For millions of people, the years of the coronavirus state of emergency were associated with massive restrictions
on freedom due to lockdowns, curfews and school closures.
These measures were justified on the basis of the assessments of the RKI Expert Council.
However, following the publication of the RKI protocols released by Multipolar magazine, it is indisputable
that the risk assessment from "moderate" to "high" was not based on scientific data.
Now that it has come to light that the classification was based on political instructions, the RKI
has deleted the risk assessments from its website.
Has evidence for a genuine reappraisal of the disastrous consequences of the coronavirus policy been deleted here?
In the following video you can see an analysis by Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg, former Director of the
Institute of Public Finance at the University of Hanover.
Since the beginning of the coronavirus crisis, he has repeatedly made well-founded
contributions on the measures taken by politicians.
"Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, I would like to welcome you to another episode of Homburg's
Background and I am delighted that you are here again.
I have discovered something, namely that the RKI has deleted the risk assessments for corona on the Internet.
Is that important? You bet!
For years, our lives depended on these ratings.
If the RKI said the risk was moderate or moderate, then we could live like people did in the past, for centuries.
But if the RKI said the risk was high, then daycare centers and schools were closed, lockdowns were imposed, curfews
were imposed and old people were isolated in nursing homes, not allowed to be visited until they died.
Regular funerals with many guests were also forbidden.
How did I discover this? Well, the starting point was an RKI protocol that I showed you in the last program.
This protocol states that the Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) set a target in midsummer 2020 to keep the risk high.
This means that the RKI's risk assessments were not based on any scientific findings, but were political guidelines.
Critics have now objected that this protocol is dated June 29, 2020 and that the risk should be
kept high until July 1, 2020, i.e. only two days.
I then asked myself, until when was the risk actually kept high?
I took a look at one of the situation reports of the time, which I am including here.
And there you will see a link to a special RKI document, risk assessment.
I clicked on it and then I got this message - namely that the file no longer exists.
I searched for it on the entire RKI server.
It could be that it has moved to another location. But it has been deleted.
This would be the end of the story if it weren't for the industrious bees that store everything fishy in the
internet archive so that you can still find it years later.
And so I can show you now.
A document, dated April 2020, with a risk assessment by the RKI.
Let's take a close look at what this assessment looks like and whether it is sufficient for drastic measures to be adopted.
Let's look through the text piece by piece.
First of all, it says that the WHO has declared a global pandemic.
Well, that's true, but the WHO has often done that.
Think of swine flu in 2009 or just two years ago, when monkeypox was declared a global pandemic of the highest warning level.
This barely made it into the media and was ignored by Germany.
There was no monkeypox lockdown, but people no longer wanted to hear about such pandemics.
And the media and politicians thought this was not a winning issue.
Second argument here. This is a very dynamic situation.
Yes, waves of colds are actually always dynamic and serious.
In a way, the former German Chancellor is quoted with her famous sentence: "I take it seriously, take it seriously too."
Of course, this is just a phrase and not a scientific justification.
Finally, some of the cases are said to be severe.
Fatal courses of the disease also occur.
Again, this is true, but it applies to every respiratory disease and is not an argument for declaring a lockdown.
The decisive factor is now at the bottom.
It basically comes down to a single word: "The overall risk to public health in Germany is currently classified as high."
I have now downloaded all these risk assessments from the RKI.
And instead of reading them out one by one, I'll show you a new type of graphic that I've made from them,
which shows the entire time course of the last few years.
Take a look. On the far left you can see January and February 2020.
At that time, the risk was considered low to moderate by politicians and the Robert Koch Institute.
And it was said that corona was something that right-wing extremists had devised to frighten the population.
Then the risk will be upgraded on March 17, 2020 based on a document that I read to you in the last broadcast.
Then in June 2020, that was the document I had just shown, the risk is kept high by order of the BMG.
This was followed by six months of even higher risk. During these six months, there was another complete lockdown.
Then the risk is downgraded to high, then again to very high, and after the vaccination requirement fails in the Bundestag
in April 2022, the risk is downgraded from very high to high.
We now find the solution on the far right, namely the risk was only downgraded to moderate in
February 2023, i.e. after just under three years.
The pattern of the graphic that you can still see here next to me makes no sense at all, even in the PCR test
logic of the RKI, which suggests political influence.
I will show you the so-called incidences or case numbers for comparison.
You can see a tiny hill on the far left at the beginning of 2020. That was the justification for the first lockdown.
Then at the end of 2021, when the entire population is vaccinated, the number of cases shoots through
the roof and remains consistently higher than in 2020.
And there in February 2023, you see, there are still considerable PCR case numbers to be discovered,
but the risk is suddenly downgraded to moderate.
The interesting question is, of course, whether the BMG issued a further instruction to the RKI
in February 2023 to finally downgrade the risk.
Unfortunately, only the RKI protocols 2020 to April 2021 were published by Multipolar
and these were heavily redacted, as you know.
The later minutes are unredacted, but are not published.
Minister Lauterbach has promised to publish the unredacted protocols soon - probably after the elections, I think,
but he refuses to make the follow-up protocols, which are actually much more interesting for us because they are
related to compulsory vaccination, available to the public.
So we will have to be patient until the later protocols are also released, of which there can be little doubt,
and until then I remain with best regards, Stefan Homburg.
Dear Kla.TV viewers, make your environment aware of this cover-up scandal!
The only way to prevent such crimes against humanity from happening again is to thoroughly
reappraise the coronavirus state of emergency.