It's quite difficult on such an open stage, because you either look in that direction and then they only
have their backs to you, or you look in that direction.
Well, there are now only the participants in this meeting.
First of all, I'm delighted that you're all here.
Thank you very much.
Hello Berlin.
Hello everyone from all parts of Germany.
I have been given the task of saying a few words on the subject of enlightenment or reappraisal.
Why should I talk about reprocessing?
A journalist from SWR just asked this question when we had this impromptu press conference here.
The journalist from SWR asked Mr. Ballweg, why do you actually want a reappraisal?
What do they actually want to work on?
Since Michael has already given the answer, I would like to give my answer again on stage.
I would tell my colleague from SWR:
Just ask Paul Schreier.
Ask Aya Velasquez.
Ask Dr. Christian Hafner.
Ask those who work as journalists, not in the leading media or the mainstream, whatever you
want to call them, but as freelance journalists.
Who don't get state money, but who have to work for free, who have to see how they can finance themselves.
Ask these colleagues, fellow journalists, what reappraisal means.
First of all, reappraisal means asking questions, not just nodding off, but asking questions.
And that's what these colleagues did.
And these colleagues have sued for the protocols of the Robert Koch Institute and the
Corona Crisis Unit, some of which have been leaked.
And dear journalists from SWR, in case you haven't noticed:
We have seen the most massive encroachments on the fundamental rights of people in the Federal
Republic of Germany since the Second World War.
And when they then ask what we actually have to work on, I'm not surprised that we have these years behind us.
Because the journalists, who actually have the task of intervening as the fourth estate if necessary, of asking
questions as the fourth estate, have failed completely.
And it is understandable that no reappraisal is desired here, that no reappraisal is desired here.
And reappraisal would also be a political reappraisal.
Reappraisal would mean setting up a committee of inquiry, a commission of inquiry.
You can see how difficult it is for politicians to come to terms with this.
But that is also understandable, of course.
Why should the perpetrators themselves solve their crimes?
That would be the same as if the police here in Berlin were allowed to judge for themselves
afterwards whether they had done everything right or not.
So, I ask, where is the media coverage?
And I would also like to mention two names from the mainstream that must be mentioned here,
on this stage and in front of this audience.
They are Jürgen Mladek - who sadly passed away recently - the former editor-in-chief of Nordkurier and Simone Schamann.
Simone Schamann now works at Nius.
And Simone Schamann has already asked the critical questions for the Nordkurier that the mainstream
should have asked when it was not yet opportune.
She even received a reprimand from the Press Council.
And now listen carefully:
Simone Schamann has been reprimanded by the Press Council on the grounds that her articles would lead to
a decline in the willingness to vaccinate in Germany.
Until then, I was not aware that the task of the Press Council in Germany was to ensure that
there was or was not a willingness to vaccinate.
What does this have to do with reprocessing?
If we look there, who should do the work?
I founded my own center with a few colleagues.
This means the Center for the Investigation, Reappraisal, Legal Prosecution and Prevention of Crimes against Humanity.
Many people always say, why crimes against humanity?
Because what we experienced here were crimes against humanity.
People have been persecuted.
Doctors are still being persecuted today.
Doctors are locked up in prison for doing their job.
My colleague Rainer Füllmich is in prison in Göttingen.
He was also a great enlightener.
We can only come to terms with the past if we change the political situation.
Because these political conditions that we have, in which we simply hand over power, will never lead to a reappraisal.
Because, as I said, then the perpetrators would come to terms with it themselves.
Nobody can assume that those who committed these crimes against humanity will stand up and say: Yes, we did it.
And now we want to put ourselves on trial before the judges we have chosen ourselves, before the public
prosecutors we have chosen ourselves, for them to judge whether what we did was right or wrong.
The judges who told me three months ago, before the RKI files were leaked, that they all did everything right back then.
These judges are now supposed to come to terms with the situation. That won't work either.
It will only work if
And Ralf Boes has just announced it, and I agree with Ralf Boes, with a lot of people, and I'd
like you to take a look at the website he mentioned.
I think we have to go through the federal states.
We have our own constitution in every federal state.
And since they are separate constitutions, each of the constitutions in the federal
state allows us to amend these constitutions.
We have the power in our hands.
You just don't know it.
Rainer Mausfeld always says that there are great illusionists at work.
We live in an illusion of democracy.
It is claimed that we have a democracy.
Yet we only have a representative democracy.
And a representative democracy is really just a disguise for the fact that we still live in an aristocracy or an oligarchy.
But a representative democracy, a representative democracy, is the opposite of democracy.
Because the only thing that representative democracy allows you to do is to elect those who rule you every four years.
But only from a small circle of those who control you.
You have no chance at all to decide on the content of policy, on policy measures, on the rules of policy.
Even though you and I are the people of this country.
This means, however, that we can seize this power in the federal states.
This is a question of power.
We as a population have to ask the question of power after what we have experienced in the last four years.
And if we don't, as we have just seen with the ban on the magazine, whose name we are not allowed to mention
because otherwise we would be in breach of regulations.
No matter what the content of this magazine is.
If the state, if the state censors the press, there is no reappraisal.
Then there is only domination and we have to defend ourselves against that together.
I'll start.
From tomorrow I'll be touring with the ZAAVV - Mobil, that's what it says.
From August 4, i.e. tomorrow, to September 22 through Saxony, Thuringia and Brandenburg.
I'm touring the three countries because there are state elections in each of them.
And I want to encourage people to change their constitutions in these countries and say:
In future, we the people want to have the final decision-making authority, and remember this word.
We want to be able to question, obstruct and prevent every political decision.
That is the right we have as a people.
And then, to answer the question that came from here earlier.
Then it doesn't matter whether there is an occupation or not, because we humans are taking power into our own hands.
And now to conclude, I would like to say once again, many people... Oh, I should also say that there are also
many of our employees on the ZAAVV mobile, many helpers.
There are flyers, postcards, postcards on the WHO treaty, for example.
The WHO treaty is certainly still being reported on today.
I'm often asked how you manage to keep going on stage, keep touring the countries,
keep being there, keep doing the court cases.
How do you manage to have this strength and keep going?
I want to say one thing.
For me, there is no alternative.
It is our future, it is the future of our children and it is the future of our grandchildren.
And either we leave the future to others or we take it into our own hands.
And for me, there is no question about that at all. We are taking this future into our own hands.
And one final thing to say.
We have now criticized the leading and mainstream media.
But don't forget, we have so many alternative media.
We have so many great programs, be it Kontrafunk, be it Radio Morgenröte, be it Apolut, be it Klartext, the
citizens' newspaper, and be it back there, and this is also very important to me, the democratic resistance.
Democratic resistance has been your companion for four years.
Of course, I haven't named them all, there are many more.
And the democratic resistance has lots of great new projects at the moment.
Have a look there too. But go to the alternative media.
Actually, these are no longer alternative media at all.
Actually, these are the mainstream media and the others are not the alternative media, they are simply the old media.
Peace, freedom, self-determination!