Recently, we received a tip from a Kla.TV viewer who was concerned about media manipulation by Swiss
Radio and Television (SRF) and compiled some facts.
See some accompanying excerpts from an SRF program in which inconsistencies can be seen.
The scene in question took place some time ago, but it is an example of the manipulative way in which
the media can impose an opinion on the population.
On 24.09.2021, politicians and viewers from the audience discussed topics such as coronavirus and vaccination on the
program "Arena" entitled "Jetzt sitzen wir an den runden Tisch".
After the broadcast, the SRF editorial team was confronted with the fact that an audience member, Ms. Doblies, who spoke in
the programme, had been equipped with headphones in her ear.
As a critical observer, it immediately comes to mind that this gave the director the opportunity to serve Ms. Doblies
with keywords in order to be able to respond effectively.
In her article at the time, Ms. Doblies vehemently argued that the vaccination was safe and that
people should not act stupid because of the injection.
The demonstrations were attended by right-wing extremists right from the start, and the opposing side was aggressive and violent.
When asked about a button in the ear, SRF denied this in a letter dated 16.01.2024.
Whether the "Arena" viewer, Ms. Doblies, actually wore a button in her ear is a matter of speculation.
But now things get really interesting.
The scene in which the button in the ear appears to be visible could no longer be found in the SRF media library.
Closer investigation revealed that SRF had apparently exchanged the video material on 15.01.2024, i.e. one
day before the reply letter left the editorial office.
Until recently, this was also verifiable in the web archive.
However, the owner of a website can change or delete the entries as desired.
This has apparently happened in the meantime.
This is because the entry from 15.01.2024 can no longer be found in the Wayback Machine, as the web archive is also known.
The video material on the SRF website has since been reset to the original version.
In the briefly exchanged video material, another spectator was shown in the relevant scene instead of Ms.
Doblies, obviously to conceal the suspected button in the ear.
Although SRF is free to modify videos, SRF's actions in this context are highly questionable.
Why is this effort being made to exchange the image material if SRF has nothing to hide?
In this scene, Ms. Doblies praises a certain Samuel, whom she addresses as "Du". Apparently the SRF made a mistake here.
In the subsequently edited video footage, the spectator shown in the picture was not
Samuel, but someone sitting next to Ms. Doblies.
Samuel had his say shortly before Ms. Doblies and can be seen here.
In contrast to Ms. Doblies, he seemed to make a contribution "spontaneously" or "by chance", as he was handed a microphone.
Ms. Doblies, on the other hand, was equipped with a lapel microphone right from the start.
He talked about using trustworthy sources, not being influenced by the Internet and trusting virologists.
What is interesting about this situation is that Samuel looked at Mrs. Doblies as soon as he
finished his speech and she nodded in confirmation.
She later complimented him on his remarks.
Was there any prior agreement between the two of them and the editorial team?
This all points more to a deliberate staging to impose a concrete opinion on the viewer regarding the corona measures.
Kudos to the Kla.TV viewer who uncovered this issue and made it public.
It is an example of being attentive and taking a closer look.
Because the question arises as to how other Arena programs are doing?
It is difficult to imagine that this was an isolated case from 2021.
It is therefore important to bear in mind that SRF's broadcasts are financed by the Swiss
population's annual compulsory broadcasting fees.
If further such manipulative interventions occur, Swiss Television is in breach of the articles of the Federal Law on Radio
and Television and is no longer authorized to collect these fees.