But we have to let the term pandemic treaty melt in our mouths, please, pandemic treaty!
Pandemic contracts are concluded. It's not about health. It's not about protecting our lives from evil evil killers.
Please google: "Ten biggest health risks", you will find the vaccination critic
Ms. Beate Bahner, lawyer, is now talking to me here. Thank you very much for your time.
Ms. Bahner, a direct question to start with.
Negotiations on an international pandemic agreement have entered a new round in Geneva.
The representatives of the 194 member states of the World Health Organization (WHO) have already concluded many of the
37 articles of the draft treaty in 11 rounds of negotiations.
Experts are therefore confident that an agreement can finally be reached in the next two weeks.
Roughly summarized: There is no agreement so far.
There will be no special vote now in December, but an attempt will be made to reach an agreement by the next
health assembly on May 25 so that a vote can be taken.
And of course we are interested to know what you think, can you confirm this? How is the whole thing developing?
After all, the WHO pandemic treaty is their specialty, right?
[Ms. Beate Bahner: That's exactly how it is. In fact, I have dealt very intensively with two treaties in the
last year. Namely in this book "WHO Pandemic Treaty".
But it's not just this treaty, it's also the so-called International Health Regulations, which have
been around for quite a while, but which were currently up to date in 2005 during the pandemic.
It was already justified at the beginning of the pandemic and then the pandemic treaty by the fact that the
national states had failed catastrophically during corona.
Of course, I was really outraged because - sorry, masks, lockdowns, social distancing, fines, vaccinations, compulsory
vaccinations ... We have gone along with everything and, in case of doubt, the whole world, some more, some less, and then those,
the contract makers, so to speak, claim with unscrupulousness and impudence and
shamelessness that we have failed, and failed completely.
That's what came out of the second draft. Others seem to have complained about so much presumption.
But we need to let the term pandemic treaty melt in our mouths, please, pandemic treaty!
Contracts are concluded for pandemics. And so pandemics seem to be a really good business.
And Germany alone has spent 440 billion, not millions, billion euros in the three pandemic years 2020 to 2023.
That's right, 440 thousand million euros in three years!
We would certainly be better off with them than in masks, which, wherever they have to be disposed of now ... the
used and the unused vaccines - millions of them unused.
But it goes on. It is big business. It's big business for a few industries.
It is of course big business for the pharmaceutical industry. It's insanely big business for the data
sector, and therefore also for the military sector.
And we know when we talk about it that it's not about health.
It's not about protecting our lives from evil evil killers who so fatefully attack us. Not at
all. They are first produced in the laboratory.
And part of the pandemic contract - and it's one of the big points of contention, by the way - is the commercialization
of precisely this "gain-of-function research", from which the corona virus then also originated and escaped, however.
And the exchange of these pathogens and the commercialization, the financialization, that is one of the
key points on which no agreement has yet been reached.
"Gain-of-function" is so-called functional research, which, depending on the purpose, can also be described as bioweapons
research, which is actually prohibited and should be prohibited and falls under the
Biological Weapons Convention, which also exists.
But here it's downright promoted and financialized, so to speak. And that is absolutely unbelievable.
You really are breaking through all boundaries, all red lines with this treaty - the pandemic treaty.
This is big business! That's all it is, de facto it ultimately serves money, power and control, of course.
The control, for example, I claim a pandemic, so the emergency regime takes effect - we know everything from Germany.
The normal legal rules don't work. We are no longer allowed to do anything. Medical martial law has been declared, so to speak.
And because we would die, because we have no natural immunity to all these bad, bad killer viruses, we need a vaccine.
But of course this vaccine cannot be developed for 10 years.
So of course we have to suspend all these safety regulations under pharmaceutical law - German, European and
international - because we have a bad, bad pandemic, says some SPD lady whose name I keep forgetting.
I can't think of anything either.
[But we have emergency powers, so to speak. We have emergency authorization, as with the Covid vaccinations - the four of them.
We have suspended all safety precautions, all safety tests, because the WHO Director-General has
once again pulled the "pandemic" ticket, so to speak.
And what is the magic word? "Public Health Emergency of International Concern", PHEIC. How
is it pronounced? Fake! Okay? Everything clear?
This ambiguity may even be intentional, we don't know.
So, these are the plans, and these international health regulations have always provided for measures such as quarantine
and testing and also coercive measures - these have now actually been pulled in Corona and they think that
everything is not yet regulated adequately enough and so they want to tighten it up even more.
Come to think of it, you and I, who may be critical of this, are a danger to health according to the WHO.
The vaccination critic is one of the WHO's ten greatest dangers.
Please google: "Ten biggest health threats", you will find the vaccination critic, who will and wants to be criminalized,
who wants to be stopped, who basically also ... so there is already a "cyber-space" facility from Interpol, so to speak.
If we publish information that does not correspond to the WHO narrative, we could be cybercriminals.
So these two plans, the International Health Regulations (IHR) and the pandemic treaty, have nothing good in mind.
So I recommend, if you haven't got a Christmas present yet - this is a little commercial break - this book,
yes, I really have ... it was my hardest book, my seventh.
It was tough stuff. I tried to make it really easy to read.
There is a heading on each page, a chapter. They are small chapters.
You can also browse through it. But you get an impression of how much we have been lied to and deceived.
I would like this book to be lent out, given away, over and over again with the proviso: pass it on after a
week! Because the information has to get out into the world.
Back to this current development: In Geneva - on June 1, 2024, we were in Geneva, we, some international lawyers had a
demonstration there - so not me, not the lawyers, but there was, first of all, a demonstration organized.
But we also organized an international press conference because the IHR and the pandemic treaty were to be adopted there, which
actually goes against the WHO's own regulations, because the final draft must be available four months in advance
for a vote by the 194 member states of the World Health Assembly. They were available less than two days before!
They were - I think - these members, if they were still there, were probably locked up at the WHO in Geneva
and not let out until they had somehow signed it. It's very dubious how that came about.
In any case, they have made massive changes to the IHR without complying with the four-month deadline, and they have shoved
a lot of the pandemic treaty, which requires a two-thirds majority, into the IHR, which only requires a simple majority.
There was a huge mess and I admit we had hoped that they wouldn't be decided, and then the next morning we actually
found out that they had pushed something through. Dubious!
It really is a pretense of the rule of law, and I was really, I admit, depressed in June.
Now they are continuing to negotiate the WHO pandemic treaty.
It's all about coal. The developing countries want more coal, the industrialized countries don't want to give up their patents.
These are all legitimate disputes, but we are arguing about the fact that gain-of-function research, i.e. this functional
research, these modified viruses that are supposedly needed to fend off a bioweapon attack by terrorists and to
develop vaccines ... Bullshit, they develop that themselves in order to then develop the vaccine.
I recommend the James Bond film "Spectre" from 2015, which describes it wonderfully.
Yes, so the pandemic treaty has actually not come about now, it is supposed to and will probably actually be decided at the
next health assembly in Geneva at the end of May. I hope not.
On the other hand, it is only paper, so we have to look at how developments in the world, the education, for example through
Kla.TV and all of us, have progressed and we have to give our governments ... so Germany,
Germany is the driver of the pandemic treaty, yes?
In Germany, we don't have to expect the government ... we don't have to expect much as long as this government exists,
which also gives so much money to the WHO, which is also heavily involved in the pharmaceutical and data business.
They profit and they want to profit. They risk our health and our lives in the process. I really think that's highly criminal!
We have to stop it and we will stop it.
We will stop it! We can do it, to use the words of someone I can't think of right now.
But very briefly, Ms. Bahner: Would the key then be an enlightened society, so to speak?
I mean, we support and help to convey what you as a specialist, as a lawyer, so to speak ... most lawyers don't manage to convey
anything in a way that the normal citizen understands, as I do.
But you can do it, you get it across, we transport it to the people.
But an enlightened society, I believe, is the key to the justice system being able to function again, isn't it?
That you as a lawyer can also work decently again because you have a real objective judge sitting there, right?
[Ms. Beate Bahner: Well, education and information and the will to inform oneself is the first step.
Then these people need to be encouraged to have the courage to say no, to say stop, to become active.
So this courage, that would be the second step.
Because the fear of losing your job, being socially ostracized and so on ... We all take them in, we're a big family
anyway, we know what it feels like to be persecuted, ostracized, whatever, to be framed, to suddenly be all sorts of things.
Of course, we are happy to welcome all those courageous people who, like us, have believed in the rule of
law, in democracy, in a state that means well by us.
Bullshit, we fell for it, now we know better: education is the first step - so many thanks to you too!
[Kla.TV presenter: Thank you very much. One final question, yes?
And in these times, we provide a lot of information via websites, Telegram, YouTube, various channels ...
If censorship continues, many things will no longer be possible, and in the event of a crisis, many people will be on
their own because they have always relied on the contributions of lawyer Bahner, but have never networked regionally.
Do you think that is also a key to this time, that people get to know each other locally, that people
step out of anonymity again and network regionally?
[This is one of the absolutely most important, most important measures really in the
house itself, in the street, in the neighborhood.
And make a note of the people who live near you, the addresses - go there!
Sometimes you might have only met outside or in restaurants somehow, so that you can drive or walk there, and I would
actually set the limit for networking: Where can I still walk to?
I can cover 5 kilometers in an hour, right?
So this 5-kilometer circle, absolutely, networking on site is the most important thing for support, medically and
of course in terms of water supply, nutrition, medicine - and of course also to help each other.
We may need that again. Yes, important note, important measure!
Thank you very much, Ms. Beate Bahner, lawyer, for this interview.
We wish you every success with all your educational work, even now.
I think you've already described it, sometimes you reach a bit of a zero point when you
think, "oh man, what's going to happen here?"
But you radiate hope, you radiate confidence - I think that's good! That can go out to the audience, yes? Okay, thank you.