Yes, Sonja Reitz, Medical Association Hippocratic Oath.
Thank you all so much for staying here today!
We were lucky with the weather here in Berlin at the demo.
I'm from the Medical Association - and why am I talking about the rule of law?
The rule of law means that science advises politics and not the other way around.
The rule of law means that the RKI does its work, provides scientific data to
politicians and that politicians act accordingly.
The opposite was the case, as the RKI files have shown.
The rule of law means that the Paul Ehrlich Institute, which is supposed to monitor drug safety and also vaccination
safety in Germany, actively monitors whether there are more side effects with a new type of vaccination.
Especially when this vaccine was only researched for three and a half months, four months in the approval studies, and even
worse that a vaccine was used that was not researched at all.
Research was carried out into a substance that is produced using PCR technology, (which) is inoculated.
A substance that is produced by bacteria and has completely different impurities that have also been proven to cause cancer.
The Paul Ehrlich Institute should have monitored all this with active drug monitoring. That would have been easy to do.
In Germany, there are sentinel practices and whatnot.
They didn't do any of that. They have made a passive monitoring, reporting system, everyone can report as they wish.
The doctors who have vaccinated have often not reported because they themselves fear liability risks and
because it is time-consuming to submit such a report.
Nevertheless, the Paul Ehrlich Institute claims today that there are no unreported cases, although all the
television programs about vaccine damage have proven this.
Everyone says I went to my doctor and he didn't believe me, he didn't report it.
The doctor also did not inform the patient that he could report it himself - nebenwirkungen.bund.de.
So the Paul Ehrlich Institute, which is supposed to monitor, is throwing sand in our eyes.
We get false information about supposedly few side effects. This is not true.
The Paul Ehrlich Institute publicly states that there are just as many side effects as with other vaccinations, per 1000 doses.
That's not true either, by a factor of about 20, not by a factor of 1.2 - by a factor of 20! All of this is verifiable.
This means that the chief medical health authorities are not informing the government
and the population correctly - Fake News.
Does not take place from the medical association 'Hippocratic Oath', as the TAZ
reported. Dishonorable. False statement in July '23.
Instead, it is carried out by the (higher government authorities vis-à-vis - not higher government authorities...)
higher health authorities vis-à-vis the population.
The third supreme health authority, the Standing Vaccination Commission, which is part of the Robert
Koch Institute, also gave incorrect recommendations.
Instead of saying that vaccination has not been proven to protect against external protection, that it has not been proven to
somehow protect against infection, they have claimed the opposite and even recommended the
vaccination of children, adolescents and pregnant women.
As a medical association, we see this as a crime against humanity, as a betrayal of medicine, of medical ethics, as an
irresponsible recommendation in a situation in which the Covid-19 pandemic was demonstrably not as dangerous as
it was announced and there were already variants that were significantly less dangerous.
Instead of focusing research on how we can strengthen the immune system, how we can protect ourselves against a virus by natural
means and without risks, the focus has been on a high-risk technology such as Mod RNA, which has been proven to produce
spike proteins in the blood of many people even after months and years and can lead to long-term damage,
late damage and deaths even after months and years.
All this is no longer in line with the rule of law.
All this is a betrayal of the ethics of medicine and thus of the population!
The population trusts these institutions - they shouldn't!
It is also not the case that the medical profession has somehow leaned out of the window and said, yes, if the RKI,
the Paul Ehrlich Institute and the STIKO do what the politicians say, then let's do what science is.
No, I informed both the German Medical Association and the KV Bremen, for example.
And there, all the information, all the studies are simply shelved without argument, not answered, and
attempts are made to portray our warning to the population as fake news or to silence us by canceling events.
This is no longer compatible with the rule of law, it is no longer compatible with freedom of opinion.
And it exposes the population to undreamt-of risks.
I don't want to expand on this, that's it. You can download this information in the press releases on the
website of the medical association 'Hippocratic Oath'.
It contains the scientific studies that substantiate the statements I am making here.
And you can spread the word, you can inform all your doctors who are still vaccinators that they may still be
on the wrong horse, that perhaps they should reconsider.
Over there are some of the press releases from the Aktuelle.
You can take it with you and throw it in.
If you want to reprint at home, you are welcome to do so.
Anyone wishing to support the patient association "Naturally healthy for all" can also pick up
admission forms at the stand at the Brandenburg Gate.
This is a kind of patient lobby. This means that patients are finally taking their health into their own hands and ensuring
that politicians listen to them and not the other way around.
Thank you for your attention. Be vigilant, inform yourself independently. Thank you.