Dr. Reiner Füllmich is a German lawyer admitted to practice in Germany and the USA.
Due to an alleged embezzlement of large sums of money in connection with the "Corona Committee" detection
platform, he made the headlines in the media and - under dubious circumstances - was also remanded in custody.
In the meantime, various media outlets have painted a completely different picture of the case, which also sheds an
interesting light on possible string-pullers in the background.
As a counter-voice to the official presentation, Kla.TV broadcasts a summary below.
It looks as if the German lawyer, Reiner Füllmich, who recognized the Covid crimes
against humanity back in 2020, has been framed.
Füllmich spearheaded a project that became known as the second Nuremberg and was a
co-founder of the Corona Investigation Committee.
His committee interviewed around 150 scientists and experts from all over the world, as well as
former employees of the World Health Organization.
And their findings showed them that the Covid measures were the first steps in a plan to destroy regional economies to make
populations dependent on global supply chains and that they were aimed at reducing population and
installing a world government led by the United Nations.
The Corona Committee received many donations that they believed were not safe, as bank accounts of
complicit governments had been seized in the recent past.
Gold worth 1 million euros was purchased and stored.
Both Reiner Füllmich and Viviane Fischer took out secured loans to finance the activities.
Reiner Füllmich on 02.02.2024: "At a time when the money in our bank account was in great danger, we decided to act immediately.
We withdrew money from this account, both she and I, to save it and keep it from being seized so that we could continue our work.
Because if our account, our bank account, had been seized, we would no longer have been able to
pay the translators, IT, administration, etc."
Reiner's loan amounted to 700,000 euros and was to be repaid with the proceeds from the sale of his house.
This was all documented and approved by the committee.
Members of the coronavirus committee met with a law firm in August 2022 and filed criminal charges against Füllmich.
The members of the committee, Justus Hoffmann, Marcel Templin and Antonia Fischer, claimed that Füllmich had
embezzled 700,000 euros, the loan he had officially taken out.
They claimed that he was a violent anti-Semite and that he had the opportunity to speak out before the criminal
proceedings began and that they would not press charges.
Two arrest warrants were issued against him, by Germany and by the EU, without Reiner's knowledge.
German and Mexican authorities illegally abducted Füllmich at the German embassy in
Mexico without an international arrest warrant.
He was then flown to Frankfurt Airport, where he was arrested and detained.
International legal experts describe his arrest as an illegal kidnapping.
According to the documented company plans, Füllmich's loan was to be repaid after the sale of his property.
But the same people who filed the lawsuit against Füllmich sabotaged this agreement.
The contracts stipulated that the profit from the Füllmich property was to be transferred to a
Füllmich account so that he could repay the loan.
However, the notary, who is sworn to be neutral and independent, instructed the buyers to transfer
the 1,158,000 euros to Marcel Templin's account.
This made it impossible for Reiner to repay the loan.
The loans were agreed in a transparent manner in written contracts.
There was no secrecy and the company was informed about the loans at all times.
The evidence supporting this was officially presented to the court, which chose to ignore
it and muzzled the defense from mentioning it.
The evidence shows that Hoffmann, Templin and the notary illegally gained access to the profits from Füllmich's assets.
And not only did the court ignore this evidence, it called the same people to testify against Füllmich.
The statement of claim states that Füllmich also made himself liable to prosecution by acquiring the gold bars
without the consent of the shareholders, concealing their existence and taking possession of them for himself.
But the purchase of the gold bars is also documented.
They are in safekeeping and can only be viewed with the signatures of Reiner Füllmich and Viviane Fischer.
This is evident from company documents that were never submitted to the public prosecutor's office.
However, they were presented by the defense and are ignored by the court.
Furthermore, although the court froze Füllmich's accounts, it did not freeze the EUR 1,158,000 in Marcel Templin's account.
Dr. Christof Miseré, I am very pleased.
We had a very exciting day of hearings today.
Can you tell me very briefly how you would summarize it, because I think it's quite historical.
Yes, a dossier that was just leaked to me actually shows that Mr. Füllmich has been persecuted for a long time and has
tried to use some kind of constructs to make him ineligible for election in the Federal Republic of Germany.
They tried with the public prosecutor's office and so on - so it was initiated by one of the services such as the Federal Criminal
Police Office, that they tried to recruit people from his environment, to obtain information and tried
- in the final analysis - to bring charges against him and that he would be convicted.
That was planned. It was already practically planned that way in a note that was already in 2021.
You can say that. There is information that this was already planned and I think on
August 21. 2021, if I remember correctly...
It's a dossier, which of course contains various data, up to the latest status.
So they also report on the procedure, on the person in general, and then also that in 2021
they just said they had to get rid of him somehow.
And to virtually get rid of the fact that he is no longer politically electable, i.e. in the end, a high
conviction, which excludes that one can still be elected in the Federal Republic of Germany.
And then they said that if you - well, there's a clause - I can read it out to you later.
If you can't do it with the rule of law, so to speak, you have to develop a construct and implement it with the players you have.
Dr. Füllmich has answered the accusations of the public prosecutor's office today with a
complaint against a public prosecutor himself.
What's it all about?
Lawyer Katja Wörmer: This means that there is obviously a dossier from the Office for the Protection of the
Constitution or the Federal Criminal Police Office which shows that Dr. Füllmich was under observation.
He has been observed by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution since August 2021 at the latest.
Measures were planned as to how and in what way it can be monitored and what exactly - what it does was closely monitored;
the formation of the Corona Committee, as it was already active before, namely against Deutsche
Bank and in the so-called "junk real estate cases".
It was then planned exactly how to proceed, for example, to prevent him from ever holding political office, to ensure that
there would be possible criminal investigations against him and that there would be possible criminal
charges based on fictitious or fabricated events.
So the dossier actually indicates that something was planned here in the background with so-called undercover investigators
and undercover persons, from which criminal charges could then be brought against Dr. Füllmich in the future.
Ms. Fischer is said to have recently admitted in a hearing that the controversial loan was
granted in order to protect the donations from seizure.
Doesn't that break down a large part of the indictment?
That's right. There have been repeated account terminations since the summer of 2020.
The "Ärzte für Aufklärung" (Doctors for Enlightenment) had their accounts closed, there were rumors that the accounts of the MWGFD
association had been frozen, and in this respect it was known that in the scene of corona critics and associations dedicated to
educational work, there were always account closures and possibly donations would also be
frozen and withdrawn from their actual purpose.
The client then came up with the idea of buying gold to get the money out of the accounts, donations or other
stores of value, such as the security in his property, to secure the money and keep it out of bank accounts.
Mr. Füllmich had to remain in custody until the end of the proceedings.
Is it possible to draw conclusions about the outcome of the trial from this court decision?
In my opinion, you can't necessarily, because the reason for detention here is the risk of absconding.
One of the reasons Mr. Füllmich is in custody is that he had previously spent six months in Mexico.
His wife is still in Mexico and it is assumed that he would possibly return there.
He also has other contacts abroad.
He had a ranch in California in the USA.
The aim here is to bring the criminal proceedings to an end first, but in my opinion the outcome of the
criminal proceedings is completely independent of this.
Particularly now, against the background of today's events, that there is apparently a dossier from the Office for the Protection
of the Constitution, which may have formed the basis for the criminal investigations here, and where there could apparently
also be - or possibly - cooperation between the public prosecutor's office here and the
Office for the Protection of the Constitution.
These suspicions are currently in the air.