At a press conference in Berlin on July 23, 2024, journalist Aya Velazquez, financial expert Stefan Homburg and
journalist Bastian Barucker presented around 1,500 new pages of the exposed and unredacted protocols of the RKI .
It came to light just how much politics was able to influence the RKI's decision-making processes. A scandal!
Today we want to summarize the article by journalist Bastian Barucker, based on our program "The
hybrid war against our children" (kla.tv 30526).
His focus in disclosing the protocols was specifically on the children and their
unjustifiable suffering during the Corona period.
He begins his speech with a brief outline of the measures taken:
Germany had the longest school closures in all of Europe, hours of compulsory mask-wearing for months on end, sometimes outdoors
and even during sports lessons, regular testing of healthy children without cause, cordoning off playgrounds, the social
distancing requirement that is completely contrary to children's sensibilities, and the
promotion of a new and untested "vaccination".
Not forgetting the strategy developed by the Home Office to deliberately frighten children and suggest that
they are to blame for the death of their parents if they do not comply with the hygiene rules.
The damage caused is far-reaching, sometimes irreversible and enormous.
They will keep us busy for decades, says Barucker.
But one thing is certain: there was no health crisis!
Children were never at risk from any virus!
Nevertheless, they in particular suffered from the measures, which were based on
political pressure and not on scientific findings.
Barucker quotes Health Minister Karl Lauterbach: "Children and young people have made the biggest sacrifices in the course of
the pandemic policy!" and Family Minister Lisa Paus: "73% of children and young people are mentally
stressed due to the measures and NOT due to a virus!"
What a late insight, especially as federal law stipulates that the best interests of the child
must be given priority in all political decisions!
But to what extent have the RKI and politicians taken this guiding principle into account in their decisions?
Barucker examines this question with quotes taken primarily from the RKI protocols, focusing on the following points:
School closures measure
March 2020: It's all about the school closures.
The RKI states the following: "Reactive school closures in areas that are not particularly affected are not recommended."
April 2020 also states: "School closures have probably not had a major impact on controlling the epidemic."
Christian Drosten , on the other hand, said on March 12, 2020:
"No more events and closing schools - that's something we have to do now."
Mask wearing measure
November 2020, the RKI protocols state: "It is unfavorable and dangerous when masks are used
by laypersons! Influence rather not possible."
The RKI was not consulted in advance.
However, the mask requirements were introduced anyway and, as was to be expected, were not medically effective, but did have
significant side effects, especially in children and adolescents.
When the topic of FFP2 masks came up, the RKI protocol states January 2021:
"So far, there is no convincing evidence that FFP2 is better, especially not for children."
A general FFP2 mask requirement was not considered appropriate from a technical point of view.
In October 2022, however, an FFP2 mask requirement was introduced on public transport for children aged 6 to 13.
In general, this was already established in the fall of 2020:
"The success of measures cannot be answered satisfactorily with RKI data.
We know which factors drive up incidences and we know sensible measures, but we won't be able to prove this with RKI data!"
An incredible statement!
Measure Vaccinations
Barucker comments as follows: "Since Corona posed no significant risk to children, there was never a medical reason for a
conditionally approved and experimental vaccination. It was clear from the outset that it only offered self-protection, if at all."
What do the protocols say about this?
May 2021: "Pediatric associations are reluctant to vaccinate children.
Politicians are already preparing vaccination campaigns so that the relevant age groups
are vaccinated by the end of the vacations."
August 2021, it can be read in the protocols that the STIKO still does not rate the benefit of
vaccination higher than the risk of the disease.
But on August 16, 2021, the vaccination recommendation for all 12 to 17-year-olds will come!
The RKI also recognizes this and is looking for explanations to justify the vaccination of children.
Suddenly, they change tack and try to show what "long-term effects" it can have on children.
On July 30, 2021, an amendment to the vaccination target will be discussed.
There was then, and still is today, no valid database showing that SARS-CoV-2 infections in
children lead to particular long-term consequences.
The STIKO chairman himself said: "There is no such thing as Long COVID in children."!
Media relations measure
In July 2021, younger people in particular were encouraged to get "vaccinated" or boostered,
e.g. "Influenza Vaccination Challenge" on YouTube:
"It must be cool to get vaccinated."
There are also other indications of political influence, according to Barucker.
Further from the RKI files: "Currently, a booster vaccination of children is also being considered from a
ministerial point of view, although there is no recommendation and in some cases no approval."
Regarding the monitoring of the safety of the previously advertised "vaccines", it says in January 2023:
"The monthly report and vaccination dashboard will be discontinued in May.
Assessment of vaccination side effects will no longer be possible.
This must be accompanied by very good communication so that it does not fall back on the RKI."!
Bastian Barucker concluded: "In principle, these medical facts are not new.
Doctors and internationally highly respected scientists pointed out early on - but mostly in vain - that the
measures posed a greater danger to children than the virus. The RKI was also aware of this.
An unbiased look at Sweden was sufficient to consider these indications as proven.
However, these voices were removed from the debate room from the outset.
It is now clear that the RKI was also aware of this medical madness."
[Mr. Barucker ends with the following appeal to the participants of the press conference:
"Now it's finally time for the press to do its job, go through the protocols meticulously
and inform the public objectively and in full.
After the politically driven anti-children pandemic policy, which was supported by so many educators, associations, doctors,
parents and journalists, anything else would be a further betrayal of the children and young people of this country."