The ruinous coronavirus measures, climate policy, immigration policy and much more are having an
impact and leaving their mark on the population.
Increasingly, the question arises as to whether the government is working AGAINST the people.
Back in 2016, well before coronavirus and climate policy, which many citizens consider to be
excessive, the paperback "Politik gegen Deutschland:
The political class is rejecting the people".
Author Günter Köchy complains about the forced immigration policy.
In this program, we present evidence that confirms the impression that politics and the judiciary are working AGAINST Germany.
01_Höcke judgment
- Anti-German politics and justice?
On May 14, 2024, AfD leader Björn Höcke was sentenced to a fine of 13,000 euros for his statement "Everything for Germany!".
This was triggered by a complaint from Sebastian Striegel, Parliamentary Secretary of the Green Party in Saxony-Anhalt.
Höcke's lawyer Dr. Ulrich Vosgerau, a universally recognized expert in constitutional law, attested: "Indeed a
wrongful conviction!" Not without reason. Because the court merely relied on his insinuation without any evidence.
According to the report, Höcke had deliberately incorporated the allegedly exclusive Nazi slogan "Alles für
Deutschland!" into an election speech in the knowledge that its use was a criminal offense.
The presumption of innocence, the basis of the rule of law, was cast aside.
The fact that Höcke's appeal was already used in the 19th century was also completely ignored by politicians and the judiciary.
Even to this day, for example by the prominent CSU member of parliament Dorothee Bär.
Prosecutor Striegel, for his part, rejoiced in 2015 with the slogan: "Immigration until the
death of the people". - With impunity, by the way.
Doesn't this expose the obvious anti-German attitude of politics and the judiciary?
br] 02_Der Verfassungsschutz als Erfüllungsgehilfe der Politik In his book "Gesinnungspolizei im Rechtsstaat?" Mathias Brodkorb,
SPD politician and former Minister of Finance and Education, takes a close look at the German
Office for the Protection of the Constitution.
The work has the subtitle "The Office for the Protection of the Constitution as an Agent of Politics".
He examined six case studies, such as the protests against coronavirus measures, private fundraising for
those affected by the flood in the Ahr valley and the AfD.
The interventions of the secret service are highly problematic in an unprecedented way.
Brodkorb points out how the Office for the Protection of the Constitution is overstepping its boundaries in violation
of the rule of law and turning the legitimate exercise of fundamental rights into dangerous political extremism.
What is right-wing extremist and dangerous is preferably formulated in vague terms by the Office for the Protection of the
Constitution so that it can be applied as widely as possible.
Because the Office for the Protection of the Constitution is thus showing itself to be a vicarious agent of politics,
Brodkorb calls for the abolition of the German constitution protection authorities at federal and state level.
03_Expensive Great Reset and climate propaganda
"The more disastrous the practical effects of the traffic light policy become, the more
taxpayers' money it spends on propaganda."
This is the conclusion of the website ansage.org.
At the request of the AfD, the German government released a list of over 100 pages.
Accordingly, around EUR 85 million was spent on information measures, advertising, etc. in 2023.
In 2022, it was even around EUR 195 million.
According to ansage.org, propaganda disguised as "studies" play a significant role.
For example, "Muslim hostility - a German balance sheet", a supposed "study" that Interior
Minister Nancy Faeser happily welcomed in June 2023.
In March 2024, the study was completely deleted following a successful lawsuit by journalist Henryk M. Broder.
ansage.org concludes: "Some ideological projects from left-wing cloud cuckoo land are not only implemented for
millions and billions, but also advertised at horrendous costs."
04_Neue Wehrpflicht in Deutschland - nach ukrainischem Modell?
After lengthy discussions, the CDU voted at its party conference in favor of a gradual
return to compulsory military service in Germany.
Young men and women would have to serve in the army or in the social sector for a certain period of time.
It had been suspended since 2011.
Until the final implementation, a "contingent conscription" is to be introduced, in which conscription
is based on the Bundeswehr's personnel requirements.
In view of the current situation in Ukraine, such formulations are a cause for concern.
According to YouTuber Krissy Rieger, the contingent conscription in Ukraine is currently
such that almost all men are forcibly recruited.
They are confiscated on the street and taken away.
Others are dragged out of restaurants, stores or their own car or home and sent to the front.
Usually for a long time, often for a final non-reunion.
Slowly but surely, an entire nation is being bled dry.
Is that what we want for Germany too?
Many still say in the face of excessive state injustice: "Oh, there's nothing we can do!"
And yet Mahatma Gandhi's self-defense measures, namely through persistent adherence to the truth and non-violent
resistance, made him known worldwide even during his lifetime and made him a role model for many to this day.
Berthold Brecht also called on the people to act in self-defense: "When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes a duty."
[Wikipedia writes: "In German criminal and civil law, self-defense is the act of defense required to
avert a present unlawful attack from oneself or another.
Self-defense can be exercised to protect one's own individual legal interests and those
of others, such as life, limb and property.
The right of self-defense is based on the principle of the preservation of rights.
For this reason, an act justified by self-defense is not an injustice."