Today's "look over the fence" falls on the author of this book: "Exhabitus".
Don Icon, thank you for joining us today and thank you for introducing us to the core of your 200-page work.
Thank you for the opportunity.
On page five of your book, it becomes clear that you have completed significant studies, for example in
quantum physics, religions, international law, canon law, economics, social sciences, marketing and others.
In addition, you mention that while you were writing your book, you acquired much more important
qualifications that we cannot discuss here for the sake of time.
Ultimately, today's discussion is also only about the reintroduction of a lost court
instance. That's where things get really exciting.
We are now talking about a court that has existed in Switzerland for a long time, which was formed
regularly and completely neutrally by the people themselves.
However, this form of court instance has not existed for quite a while now.
In your book "Exhabitus" you provide all the necessary evidence and legal foundations for the
restoration of this legal common property that we have lost.
- Did I understand that correctly? Yes, that is correct.
Strictly speaking, however, our discussion is already about the initial formulation and
practical development of your core concern.
In your recent media release to Kla.TV, you wrote, and I quote: "After a very intensive preparation phase,
we are now ready to go public with the 'IG Volkstribunal' project from November 1, 2024."
Who are we - and how do you formulate your core concern in your own words?
WIR stands for the newly founded NGO, i.e. non-governmental organization, "Interessengemeinschaft Volkstribunal".
The People's Tribunal, as such, is one of the oldest institutions in the administration of justice.
The tribunality emerges from the people and cannot be controlled by state or corporate interests.
In Roman law, the tribunes embodied the voice of the people, who had the right to veto
votes in order to keep the ruling caste in check.
However, the possibility of judging something independently has been insidiously abolished by politicians in recent decades and
so today there is no longer any control of standards or control of the courts that could protect us in this way from
the evil machinations of politicians and government bodies.
Was there any public justification for this outrageous step?
Yes, of course. The tribunals that were set up by the people, also called jury courts, were closed on the grounds of unprofitability
and will certainly not be reactivated by the rulers.
This has created a self-contained system for the defense and implementation of political and corporate interests, and citizens
today have no legal means of defending themselves against assaults, including the rape of
their bodies - e.g. with coronavirus injections.
Various cases and studies have already shown that the law is being bent and human rights are being
systematically disregarded, and these have been brought to the attention of the public in media such as Kla.TV.
Today, we see a great many crimes taking place before our eyes and we can currently only act as spectators and -
even better - as financiers, so as not to fall victim to maximum judicial and official arbitrariness.
The last four years have made this abundantly clear.
Corruption, oppression, surveillance and exploitation have reached an institutional standard that is gaining even more momentum
and defrauding and exploiting people's basic rights. - Madness.
It is therefore utopian to think that some powerful savior will suddenly appear and make everything better.
The "IG Volkstribunal" - "Interessengemeinschaft Volkstribunal" - was founded to re-establish the independent body.
Does this new NGO already have clearly defined topics or goals?
Yes. We have to independently work through many issues that have not been investigated over the past decades.
The independent research was not taken into account, let alone taken seriously.
So we need to focus on the bigger crimes that need to be assessed from the outside and tackle them.
The latest studies on corona history, geoengineering, 5G and the enslavement of people cannot be judged by the
authority that is part of this system, that supports the crime and even profits from it.
Yes, that makes sense. Are there any legal bases or means that can be used for this?
Yes. In Switzerland - thanks to our federal constitution - we can still make use of certain
resources that are currently not being used.
Interesting. So we stand together as "IG Volkstribunal" under the highest moral and ethical standards and investigate whether the
Swiss administration is still working on behalf of its citizens or whether it is only looking after corporate interests.
We must consult the real studies of the sciences and conduct the discourse without regard to finances and status.
It is also imperative that all investigations are open source and that all negotiations are conducted in public.
And every citizen can be part of this and become a link to support our cause and find the truth.
I don't want to get ahead of myself, but is there already a practical way to connect?
Yes, interested parties can simply log in via our website www.volkstribunal.ngo or via Telegram https://t.me/Volkstribunal.
As a member, you are a supporter and will be informed about the latest events.
However, we need 100,000 members who are in the NGO.
For this we need a copy of your ID and some data, which can also be sent to us by post.
We manage everything offline and guarantee data protection.
Very good. Nothing is misused or published. That is important to us.
Very good, yes, that's important. Okay. But before we do that, let's delve a little deeper into the new material.
Tell us something about the attitude and approach of this new NGO today.
Because we are actually dealing with a legal bankruptcy that has occurred, everyone who holds a position in the "IG Volkstribunal"
has decided to take an oath to the truth and stands by the Swiss with their expertise in
human rights issues and the legal bankruptcy,
to come to terms with the crime that is taking place before our eyes.
This oath is also required by future judges, jurors and participants.
Can you give us a specific example of what you think is going wrong that has led to legal bankruptcy?
Yes. Even the basic construct in Switzerland no longer meets the constitutional requirements of the separation of powers.
For example, with the transition from a confederation of states to a federal state, the police
were merged with the courts to form a single unit.
This is how the Department of Justice and Police came into being. The two powers were thus united.
What makes this even more difficult is that they are controlled by politicians and are given a budget.
Thus, corporate structures have effectively taken the place of state structures.
These three normally separate entities are thus making common cause - to the detriment of citizens.
Now that everyone has to meet their budget targets, it is therefore utopian to think that a court will
rule in favor of justice, but it is to be expected that business will take precedence.
It's the same with the police. Today I see them more as - sorry, forgive me for this comparison
- prostitutes of the state than as protectors.
Today, they take to the streets to raise funds for third parties in the gray area of legality.
Since they cooperate with the courts, neither their illegal actions nor the transaction as such can be contested.
How could one ever win a court case under these matted conditions?
I have tried to write this down as comprehensibly as possible in the book "Exhabitus".
In addition, the priorities of the courts in Switzerland have been redirected so that they must serve primarily as a place of
business and no longer as a place where the truth is established.
Today, the judge is the captain of the business, so to speak, and no longer the supervisor of laws.
The achievement or remnant of the past - the so-called direct court - has therefore been completely abolished in Switzerland.
That no longer exists. There is no longer a jury in a courtroom and you need a lawyer instead.
The truth is no longer sought by the jury, as it once was, but is left to the lawyers and judges for expensive money.
The worst thing, however, is that all the existing supervisory bodies have simply been abolished
and the courts have thus become virtually outlawed.
What exactly is legal bankruptcy? And when does legal bankruptcy occur?
Legal bankruptcy as such, this is defined in the legal dictionary and I think we are blending that in here:
"Legal bankruptcy is the inability of a legal institution to provide justice to those subject to it.
A legal institution reveals legal bankruptcy, for example, if it allows liars to reach the top, makes smugglers into secretaries,
fraudsters into cashiers, forgers into minute takers, con artists into assessors and blackmailers into legal supervisors.
Under such circumstances, only a complete return to generally recognized values, e.g. truth,
freedom and legal principles, promises improvement."
I would simply like to say here that this text is not from our NGO, but was written in the
official legal dictionary by Prof. Dr. Gerhard Köbler.
This has nothing to do with us, it's official.
Okay, that's official. How does the legal bankruptcy manifest itself in practice?
The last three years in particular in this Corona delusion period have shown the machinations of the public sector and in
particular the police and judiciary that the state must criminalize and siphon off citizens by all means in order
to remain liquid, i.e. solvent - and to justify itself.
The total failure of the courts has been demonstrated by countless "transactions", which used to be called "cases" -
to the effect that the citizen no longer has any rights. And the police have provided us with confirmation of this finding.
They talk about "transactions" and not "cases".
Can you give such a "business" a concrete face?
Yes, one of my favorite examples actually, is the deal that the attorney Dr. Gerald Brei charged in federal court.
The court ruled that the case could not be heard because facts that were already known could not be heard.
The point was that the mask does not protect against a virus. - So it was total madness.
However, this does not change the fact that no face covering was worn - and the penance remains. Unbelievable.
Such cases show how blatant the failure is.
This is no longer comprehensible with common sense.
In such cases, the so-called Radbruch formula should be applied, which prevents precisely such unworthy behavior.
What exactly is Radbruch's formula?
The Radbruch formula is a thesis of the German legal philosopher Gustav Radbruch and states that a law that
harms a person does not have to be obeyed by a person.
And in the second step - he has put forward a two-part thesis - in the second step he describes how, if a law is
already illegal from the outset or does not serve the people, this law should also not be observed.
Here we can dive straight into the philosophy lesson.
What is important to know, however, is that the underlying ideas were developed after the Second World War in
order to make the same thing impossible in the future.
The knowledge that every law is commercial in nature is fundamental and the difference
between law and justice must first be understood.
So we have rights that are inalienable as long as we take care of them.
In contrast to this are the laws, which have absolutely nothing to do with justice, but only protect and favor trade.
The laws are reduced to absurdity until the aforementioned legal bankruptcy occurs and in this case we go back to
square one, so to speak, and have to go back to basic values - as described in the legal bankruptcy.
Currently, formulas such as Radbruch's formula or the Hippocratic Oath are just relics and lip service.
In your opinion, what path can lead out of this legal bankruptcy?
On the homepage rechtsbankrott.ch, which currently represents the prosecution, we have information on this
endeavor and strive to advise people according to the truth.
The legal way is through a tribunal by the population.
For an independent tribunal, we need 100,000 members of "IG Volkstribunal" to set up the court legally and additional
powers to prosecute, i.e. in the event of legal bankruptcy.
These powers of attorney are collected by our NGO and serve as the basis for the prosecution.
First of all: With these powers of attorney, only the legally required "YES" is given to the
processing before the tribunal and nothing more in advance.
The term "power of attorney" has been chosen because it is legally necessary.
Nothing else happens with the power of attorney, the data will not go anywhere and will not be digitized.
The power of attorney is to be understood as follows: I give my support for a truly independent investigation into the crime.
The People's Tribunal is the institution that was established to make independent judgments.
We must be 100,000 members to carry the court and show how this is to be installed in accordance with Art. 30 para. 1
BV, Art. 6 no. 1 ECHR, then Art. 10 in the Human Rights Act.
Independent and impartial judges and jurors are the ones who preside over the court and reach a verdict.
This was once our vested right and was simply abolished by the courts and politicians and is
now simply denied to us, they are not coming back.
Who exactly conducts a people's tribunal, does your NGO do that? Or how does such a tribunal work in practice?
Our NGO (Activist) has nothing to do with the court as such, but merely provides the knowledge, describes and
establishes the court and collects the powers of attorney as the prosecuting authority.
If there is a demonstrable desire of the people, with the gathering of 100,000 people, the creation of the court can begin.
The first official act in this case is to replace me, because I am not important to the
tribunal, the court, and I am not a lawyer.
I'm not a judge, I just put everything together and set it up.
The dish is self-rising - that is important - and belongs only to the members.
We have financed everything up to this point out of our own pockets and are happy that we no longer have to do this alone.
Understandable. The statute is written so that I lead the People's Tribunal until it reaches legal capacity
and then a competent Chancellor must lead the Tribunal.
The "IG Volkstribunal" belongs to the members who are registered - in equal shares - and each with one vote.
I will certainly have to do a lot of information work here so that all those involved - and also the defendants -
can analyze the entire construct so that the verdict cannot be overturned afterwards. That is still important.
That is important, yes. How does a people's tribunal work in practice?
Yes, how does it work? The impartial judge and jury find a verdict, which is legally accompanied by a judge
and jury, which is made up of people from our midst.
They jointly assess whether the points charged have been fulfilled and thus whether the question of guilt has been clarified.
In order not to go into too much detail here, I refer you to my book "Exhabitus", because
that's where I wrote the complete court description.
Okay. We've already shown that, we can read up on that. That sounds kind of fantastic.
But what happens, for example, after a conviction? How are those convicted led to repentance?
Since a people's tribunal is completely public and the questions of guilt to be addressed will be about high treason or
institutional slavery, institutional corruption, armed terrorism and so on, the people's wishes are legally pronounced
after the conviction. So, there is nothing more to be done.
Isn't it somewhat illusory to think that these convicts will then simply bow to the will of the people?
Every court currently in office has a legitimized authority behind it.
After a legitimized people's tribunal, which authority would ensure the appropriate execution of sentences?
As soon as a people's tribunal has come into being by legitimate legal means, i.e. through its 100,000 members from the people,
the military must ensure that it is enforced accordingly.
The issue here is the fact that the military is responsible for human rights in times of war or certain states
of emergency and must therefore implement the punishment.
Are we talking about our state being overthrown by a military coup? Oh, what a question! No, not at all!
Not at all? No, no, not at all! The real state is the people, not the administration, and it's only about
removing serious criminals from our state system. - Not a coup!
Okay, no coup! Now that we have seen that the separation of powers is already just an illusion, that the legislative power,
the judiciary and the executive power have all been undermined, isn't it possible that
the military power has also been undermined?
How important do you think it is that this preliminary clarification is carried out
before a verdict is reached by a popular tribunal?
I would rather take a different approach here than a negative manifestation.
We are a tribe of people who have been betrayed by a few.
I assume that many people were unlucky in their thinking during the Corona period and followed the wrong leader.
However, we already see that many whistleblowers are very willing to testify and we have to assume that
this trend will pick up speed as soon as we start.
If the negotiations are also broadcast live and everyone can attend the proceedings, we won't even need the military any more.
Let me put it this way, a deceived and awakened people cannot be governed optimally. That applies worldwide, it works everywhere.
Do you have any appropriate closing remarks?
Yes, very much so. We've reached a point in history where we all distrust each other, condemn each other wholesale, and
are manipulated to the point where we don't even trust our own most sincere thoughts. - That's where we are.
The People's Tribunal should resolve this permanent grievance.
It doesn't matter if you are woke, system-believing, gene-therapized, left, right, gender, lesbian, young,
old or whatever, but the ultimate convergence tool must be created to make all sides heard and tackle the crime.
As long as we allow ourselves to be torn apart and distracted, the perpetrators will just go on and on - we know - until the
extinction of human civilization or the destruction of our earth. - This is a great example now, but
we are on our way. - This simply must not happen.
Finally, I would like to emphasize once again that our NGO is not aiming to overthrow the system - that is still
important - but merely to legally remove all criminals who have maliciously infiltrated and are abusing our state.
I would also like to take this opportunity to thank my team for their endless patience and all the
people who will not give up until the truth prevails.
Very good, nice closing words. Thank you for this clear statement.
We can therefore look forward to seeing how quickly your new NGO will be able to gather the required
100,000 signatures, i.e. members, as stipulated by law.
As you have already explained, the collection takes place via your website www.volkstribunal.ngo. Thank
you for the clarification and all the best to you.
Yes, I wish you the same. Thank you for letting me be there.