We have of course had well-known things like the Trump assassination.
Of course, I went into this in great detail.
Everyone was swimming, what really happened? Who orchestrated it and why?
And was it the Deep State or was it an individual perpetrator?
If the assassination had succeeded, what would have happened next?
A completely bizarre party, this Olympic opening ceremony in Paris, and you had the feeling that
there was nothing but decadence and chaos here.
But that's only superficial, in reality it was a carefully planned staging.
I'm standing here with the freelance and investigative journalist Gerhard Wisnewski. I have the privilege of conducting an interview
with him. Thank you very much for your time, Mr. Wisnewski.
And we would be really interested to know that you have been publishing your book "Verheimlicht, vertuscht, vergessen -
was nicht in der Zeitung stand" for several years now, and another book about the past year has just been published.
Of course, we and our viewers are keen to know whether you can perhaps give us a few
highlights, a few glimpses of what will happen there.
Yes, of course, this yearbook is already being published for the 18th time, so we'll soon have completed 20 years!
And, as always, it works through known and unknown things from the previous year.
And the well-known things are of course treated in a way that they were not treated by the mainstream.
And I see the book as a necessary corrective to tell this story differently or to tell it further or to
tell things that haven't made it into the media yet.
And of course we have had well-known things like the Trump assassination.
Of course, I went into this in great detail.
Everyone was swimming, what really happened? Who orchestrated it and why?
And was it the Deep State or was it an individual perpetrator?
Or some very extreme ones: "Trump staged this himself to improve his election chances" - and I was actually
able to take a big step forward and came to a conclusion.
And above all, what I did for the first time: Everyone has only ever looked to the past, analyzed the
assassination in retrospect, which is all very commendable, I don't want to belittle that at all!
I have now done the same, it's in there too.
You have to look at every detail and what really happened here, but I did something else, namely to ask: "If the assassination
had succeeded, how would it have gone on?" Good question, yes!
What would have happened then? And then we suddenly see how an entire system of individual elements that would in any case
have secured power for the democratic government interlocks.
Trump would have been gone anyway, but there would have been no chance of putting anyone else up there among the Republicans.
The question would have been, or the most convenient thing would have been: The
election is simply suspended. That's the end of it!
That woman there, that incompetent Kamala Harris should never have had to face an election campaign.
So it would all have worked out wonderfully if only the assassination had succeeded, and you can
actually see that there's more to it than that, of course. I'm not giving it all away yet! Too bad!
But you can see how this whole system would have unfolded now, the planned system. This is
just a compulsory topic, it simply had to be.
Sure, because it is of global political importance, but there are many other issues.
Yes, we have also had the death, the mysterious death of this Russian regime critic Navalny. And what happened there?
So of course he was murdered by Putin, say the mainstream media, of course.
It was clear that Putin himself would turn up with a butcher's knife. That is well known.
And yes, that was also very interesting to watch, because the problem was that it was a Western ally, Navalny.
His entire anti-corruption foundation is run, I say, by Western wire-pullers.
So this anti-corruption foundation is something Russian in the very last place.
So Navalny was a Western provocation operation, quite simply.
And now they had a problem, he had been sentenced to 19 years in prison. So what do we do with the man now?
He can no longer lead a demonstration, he can no longer have himself arrested in public, and there are no more great trials.
How do we make propaganda with this now?
And from my point of view, they have now pulled a very clever stunt, they have eliminated him from the outside, and then he
has risen again, the Navalny myth, in the form of his widow.
Who is now suddenly appearing in public, more than ever.
So practically exactly when he died, she appeared at the Munich Security Conference, this warmongering conference, and practically
called the West to arms against Russia, against Putin!
As if it were their private army, NATO or something.
In reality, it is the other way around, it is just a private asset of NATO and the Western powers. An instrument, a tool.
But they have managed to free the Navalny myth from prison by transferring it to the widow.
And the widow should now continue with the propaganda. For example, topics like this.
In other words, with the 19-year-old arrest, there might be some concern that he might start to blab or betray himself.
I mean, that's a long time. It wears you down!
And in Eppstein's case, we also saw that he suddenly committed suicide.
This could also get regime critics out of the way.
Absolutely, it's very possible. We all know that people can change in 19 years.
And then, of course, he would have had plenty of time to think about what kind of puppet he
was, what kind of tool he was, how he was used!
And it's good that you say that, it may also have been a precautionary measure and it's not as absurd as
it sounds, because in prison, even in Russia, you can get everything: drugs, weapons, poison.
There are also agents or you can buy prisoners to poison him, no problem! Really no problem.
And what's more, what I also wrote, well, a lot has been written about the lousy treatment in these
prisons and camps and how he is harassed there and so on.
But there are videos, just before this death, where he is quite cheerful.
He did have another trial, a trial before a court near this penal camp.
But he was joking with the presiding judge, yes, joking back and forth, along the lines of, I'm running out of money now,
maybe you could transfer some of your judge's salary to me?
He said yes! And they both laughed and everything.
You can actually read it in some sources, even in Western sources that not everyone knows, of course, that he was
actually in a good mood, in a good mood and had no problems.
Well, he had to reckon with it, he had created this future for himself. It was no wonder he was in there!
He was very provocative, he crossed all the red lines, no question about it!
It was almost intentional. You really wondered, is that what he wants?
I say, now he was practically finished for the whole propaganda operation, 19 years in prison, out of the picture.
And, as you mentioned, the risk that he might tip over and unpack at some point.
Maybe after 10 years, after 15 years, yes, but of course you couldn't use something like that.
In other words, the man had to be shut down. Clearly.
And was made a hero, so to speak. And through the widow, his spirit, his myth and everything lives on.
[Gerhard Wisnewski: Yes, it was incredible. So you have to imagine, it was exactly on the day of the Munich Security
Conference when he died, and the widow appears a few hours later with a speech at this security conference. About the death.
It makes you wonder ... I'm not really familiar with such spontaneous speeches at this Munich Security Conference.
Had that perhaps been planned beforehand? So this appearance, everything was timed, or what? Exciting!
Absolutely, so bringing in this connection is very interesting. You go into that in more detail in the book, don't you?
Yes, so it's described in detail and of course there are lots of other topics. Oh yes, I have an anti-conspiracy theory.
Oh yes, interesting, we want to hear that!
Something completely new. The Iranian President Raisi crashed in a helicopter.
And it's actually my specialty to investigate assassinations, and everyone immediately screamed, even in the
alternative media scene: "Assassination, assassination by Israel" and so on and "weather weapons" or whatever.
Without evidence, of course, and I then took a very close look at this helicopter crash and I have a little, a
little bit of expertise, because I have accompanied experts investigating airplane crashes in the past.
It used to be called the Federal Institute for Aircraft Accident Investigation or something like
that. And yes, there are some interesting factors.
For example, people say, so why did it crash there? The weather was nice and all.
But the process is a little different if you open it up carefully.
So that means there was a group of three helicopters and President Raisi in the middle helicopter and the one in front,
they were flying over the mountains, a three thousand meter mountain range, and suddenly the pilot of the front helicopter
says: "We have to climb, there are clouds ahead of us."
So what we see as nice weather, for example mixed, blue and white and so on, is a bit different for aviators.
You should not fly into clouds. That is dangerous.
And yes, then he gave the order to climb and no, the middle helicopter, sorry, I got that mixed
up, gave the order to climb with the president.
That was the command helicopter, of course, and they all went up, the other two helicopters, but not that one.
It flew into the clouds and that is of course a very probable cause of the accident, especially as we were in the mountains,
no visibility and then there is the issue of loss of lift.
The higher a helicopter climbs, the less it can carry, so I have studied this in more detail than we can discuss now.
And then I came to the conclusion that it was clearly an accident, a weather accident.
Because what we don't even see as weather, such beautiful white clouds, is weather.
And this is not without danger for pilots, because there is incredible turbulence within the clouds.
And that's why he gave the order to climb. Only he himself didn't make it.
According to my research, this was because it was at the limit of its carrying capacity.
And the Iranians themselves have also said, no, not assassination.
I saw that too, the reports there and the quotes about what they found, and tragically even one inmate survived for a
few hours and they were able to talk to him on the phone.
And they asked him what happened and all that?
There was also speculation that the helicopter had been shot down, but the man only said that he didn't know what had happened.
He didn't realize anything, it happened all of a sudden.
That still remains a mystery, but of course plays into the hands of certain people,
whether it was a coincidence or an assassination.
Yes, interesting, so you also examined that again and explained it again in your book, yes? Very good!
So I've practically come to the opposite conclusion from the alternative media scene, for
once, because we're usually all on the same page.
That it wasn't an assassination attempt in this case, something like that can happen and the
Iranians have always had problems with helicopters.
In fact, two presidents have already had to make an emergency landing by helicopter in the past decades, two
Iranian presidents, because they have, I don't know what kind of problems they have there.
Iranians have the same problems with helicopters as the Germans have with airplanes.
Yes, exactly, with the air force, the so-called. Yes strong, thank you.
[Gerhard Wisnewski: Yes, well, you can see that there is an incredible amount of material in each
chapter. I'll just mention a few things very briefly.
So Princess Kate suddenly disappeared last year.
And was no longer seen and was kept under lock and key and kept away from the public with ever new
excuses, and the question now was, what was going on?
And then she emerged like a phoenix from the ashes a few months later, as if nothing had happened, even
though they claimed she had cancer and had chemotherapy.
And then, of course, I uncovered heaps of contradictions; none of this is true at all, it can't be true.
And I also quoted doctors, professors, about this cancer story, it's not true at all.
Or to put it another way, it's not coherent, that's a better way of putting it. It is simply not coherent.
And we still don't know exactly what the reason for this disappearance was.
The woman went into hiding for me, for five months or so, and I just followed her, this scavenger hunt for the princess.
[Kla.TV: Very strong, yes! But you haven't found a conclusion yet as to what exactly happened, have you?
Of course, there is also a completely crazy possibility.
Unfortunately, the things that happen behind the scenes, in reality behind the official versions,
are sometimes extremely bizarre. Extremely bizarre.
And then I dared to go in a bit, what else could have happened?
Why did they start this cancer story? Why was it kept under wraps?
Why did she suddenly need absolute peace and quiet? Seclusion from the public and so on, and then you come to a completely
different conclusion, but I don't want to reveal it now.
Very exciting, so it definitely arouses interest.
You want to read it and I'm definitely interested in your assessment!
There is another crazy story, namely the occult messages at the Olympic opening ceremony.
[Gerhard Wisnewski: Absolutely blatant. If some spectators still remember, it was a completely bizarre party, this
Olympic opening ceremony in Paris, and you had the feeling that there was nothing but decadence and chaos here.
But that's only superficial, in reality it was a carefully planned production, and everything was encrypted.
An encrypted production in which humanity's past and its future are revealed.
So we've been told where we're going. Symbolically, everything is symbolic.
You could almost say it's like a crazy dream.
So when you looked at it, it was almost like a really crazy dream, but we know that dreams can also have meanings and that
dreams work with images, and this one also worked strongly with images, with bizarre images, just as in some
dreams everything seems bizarre and yet makes sense - and this one also makes sense, which is behind it.
And the most exciting thing is where the journey will take us. That's what they told us and yes, it's incredible!
During my research, I was fascinated by how one thing always led to another. I can also highly recommend the chapter.
Very exciting! We experienced it at the Gotthard Tunnel, at the opening.
There were ceremonies like that, which you couldn't understand at all.
Nobody understands it, it no longer has anything to do with art, it's scary.
Now you're talking, I say, about these occult messages that are brought across there.
Are they just nutters or are they already globalists?
Is this the program that is currently running worldwide?
Paris has always been the capital of Freemasonry.
The French Revolution was arranged and carried out by Freemasons. Robespierre, Danton, Desmoulins - I think Guillotin was also a
Freemason, the inventor of the guillotine ... so humane mass killing has apparently always been, I don't
know, but it seems to me, their hobbyhorse, I don't know.
This scene is important, the capital of Freemasonry, and what they did here in Paris, but actually also with humanity as a
whole, because it was the birth or rebirth of European democracy, after ancient Greece. Liberty, equality, fraternity and so on.
And the removal of monarchies and the replacement of monarchy with democracy, which can be corrupted and bought at any time.
We see that every day with our MPs, how easy it is to buy them. Many of them, not all of course.
[Kla.TV: Yes, we now have some pretty scary contributions. "The Blood Sect", I don't know if you know it, in three parts now
about numerous victims of ritual violence, which can no longer be summarized at all. There are so many people coming forward.
In other words, the whole gruesome game seems to be taking place all over the world.
The Olympic Games are not classically French, but also a global event, so I think the red threads are already
running together somewhere in one department, apparently.
[Gerhard Wisnewski: Yes, I regret that I can't watch many of your contributions due to time constraints.
I find exciting stories like the trilogy you mentioned incredibly commendable, very,
very well prepared. Great, great, so admirable!
[Kla.TV: Yes, it was a lot of work. Lois Sasek and a team of over 100 contributors also compiled this
data because there were so many witness statements.
But to cut the whole thing down so that it could be broadcast at all, you really would have had days of material. Great, great!
[Gerhard Wisnewski: Yes, well, there was the sinking of the super yacht off Sicily, of this British software tycoon, Lynch was his
name, and there you have to realize that the purest secret service nest has sunk, and now you have to guard the wreck,
because it's about the safes of this yacht and what might or might not be in there and strange coincidences that have occurred.
The truth is that there is still no explanation for this.
All the experts say it's impossible for a yacht like this to be tipped over by a gust of wind and then sink.
Because you have to imagine that a sailing yacht is normally almost as tight as a submarine when you close it up.
It can practically capsize and won't sink, at least not for long.
There will certainly be a bit of water ingress, but that it will sink in 10 minutes ...
Or you've probably seen capsized boats lying on their side, because air collects in the hull and it's like an air cushion,
and the boat can't sink at that moment, at least not quickly.
This takes a while and this lead-like sinking is also extremely strange.
And there are many voices, including experts, who say that there is some mysterious
element that we are missing, that we don't know.
So it couldn't have worked like that, it couldn't have been caused by a mere gust of wind or
a tornado, and I also investigated this number.
Exciting, very nice. There's still a lot to come.
So the book, once again highly recommended. Let's take a look at it and show it here too.
Mr. Wisnewski, if we may now take a leap out of the book, but we remain in the year 2024.
Syria, as a keyword, has now shocked us all very much. There have been many, many years of fighting there.
In the end, Assad restored order with his entire government and the military, or so it seemed.
And now a highly motivated army of rebels is suddenly overrunning the entire country, the army is
literally fleeing, Assad is leaving the country.
What is your opinion on this? Do you already have one?
It's very risky because it's still fresh, I realize that, but of course we're interested in
your impression because you know the red threads.
Well, if you look at it from a bird's eye view, it all looks like it was agreed.
So it can hardly be explained otherwise, because there are two things that interlock like cogwheels: the
advance of these so-called rebels and the total retreat and total surrender of the government troops.
So they somehow complement each other. And the question is, why?
Normally, of course, you would expect the rebels to have to fight incredibly hard. That there would still be real fronts
and everything and then maybe at some point an escape or surrender or something, but that went like clockwork.
Assad's escape and all that. So he managed that, but it must have been prepared somewhere, of course.
Gaddafi didn't make it, Saddam Hussein didn't make it either. They were both murdered, quite simply.
And of course, but it is unfortunately a step in this world strategy of NATO, of the USA against Russia.
This now also includes a new NATO military base in Romania, a huge base that is being planned.
So the encirclement operation is continuing over a wide area and now it's getting really dangerous, not because I
love Russia or Mr. Putin so much, but because I like balance.
Because they make the world safer. And if we get a total US dictatorship at some point, then it won't
be funny here anymore. It's already no longer funny.
And then there is no longer any control of power, no counterpart, and that's why you have to
support Russia remaining a superpower - in my opinion.
So the keyword Russia would also have been my next point.
Russia was very much on Syria's side during the last crisis, during the last attacks, when the FSA etc. invaded Syria.
They have put up a very strong fight against foreign influences there, or I would say supported Assad.
Support came from Iran, from all directions.
How do you assess the fact that this overall support has suddenly disappeared?
It could be a sign for Ukraine that the Ukraine war has now simply tied up so many forces, Russian forces, and that it
was perhaps even part of this Ukraine strategy to tie up the Russians there in such a way that they have to neglect Syria.
That could also be a reason for this turnaround, which was nonetheless not so chaotic but, as
I said, very, very smooth, remarkably smooth.
That's true. And from the very beginning, there is said to have been no real fighting in Aleppo, Hama, Homs, Damascus, anywhere.
The Syrian high command is said to have given orders from the outset not to fight.
That's what you just said, so it was strange that the entire army retreated.
I assume you'll be sticking with this whole story too.
Yes, well, it was a bit too late for my current yearbook, I couldn't take it with me, the Syria issue.
[Kla.TV: Absolutely understandable. You have kept it exclusively for us to bring it here live now on Kla.TV, thank you.
No, but it is indeed an important point, I think also in terms of global strategy, to keep at it.
We will be happy to stay in touch with you and appreciate your assessment of this whole situation and look forward
to hearing from you with new insights. Thank you very much!
[Kla.TV: Mr. Wisnewski, one last question. Now, in all the weird times that are happening all over the world, and with all the
crises we're facing - which you write about in your book - a lot of people who have woken up are still relying on
Telegram, social media, online networking or channels like the online broadcasters that we know.
What do you think about internet-independent networking, regionally and locally? Do you see a need for this?
[Gerhard Wisnewski: Yes, absolutely, because I think the whole Internet network is great, of course.
But it's virtual and you see video images of people, critics, allies and friends, but the human, direct level is missing.
Because you draw a lot of strength from it, I realize that here at this congress.
When you see them all and meet them and shake hands and so on, you are strengthened, so you
feel much more directly that you are not alone.
And of course it can also offer you more security, especially regionally, locally, if you have allies who look out for
each other a bit, which is absolutely necessary, unfortunately.
So it's very important and we don't know what else they're going to do with the internet, with censorship and so on.
And we've also seen that they've deleted a lot of channels, on YouTube and elsewhere.
Donald Trump himself was a victim of censorship and had to deal with it.
So even the US president in office at the time was shut down by Twitter!
Of course, it's a nice irony that his buddy, Elon Musk, has now bought the thing.
But we can't all do that now, and that's why it's very, very important.
Thank you very much, Mr. Wisnewski, also for this impulse to our viewers, to all of us,
for your assessment and your tireless work.
Yes, your work should not be underestimated either, it is tireless. So really admirable, great great.
Thank you, together we will continue.