Do you know how fear of the danger of deadly epidemics has been anchored in the minds of all mankind, inculcated as it were?
Over 40 years of brainwashing are said to have made it possible to implement the coercive measures in the name of
the health dictatorship during the coronavirus pandemic.
Michael Leitner, journalist, author and filmmaker, showed how the narrative of the first pandemic of international proportions was
developed and spread with targeted scaremongering in his insightful lecture on
YouTube "AIDS - the mother of all epidemics".
With the kind permission of Michael Leitner, Kla.TV shares some of his findings from his investigative research below.
40 years of brainwashing
A formative component of brainwashing was how in films, especially in science fiction films, viruses constantly mutated
and could thus totally change people within a very short time.
This sparked fears of bad viruses in people's minds.
On the other hand, every few years fears of life-threatening epidemics were stirred up.
In 2014, it was the Ebola outbreak in Africa, which in the end was actually based on the
fact that the Ebola definition had been changed.
For example, internal bleeding due to severe gastrointestinal illnesses was also classified as an Ebola case.
In 2009 there was swine flu; since 1997 there has been an increase in bird flu; in 2002/2003 the SARS epidemic.
But have you researched whether there has actually been an increase in mortality based on published facts and figures?
You see, cholera, plague, typhus, those were real epidemics!
In the 14th century, the plague claimed 25 million lives in Europe alone.
AIDS - the mother of all epidemics
And now to AIDS - the mother of all epidemics, with which the pandemic scare of deadly
viruses and diseases was launched worldwide in 1981.
"The great epidemics" was on the cover of the magazine "Der Spiegel" at the time.
Death plays "the song of death" on the violin, along with the great epidemics, AIDS, syphilis, plague, cholera and smallpox.
The younger ones among you can hardly imagine the scaremongering about HIV-Aids in the 1980s.
The headlines were similarly full, just like during the Corona period. People were really scared then.
The Robert Koch Institute had extrapolated the number of new HIV infections and the result was that in 1996 the
last German would contract AIDS and die shortly afterwards.
So people were really persuaded: We'll all be dead in seven years.
Comparative figures on deaths to classify the risk of AIDS
It should be made clear that the following comparison of figures is not about trivializing deaths due to AIDS.
When comparing the actual figures at the time, it is easy to see that, for example, the infant mortality rate in Germany
between 1984 and 1993 within the first seven days of life was always higher than the number of annual AIDS deaths.
Between 1981 and 1998 there were 10,000 AIDS deaths in Germany.
[In 1996, the proportion of AIDS deaths in Germany was 0.22 per thousand.
In the 1990s, 1.5 people died by suicide every hour in Germany.
That is 13,140 per year or seven times as many as died from the AIDS epidemic in 1996.
In 1996, the risk of accidental death was about 18 times greater than the risk of dying from AIDS.
As a reminder, the plague claimed 25 million lives in Europe between 1347 and 1352.
AIDS: Strategy of distortion, manipulation & deception
The prevention campaigns
When it became apparent that Germany was not threatened with extinction by AIDS, it was claimed that safer sex campaigns and
the use of condoms had prevented the spread of the AIDS epidemic.
The chart on the left shows the number of condoms sold in Germany between 1978 and 1994.
The lowest figures were in 1984/1985, and at the beginning of the 1990s about 0.2 more condoms were sold per year and per
inhabitant than in 1979, before the terrible AIDS epidemic began.
The safer sex campaign therefore had no discernible effect.
The graph on the right shows the back-calculated HIV infections, i.e. the viral load was used to determine
approximately when someone who had recently tested positive for AIDS must have become infected.
The cross marks the start of the prevention campaigns.
As you can see, the start of the prevention campaigns has not changed the number of new HIV infections at all.
The publication of AIDS cases
How is it that the number of AIDS cases in Germany rose steadily between 1986 and 1996, as shown in the graph?
AIDS cases were counted cumulatively. This means, for example, that the AIDS cases of
1992 were included in the AIDS cases of 1993.
Every AIDS patient was counted as a new AIDS case every year. Whether they had died or
been cured in the meantime was irrelevant.
Were rising numbers produced on purpose, because rising numbers mean rising fear?
The lower light-colored columns in this graph show the actual number of new AIDS cases per year.
However, only the cumulative count was made public.
Definition and diagnosis of AIDS
AIDS has been redefined time and again.
In the diagram shown, you can see that in 1993 there was supposedly a massive increase in new AIDS
infections in the USA compared to other countries.
However, this was due to the fact that in 1993 the USA was the only country to define
AIDS with a lower number of T4 lymphocytes.
In Africa, HIV was usually diagnosed clinically, i.e. two main criteria and one secondary criterion had to be fulfilled.
And then someone was an AIDS case without any further laboratory testing.
In Africa, the classic diseases of poverty have simply been redefined.
The "Caracas Definition" of AIDS for South America stated, quote:
"Although AIDS patients in Brazil have fever very frequently, diarrhea and weight loss exceeding an arbitrary value
could not be observed often enough to meet the WHO criteria.
To avoid the difficulty of having to determine normal weight or weigh many patients, the Caracas definition allows underweight
to be diagnosed clinically without having to weigh the patient."
Apparently the people in South America were not malnourished enough to be considered AIDS cases.
With this definition, the number of AIDS cases could be kept high.
The number of cases
How did the numbers of AIDS cases come about?
Each AIDS case reported has been multiplied by different factors in the regions.
In Asia at 84.55, in Africa at 6.65 and in America - excluding the USA - at 3.98.
The HIV test
Some HIV tests subsequently had their approval withdrawn and had to be taken off the market because they
provided unsuitable results, as shown in a list published by the Paul Ehrlich Institute.
In addition, there are many factors that are known to cause false positive HIV test results.
Factors identified by recognized, reputable scientific articles.
In addition, the tests were not uniform from country to country or region to region.
These were some aspects of Michael Leitner's lecture that show how AIDS has obviously been deliberately
stylized into a dangerous global epidemic through manipulation.
The link to the entire presentation can be found in the credits.
Michael Leitner's conclusion is:
"Without this era of 40 years of newspapers, television, movies full of evil viruses that are constantly trying to
wipe us out, this pandemic fuss with a flu renamed Corona would certainly not have been possible."
We conclude with a quote from Nobel Prize winner for chemistry, Kary Mullis, which encourages us to critically
scrutinize and verify the things that are presented to us.
"If 99 percent of all scientists are of the same opinion, it is almost certainly wrong".
Therefore, watch Kla.TV and spread the word about our well-founded programs.