"Pandemics come when they are needed. Pandemics won't happen if we don't believe them."
This was the conclusion of Dr. Gerd Reuther in his lecture on 13 April 2024 on the topic of
"Scaremongering and invented crises to steer the world".
University lecturer Dr. Gerd Reuther is a specialist in radiology, medical educator and medical historian.
Kla.TV broadcasts the informative and highly topical lecture on this occasion:
A few days ago, the WHO once again declared a global emergency.
The Berliner Zeitung reported on 14.8.24:
"The WHO sees a risk that Mpox could spread internationally again after 2022 and become a health risk in several countries.
The emergency declaration is intended to alert authorities around the world to prepare for possible outbreaks."
Just a few months ago, the new International Health Regulations (IHR) were passed in a "cloak and dagger" operation.
This has given the WHO, or Tedros in person, even more power over all 194 member states.
Is the new Mpox hysteria another maneuver to bring the world under a "WHO dictatorship"?
One thing is certain: "In the coming days and months, the WHO will coordinate the global countermeasures in close
cooperation with all affected countries ," said Tedros.
Why a global pandemic emergency is being declared right now remains to be seen.
It is clear that the stagnating profits of the pharmaceutical giants will soon go through the
roof thanks to the boosted Mpox vaccine industry.
Ernst Wolff writes on August 15:
"WHO & SPIEGEL receive millions from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which in turn is
heavily invested in the pharmaceutical industry."
To assess this current situation, take a look back at the history of pandemics with Kla.TV today.
Yes, I am particularly pleased to be back here in Vienna.
After all, I have spent 13 years of my life working here.
I am therefore also grateful to Mr. Hauser for bringing me back to Vienna.
Because after what happened here with Corona, Vienna was really no longer inviting, it has to be said.
And I had almost sworn never to cross the border of Vienna again.
But I did it anyway, because I think it is simply very, very important.
Because for this totalitarianism that is to be established here, they need another pandemic.
And this pandemic must not be allowed to happen.
And it can only be prevented if we take a look in the rear-view mirror and see what happened in the past.
What the epidemics have looked like over the past 700 years.
And that's why my wife and I wrote this booklet a year ago.
And you can actually summarize the history of the epidemic in 150 pages, which you wouldn't believe.
Because the same thing has been happening for 700 years.
It's not about bacteria and viruses. It's about panic, nothing else.
Pandemic is a synonym for panic. Yes, and for this panic you need dead people.
But of course you don't want to show these dead people directly out of piety.
Perhaps also because they don't exist. That's why coffins are used.
And the coffins, we all know them from Bergamo. I don't need to say much more about that.
I think there were only 13 coffins that were driven around in circles for hours.
But the whole thing was done several centuries earlier.
Take a look at the picture on the left. It's just as fake as the coffins on the right.
Or do you believe that you can simply carry such a coffin with the whole person as one person alone?
That's why you need coffins, because you don't know if there's anything inside.
And, of course, because the coffins can't be right. For centuries, people were not
buried in coffins because it was too expensive.
And because it would have kept the decomposition in the limited churchyards for too long.
And that's why this picture was painted at least 100 or 200 years later and dated back as if it depicted the situation in 1347.
In other words, both of what we see here is fake news and nothing else.
Because it depends on this fear. But this fear has two faces.
For us, for most people, it's this fear on the left.
The fear that takes away our ability to think, that forces us to seek protection and submit to offers of help.
And then there is also fear as an opportunity.
You may know the gentleman on the right. That's the famous Warren Buffett.
In other words, for the minority of humanity, this epidemic panic is a reason to rejoice.
Because, as he said, widespread fear is your friend as an investor. Because then you can make bargain purchases.
And they always made these bargain buys.
Not only now in Corona, but also earlier. [So here it is for Corona:
The Canadian physicist Denis Rancourt once wrote here about poverty versus the dead.
And you can see: The poorer the population, the more often it died. Not from a virus, but from the measures.
And the same thing happened before, in 1866 and 1871 in Amsterdam, up here for smallpox.
This is the number of deaths of the poor and this is the number of deaths of the very rich.
And down here, the whole thing for cholera, deaths of the poor, deaths of the rich.
In other words, you have always been able to get rid of a part of the population that you no longer wanted with an epidemic.
And above all, it wasn't their fault. And they don't want to be blamed.
So you don't necessarily have to wage war to reduce the population. An epidemic will do.
And of course you can then redirect the economy. We are now seeing what is happening with corona:
New major projects that would never have been implemented before.
But they have also done this before, with the epidemics, as I will show you in a moment.
Suddenly the economy was buzzing because people were dying and there was no one left to work.
New major projects have been launched and certain people have been let go.
Today it's the swearers, in the past it was the heretics and witches or even the Jews, who were simply
killed to make room for new people to control society.
And you can see from a rough overview from 1347 until now that there have always been some kind of epidemic events here.
But there are also strange breaks in this epidemic story.
Namely, why were there no epidemics for centuries until 1347?
You have to wonder if there has been an epidemic every eight to ten years.
And there is said to have been a major epidemic, the well-known Spanish flu, in 1918 at the end of
the First World War, because many people were unwell.
But we also had a Second World War.
Why was there no epidemic at the end of the Second World War, when people were no less badly off?
The answer can only be: Because you obviously couldn't use them at the time.
And here are the plague events from 1347 to 1750 and you can see, after the first big bang in 1347, this jaggedness, then at
the time of the Thirty Years' War - there were more and more plagues - and then suddenly much fewer plagues afterwards.
What is supposed to have happened medically?
You become smarter when you look at the social conditions.
In 1347, the Catholic Church really came into its world claim and said: Every soul must be subject to us.
And the fear of an epidemic was needed for this. And of course there was resistance.
This is often referred to as the peasant wars that developed.
But it was not only peasants who opposed their exploitation and oppression.
These were the citizens who lived in these states in the first place.
And you can see that the epidemics have increased in order to get this under control.
Until major events such as the Thirty Years' War finally occurred.
And then it became relatively quiet with the Counter-Reformation and the Baroque splendor.
Baroque palaces and Baroque churches were built there.
They needed the workforce and had the people so under control that they said: Now we can do without epidemics.
And something else that also shows that these epidemics are not a logical natural phenomenon, which we had with Covid, namely
even after a long time we had a very different incidence here in individual counties, federal states or the states of the EU.
How can this be possible if a disease is supposedly spread from person to person via the air?
Then there must be an equilibration after a very short time, after a few weeks or months; in other words, there
must be roughly the same incidence of illness everywhere.
But that was not the case.
And the only time there was an excess mortality - the Canadian physicist Denis Rancourt once simulated
and calculated this too - was in March, April 2020.
And that, too, is revealing.
Actually, a Chinese-imported disease should have appeared at the major ports and airports and spread from there.
But that was not the case.
That was northern Italy, that was Strasbourg, Alsace, that was Paris, that was the area around Brussels, a bit of
London and that was the Madrid and Barcelona area here.
But not anywhere else where there were also airports and ports. And why did the whole thing happen?
Because it wasn't an infectious event that happened, the excess mortality - it was a medical death that happened.
Namely, the World Health Organization has issued a recommendation that patients with suspected Covid-19 should be ventilated as
quickly as possible, which is practically tantamount to murder in old people, because
they can no longer be taken off the ventilator.
Chloroquine, a malaria drug, was prescribed in a dose that was actually lethal.
What was done here was murder. Everyone who implemented it had to know that.
In a number of countries, as you can see, in Germany or Austria, this was not done; but in these countries it was done.
They gave Remdesivir, which was completely useless and harmful.
And worse still, the patients who were unnecessarily ventilated were not given antibiotics.
Although every ventilator patient develops a bacterial infection without these antibiotics.
This means that, in principle, a medical death was deliberately caused in some regions for a
few weeks in order to stir up the necessary panic.
And if we look way back now, to 1347, to the first great plague, there are maps like
this today and you can see what can't be right.
Although the distribution of the disease seems to be quite homogeneous, this plague would have lasted for five years and
entire regions - such as today's Poland, eastern Germany, the Czech Republic, the region around Milan and here
in the Pyrenees - would have remained disease-free for five years, without geographical borders.
That can only be because the people there didn't participate and that's what we have to do! If enough
people don't participate, there won't be a pandemic!
And in the meantime, studies have also proven quite well that this plague, where it took place at all - there were only
relatively few cities - 95.5 percent of the events happened within a distance of ten kilometers from navigable waterways.
And you know how many parts of the country have no navigable waterway.
In other words, in many of these regions where colored areas are simply drawn in to show that it
was supposedly so bad, nothing happened at all.
If you do, you have to make such city points.
And then our research showed that many of these plague statistics were invented.
Different cities have the same reports - only the name of the city has been changed - to
suggest that a plague had taken place there.
But even if you don't do that and just look at the fact that most of Europe was rural, and back then people didn't live
mainly in the big cities but in the countryside - then only ten percent of the population would have been affected at all.
So there could be no question of mass death and mass disease as early as 1347, when the first
supposedly great plague struck. And why was it needed?
It was also about restructuring at the time.
If you look in a history book today, it says:
The first plague was the prelude to the Renaissance. Just as we are now experiencing a turning point.
That's what they did. And back then, the financial market was in the hands of the Jews.
After half of the Jewish communities had been wiped out, it was no longer in the hands of the Jews,
but of local patricians who took over the business.
And conveniently, many, including the princes of the church, were rid of their debts because they killed their creditors.
The reorganization of the economy. At that time, most fine fabrics came from northern Italy, but not after 1352.
There was suddenly a German textile industry in manufactories.
And the Catholic Church suddenly had plenty of land in the cities and was able to build huge
cathedrals. Not with their own money, of course.
And in some places where it worked, the population was just a bit more manageable.
Because if more people died somewhere, it was only in a few big cities.
And then there were fewer unpleasant people.
Let's look at another event, the so-called English Sweat of 1529. Quite a strange event.
Similar to Wuhan, a ship would have landed a deadly plague in the port of Hamburg in 1529.
According to everything that can be reconstructed, it was probably a summer flu.
Strangely enough, the summer flu only took place in certain cities in Germany and Switzerland, and a little in the
Netherlands - but not in France, Poland or the Czech Republic.
Today, medical historians are still searching for the pathogen. But they will not find it.
But you can find it if you look at the map of the Reformation.
In 1517, a certain Martin Luther reformed the church, and there was now a Protestant church.
And these are the areas where the cities have converted to the Protestant faith.
These correspond almost one-to-one with the cities where the English sweat took place.
And it didn't happen because of an infection, but because of the therapy.
In these cities, people have been told that they have to be tied up in two comforters for 24 hours at 35 degrees in midsummer.
And then they died. That was the hydroxychloroquine that was used at the time.
And unfortunately, so many people let themselves be scared back then and did that.
And the paper had been published, interestingly enough, because we are in Austria right now, signed by two pharmacists from Linz.
They were never able to find the two Linz pharmacists, because they never existed.
They were fake pharmacists, but it was enough to kill several thousand people.
And what happened in London in 1665? There was the great plague, which allegedly killed 68,000 people.
It may be, it may not be, I don't want to judge it at all. But what happened a year later?
The Great Fire. The whole of London burned down - a thermal renovation that worked very well after the shock of the plague.
And what happened after the baroque reconstruction of London? There was never another plague. What a coincidence.
Or let's look at the year 1830-31. It was not yet 1848, but it was fermenting.
After the Napoleonic Wars, as we know particularly well here in Austria, the Metternich regime was established.
And then you could see what the masks are actually good for.
Not to protect against infection, but to ban speech.
That's how a cartoon showed it back then. And it was the same in other countries.
There were revolutions in Paris, in Brussels, in Antwerp, in Warsaw. And that became dangerous.
And what came next? Then came the cholera. It arrived from Bengal for the first time.
For thousands of years she didn't get a ship, but then suddenly she came. And then the people died.
And of course only in the big cities, because the revolutions still took place in the big cities back then.
And the last thing, the Spanish flu, which is still considered a real infection even by many corona critics, is not real either.
You can see here: These are the statistics on the incidence of influenza in the German army in 1918.
There was a summer flu, 6.5 percent of the soldiers were ill.
And an autumn flu, not even 2 percent.
And the man who was responsible for the defeat of the German army, Erich Ludendorff, could have
said: We only lost because of the Spanish flu.
No, he said: "The people had a bit of flu, but above all they didn't have any potatoes and they brought a bad
mood with them from home. That's why the German army lost.
And in November 1918, the flu was over. There was nothing left.
But today you can read in the books that lasted until 1923.
But take old books, they don't say that. People had this normal flu in 1919, which was just a bit more severe because people
were in need at the end of the war and had nothing to heat.
They had already forgotten about them.
So even then there were no new pathogens, no dangerous pathogens.
At best, it was the circumstances. It was not a new flu that took place here.
Just as little as it was now.
And that's why a paper was written that investigated this for the city of Cologne, that the citizens of Cologne
essentially found out about the Spanish flu from the newspaper.
But not through cases of illness and not through the dead lying on every street corner.
And that is what Ms. Andersen said earlier in drastic terms, in her own words.
That was said by someone I would like to pay tribute to here, because he is Viennese.
Ivan Illich predicted the scenario we are facing back in 1975.
He said: "A new elite of scientific controllers wants to turn the whole world into a hospital ward and rule it.
This new medical clergy wants to decide what illness is, who is or may be ill and what should be done for them."
He knew nothing about RNA vaccinations and nothing about PCR tests. But he did know the mechanisms.
Why? Because Ivan Illich was a Catholic priest. He had insider information.
So, now you might want to ask me, whoever looks into the past can predict the future, what this
shell game will pull out as the next pandemic.
I can't tell you what he will pull out of his hat either.
But I can tell you that it will come when it is needed or when it is not, and will not come if we do not believe it.
It is enough if a sufficiently large number of people do not believe the pandemic and
'without a pandemic, no totalitarianism'.
Thank you very much.