Since the 1990s, a certain verdict has been reached in family courts in custody disputes that is not in favor of the children.
Hundreds of healthy, socially well-integrated children were and are taken away from their - mostly single - mothers.
The mothers are not accused of violence, abuse or neglect, but of an alleged disturbance in their bond with the child.
The accusation against the mothers is that they brainwashed their children into developing so-called Parental
Alienation Syndrome, or PAS for short, and therefore rejecting their previously beloved father.
In reality - as research by Dr. Herbert Renz-Polster suggests - this alleged diagnosis is the invention of a child and
adolescent psychiatrist who wanted to use it to turn custody cases in favour of fathers suspected of pedophilia.
He has thus developed the perfect way to reverse the perpetrator-victim relationship.
At the end of 2024, the pediatrician, scientist and journalist Renz-Polster published his research into the true
background of the PAS theory on his blog "kinder-verstehen.de".
Kla.TV summarizes the first part of his well-researched and comprehensive report for you:
[Speaker 1: Dr. Renz-Polster has spent hundreds of hours in recent years researching the theory of Parental Alienation Syndrome,
or PAS for short, and reading the works of its inventor.
He tried to find out how the followers of this ideology managed to make this absurd "diagnosis" acceptable in family courts.
As unbelievable as it sounds, for the last few decades - until at least 2023 - every single mother in this
country could lose custody or even access rights to her child simply by making an allegation of PAS.
This can be done by accusing the mother of breastfeeding her child too often or for too long.
PAS or "symbiosis" allegations have now been developed by well-connected lobby groups into weapons that
are difficult to defend against in disputed custody cases, according to Herbert Renz-Polster.
Origins of the PAS theory
"Sexual abuse is not necessarily traumatic for a child.
Whether a child is traumatized by abuse depends on how society views such encounters."
"Sexually abused children suffer because our society overreacts to pedophilia."
"Children are naturally sexual and can initiate sexual encounters with adults by 'seducing' the adult."
"Then when the sexual relationship is discovered, the child will make it look like the adult started it and is to blame."
"This is how the alleged expert defines the deeper framework behind sexual intercourse between adults and children:
Incest is in fact 'a biologically advantageous practice', as it 'preserves the purity of the lineage'.
Sexual intercourse with children would also increase the number of offspring."
You, dear viewers, shall be spared the rest of his morbid remarks, as his detailed "expert opinion" becomes very disgusting.
But what must not be ignored at this point is the reality that nature itself does not tolerate incest.
There is therefore a ban on incest in many countries for good reason.
The risk of hereditary and other diseases is too great and the mortality rate among incest children is high.
Apart from that, we are talking here in plain language about rape of the children.
Here is a quote from ex-Scotland Yard officer and whistleblower Jon Wedger:
"and only later did I find out that women were unable to have children because their wombs were
misplaced due to the damage done to their young bodies.
The men had continence and back problems because their bowels ruptured and things like that. And we hear nothing about it!
The pain it causes, the physical pain and then the trauma!"
Despite such facts, how can a Mr. Gardner still argue that pedophilia is often an "imprinting"
against which the person concerned is powerless.
Pedophilia arises from good experiences during sex between children and adults.
The "orgasmic gratification" experienced by the child ensures that the abused children
later want to do the same to their own children:
"It's easy to understand how a child can become 'addicted' to such an experience and then crave
frequent gratification of the same kind," Gardner said.
At the latest here one wonders why this man was not prosecuted instead of getting an expert title!
About Dr. Richard Gardner
Gardner was married and had three children; his marriage to Lee Gardner ended in divorce.
He initially worked as a child and adolescent psychiatrist in private practice, but then shifted his focus
to his work as a psychological expert at family courts.
He committed suicide at the age of 72 .
In the 400 cases in 25 US states, his clients were primarily fathers who were accused of child abuse.
In addition, Gardner worked on several publications of over 40 books and hundreds of articles, most of which
he published in a self-publishing company founded specifically and solely for his works .
Lecture tours have taken him all over the world - including to Germany.
In his work, Richard Gardner primarily set down his impressions and personal convictions that he
had formed as an expert witness in custody disputes.
Richard Gardner did not carry out any research of his own, nor was he ever part of a scientific working group.
The few papers that appeared in scientific journals regularly sparked critical debates among experts.
Since students from Columbia University sometimes sat in on his practice, he held the title of "clinical
professor" - which has nothing to do with a real professorship.
He also liked to write about the psychosexual development of infants and toddlers - interspersed with hair-raising claims
about their alleged oral sex fantasies towards their father.
Kla.TV stops the report on Gardner's deviant and hard-to-digest fantasies.
Claims that infants and children would seduce their fathers clearly reveal what kind of child Gardner really was.
And unbelievably, he was recognized as an "expert witness" in custody disputes for decades.
The victim-perpetrator reversal through PAS
Gardner pulled off a real coup in the 1980s with the PAS theory.
As quickly became apparent in the custody proceedings Gardner accompanied as an expert witness, he had created a veritable
"Swiss multifunctional knife" with this alleged illness, with which highly contentious custody
proceedings could be turned in his clients' favor.
The "Swiss multifunctional tool" referred to consists of a simple hinge: namely the assertion that children are bound
to their parents by nature - i.e. for genetic reasons - and that they always love both parents equally.
This love for both parents is essential for the child's survival and is the only way to ensure its full development.
Dr. Renz-Polster firmly opposes this: "Bonding reflects the lived and felt togetherness, (...)
it is not simply the result of consanguinity."
But Gardner played out this claim in abuse cases where the father had actually been found guilty of sexual abuse - and
where the question was what should happen to the perpetrator.
Here he regularly argued with the alienation trap:
The abused child should remain connected to the perpetrator because "by its very nature" it needs both
parents for its development and basically also loves them.
Therefore, "particular care must be taken not to alienate the child from the abusive parent".
Removing the perpetrator from the child should therefore "only be seriously considered when all attempts to treat the
pedophilia and reunite the family have demonstrably failed".
If the child rejects the father, with whom it is bound by ancient laws, then this cannot be the result of the child's free will.
After all, this is not "natural" behavior.
What's more, if the child is stubborn and unteachable in its rejection, then there must be
manipulation by a disturbed mother behind it.
Dr. Gardner has now named this disorder Parental Alienation Syndrome.
So instead of removing the perpetrator to protect the child, it is important to initially present the
abuse by the father to the child as normal as possible.
Psychotherapy for the abused child, on the other hand, was viewed critically by Gardner.
You should "explain to the child that there are no perfect parents".
You could also "tell him about other societies where this behavior is considered normal".
According to Dr. Renz-Polster, Gardner's entire work can be summarized in the following quote:
"Child sexual abuse is not a bad thing in itself - our assessment is the problem."
PAS as an instrument for unlawful expert opinions
The PAS diagnoses up to "symbiotic attachment" together with diagnoses based on this such as "attachment intolerance" are very
popular with certain experts in custody matters, with guardians ad litem and even with
some youth welfare offices and family courts.
A network of experts has specialized in forging precisely this accusation into a "tactical weapon in contact disputes", as Prof.
Jörg Fegert, Medical Director of the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at Ulm
University Hospital, calls the PAS construct.
And the relevant lobby groups seriously believe that they can use this theory to enforce "fathers' rights".
Sociologist Dr. Wolfgang Hammer clearly confirms this with studies from 2022 and 2024 - here is a quote from Renz-Polster:
[Speaker 1: "These cases are not isolated incidents.
That socially well-adjusted children without the usual, understandable reasons such as neglect or proven abuse are taken
away from their primary parent, 'relocated' or 'taken into care by the state' - there is an
ideology behind this, disguised as 'science'."
In his report, Hammer describes in great detail the basis for the verdicts, a high percentage of which are based on PAS.
There are even supreme court rulings that claim that mothers alienate children or invent
violence and abuse just to prevent contact.
Such narratives defy professional and legal justification, but are the basis for decisions that can have fatal consequences
for children and mothers. Dr. Renz-Polster writes about this:
"And this system goes back to the wrong (and in my eyes also sick) theories of this man (Gardner)."
To conclude Dr. Herbert Renz-Polster's statement
"I am concerned with naming an injustice that cries out to heaven, which has found a sympathetic
ear with far too many experts for far too long.
But my main concern is that PAS, 'attachment intolerance', 'symbiotic attachment', i.e. damaging dependency
relationships, are used by interested lobby groups as a tactical means of asserting their interests.
My point is that children have been and are being wronged by these 'diagnoses'."
[And why do certain judges, lawyers and counselors not see this injustice?
Yes, you would actually have to assume that they are even covering it up!
Ivo Sasek denounces precisely this passivity of the judiciary in his "Sieben
Standpauken" and calls on them to finally do their job.
3. to the judiciary at all levels and their executives
You judges, public prosecutors and security forces: up to now, despite crystal-clear legislation, you have simply stood idly by
and watched as, for example, even the youngest children all over the world have been given free access to
pornography, right down to their laptops and cell phones.
You didn't intervene when early sexualizers started screwing up our children at kindergarten age with
masturbation, anal sex, swallowing sperm and the like.
To this day, you have only kept a low profile in the face of countless child abusers.
Shortly before the broadcast of this program, Dr. Renz-Polster made an important announcement to the Kla.TV editorial team,
which could provide an argumentation aid for affected parents:
[Speaker 1: "In 2023, the UN Human Rights Council is said to have rejected 'parental alienation' as a 'pseudo-concept'.
The Federal Constitutional Court also stated in a ruling in November 2023 that recourse to the 'concept of PAS, which is
considered to be refuted by experts' does not provide a 'sufficiently viable basis for a
decision based on the best interests of the child'."
Simply put: PAS could no longer be argued in court because it had been discarded as a theory.
"The Ministry of Justice has endorsed this and called on the German family courts 'to be guided by
this decision of the Federal Constitutional Court'."
Now we need to observe and demand that these resolutions are not just empty phrases that are simply intended to
reassure the people or even give the impression that we are concerned about undesirable developments and injustice.
The fact that so-called "experts" and experts like Gardner can spread and introduce pedophilia-promoting
allegations and fantasies for decades without being touched casts serious doubt on the efforts of the judiciary.
Finally, many thanks to Dr. Herbert Renz-Polster, who is continuing his extensive research in four further parts!
Dear viewers, please help to ensure that this topic is also heard in your environment.
You want to change the world? So do we. Become part of the big Kla.TV investment research now at www.kla.tv/mitwirken.
The network of Freemasons is revealed! Become part of Kla.TV's biggest investigative
research and register now: www.kla.tv/mitwirken