The refugee and coronavirus crises have raised questions and concerns among large sections of the population.
For some, even their basic trust in politics was shaken.
The increasingly noticeable censorship of opinion and the discovery of shortcomings in the judiciary and prison system are
giving rise to growing doubts as to whether the restrictions and coercive measures imposed by politicians are
really for the good and in the interests of the population.
The relationship between politics and the people that politics is supposed to represent is noticeably broken in many circles.
More and more people are therefore taking to the streets to demonstrate.
They do not feel understood by politicians, by "those at the top", and therefore do not feel properly represented.
To better illustrate this situation, let's look at these three examples:
1_Business model refugee crisis
The refugee crisis is also an enormous financial burden for Germany:
Housing asylum seekers, war refugees and rejected but tolerated asylum seekers costs around 50 billion euros per year.
The state of Berlin alone pays almost one billion euros per year - more than 2.7 million euros per day.
Who benefits from this crisis?
For example, security services: The number of employees rose to 280,000 in 2023.
BDSW* spokesperson Silke Zöller has the impression that "refugee accommodation has developed into a money-making machine".
It is clear that not everything is legal in such a gold-rush atmosphere:
Last year, the Berlin State Office of Criminal Investigation checked 514 employees of
204 security companies in 85 refugee shelters.
The result: 300 of the 514 employees had a police record, were untrained or under the age of 18.
In view of these catastrophic conditions, shouldn't those responsible, right up to those in
power, be thoroughly scrutinized and held accountable?
2_A "citizens' council" for opinion control
Nancy Faeser's Ministry of the Interior paid almost 60,000 euros in taxpayers' money for censorship plans.
The sponsored "Forum against Fakes", which is also supported by the Bertelsmann Foundation, among
others, founded a "Citizens' Council" on March 15, 2024.
This opaque, 120-member committee against "disinformation" wants the government to introduce legally binding information
for citizens, media supervision and internet control.
In addition, pre-censorship is recommended.
Every text posted by journalists and citizens on social media platforms is to be checked in advance by
the artificial intelligence and deleted if necessary.
Anyone who violates this can even end up in court.
The demand is for an authoritarian state that officially decides what is right or wrong - in line with the UN's 2030 Agenda.
Do all citizens really want this totalitarian citizens' council with hand-picked members and AI control?
3_Reiner Füllmich's inhumane prison conditions
The appalling prison conditions of Dr. Reiner Füllmich in the Rosdorf maximum security prison in
Göttingen came to light during an interview with his lawyers.
These statements were shocking because no one could imagine that such things were possible in German prisons.
The prison officers told lawyer Dr. Füllmich that they had never seen a defendant like him being held in solitary
confinement for 11 months for a simple offense and brought to the court hearings shackled hand and foot.
On his return from court, Dr. Füllmich is completely undressed in order to undergo a thorough and embarrassing strip search.
The internationally recognized lawyer has been tortured in isolation for 11 months.
Dr. Füllmich is strictly forbidden to talk to other inmates.
His only contact with the outside world is his lawyer.
Dr. Reiner Füllmich is only allowed three hours a month for visits or phone calls with his family.
According to Füllmich's doctors, his health is now severely compromised.
Does the German population know about these conditions, has it decided in favor of them or
would it like to have a say in correcting them?
Conclusion
Fortunately, there are peace activists and visionaries, justice fighters and pioneers who, in the face of failing
politics, are steering the dissatisfied and increasingly angry masses in peaceful, constructive directions!
At the 2024 demo in Berlin, lawyer Ralf Ludwig showed that the final political decision-making authority and thus the
power must once again lie with the people as a way out of political mistakes made by representatives of the people.
This means that the people, not the politicians, MUST have the final say in all political decisions.
Here are excerpts from Ralf Ludwig's speech:
" It is claimed that we have a democracy. But we only have a representative democracy.
The only thing that representative democracy allows you to do is to choose those who rule you every four
years - but only from a small circle of those who rule you.
You have no chance at all to decide on the content of policy, on the measures of policy, on the rules of
policy, even though you and I are the people of this country.
- I think we have to go through the federal states.
We have our own constitution in every federal state.
And since they are separate constitutions, each of the constitutions in the federal
state allows us to amend these constitutions.
This means, however, that we can seize this power in the federal states."
This is what Ralf Ludwig has to say about a completely legal and, above all, peaceful path to a genuine
people's democracy in which the people really can decide.
This path via the democratically adopted amendments to the state constitutions is completely non-violent and legally flawless.
This would give full responsibility and all power to the people, which is the very idea of democracy.