In school textbooks you can read how first smallpox and then one disease after another were
defeated by safe and effective vaccinations.
But is this really true?
University lecturer Dr. Gerd Reuther, radiologist and medical historian, sheds light on this question.
Dr. Reuther has long been known for his criticism of pharma-dominated medicine and expressed this in his Spiegel
bestseller "Der betrogene Patient" (The Deceived Patient).
In his lecture, Dr. Gerd Reuter uses the example of smallpox vaccination and medical-historical
sources to show the consequences of compulsory smallpox vaccination for the population.
According to Dr. Reuther, smallpox was a harmless disease, but the vaccination against
smallpox led to tens of thousands of deaths.
With the vaccination came the death of smallpox, so to speak.
According to Dr. Reuther, the 300 years of vaccination history could be equated to a single health crime.
Hear for yourself what Dr. Reuter has to say about vaccinations and, in particular, smallpox vaccination.
The lecture was held as part of the MWGFD symposium on "Vaccine approval, vaccination recommendation,
compulsory vaccination - is the data sufficient?".
Dr. Ronald Weikl: Enjoy, please enjoy. Now join me in what is sure to be an extremely entertaining
presentation by our esteemed colleague Dr. Gerd Reuther entitled "Vaccinations - a success story?"
Dr. Gerd Reuther: Yes, dear René, thank you very much, dear guests.
The Covid-19 vaccinations, which were not vaccinations, were not the first health crime in medicine.
Actually, the 300 years of vaccination history are a single health crime, but due to time
constraints I will only talk about one vaccination.
However, that is 200 years of vaccination history, namely the first 200 years were all about smallpox vaccination.
And this smallpox vaccination has already gone the same way as Covid-19.
It was about coercion, about penalties, about a lot of money, in some cases even more money than today.
And it was about doing something that had no evidence.
And the damage has been covered up.
Some may say, can you compare smallpox and Covid?
Covid, it was just the flu.
But smallpox was a terrible disease.
I have brought you this one picture here, which you will see again and again.
Interestingly, you always see the same pictures of smallpox on the Internet and in books.
There weren't so many smallpox patients in the era of photography and film that you could keep bringing in new ones.
But back in the 19th century, a cartoonist dared to show that smallpox is not actually such
a terrible disease and is no worse than Covid.
But they just look bad.
So he has taken the liberty here, as a kind of marketing gag for the medical professionals who are riding the ox
and donkey here and as an incentive, so to speak, for the
Vaccination a nymph covered in smallpox to scare people.
And you can see what the children on the right are doing.
The children flee.
But you need this fear scenario, like the corpses that would be lying on every street corner with Covid.
That's how this stockinged nymph was shown here.
And fear has always been at the heart of the business.
But this was not justified for smallpox either.
Why? Smallpox is known to have existed for at least a thousand years, probably for many thousands of years.
were also present in the West, but as a harmless childhood disease that was not even discussed.
And here are some statistics from England.
And as you can see, it only starts at 1630.
The first adult case, which probably corresponded to smallpox, is documented there.
Until then, there are at most questionable curiosities that an adult would have contracted smallpox.
This only started in the second half of the 17th century.
And the smallpox disaster in particular was in the 18th century, when vaccinations were already available.
Because before, if you look here again, there weren't a hundred deaths a year from smallpox in London.
Many have lived under very poor social conditions.
And it wasn't until the 18th century that there were hundreds of thousands of fatal cases of smallpox.
And let's just think about Covid.
People did not die in 2020, but only after the vaccinations had started.
And here perhaps as a first hint.
Could this have something to do with other social developments?
Yes, smallpox only became a disaster for Europe when the Counter-Reformation took hold after the Thirty Years' War.
It is still written in many books and is diligently copied again and again that the inoculation of smallpox
patients with pus has an old tradition in folk medicine.
The Chinese, the Indians, the Africans have already done it and that's why vaccination is the most natural thing in the world.
If you look at the facts, that's not true at all.
There are no documents before 1700 that anyone would have carved pus into another person.
Inoculations were first documented around 1700 by two Greek fortune-tellers in Constantinople.
Shortly afterwards, smallpox epidemics also occurred there.
And 1713 was the first report of such inoculations by a Greek doctor.
But not an old folk medicine tradition.
And it is also an old wives' tale of smallpox history to say that this woman here, Lady Wortley Montagu, would have been
the great introducer of the beneficial smallpox vaccination.
She saw this in Constantinople and then acted as a vaccine lobbyist in Western Europe from 1721.
And essentially spread it to the upper classes.
But even back then, healthy people died as a result of these inoculations.
And especially in the leading social circles.
Even among vaccination advocates, a death rate of at least 2% is attested.
We do not know how high it really was.
But you can actually leave Mrs. Wortley Montagu out of the story, she didn't really play a role.
Because ten years after her work as a vaccine lobbyist, no more than 1000 people in England had been inoculated.
More important was a certain Abbe Conti, about whom you hardly learn anything in the story.
A Jesuit who campaigned for these vaccinations.
And the reason why the inoculations took off anyway was because there was a lot of money involved.
Here is an example.
An English doctor has been summoned to the Russian Tsarina Catherine the Great to inoculate her and the children.
And for this activity of, let's say, five minutes, he received a payment of 10,000 pounds. In
today's equivalent of about one million euros.
A lifelong pension of 500 pounds a year and the title of baron.
He and his descendants were set for life.
The vaccination Porsches in the garages today are comparatively few.
In 1721, these obscure inoculations of smallpox riders on the
sloshed into the pond.
Allegedly, smallpox cases were introduced to the USA by a ship.
And a clergyman and a doctor then insisted that it was essential to protect the population with inoculations.
And this evaluation, which they made at the time, is also considered to be the first medical statistic.
The smallpox mortality rate of 15% would have been reduced to 2.5%. A success.
But what you don't realize is that this wasn't a proper study that Mr. Cotton Mather, a fanatical Puritan, did here.
The groups were not comparable at all. There was no randomized distribution.
Those who were vaccinated and those who were not were obviously very different groups.
And the success must also have been limited because Mr. Cotton Mather had to let his wife deny him in his own
house for 14 days during this vaccination campaign, because otherwise they would probably have lynched him.
So there must have been serious health incidents and deaths.
Mr. Cotton Mather also did witch trials over there, by the way.
Yes, and the successes in Europe didn't look good either.
If you look here, this is a statistic from Copenhagen, annual smallpox mortality.
And here you can see where the inoculation hospital was opened and closed again.
You can't see from the figures that anything has changed.
So successes are a thing of the past.
And if they didn't happen in Copenhagen and elsewhere, they probably couldn't have happened in Boston either.
And what many books on the history of medicine also fail to mention is that in 1729, eight years after Lady
Wadley Montagu propagated the whole thing, the British Parliament had already banned inoculations.
And it was only after 1743 that any were carried out at all.
And Maria Theresa's personal physician in Vienna made the very wise statement at the time that
aristocrats and the wealthy usually die of smallpox.
The untreated colony survives without treatment.
This also shows that smallpox was not a really serious disease.
They only became a serious disease in the form of this inoculation vaccine pox.
And that has influenced history.
Not smallpox, but vaccine-induced smallpox.
I will show you two prominent deaths here.
Louis XV on the left, the last Bavarian Wittelsbach on the right.
His line was extinguished by his alleged pock death Maximilian III Josef.
Both allegedly died of smallpox, one at 64 and the other at 50.
And what they both had in common was that they were the much-loved rulers.
The people were doing well under their rule.
We know for certain that Louis XV could not have contracted smallpox at the age of 64, because he had
contracted it as a child and smallpox confers lifelong immunity.
Louis XV looked at himself at 64 and said, if I didn't know that I had had smallpox as a child, I would say I had smallpox.
He didn't survive it. It could only have been vaccine-induced smallpox.
Max III Joseph is accused of having only ordered his population to undergo inoculations, but always refused himself.
One may doubt that dying of smallpox at the age of 50 from full health.
And there are many more.
Two Habsburg emperors in Vienna also died of smallpox.
And there are a few things that should give us pause for thought.
The nobles who died were people who were very wealthy.
But smallpox was actually a disease of the slums, of the poor.
How can that be?
And it was always a childhood illness.
Why can people of advanced age get smallpox from full health?
Hardly any doctor had ever seen smallpox in adults at that time.
And more importantly, everyone knows that smallpox is extremely contagious.
But where the rulers and the other nobles died, there were no more sick people and no more deaths from smallpox.
They were not contagious and obviously did not infect other people.
But there is another thing they have in common.
All rulers had the church as their enemy.
They wanted to remove the church from its tax exemption.
Which did not happen after her death.
And I have another witness to these events.
This is a monk, Abraham A. Santa Clara, who lived at that time.
His real name was Johann Ulrich Megerle.
And he already said at the time that the privilege of the Medi Corum gentlemen is to kill with impunity.
So James Bond was not the first person in human history to get the license to kill, but it was actually
introduced in the 13th century with the founding of the medical profession, as Mr. Megerle says.
For anyone who thinks that this is all exaggerated, because inoculation can't be that bad, I've brought along a
sentence from the vaccination history book by Hervé Bovin.
This is an emeritus professor in Leuven.
And this is an ardent supporter of vaccination.
Also associated with the Pasteur Institute.
And he writes in his 2011 book that inoculation, as it was practiced in Europe between 1721 and the
introduction of the Sutton method, which we'll talk about in a moment, was very dangerous.
It was undoubtedly at the limit of what could be tolerated.
So he is also indirectly saying quite clearly that these inoculations were also a potential murder weapon.
And none of this would have been necessary if we had listened to this gentleman.
Daniel Sutton, not an academic doctor, but an artisan surgeon. He came from a family of surgeons.
He carried out inoculations from 1750 onwards, but using a new technique.
And earned a lot of money with it, by the way.
An inoculation cost 10 pounds for ordinary people and 25 pounds for the wealthy.
He made 500 to 1000 a day.
Back then, a detached house cost 500 pounds. That means he earned several detached houses in one day that way.
But nonetheless, he deserves credit because he said at the end of his life, I haven't lost a patient.
First of all, he refrained from taking further toxic measures. This is often forgotten in the vaccination story, just as,
for example, the adjuvants in the vaccines are often omitted.
Because back then, when you were vaccinated, in official medicine you also got adalas, antimony,
mercury and other delicious poisonous things.
He didn't do any of that.
He only did this inoculation and said nothing else except fresh air.
But he did one thing above all. And if people had listened to Mr. Sutton, the Covid vaccination disaster would not have happened.
He conducted a basic experiment.
He once just scratched the pus into the skin without any blood flowing.
He dissected the skin once, injected the pus into the subcutaneous fatty tissue and then injected
the pus into the muscles and saw what happened.
And he found that the target event was vaccine pustules on the skin, i.e. a harmless smallpox disease,
so to speak, that occurs after this inoculation.
This only occurred when he made the inoculation into the skin, not into the subcutaneous fatty tissue and not into the muscles.
Why?
It is actually clear.
Because our immune system works intracutaneously.
Everything we put in deeper is a disaster.
And unfortunately, medicine has not realized this since Mr. Sutton's time, 250 years ago.
Unfortunately, his work "The Inoculator" was not published until 1796, when Jenner's
vaccination was already in the starting blocks.
But what Sutton has taught us is that our immune system only works via the skin and mucous membranes,
if you want to teach us anything with vaccinations.
This is an evolutionary arrangement. But not if you inject something deeper into the tissue.
Only the skin, nose, throat, lungs and digestive tract can have an effect on the memory of the immune system.
Anything else is a bodily injury with the potential to cause harm.
That would have been Sutton's breakthrough.
But Mr. Jenner came.
And Mr. Jenner was of the opinion, not as the first, but also other doctors before him, that the harmless cowpox, which would
have led to the fact that the milkers have no smallpox scars,
but have retained a beautiful white skin, could serve as a good substitute for human smallpox horses if vaccinated with them.
The milkers actually only stayed healthy and had beautiful skin because they had fresh,
unpasteurized cow's milk. It had nothing to do with cowpox.
Why? Because they were extremely rare.
Jenner himself has never provided evidence for the effectiveness of his vaccination and he has carried out unethical experiments.
For example, he vaccinated his gardener's son with this cowpox vaccine and exposed the
child to smallpox to see if anything would happen.
And he didn't hesitate to vaccinate his son. You don't usually read that either.
His son was mentally handicapped after this vaccination and died at the age of 21.
This is the vaccination hero Jenner.
And a few years ago, old tubes that Mr. Jenner sent out back then were also examined.
There was no cowpox in it at all.
Horse pox was in there, or maybe just something dried up, something that was sent all over the
world, which surely couldn't have been of any use.
And the few statistics that exist, in England after the time of Jenner's introduction, show you here on the
left side, these were the smallpox deaths in England.
Vaccination had already been compulsory since 1853.
14,000, 20,000 and then an epidemic with 44,000 smallpox deaths.
People then slowly realized that the vaccination would actually lead to the death of smallpox.
And then there was a city that did the experiment, so to speak. You can see it here. This is the city of Leicester.
I'll go back again.
The city of Leicester, which has simply said from the city council that mandatory vaccination
will no longer be practiced within the city limits.
Compulsory vaccination is no longer practiced.
And the city of Leicester, then, has the lowest number of smallpox cases and the lowest number of smallpox deaths compared to
the other cities where compulsory vaccination has been practiced.
And this was also shown by the further course of events at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century.
Here you can see the number of cases of smallpox that have died and those that have died as a result of smallpox vaccination.
The curves essentially show the same high values.
This means that even ardent supporters of vaccination cannot talk about a reduction in mortality.
But there were not only deaths, but also severe disabilities.
The meningitis occurred with modifications of the smallpox vaccination.
And in 1924, a pathologist in Prague established the clear connection for the first time during an autopsy.
You can see how long that takes. So 125 years. 25 years after the introduction of vaccination.
The first time it was discovered that the whole thing was causing meningitis.
Although, of course, this has happened before.
And it then took another human life, namely a generation, 30 years, for vaccine damage to be recognized in Karlsruhe in 1953.
Until then, there had officially been no vaccine damage, even though vaccination had been practiced for 250 years.
And in the FRG, although there were no more smallpox cases, there were 7 confirmed smallpox cases from 1949 to 1979,
360 vaccination deaths conceded by the RKI or Paul Ehrlich Institute and at least 984 permanent injuries.
And that's why smallpox had to be declared eradicated in 1979, because that was the only way
to get the smallpox vaccination off the stage.
Otherwise the smallpox vaccination would have had to be continued.
But that didn't work.
And I would like to conclude with a quote from an American physician, a vaccination advocate who was
medical director of preventive medicine in the US Army.
In 1940, after almost 250 years of vaccination history, he said that the whole question of immunization, both
active and passive, was still at the experimental stage.
And we have now experienced the experimental stage the whole thing is in.
And if this is the case after this time, then you can only say why vaccinations can still be an issue at all.