In our broadcast of December 27, 2024: "War opponents not wanted as president" , we reported on the annulment of the Romanian
presidential election by the Romanian Constitutional Court.
The first round had previously been won by the independent candidate Calin Georgescu, who is known
for his critical stance towards NATO and the EU.
The program showed that the court's decision was extremely questionable.
Large sections of the Romanian people doubted the legality of this action.
His popularity increased steadily, and in the polls in January he was well ahead of his rivals with 37%.
In February, Georgescu was then arrested by law enforcement authorities when he tried to declare his candidacy
for the re-election, which he would most likely have won.
He was released after questioning, but placed under supervision by the public prosecutor's office.
Among other things, this prohibits him from leaving the country. He is also not allowed to open social media accounts.
The people reacted to this step with large demonstrations of solidarity.
Hundreds of thousands took to the streets in Bucharest in support of Georgescu.
However, he was excluded from the repeat election by a decision of the election commission.
Georgescu then lodged an appeal, but this was rejected by the Romanian Constitutional Court,
which had already annulled the first election.
The legal process is thus exhausted and the popular candidate is not admitted to the election.
But was this decision made in the right way?
Did the court really make a neutral and objective judgment here or is there evidence of influence by other forces?
Kla.TV has taken a closer look for you:
Before we discuss Georgescu's disqualification for re-election, let's take a look back at the
annulment of the first round of the presidential election.
This has been criticized from various sides.
At the Munich Security Conference, US Vice President J.D. Vance described the Romanian authorities' decision to annul
the election as an "attack on democratic decision-making".
As a consequence, the US government suspended a visa program for Romania for the time being.
The so-called "Venice Commission", which advises the Council of Europe on matters of constitutional and international
law, also looked into the case and criticized the decision.
The former director of the Romanian foreign intelligence service SIE, Silviu Predoiu, also publicly
questioned the basis on which the court had based its decision.
The annulment was justified by the judges on the grounds that Romania had become the
target of "an aggressive hybrid Russian attack".
Reference was made to intelligence information disclosed shortly beforehand by President Johannis.
Predoiu vehemently contradicted this statement:
"Let's take another close look at these reports - nowhere is there any indication of a foreign actor manipulating the elections.
Not in a single report. Why? Because there were no such actions.
There were no interventions that went beyond the usual scope of foreign propaganda."
However, the extent of the scandal lies even deeper.
The Romanian investigative magazine "Snoop" examined the TikTok campaigns allegedly initiated by the Russians, which -
according to the Constitutional Court - were supposed to have been decisive for Georgescu's election victory.
However, their investigations revealed that one of these campaigns was financed by the National
Liberal Party (PNL) of the then President Klaus Johannis.
We can only speculate as to why.
But it is precisely this campaign that is described in the document of the Supreme Council of the Romanian
National Defense as evidence of Russian election interference.
These findings render the already highly questionable decision of the court completely absurd.
The election was obviously canceled for pretextual reasons.
Why this? Were the judges put under pressure?
Georgescu himself accused US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, the European Union and foreign donors
of having played a decisive role in this process.
Are these conspiracy theories or is there evidence that Georgescu has hit the mark with these accusations?
The role of the Biden administration
Richard Grenell, the Trump administration's special representative for foreign policy, refuted the
claim that Russia interfered in the Romanian election.
According to Grenell, the investigation into the Biden administration's diplomatic activities revealed
that it had tried to tip the balance in the Romanian elections against a conservative candidate.
The influence of the Biden administration was also confirmed by investigations by
Romanian investigative journalist Iosefina Pascal.
The role of the EU
Former EU Commissioner Thierry Breton made a remarkable quote ahead of the German parliamentary
elections regarding a possible strong showing by the AfD:
"So let's wait and see what happens, keep a cool head for now and enforce our laws in Europe.
This is because there is a risk that they will be circumvented, and if they are not enforced, this could lead to disruption.
We did it in Romania, and if necessary, it will also have to be done in Germany."
Who does Breton mean by "we" when he says: "That's what we did in Romania"?
So is Georgescu right in his assertion that the EU has exerted influence here?
Liviu Dragnea, the former leader of the Social Democratic Party in Romania, is also convinced that
influence was exerted on the Constitutional Court from abroad.
He points out that the French ambassador had met with the President of the Constitutional Court several times, most
recently a few days before the decision to exclude Georgescu.
Dragnea commented on the ambassador's visits as follows:
"He came to give orders, not to visit a friend".
Georgescu commented sarcastically on these visits with the tweet: "Long live France and
Brussels, long live their colony called Romania!"
The role of George Soros
According to Georgescu, the third group that influenced the election was foreign donors.
Here the traces lead above all to the global strategist George Soros.
He is related to the man who filed the lawsuit to exclude Georgescu from the election:
former Romanian Education Minister Remus Pricopie.
He is currently Rector of the National University of Political Sciences and Public Administration in Bucharest.
This university is part of a network of universities in which George Soros is investing 1 billion US
dollars "to combat nationalism and promote an open society".
As we explained in detail in the programme of 27 December 2024 , Soros is heavily networked in Romania and has
infiltrated large parts of the party landscape, media and universities with his donations and his network of NGOs .
Calin Georgescu announced in an interview that he would dismantle these networks from
day one of his presidency. Georgescu verbatim:
"Listen, the Soros network will certainly be banned because it has done a lot of damage to my country, to my people.
Right in the first minute of my term of office, I can assure you.
It will be banned in the first minute of my term of office. Not later.
Because everything that was done by the Soros network was not only directed against democracy - which is
disastrous - but also against culture, tradition and everything that is part of Romania's values.
So once again: Soros must disappear from this country - completely.
Total means: Total. No discussion, no negotiation!
Several judges at the Constitutional Court, which excluded Georgescu from the election, also had links to Soros, as the
Romanian investigative journalist Iosefina Pascal revealed.
For example, before becoming a constitutional judge, Elena Tanasescu sat on the board of the "Institute for
Public Policy", an NGO that belongs to the Soros network and has received considerable funding from it.
So it is hardly surprising that these judges did not want to allow a candidate who has positioned
himself so clearly against Soros to stand for election.
Conclusion: There are strong indications that the Romanian Constitutional Court was externally
influenced in its decisions to annul the presidential election and not allow Georgescu to stand.
This suggests that this is a coup by covertly acting background powers - also known as the "Deep
State" - against the candidate favored by the people.
Romania is not an isolated case.
In France, Marine Le Pen, who had a good chance of winning the next presidential election, was also banned from
standing for election in the coming years by a court ruling.
Until now, such an open approach by the Deep State has rarely been necessary, as it has been able to manipulate the
people through its control of the mainstream media so that they predominantly voted for the candidates in front of them.
With the increasing influence of the free media and independent investigative journalists like Iosefina Pascal, the
people can no longer be kept under the intended hypnosis.
The octopus, which has been acting in secret up to now, is now increasingly being forced to
intervene directly and openly, as in Romania.
However, as after the annulment of the election in Romania, this only led to a defiant reaction
from the people, who backed Georgescu all the more.
This forces the shadow government to show its true, completely undemocratic face more and more, which in
turn accelerates the awakening process of the people.
Therefore, dear viewers, do not be discouraged by the increasingly obvious breakdown of justice everywhere,
but rather become part of this global awakening process.
Even if the Deep State tries to freeze the new buds like an April frost, the human spring is coming and can no longer be stopped!