The US state of Tennessee has passed a new law banning geoengineering and chemtrail activities in the state.
On 18.03.2024, the Senate voted 25 to 6 in favor of the bill "Senate Bill No. 2691" (SB 2691), which was
also approved by Congress on 01.04.24 by 70 to 22 votes.
The restrictive law, which penalizes violations with a fine of US$ 10,000 per day, will therefore come into force on 01.07.2024.
The legal ban on geoengineering in Tennessee is a first important and courageous step that proves that
"chemtrails" are not just an alleged conspiracy theory.
After all, if there was no need for action, there would be no need for restrictive laws.
Moreover, the example of Tennessee shows that it is indeed possible to do something about a seemingly monstrous,
unattainable superior force that unscrupulously manipulates the weather above people's heads as it pleases.
As a rather small US state, Tennessee is over 87 times smaller than the total area of the USA at 109,151
km², approx. 400 miles long and just 100 miles wide.
However, it borders on 8 neighboring states.
If they also follow the example of their courageous, small neighbor, a ban zone for chemtrail flights of the considerable
size of 1.2 million km² would already have been achieved.
And it is precisely this process of state initiative that is already underway in the USA:
Minnesota, Pennsylvania and other US states have already introduced laws similar to those in Tennessee
to combat supranationally organized geoengineering.
At the beginning of 2023, the Mexican Ministry of the Environment, in consultation with the country's National Science
and Technology Council, announced a ban on the release of chemical aerosol particles into the atmosphere,
after a US start-up company called "Make Sunsets" began its weather manipulation attempts without any permission,
i.e. illegally, on the Mexican peninsula of Baja California.
Both large-scale solar dimming projects and those under development are now officially banned in Mexico.
The aim of the new policy is to protect communities and the environment.
The toxic nanoparticles of the aerosols, such as sulphur and aluminum oxide, must now remain in the USA, where
they would actually have to be disposed of properly and therefore expensively by the manufacturing industry.
Doesn't this reveal an extensive environmental crime of international proportions that is actually manipulating the
climate in the name of "climate protection" and illegally disposing of tons of toxic industrial waste in the process?
And wouldn't this interesting development actually be a hot topic for European politics and the leading media?
So while in the American hemisphere the topic of "chemtrails" and "geoengineering" has been discussed in public for
some time and is already being combated by law, in Europe, especially in Germany, this hardly takes place.
In this case, the system-financed media are obviously used to banishing unwanted information and topics further into
the corner of conspiracy theorists in order to prevent public discourse and justified criticism of certain measures.
In the case of chemtrails and geoengineering, this happens almost like a prayer wheel.
Here's what t-online wrote after Tennessee's remarkable push:
"A new example of what is possible in the USA:
The state of Tennessee wants to ban "chemtrails".
It's sure to be a success, because they don't even exist", claims t-online author Simone Rafael.
Even after the torrential rainfall on April 16, 2024 in the desert state of the United Arab Emirates, the local system
media denied any connection to derailed weather manipulation
and this despite the fact that such practices were openly admitted even by the Saudis and the Emirates - at first.
In the meantime, state press censorship seems to have been hastily imposed in Dubai, the economic and
tourist metropolis that was hit hard by the heavy rain,
because the National Meteorological Center suddenly denied any declared connection, which it had
previously openly admitted to the US media company Bloomberg.
According to the report, aircraft were deployed at seven intervals on April 14 and 15 to
treat clouds over the desert with silver iodide.
As a result of this approach, Dubai experienced the heaviest rainfall on April 16 since weather records began 75 years ago:
With around 150 liters of rain per square meter, it rained more in 24 hours than in the rest of the year.
Numerous streets and the metro in the metropolis were under water, and the airport was also
flooded due to the unusually heavy rainfall.
There were also massive floods in neighboring Oman, resulting in deaths, including many children.
The climate in Dubai is usually very reliably dry; this is also confirmed by the weather data for the period
1991 to 2020 with an annual average of 79.2 mm of rain (i.e. just under 80 liters per square meter).
So, in the case of Dubai, should a thirsty metropolis of millions with its rapidly growing demand for drinking and industrial
water be helped by targeted geoengineering - whereby the people carrying out the work have clearly misjudged the situation?
Meticulously investigating these anomalies would actually be the task of responsible politics and genuine journalism, which
is almost impossible to find in the so-called quality media.
Instead, fact finders such as Wulf Rohwedder from Tagesschau.de claim that human weather
manipulation such as cloud seeding played no role in Dubai.
These are rumors and typical conspiracy ideology.
This raises the question of whether journalists like Rohwedder have thoroughly checked and researched their
statements themselves beforehand, or whether they are instead publishing claims that lack any validity.
This would be a deliberate deception of the public and therefore a criminal offense.
Finally, let's return to the current role model, Tennessee.
Now that the new law has been successfully passed, it is important to implement effective criminal
prosecution that punishes violations in a targeted manner.
This is both a challenge and an opportunity - after all, it can also create completely new jobs!
Accompanied by vigilant reporting by free media, more and more states will follow Tennessee's example and thus
achieve a nationwide ban on supranational geoengineering.
Finally, this international environmental crime must be dealt with in a global legal process, including compensation
from the polluters for the countries and people affected.