do this if he accepts the WHO pandemic treaty.
The fact is that in the supposedly best democracy in the world, isn't it, neutrality is being buried by a few people,
without consulting parliament or without consulting the people.
And today we have reached the point where we can say that democracy is a form of government in which those in power take
into account what citizens believe or have been led to believe.
This undermines our neutrality and the right of citizens to have their say.
The agreements with the WHO are not published, nor are the International Health Regulations, which are authoritative.
You will find it already, it is in complicated English.
I think everyone goes crazy after five pages - I tried that.
And you simply can't read them.
I will pass over GAVI .
Well, what happens if you adopt these guidelines ?
Then the Secretary-General can declare a pandemic or he can declare that a pandemic is imminent.
And nobody can check it. There are no checks and balances.
It can set up a system for the verification of vaccinations and for the verification of vaccination status.
The WHO would be authorized to carry out forced vaccinations and forced detentions, lockdowns and lockouts, could
introduce quarantine procedures, have control over travel and mobility of citizens, while undermining national law
and it can even determine which medicines and vaccines you have to take, determine the prices and determine the companies.
And it can be controlled.
Within the WHO there is the IHR , an organization that can go to the respective countries, check whether the countries are
complying with these regulations and oblige the countries or the governments of these countries to lock up recalcitrant citizens.
Well, what needs to be done is quite clear, it all needs to be stopped.
These amendments to the International Health Regulations etc. must be stopped.
There needs to be a movement in Switzerland that calls on the Federal Council to do
this, doesn't it? Neutrality must be revived.
Citizens should not be afraid of freedom of expression, because it is being censored.
And I can tell you that the most frequent question I get after a lecture or when something is on the Internet or
when I publish a paper is whether I'm not afraid and whether I now have 24-hour personal protection.
And I think that if so many citizens in Switzerland are afraid that this becomes the most common question when someone speaks up
- are you not afraid, do you have 24-hour personal protection, can you still keep your job at all? -
then something is no longer right in our country.
And the thing is, there is an organized shitstorm after freely expressed opinions. And I can tell you where I found
something like that, how to do it. In the manual of the Ministry of State Security, Directive 1, 1976 of the GDR.
There it says how to individually destroy, slander or defame someone.
Now, the Federal Council or our government has once again amended the Epidemics Act in anticipatory obedience.
You can find the individual steps, I won't list them here, but have a look here, for example, there is amendment number 9.
The SBB can be obliged to check vaccination certificates, as can the airlines.
What the WHO and IHR are threatening is that you will get a QR code, it will say whether you are vaccinated, what
your vaccination status is, the cash will be processed via it.
And if you can't show the corresponding status of medication taken, tests carried out or vaccinations, you
can't go to the gym, you can't go shopping, your account will be blocked, you can't fly, etc.
It is also the case that the amendment to the Epidemics Act imposes a ban on assembly -
which is actually what we have the right to do.
So it's worth reading this Epidemics Act, which we were also unable to vote on, properly.
Whether that's true then, isn't it, once you've been to the WHO and the IHR, whether you can resign is questionable.
There are these withdrawal modalities on page 9, I think it's six months, if you want to leave the WHO, you can do that.
Then they say you can't get any more medication or vaccinations and politicians are afraid that they
will no longer be able to provide for the population.
But you will then remain with the IHR for at least another year and a half and will have to deregister there separately.
Well, what's the point?
And I'm actually very close to Mr. Nehls here, aren't I?
Bertrand Russell has already said that.
Our policy through diet, injections etc.
From early childhood, a character is to be produced that makes it impossible for us to criticize our government.
It should be psychologically impossible.
And you don't have to take Orwell here, it's much better to take Aldous Huxley's Brave New
World and I think the red section is exactly right.
The rise of dictatorial governments, in vitro fertilization, genetic cloning, virtual reality, sexualization of all
aspects of life, including public life, and a massive and increasing use of psychotropic drugs and antidepressants.
. This is how our society is to become easily manageable.
Well, those who sleep today will wake up in a dictatorship tomorrow.
What we want to know: Did the Federal Council know about Pfizer's post-authorization data , yes or no?
If so, why did he make vaccination compulsory?
Why were the alternatives suppressed? By whom and at whose behest?
Why are these contracts with the pharmaceutical industry still blacked out?
This must be abolished.
I don't just want to know the ones from Albania, South Africa and the EU, but also the ones with Switzerland.
The contracts with GAVI must be disclosed, negotiations with WHO and IHR must be stopped and these contracts and these
descriptions, which are all only available in English, must be translated into all four national languages,
because there must be the possibility of a referendum.
Well, I've been thinking for a long time, why do so few people fight back?
I think the world is in a bit of turmoil with wars, whatnot, unrest etc. and I believe that individuals
are trying to defend their hard-earned peace of mind by selectively absorbing information.
But I don't think that will work in the long term.
Thank you for your attention. Credits The lecture is part of a series of lectures organized by the
Freedom Movement Switzerland (FBS) and "schweiz-macher".