Kla.TV publishes an abridged version of Prof. Walach's statement on the RKI files.
Prof. Walach was a professor at the Medical University of Poznań in Poland and a visiting professor at the
University of Witten/Herdecke in Germany until June 2021.
He studied psychology and philosophy at the same time and works as a freelance consultant, scientist, author and coach.
You can find the full version of his article as a PDF and as an internet link below the program. "RKI-Files" is what I call
the documents of the Robert Koch Institute, RKI for short, that Mr. Schreyer and his multipolar magazine have exposed.
These are mainly minutes of meetings about the events that led to the declaration of a national emergency with all its
consequences: curfews, restaurant, theater, sports club and other closures, popularly known as "measures". They are
available in their entirety and have already been commented on in detail by Multipolarmagazin and others.
I would like to point out a few important details and discuss a study in the second part of this article, which I helped with a
little and which is now available on the Zenodo preprint server.
It shows: Just 13.5% of all people who have ever tested PCR-positive for SARS-CoV-2 were actually infected or
had an immune reaction, detectable by IgG antibodies.
The RKI knew this very early on or could have known it.
So we could have stopped the test mania and the measures very soon if we had wanted to.
So the whole thing runs like a train on two tracks.
Both tracks are called "political will".
And the train is not heading in the direction of "caring for citizens". I don't know where it's going.
But I know that none of this had anything to do with care and attention, but at best with political power.
The RKI files clearly show that there was no cause for excitement.
The staff at the RKI clearly saw that there was no cause for concern at the beginning of March 2020, neither in terms of
worrying infection figures nor in terms of other parameters.
They have pointed out that the influenza sentinel data does not show rampant SARS-CoV-2 infections and
that there is no need to fear a state of emergency.
I have often pointed out in my previous blogs that the influenza sentinel data published by
the RKI showed very little SARS-CoV-2 spread.
Reminder:
The Flu Sentinel is a network of doctors' surgeries scattered throughout Germany.
They send samples from patients with flu-like symptoms to the RKI or the relevant laboratories so that
they can identify which pathogens are circulating.
Because the system is nationwide and reasonably representative, this data can be used
to track the spread of infections very well.
I had looked at this sentinel data several times and published several times in my blogs that even at times when there was
supposedly a state of emergency, lockdown, curfew, there was never a worryingly high
number of SARS-CoV-2 infected people among them.
Rather all kinds of other pathogens.
Since this data was collected and published by the RKI, the government knew this or could have known it if it wanted to.
These facts were never made public.
Horrible news was spread.
We now know:
These came to the RKI on the instructions of the government and were made public from there.
The claim that the RKI acted on the basis of scientific data and without government intervention is a lie.
The German government's reactions to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had nothing to do with science, facts
and real threats, but were politically motivated.
Whether this motivation had the welfare of the citizens in mind can be doubted in view of the many lies that were served up.
The RKI must therefore be seen for what it really is:
a subordinate authority that has to follow the instructions of the Minister of Health and does not operate on the basis of its own
findings according to scientific standards and considerations.
Many people have always suspected that this is the case, including me.
Now we know and it is documented.
Our study uncovers another scandal:
The RKI should have known quite soon that testing with PCR tests does not really detect infected persons, but
produces many false positives due to the high sensitivity and imperfect specificity of these tests.
Because of these PCR tests, however, the executive massively encroached on the civil liberties of us citizens:
Those who tested positive were denied access to all kinds of events,
You were no longer allowed to move around freely, you often couldn't even leave your home or run official errands, etc.
And there is something else that stands out from this data:
The vaccination campaign leaves no trace in the data.
The vaccination campaign was launched at the end of 2020 to increase the population's immunity to this SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Since the IgG data were only available up to calendar week 20 in 2021, but the PCR test data were available for the entire period,
a clear shift in immunity should actually have been shown by the fact that the curves of IgG and PCR positives diverge sharply
at some point and develop in opposite directions or differently.
That is exactly what they do not do. Rather, they are very close to each other
compare the turquoise and yellow curves above.
In other words:
There is no evidence in the data that the vaccination campaign has had an impact on the
distribution of the immune proportion of the population.
To put it another way:
Whoever is immune to SARS-CoV-2 is most likely due to a natural infection. This was now a
complicated argument for what is now a well-known fact:
The genetic preventive interventions of modRNA "vaccinations" have not prevented infections.
Let's summarize:
The government has lied to the population by claiming that the "measures" to contain a SARS-CoV-2 "pandemic" are science-based.
The measures and the criteria for these were specified by politicians.
Why, with what goal, with what motivation,
The executive would be accountable to the population.
And it is time for competent science journalists to demand this from the government and for lawyers to follow up.
The RKI has lied to the population, presumably on behalf of the government.
Because the PCR tests were unsuitable to substantiate anything,
and the courses of IgG-positive , initiated by the RKI itself, showed this early and very precisely.
We know today:
Only 13.5% of those who tested positive were also clinically infected and showed an immunological trace of this infection.
All the others either got rid of this infection without any consequences or the PCR tests were false positive.
These debacles must be dealt with publicly, transparently and honestly.
That is the only thing that helps democracy in this country.
No demonstrations against or for anything,
no anticipatory prevention of supposedly false information, but rather a reappraisal.
And as I understand it, this includes admitting mistakes,
Public naming of the guilty parties, possibly legal action
and rehabilitation of the falsely ostracized
and installation of processes that can prevent recurrence.
The least we could do would be to reject the WHO pandemic and health treaties.