Any of you who have children or grandchildren of school age will be familiar with this:
Lessons are constantly being canceled, children leave school early or have substitute lessons.
The reason for this is the acute nationwide shortage of teachers.
This means that many children receive too few lessons to master the intended subject matter.
In this context, the following newspaper headline from the Frankfurter Rundschau of November 13, 2024 is worthy of note:
"Vaccination lessons are now available in Hessian schools"!
This is not the biology lesson on the subject of vaccinations that we have known up to now.
Rather, it is about additional detailed teaching material compiled by the state government on the
subject of infectious diseases and vaccination protection.
This should help young people to make their own "conscious" vaccination decision.
Health Minister Diana Stolz explains the following:
"Teachers have a special relationship of trust with the children and young people and, thanks to their many years of experience
and teaching skills, are able to convey even complicated issues in an understandable and age-appropriate way."
In summary, this means that teachers should invest additional preparation and teaching time and use their special relationship
of trust with pupils to encourage them to get vaccinated.
How can a "conscious decision" be made under these conditions?
Pupils are only shown the supposedly positive effects of vaccinations.
However, everyone knows that a conscious decision can only be made if you carefully weigh up the pros and cons of something.
Why are the following aspects not addressed?
Starting with the highly praised and much-cited high safety of vaccines.
The most important vaccine scientist in the USA, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, and his students have only recently
admitted that vaccines - as long criticized by vaccine critics - have hardly been studied.
After decades of claiming that the safety of vaccines had been thoroughly and intensively studied,
the Plotkin school has now capitulated: It is not so!
"Most vaccines have not been sufficiently studied either before or after approval," Plotkin and his students say.
This was reported in an article titled "Funding science on vaccine safety after licensure," which
appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine.
The blog for science and politics 'tkp' explains this in a detailed article.
They write: The Plotkin School has admitted "that vaccines are not properly studied - either before licensure or after licensure.
For example, they admitted that pre-approval clinical trials have limited sample sizes and follow-up times and that
no funding is provided for post-approval safety studies."
For this reason, it is also not possible to record whether there were side effects after the vaccinations.
The public is then told that there are few to no side effects from vaccination.
But the reality is different if we take a look at the HPV vaccination against cervical cancer, which is
particularly popular with young people and has recently been heavily promoted in schools.
Several studies have clearly shown that the vaccination triggers serious side effects such as autoimmune diseases.
In addition, participants in a study conducted by Merck died 2-5 times more frequently than is
usual in this age group in terms of mortality.
In addition, cases of cervical cancer increased rather than decreased after the vaccination was introduced.
In addition, further studies have clearly shown that there are numerous other side effects with other vaccinations as well.
These include sudden infant death syndrome, neurological developmental disorders, allergies, autoimmune
diseases, increased susceptibility to infections, etc.
More detailed explanations can be found in Kla.TV programs, which are listed in the credits.
In his lecture "How effective are vaccinations?", Andreas Diemer, a general practitioner and graduate physicist, also
explains in a way that everyone can understand what the studies on the safety of vaccines are all about.
The most important points are briefly summarized below.
- There are no studies on the safety of the vaccines.
- No real placebo studies are conducted.
- Thus, there are no comparison groups in which it is clear whether and which side effects
occur in vaccinated and unvaccinated people.
- There are no scientifically correct studies on the effectiveness of vaccinations.
The studies that were carried out were all conducted by the manufacturer itself.
This naturally leads to the studies being steered in a certain direction.
First and foremost, the manufacturer wants its product to be sold and sets up the study and
the evaluation according to the desired result.
- The test subjects in the studies are often healthy, adult men who do not represent a cross-section of the population.
- In addition, there are usually too few test subjects and the study period is too short to
really get a picture of any side effects that occur.
- The study also does not investigate whether vaccinated people fall ill less often or less
severely or die less often than unvaccinated people.
- It is only the antibody level in the blood that is measured.
This is a value that is determined arbitrarily.
If this value is measured in the blood, it is claimed that the vaccination is effective.
- There are also no independent bodies or authorities to evaluate the results.
The Paul Ehrlich Institute and the RKI, which are supposed to evaluate these study results, are failing in this area.
They are influenced and partly financed by the manufacturers.
The STIKO is also closely intertwined with the industry. 17 members of STIKO work in the vaccination industry.
It would be like having a high school graduate evaluate his or her own high school diploma. The result will not be neutral.
The statement: "Since more vaccinations have been given, the diseases in question are on the decline" is not true.
This is because even before certain vaccinations were introduced across the board, cases of the disease were on the decline.
This is mainly due to improved living conditions such as hygiene and nutrition.
There are also studies that show the opposite.
In some cases of so-called epidemic outbreaks, for example, most of those infected have been vaccinated.
None of these aspects are discussed in the teaching materials.
Instead of being taught in a comprehensive and balanced way, students receive one-sided and previously filtered information.
Everything that does not fit into the common narrative, and in this case the "vaccination narrative", is simply left out.
Once again, it is clear that our children are exposed to a high level of ideological influence at school.
What is behind this massive vaccination campaign, which is being pushed through despite an acute shortage of teachers in schools?
The population's willingness to be vaccinated is generally declining.
Should this be regained through young people?
Vaccinations are also a billion-dollar business for the pharmaceutical industry.
Since doctors carry out the vaccinations, they are also part of this business.
Dr. Paul Thomas, a Dartmouth-trained pediatrician, discussed this dilemma in an interview with Polly Tommey on
April 16, 2024, as part of Children's Health Defense's "Vax-Unvax: The People's Study" bus tour.
He explains in detail how pediatricians have to work in order to - literally - "stay in business".
Pediatric practices are highly dependent on vaccination.
If a doctor forgoes this, he loses the majority of his income.
The doctor earns money from every vaccination administered.
Here is a brief example from Dr. Thomas' practice.
"Let's say for a two-month visit with a healthy baby, there's one DPT vaccine - that's three shots, three
antigens," he explained, plus "HiB, pneumococcal, hepatitis B, polio, rotavirus - that's about $240."
There are also quality premiums that are linked to vaccination rates.
Insurance companies offer pediatricians bonus payments if they achieve certain vaccination rates.
These are generally 80% of patients who are fully vaccinated by the age of two.
Thomas makes a clear statement on this: "This means that a pediatric practice cannot survive if it
does not carry out most, if not all, vaccinations.
And I think that explains the blinders - why doctors just don't want to go and deal with the
fact that these vaccines are doing a lot of harm."
The medical historian and author Dr. Gerd Reuther has even more far-reaching explanations for the question of why vaccinations
are so heavily advertised and increasingly administered.
We quote from an interview with Report 24:
"Despite everything, profit interests fall short when we look at this agenda, which has
led to the emergence of many chronic diseases."
With astute analysis and scientific depth, he uncovers connections that reach far beyond
medical discourse. Watch the whole interview here.