Resonance. Beings of frequency.
More and more people are suffering from health complaints like dizziness, headaches, cardiac arrhythmia or insomnia.
And stress is often cited as the cause.
The following documentary from 2012 shows that these symptoms are frequently associated with
totally different and otherwise less well-known causes.
The film takes us on a journey from our origins and into the 90s, a period in which the expansion of
wireless communications technology was just beginning.
Since then, mankind has been immersed in an ocean of man -made frequencies.
To the naked eye, the planet appears the same. But at a cellular level, it's the greatest
change that life on Earth has ever been subjected to.
The effects are not to be underestimated.
Klagemauer TV has translated and dubbed this film for you in German.
Scientists, industry representatives, physicians and affected people have their say.
We hope you gain a lot by watching the following documentary by James Russell. Resonance. Beings of frequency.
We just don't fully understand yet what we're doing.
We have an announcement finally on whether cell phones cause cancer.
Resoance. Beings of Requency.
An unknown scientist is about to make a discovery that should have changed everything. His name was Winifred Otto Schumann.
On the day in question, he was teaching his students about the physics of electricity.
How a sphere within a sphere can create electrical tension, and subsequently a frequency.
Schumann's class had struggled to understand the subject, so to make it easier, the professor instructed them to
imagine the Earth as one sphere and the ionosphere as another.
He then asked them to calculate the tension that would exist in between.
Having no idea himself, Schumann also began to calculate.
The pulse of the Earth, Schumann resonance, was exactly 7.83 Hz. The discovery was remarkable.
Schumann resonance wasn't just similar to the alpha waves of the human brain. It was identical.
The brain's frequency, which controlled our creativity, our performance, our stress, anxiety, and our immune
system, had somehow tuned in to the frequency of the planet.
The pulse of the Earth had become the pulse of life itself.
When you look at the history of the Earth, it seems pretty obvious.
Schumann waves had been part of this planet since the very beginning.
Life evolved surrounded by them, and inevitably tuned in.
In fact, our sensitivity to frequency became deeply connected to our ability to sense another of the planet's phenomena.
Magnetic Fields
We do know that bees are sensitive to magnetic fields.
We know that within their bodies they contain particles of magnetite, and laboratory studies have shown
that they are indeed sensitive to magnetic fields.
You can demonstrate in a laboratory that if you artificially create a magnetic field, you
can control the way that they build their comb.
And it seems logical that bees are using magnetic fields in navigation.
The delicate balance of life on earth is perfectly illustrated by reliance on bees and their pollination of plants.
It's hypothesized that without bees life wouldn't stand much of a chance.
Insect pollination is needed for really all the things that make eating interesting.
So all the fruits, the nuts and things like that all require insect pollination and bees
are the most important group of pollinators.
Around 70% of the worlds food crops are pollinated by bees. In 2006 the unthinkable happend. Bee colonies around
the wolrd began collapsing. And nobody could explain why.
Colony collapse disorder has affected hives all around the world with some countries reporting losses of up to 70 percent.
A variety of reasons have been offered as to its cause but none of them have been able to conclusively explain why all
of a sudden bees don't return to their hives, apart from one.
A sensational piece of research by Joseph Kuhn and his team.
In an experiment the doctor worked with eight bee hives and placed a regular home deck phone inside half of them.
The scientists then monitored if the presence of a deck phone would affect the way that bees returned to their hive.
The results were astonishing.
In the hives where no DECT phone was present the bees returned at a normal rate.
But in the hives which contained a DECT phone the bees hardly returned at all.
In one hive containing a DECT phone not a single bee returned.
To fully understand the relevance of Dr Kuhn's experiment we must first understand how a deck phone works.
The reason you are able to walk around your home talking on your DECT phone is because the base station of the DECT phone sends
electromagnetic frequency waves called microwaves to the handset.
This is exactly the same way that a mobile phone mast communicates with a mobile phone.
A deck phone is basically a miniature version of a mobile phone mast.
If a bee is affected by what comes out of a DECT phone, it will most definitely be
affected by what comes out of a mobile phone mast.
And with 4 billion mobile phone users around the world, all of a sudden there are an awful lot of mobile phone masts.
The bee's magnetic sense allows it to navigate using the magnetic lines of the Earth, an ability it has
spent millions of years fine -tuning and developing.
Does it stand to reason then that such an acute sensitivity would be affected by even the
slightest change in the electromagnetic environment?
So, what about a gargantuan change, and one which has happened almost overnight?
Are there other species that have this sensitivity to magnetic fields, a sensitivity which
ultimately makes them vulnerable to man-made frequencies?
Unfortunately, the discovery of a new protein cell called a cryptochrome suggests all life has a magnetic sense.
Chryptochromes
They were discovered in the 1990s in plants, where their function is to absorb blue light, which is used to regulate growth.
They have since been found in insects, animals, mammals, including humans, and in birds.
Cryptochromes are a biological molecule called a protein.
It's generated by some of your genes called cry genes.
And the cryptochrome molecule actually controls your circadian rhythms, including melatonin production.
Some of the cryptochromes seem to have a function of absorbing light as detectors for the circadian clock.
So they're inputs for the light dark cycle that many species seem to have, plants as well as animals.
But in the year 2000 Thorsten Ritz demonstrated an even more amazing role for the cryptochrome.
In a series of experiments on robins he demonstrated that their navigational sense was not only a magnetic
one but it came directly from the cryptochrome cells which are located behind the eye.
The way he tested that was to expose birds to radio frequency fields to see if it actually disturbed their magnetic compass.
And not only did the radio frequency field indeed disrupt the migration of robins but it did
so at very very low intensities of fields and
That's really important and really interesting that very low level radio frequency fields interfered with the robin's compass.
The experiments by Ritz clearly demonstrated that the cryptochrome cell used in navigation
was seriously affected by man-made frequencies.
And man-made frequencies at levels well below those deemed safe by the governing body ICNIRP.
There's certainly solid scientific reason for supposing that magnetic fields, artificial magnetic
fields will disturb the habitat of a number of species
Over the last 25 years
A number of species which, rely on the earths magnetic fields to navigate, have mysteriously gone into decline.
109 species of Arctic migratory birds have declined dramatically in numbers.
5 Species of butterfly have become extinct in Britain.
36 species of Australian shore birds have decreased in number by 75%.
10% of the worlds butterflies face extinction.
50% decline in all European grassland butterflies.
Half of all known British butterflies are under threat of extinction.
Bee numbers have dropped by upto 70%.
80% of all Australian wading birds declined in numbers.
Half of Britains bee species have declined by upto 70%.
Farmland bird population falling by as much as 79%.
1 in 8 of the worlds bird species under threat. 190 different species of bird face imminent extinction.
How much has our environement changed because of electro magnetic fields? Over the last
25 years it's a change beyond recognition.
It's millions and millions of times in terms of electromagnetic energy.
The former national radiological protection board in one of their documents said that they thought that the radiation
environment, if you like to call it that, had increased many millions of times from what it was 50 years ago.
It's an enormous change in environment on earth and it completely swamps all these natural signals
including the schumann waves that we have evolved with.
Measuring Schumann resonance in or around a city has become absolutely impossible. Electromagnetic pollution drom
cell phones has forced us to make our mesurements at sea.
Dr Wolfgang Ludwig, Physicist
If mankind has the ability to sense magnetic fields the same ability as the bees the birds and the
butterflies does that also mean that we are as vulnerable as they are to man-made frequencies?
Will changes in our environment affect us as it's clearly affecting them?
How to describe electrosensitivity?
Electrical sensitivity is when people start reacting, their body starts reacting to electromagnetic fields.
Generally speaking the electromagnetic fields that they'll be reacting to is wireless.
So it'll be wireless communications, it'll be wifi, it'll be cordless phones, DECT phones, mobile phones, masts.
All of them emitting signals that our body has never experienced before.
And when people start to become affected, when I became affected, the way that it starts to affect you is,
generally speaking, it's your head first and it will start giving you pains in your head.
But I hate to use the word headache because it's pains in your head that is unlike any other headache you've ever had before.
Most people's complaints are things like cardiac arrhythmia, insomnia, headache, visual disturbance, vertigo,
different kinds of paresthesias or new neuroses where they are feeling unusual sensations within their body.
But really it can also affect endocrine function, thyroid function, again the list is really endless.
The aspects of an organism that allow it to detect and respond to electromagnetic fields.
You could say this word's going to use in a number of different contexts and if you bisect it and break it
down electrically sensitive you could say that really that's a response to life itself.
For example if we're looking at an organism to determine the presence of life we're
really looking for the presence of electricity.
So with the electrocardiogram for example the ECG and the electroencephalogram the EEG, what we're
looking at there is the presence of electricity from those target organs, the brain and the heart.
When we see the presence of that, that's a sign that there's life.
In a way, given that on a cellular level electromagnetic fields a part of life itself, we could
say that all life is electromagnetically sensitive.
Is this a real condition? Yes absolutely it is.
At present the world health organization statements regarding this are that it is real and symptoms can be severe and disabling.
Figures for electromagnetic hypersensitivity are around two to three percent.
Those are people who've had their life extremely affected by this condition.
But as i've previously mentioned on a cellular level a hundred percent of people are reacting.
That means that the healthcare consequences of of not taking this seriously, not recognizing it, are potentially huge.
And the numbers of people that have mild or moderate electrical sensitivity are probably far higher than we estimate.
With the advent of the mobile phone in the 1980s came the need to build a network of antennas to support them.
Since then the telecom companies have erected over 5 million mobile phone masks around the world.
But incredibly prior to filling the air with microwave frequencies they didn't conduct a single piece of research to ensure there
wouldn't be any long-term health effects from such exposure.
The grid was built without first making sure it was safe.
Thank you for your help.
Pretty ugly, isn't it?
Yeah and it's constant as well one thing you'll notice is it doesn't stop, it's 24/7.
This is what's coming out of the mast if you can see the mast, you're being exposed to it. - Right.
Frankly even if you can't you're being exposed to it you are exposed to it at this distance,
because it passes through concrete walls and things.
If you're within two, three hundred meters of the mast up there this is what you're going to be exposed to 24/7.
When you can hear it it changes everything. - It does. - Imagine if you could see it.
It'd be the equivalent of sort of you know seeing a daily smog.
With a constant smog of man-made frequencies surrounding our daily lives and no testing as to its safety, is
there any wonder people's bodies have started to react.
Well it was almost 10 years ago and I was in my 30s. No history of breast cancer in my family.
And living a really healthy lifestyle.
I've been living next to an phone mast many years, over seven years by then. - How far was that from?
It was a hundred meters from the house.
Right so pretty close. Yeah and for years I'd been having symptoms which hadn't related to the phone mast because I didn't know
anything about you know the condition of electrosensitivity then.
And I'd been having vertigo, sleep problems, headaches, sharp pains in my head and I'd often visit the
doctor only to be told it was either stress or a virus.
And then just down to the blue I was diagnosed with breast cancer and it was the biggest shock of my life.
And at first I thought well it's bad luck you know it's just unlucky it's me and started to go through my treatment.
And it was then I started bumping into neighbors in the hospital and I only lived in a small village.
A nd started bumping into other young ladies as well who were neighbors. - How young where you? - Well I was
the youngest in my 30s, but the others were in their 40s or early 50s. All right, that is very young.
And that was five of us all, all diagnosed at once within six months of each other with breast cancer.
With so many phones and masts and a mobile phone industry worth trillions you would hope that by now a strict governing
body would have been installed an iron-fisted regulator who ensures the telecoms industry is on the side of caution.
Someone to set strict levels and which protect the public. Someone to ensure that what we're being exposed to is absolutely safe.
Unfortunately we don't have any of that. What we do have is ICNIRP.
Well ICNRP was set up in Europe about 20 odd years ago to look into non-ionizing radiation.
It stands the International Committee of Nonionizing Radiation Protection and their job is to look at all the
literature that comes out and basically summarize it.
You can't get elected to it, you get invited to join it, if you're one of the the preferred people.
- Right. - So it's always erred on the side of industry because that's really where its roots are.
So what we've got is, we've got a guidance standard which they've set which has been adopted by most of the countries in europe.
And it's been something that the european commission themselves recommend including their expert body seneir.
But those guidelines are based on evidence that we know has a cause and effect for radio frequency radiation.
So the only setting that exists at the moment for energy that's around the same frequency of mobile phone masts, mobile phones,
DECT cordless phones, wireless communication devices that we're used to on a daily basis, is
the one that we know works for microwave ovens.
So you can generate enough energy and localize it in a small enough area you heat things. You heat tissue,
you heat anything that has some level of water in it.
None of the current rules have anything to do with chronic health effects or cancer. None of them, not one of them.
They're all set for heating effects and acute effects like prickling of the skin or your eyebrows going up or something.
None of them are for long-term health effects.
So you're saying that it's below 40 that means it's meaningless.
It's meaningless. It is not intended to protect from long-term health effects.
ICNIRP is just irrelevant. It's irrelevant.
For example if you want to make sure that nobody exceeds the speed limit past a school. Set
the speed limit at a thousand miles an hour.
Then everyone will obey the speed limit. No one will exceed it. You know everyone can go sailing past your school
at 999 miles an hour and the limit will be complied with.
The advisory body effectively are not set up to look at the evidence with regards to safeguarding the general public.
In 2011 the world health organization changed the danger rating of mobile phones,
reclassing it as possibly carcinogenic to humans.
Based on an increased risk of contracting a glioma the type of brain tumor associated with using a mobile phone.
What was the catalyst for this abrupt change in status?
There have been countless studies conducted into the possible health effects of mobile phones.
Some showing an effect, some showing no effect.
But the most conclusive came from Lennart Hardell.
He has overseen the largest and most comprehensive piece of research ever conducted.
Combining his own work with that of others from around the world.
From the early 1990s they have investigated the phone habits of more than 2 000 people from around the world.
People with tumors such as astrocytoma and acoustic neuroma. The brain tumors associated most with
mobile phone use due to their proximity to the ear.
Their findings are shocking. They concluded that mobile phone use does increase the risk of a brain tumor.
And they also discovered why earlier research showed no effect.
I think there's more evidence that it's carcinogenic than just possibly carcinogenic.
But I can understand it in a way because most of the cancers which will arrive haven't arrived yet.
People haven't been using cell phones f or long enough for the true effect to become apparent.
As is the case with other carcinogens, it takes at least 10 years before you start to see an effect from the exposure.
Because the mobile phone explosion didn't really take hold until the late 1990s, it's not surprising
we are just starting to see the effects right now.
So what are the telecoms industry doing to protect its users from contracting a brain tumor?
Afflict to the far reaches of their safety manuals. Suggest that they are more concerned about protecting themselves.
At the back of almost every single phone's user guide are instructions on how far to keep your phone from your body.
Instructions which, in the most part, are wholly unworkable.
And what happens when the telecoms industry funds research into the harm that they are causing?
And that research concludes that there is an effect. That the use of a mobile phone
does play a role in the development of cancer.
They tend to keep that research to themselves.
Although the epidemiology clearly shows that using a mobile phone increases the risk of contracting a brain tumor.
What people like ICNIRP need to see is a definitive cause and effect. How it happens. What's
the mechanism. How exactly is the cancer caused.
It may seem obvious that a being so tuned in to the earth's frequencies and so sensitive to her magnetic field,
would naturally have a reaction to manmade microwaves.
But for years, the telecoms industry have defended their actions by asking the same question.
How does a mobil phone cause cancer?
As it turns out, they've been asking the wrong question.
How does a mobile phone prevent the human body from curing cancer?
The answer is Melatonin.
It is universally agreed that the free radical cell is the main causal factor in most cancer.
Our body's main defense against these free radicals is its most powerful antioxidant: melatonin.
It passes into the bloodstream and its job is to act as a natural antioxidant, a natural anti-cancer agent.
Melatonin is a very, very powerful anti-cancer agent.
What it does is it acts as a what's called an onco -static agent that that is it protects you against cancer.
It controls the sleep wake cycle so that you get a good night's sleep when you've got proper melatonin.
It's an anti-aging molecule in other words, by mopping up those free radicals it leaves your skin and complexion looking younger.
You have a reduced amount of melatonin and what happens then, is that your immune system starts to be less competent.
For start you tend to get sleep disturbance, you can't get off to sleep or if you do you wake up and can't get back to sleep.
You can have heart complications because melatonin protects your heart as well.
And you're much more prone to disease because your immune system is not functioning at it's best.
So these are some things that happen when you have a lowered melatonin level.
And for example the average woman with breast cancer has only got one tenth of the melatonin of a normal woman of her age.
And for people with prostate cancer they've got less than half the melatonin that they should have.
Autistic children have less than half the melatonin levels they should enjoy.
Reduced melatonin in night shift workers because they're working at night, exposed to light, they don't produce nocturnal melatonin
is known to produce a 50 increase in breast cancer risk.
And the international agency for research on cancer, IARC, has actually classed night shift work as a class to a
probable carcinogen because of this melatonin reduction.
There are lots of studies now showing that people on night shifts or people who are blind, have
different cancer rates than the average population.
And most of those studies support the view that the absence or the lowered melatonin has an adverse effect on health.
Because the body only repairs itself at night, melatonin is only produced when the pineal gland senses that no light is present.
What happens is that the pineal gland is light sensitive.
It's sitting right where your brain receives signals from your eyes at crossover point in the middle.
It's called the super chiasmatic nuclei.
And the connections from there goes directly to the pineal gland to tell it whether there's any light around or not.
If there's light around, then there's also interference with the signals the brain wants
to send to our cells, in order to repair them.
So it says there's no point in the brain sending these signals out to ourselves to tell them to repair
because there's so much interference that they won't hear it.
So it waits, the brain waits until it's dark.
What kind of research is showing that there's an effect on melatonin production from
electric fields, magnetic fields, radio waves?
Right, well the Battelle-Institute in America has done a lot of work on this way back from the late 1970s in fact.
And their scientists there, Barry Wilson and Dick Stevens and people like that, started thinking that because we know that
if you turn the light on then the brain stops making melatonin.
They thought well maybe our brains can't distinguish between electric fields that we make ourselves artificially and the
natural light that we all know this happens during the daytime. Because we just don't make melatonin in the daytime.
With very good biological reasons.
So they thought well maybe these electric fields are suppressing the synthesis of
melatonin and that that in turn is leading to cancer.
Breast cancer particularly in women because they don't have the immunological protection that they would otherwise have.
So the brain interprets radio waves as being lightweight?
Visible light also has a frequency.
The hypothesis that the pineal gland cannot distinguish between light frequencies and man-made
frequencies is certainly backed up by a wealth of research.
The genius of our body means it is able to counter the production of free radicals with the production of melatonin.
We have created in ourselves a precise balance, a perfect system of defense.
It has taken our body millions of years to perfect this technique.
A technique created based on the surroundings we have evolved in.
But over the last few decades our surroundings have changed. And changed exponentially.
To the naked eye the world appears to be the same. But at the cellular level it is the biggest
change in the environment life has ever encountered.
It stands to reason that such a gargantuan change would inevitably upset such a delicate balance.
And the consequences of our bodies not producing the right amount of melatonin could be disastrous.
Scientists around the world now believe that free radicals could be the causal factor in every known disease, not just cancer.
In the beginning of the 1900s childhood leukemia was a medical rarity.
We've seen nothing but an increase in childhood leukemia ever since that point.
It's going up every year by about 2%.
And that applies to many other disorders as well. Autism, brain tumors, cancer.
Cancer rates in the 1910s were probably half of what they are today.
And many other diseases are being connected by studies, by scientific studies with exposure to
electromagnetic fields and radiations. Not just power lines but also to radio fields and microwave fields.
Because in the last 50 years really we've immersed ourselves in an ocean of electromagnetic radiation. It's all around us now.
Invisible, we can't see it, but we know it's there.
Every time you lift up your mobile phone you know it's there.
We are a brilliant, yet complex organism.
The way that our body functions isn't by chance nor is it something which has happened overnight.
Like every other creature on this planet we have adapted into the environment we exist in.
An environment which, since the beginning of time, has had a delicate balance of fields and resonances.
These phenomena don't just surround us, they make us what we are.
The cells of our body communicate with each other using light frequencies. Our DNA uses
electromagnetic frequencies to reproduce itself.
At the core of everything are protons and electrons positive and negative making all life magnetic.
We are as all life is equipped with cryptochrome cells which allows us to sense those fields in ways we barely understand.
We are beings of frequency, electricity, light and magnetism.
And to become this way has taken millions of years. A process which started with the very first cell.
Although we have embraced the wireless technology and accepted it into our everyday
lives, at a cellular level our bodies haven't.
The frequencies that now surround us are as alien to our cells as they would be to our eyes if only we could see them.
Our children are being born into a world that their bodies simply cannot understand.
Where will all this lead?
As this film is being made 4G technology is being rolled out around the world. To
accommodate this the ceiling levels are being increased.
Wifi is in almost every single home, school, and business surrounding us constantly.
DECT phone technology is the norm in almost every single household.
At a time when the industry is responsible should we be displaying caution, they are displaying
a reckless disregard for our long-term health.
Money talks.
And they are bad as likely to develop a conscience as the tobacco industrys did.
If there's going to be a change it's not going to come from them.
It's going to have to come from us.
We just need to open our eyes and see the problem.