But we need to let the term pandemic treaty melt in our mouths, please, pandemic treaty! Pandemic treaties are concluded.
It's not about health. It's not about protecting our lives from evil evil killers.
If you google: "Ten biggest health risks", you will find the vaccination critic.
Kla.TV is today in conversation with lawyer Beate Bahner, an expert on the WHO pandemic
treaty and international health regulations.
Ms. Bahner, thank you for taking the time to answer our questions today.
With pleasure! In view of the events of the last few days, we couldn't be talking more topically today.
After some back and forth, the national WHO representatives have been able to agree on a treaty
text for the International Health Regulations.
The treaty was supposedly adopted by the member states in May 2024.
One year later, the WHO delegates will meet from May 19 to 27 to discuss and vote on the WHO pandemic treaty.
This vote took place yesterday, May 21.
What are the main features and what are the changes compared to the previous versions?
And last but not least: What do these revised international health regulations and the pandemic treaty
mean in practice for the citizens of the member states?
So many questions at once. Very small correction.
It was on Tuesday, May 19, that there was allegedly unanimous silence in Geneva on this WHO pandemic treaty
and that this was then considered a vote or approval.
So you didn't raise your hand or cast a ballot, you said nothing within a few seconds and then,
like in an auction, you hit it: So, all accepted.
That was the pandemic treaty.
I would like to ... in fact, I don't think it makes much sense to discuss any changes to last year's draft now.
Because there weren't so many serious changes.
What I ... and I actually have ... I allow myself to keep the (book) pure. Because I published this book a year ago.
And back then, I already presented and processed the entire pandemic treaty and the international health
regulations - these are two treaties, you don't really know why - in this book and of course also commented on them.
And now I see this (contract) here, I've had it translated into German and prepared it myself for editing.
I recognize this pandemic contract very well.
They are the same definitions, the same goal of being well prepared for pandemics.
Funnily enough, before Corona we all didn't really have much to do with pandemics.
Suddenly we are supposed to be constantly prepared. And the WHO pandemic treaty is also supposed to apply between pandemics, so
there are obviously plans to be prepared for incessant pandemics.
And if there is no pandemic, the WHO treaty should still apply.
Because it allows the actors - and these are not only the organizations, which are increasingly privately funded, but now
not just 80 percent, possibly even 95 percent, because the USA has pulled out since January, I believe, due to Trump - these
actors, these are actors and they are also profiteers, and pandemics seem to be a great business, similar to
climate, otherwise you wouldn't conclude a pandemic treaty.
You just have to let this term melt in your mouth.
A pandemic contract! When somehow we were told that it was a stroke of fate, that the coronavirus pandemic had
come upon us all of a sudden, had jumped from a bat at a market in Wuhan and infected the whole world.
This seems to be planned for the coming years and decades.
Do we want to continue to declare pandemics in the future?
I have also described the last declared pandemics in this book.
That was bird flu, that was Ebola, that was swine flu.
And we always remember by chance, but then by chance a vaccine is ready, the cure.
And this will continue to be the case in the future.
We have already announced the influenza pandemic in the new pandemic agreement, which was already in the draft last year.
How do they know there's an influenza pandemic?
Disease X, the dubious disease X, we want to be prepared for that too.
But it's ten times worse than corona.
I am very impressed by the fact that we know that a disease that does not yet exist
will be ten times more dangerous in the future.
After all, Corona wasn't that dangerous yet, so perhaps that doesn't threaten to be dangerous either.
But it at least feeds the suspicion that things are not quite right here.
And I've also devoted a very detailed chapter to all the pandemic simulation games, which have been around since 1999 and then also
with military terms: Clade X, Dark Winter, Spars, whatever, Contagion, Catastrophic Contagion, brutal words from the
military, where you rehearse and swear the organizations, the governments, the media and everyone who is
a bit part of it, just for potential new pandemics.
And just very briefly, if you compare it or if you follow it like I do, the Deutsches Ärzteblatt, the Ärztezeitung, then you
hear about it every few weeks, months, it's somehow a new hype.
As I said, sometimes bird flu, sometimes RSV, dengue fever. Yes, dengue fever, very bad,
five cases, is caused by the tiger mosquito.
All this keeps coming back, but I was quite astonished by the next stage that took place last year, in Washington.
A bird flu congress was held in Washington in October 2024.
It would have cost a thousand euros, a thousand dollars to take part, it was for manufacturers, for players, for profiteers, and
one of the things was to be prepared for overcrowded clinics, including in the labor market, when they all disappear, the
workers, and yet not a single person has ever died from bird flu.
In my opinion, bird flu is also a bad example of how farmers and animal breeders are being told that they have animals, geese and
ducks with bird flu and that either they have to be vaccinated or they have to be culled and
killed, and this has happened millions of times.
So, the story with the pandemics is a very unpleasant one, it seems to be about billions every year, and they clearly
want to squeeze us like a lemon with this pandemic treaty.
How can citizens prepare themselves? Are there ways to defend themselves against such
coercive measures, which are supposed to serve health?
Well ... could we ... how did we fight back in Corona? Corona was a really masterfully staged test balloon.
Not the worst blow of fate, we all know that, but just an exercise, a nice little
military exercise that worked brilliantly.
You had no access to restaurants, to operas, to museums, even privately you were excluded if you were not vaccinated,
first you had to be tested, then you were vaccinated.
In 2020, as I said, there will be daily testing everywhere, and in 2021 even more so as a punishment for not getting vaccinated.
How many fought back?
Not so many.
Although at least 25 percent of Germans have obviously not taken the vaccinations, the figure is probably much
higher, as can probably be seen from the doses and the invoices.
Falsified vaccination certificates have become the new fashionable offense for them and were sometimes punished very
severely, as a first offender you were immediately convicted, which is very unusual, you get more than
90 daily sentences, then you have a criminal record.
For a first offense is usually 30, 40, 50, 60 day sentences.
So they clearly wanted to stop this, and many judges will probably have actually thought that anyone who
doesn't get vaccinated is a threat and a potential killer.
How can you defend yourself? By saying no,
simply no and protested a lot more, got informed, as I said, actually. That is basically impossible to revise.
I will probably put this pandemic treaty in a little extra brochure and then say, okay, this is no longer Article 4(2G),
but Article 4(3B), but nothing has changed in terms of content,
but an incredible danger, because an essential part of the pandemic treaty is the fight against infodemics.
Information as a disease: pandemic, epidemic, infodemic, okay?
So too much information that could confuse people - let's see if I can find it here right
now - that could confuse people, infodemic.
Here, there's a definition of infodemic, it's already in the health regulations, in the amended, tightened ones: (quote)
"Infodemic means an excess of information, false or misleading information in digital and
physical environments during a disease outbreak.
This leads to confusion and risk-taking behavior that can be detrimental to health."
So it's risk-taking behavior if I don't get every vaccination that the state prescribes - and that was an amazing explosion, one
vaccination, then the second, then came the booster vaccination,
Some people have been vaccinated five times and are still proud of it - but when the state tells us that we now have bird flu or
RSV or the tapeworm fart that could be dangerous and says you have to be vaccinated every
month, then the state wants us citizens to cower.
And you can only do that with us for as long as the citizens actually participate.
But this phrase "we own the science, we are the science", we have leased the science for ourselves - that was a
well-known UN politician, which is of course very dangerous.
And you are already considered a criminal, and that is being intensified, and that is being
tightened, and that is already being tightened in the EU.
Yes, in Germany, in the EU, we are currently seeing what happens to Germans who want to leave the country and merely hold a
different political opinion - are not dangerous, are not planning terrorist attacks, do not want to rape or kill anyone - that would
be a reason to refuse to leave the country or perhaps to refuse entry, as happened to two German journalists living in Russia.
This is an EU sanction.
For me, this is an outrageous development, but it is attributed to this Digital Services Act,
which has been in force in Europe for a year now.
We basically already have a pandemic agreement in Europe, which is the regulation on serious cross-border threats.
Europe is the test balloon here.
And who is the driver?Germany.
Germany, the largest contributor to the WHO in 2020, ahead of the USA in 2021, ahead of the Bill & Melinda
Gates Foundation, ahead of the other major contributors.
What really annoys me is that Germany is and always has been a huge payer, but all these
treaties and IHR are not translated into German.
They are translated into Chinese, Russian, Spanish, French, English, maybe one or two other languages, but
not into German, which is really cheeky towards us citizens, after all it is our tax money.
But it is indeed a very, very dangerous development that has already been implemented in Europe and in Germany. And
we can see, those of us who read and follow this, including on alternative media, that this is being enforced.
We see that people get their houses searched for expressing their opinions freely. Maybe that will happen to me too.
I have to say, I was actually always thinking about 2021 and also 2022, when I announced that I was writing a book on
coronavirus vaccination. That was then this - now I'm getting a house search. I didn't get it, I really have to say.
Even today I still think that I'm being attacked somehow, but not because I'm a bad person, but because I won't let
my mouth be shut and say that corona was, now confirmed by the RKI files, the rarest disease imaginable.
There is another rarer one, measles. We do that separately.
To say that, to have it confirmed, can be dangerous, and that's why this pandemic treaty, which serves completely different
goals, namely total control and surveillance, networking with digital identity, with the vaccination certificate, with the
tests, with digital money ... So we should, I don't know whether on the forehead or somewhere in the skin, at
the moment it's still via iPhones or cell phones, we should, should all data be networked.
And Bill Gates, who is the biggest with his foundation, really the biggest financier of both the WHO and these two vaccination
institutions GAVI and CEPI, not only wants to vaccinate the whole world, he has said that, but he also wants a lot of information.
And now I'll see where I can find this again ... testing, exactly. He wants information, and he wants it through the tests.
First they claim that we have a bad, bad new pandemic, so all the animals have to be
used, swine flu, monkeypox, bird flu, whatever.
So let's call the next pandemic the booby flu.
Yes, and because there is an imminent danger, because a gannet flu virus may have been found in the wastewater somewhere in
Honolulu, a gannet flu or gannet pandemic is now being declared. And then the mechanism that we saw
with corona kicks in. A state of emergency is declared.
With the state of emergency comes the testing, comes the claim that you are positive because the PCR test
has acted as an incredible fraudulent instrument here.
The WHO also provides for worldwide laboratories. These tests are being expanded.
And Billy, Bill Gates is already writing in 2021, in his annual letter he says: "As scary as it is to imagine, the
next pandemic could even be the result of bioterrorism."
I suspect that too. Heiko Schöning suspects that too, perhaps this time with bacteria. But not somehow by chance, but by the
pharmaceutical industry or the WHO or some mafia through all these biolabs. A new one has just been set up in beautiful
Spiez, Switzerland, as a showcase reference laboratory.
So this gain-of-function research, this research into making viruses more severe, more
dangerous, is making good progress worldwide.
So I think bioterrorism is indeed a danger, but not from some evil terrorists, but from those who profit from it.
"To prevent a repeat of last year's disaster," says Corona, "pandemic preparedness must
be taken as seriously as the threat of war."
But now comes Bill Gates: "It is possible to develop diagnostics that can be used very quickly.
I am confident that in the next pandemic, we will have so-called mega-diagnostic platforms with which we can test
up to 20 percent of the world's population every week."
Yes, so he wants to test a billion people in a week, but not to protect our health, but because he is
also involved in ID2020, which is the digital identity.
He's involved, Microsoft is involved, the Rockefeller Foundation is involved, it's all somehow
coincidental, always the same figures and usual players.
And what does Billy want here? Everything is written in my book too.
He wants the transparent person, he wants information, but far more than is contained in an identity card or a passport, for
example: Personal data means any information relating to an individual who is or can be
identified, directly or indirectly, from that information.
This includes biographical data such as name, gender, marital status, date and place of birth, country of origin, country of
residence, individual registration number, occupation, religion and ethnicity. Biometric data such as a photo, a fingerprint, a
facial or iris image. And now it goes on. He wants health data and any opinions about the person, such as assessments
of their state of health and/or their specific needs.
Wow! That was just a very small excerpt, Mr. Wildung, about what is actually planned here with the WHO pandemic treaty.
There are many more aspects, but we would have to talk about them for four hours.
I just wanted to present it briefly, it is one of the most impressive examples of the pretense of the rule of law.
A contract is supposedly concluded, and those who are interested in it will benefit themselves.
The only ones who don't benefit are the citizens.
They really want to subject us to tests, compulsory vaccinations, controls, digital identity and deny us life or
access to social, probably also professional, perhaps also health-related life if we don't submit to it.
[Kla.TV: Thank you very much. Ms. Bahner, thank you very much for your time. Thank you very much for your interesting comments.
I think we'll be hearing from you again and all the best and I'm glad you're sticking to your guns and
really standing up for what's right and not letting up.
With pleasure. Vaccinations and the WHO, I've actually kind of taken up the cause for the next
few years of my career. We have to finish that.
Yes. Thank you very much ... With pleasure. ... and all the best to you. With pleasure.