"On March 29, 2025, the event "Freedom & Self-Determination - The Responsible Citizen" took place at the
Kulturhaus Dornbirn with interesting contributions on the rule of law, sovereignty and cash.
The event was organized by the Dornbirn Academy for Personal Development.
HOCH2.TV has recorded and edited all the contributions for you, dear viewers.
Kla.TV today features an interview with Dr. Sharon Tagwerker:
"Personal responsibility - the order of the day!"
Yes, like Erwin, I would like to start with Dr. Tagwerker.
Not only because of Ladies first, but also because you have the right of origin here from Bludenz, so to speak.
You're practically predestined for that.
Hello Ms. Tagwerker, you are taking the microphone.
Above all, we want to talk to you about it.
Of the panel guests taking part today, you are to a certain extent the one who has the professional
experience - in the direct consequences of what happened back then, almost exactly five years ago.
And you are constantly confronted with the effects of the pandemic - especially on the
youngest members of society - as part of your job.
Those who were actually least able to defend themselves, it has to be said.
And here is the question: What can you report on this?
Okay, so children and young people have of course been massively affected by the pandemic and the measures.
What was probably most obvious were the psychological consequences and the psychiatric illnesses that followed.
Unfortunately, there has been a massive increase in suicide attempts and suicides themselves up to 2023.
These are also figures that are not directly readable, but have actually been compiled by the psychiatrists
- who launched an appeal in 2023 - and made public.
Exactly, there has been an increase in massive depressive illnesses of up to five to ten times.
62 percent of girls and 38 percent of boys were affected. The Danube University Krems conducted a survey in school classes.
And 2021 was the absolute peak with one million children suffering from mental illness.
And in contrast, 70,000 therapy places were missing.
Of course, we felt this in practice.
We were faced with the fact that we had to look after children who had a psychological, psychiatric
problem and we had to wait months for a therapy place.
So it was a really stressful situation for the parents, for the children and also for the doctor.
And especially if you are not used to administering psychiatric medication and do not feel competent to do so.
But then you get imaginative and try something else.
So another medicine revealed it to me.
So now I've gone even more into the complementary area - and lo and behold, it also helps.
Not for the very seriously ill, of course, where you're happy if the psychiatrist can intervene.
Yes, that's it for once.
So that's definitely a very disturbing inventory.
What would interest me here and certainly also the audience.
It is often claimed that this has nothing to do with corona.
Some may blame this on the effects of vaccinations, although this is probably less of a problem with children.
Others say: Yes, these are the late effects of the viral disease itself.
To what extent is it possible to differentiate what this has to do with the measures?
To what extent can this be attributed to this?
That is of course a very difficult question.
In principle, this is certainly multifactorial .
So there is no question that the spike protein is absolutely pathological and causes a lot of damage, especially in the brain.
Both the vaccination spike and the Covid-19, i.e. from the virus itself.
But what caused the psychological problems, of course, were above all the measures involving isolation.
It is a recognized method of torture that you are not allowed to meet the grandparents, that you are
not allowed to see the relatives in the hospital.
Especially those who were still seriously ill, who were not allowed to receive end-of-life care.
It really is an extreme loss when you can't share such moments with your relatives.
Or if you are denied the first years with your grandparents or vice versa.
I have had families with children who are "strangers".
So everyone goes through an alienation phase and they were alienated from their own grandparents, massively.
They no longer let their grandparents get close to them.
This is of course shocking, both for the parents and for the grandparents.
And that burns itself in.
And also those years with the mask in front of their faces: that was of course a loss of socialization for the children.
And I mean, yes of course, there are many other causes of psychological disorders. [Daniel
Matissek] So especially in schools, there were also these school closures in Austria.
This has probably had traumatic consequences for whole generations of pupils.
I've always wondered about that - you've already published about it:
To what extent have the structural problems of the school system in Austria perhaps exacerbated the negative development?
Yes, on the one hand we have a completely outdated school system, which has not been reformed at all in recent decades.
It no longer corresponds to the latest state of brain research.
And on top of that, during the pandemic, many classes were simply left behind due to the shift to digitalization.
So they couldn't keep up with the material.
This has cost many pupils their school careers.
Unfortunately, I have experienced this myself a few times, even in practice, which is extremely tragic.
And yes, there is a massive lack of this in schools.
So the students are being lumped together.
The 08/15 student is actually the great one, right?
And the fact that this results in 29 percent functional illiteracy is actually a total disaster for our school system.
In other words, 30 percent of those who have completed our school system are unable to read with comprehension.
And that really is absolutely amazing.
If you listen to all this - including all the other consequences, the psychological damage - then you have to say that
it all more or less came upon the people without them being able to defend themselves in the slightest.
It wasn't just children's rights that were curtailed back then, but also parental rights on a grand scale.
No one could defend themselves against these appalling developments.
This has effectively befallen the people.
And because we are also talking about "responsible citizens", it was actually total disenfranchisement.
You can probably confirm that. [Dr.
Tagwerker] Yes, absolutely.
So you were no longer in control of your own body.
So you should get this vaccination, you should wear a mask.
We now know that they have caused damage, including to children.
So the children who had to wear masks at school all the time have a few IQ points less than those who didn't.
You had to get tested, you also had to have your child tested.
So that was really difficult.
Even disabled children were tested.
Some of the scenes of violence were unimaginable.
So it was very traumatizing for the children as well as for the parents.
And then, of course, that the children were allowed to vaccinate themselves from the age of 14 - that was the ultimate anyway.
So there were incidents where the child came home:
"The vaccination bus came today and, by the way, I'm now vaccinated."
So it's incredible.
In other words, a 14-year-old who may be partially of age, but certainly does not know about the
consequences of such decisions and cannot foresee them.
What interests me, or what shocked me during the preparations, is the number of
suicides, including among children and young people.
In Germany, we can only judge this empirically or by feeling.
In fact, there are still no official, officially verified statistics on suicide figures in Germany.
Man, even the Federal Statistical Office - under political pressure, of course - refuses
any connotation with Corona in this regard.
Even if we as journalists have already asked a dozen times.
There seem to be surveys on this in Austria, don't there?
Yes, there are surveys.
You can at least view the statistics for adults directly via Statistics Austria.
However, it should also be treated with caution, because accidents or poisoning or whatever,
for example, appear in a different statistic.
And you don't see that from children and young people.
So there you can only see it indirectly by looking at the mortality statistics here.
The figures I have just provided are from this report - which I mentioned earlier - from the
"Austrian Society of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry".
They published this in 2023 because they themselves were so shocked by the rise in these figures.
And another very serious consequence, also for the economic dimension, is of course the huge increase in
sick leave, which has increased massively, especially in 2023 - you can see it here in the table.
So you could say that, in principle, the whole of society has been systematically made ill.
Here, too, the question arises, because this is often called into question:
To what extent would you focus on the proportion of vaccine damage or perhaps what is commonly referred to as Long Covid?
Of course, it is difficult to differentiate.
That is difficult to differentiate.
Spike is dangerous and harmful.
So I would say that the vaccination plays a very large part.
So in relation to the children, not so much, because thank God many children are not vaccinated.
But you can clearly see that with adults.
So I used to be used to a child with maybe one family member lying down with some infectious disease.
Now it is often the whole family that is constantly ill.
So everyone is always laid up, right up to pneumonia, which doesn't just affect one person, but the whole family.
I'd never experienced anything like it before the pandemic.
And I mean, on the one hand, of course, the stress that people are exposed to - that has increased massively.
There are also nutrient deficiencies, there are many other reasons, i.e. the microbiome ,
which is now also increasingly being destroyed.
But if you talk to people a bit, they say themselves: since the vaccination, this and that has happened.
I mean, I haven't yet found any real statistics, any credible statistics, on this.
So you could say it's actually an attack on the health integrity of the organism in various respects.
Firstly through the measures, then through this vaccination and of course also through the overall social stress,
which then probably caused a weakening of the immune system.
It is multifactorial, as you said, but it manifests itself in different forms.
And in principle we are still struggling with this today.
Today, this is not just a problem for the younger generation - who are now five years
older - but of course for society as a whole.
And now just the question, since there are still plans for such vaccinations, including possible mRNA
vaccinations in connection with cancer and so on:
Do you see any learning curve with the official body?
Or is it more a case of not just repeating all this at the moment, so to speak, but
perhaps perfecting it in order to continue it?
Absolutely.
So, colleagues are starting to doubt, thank God, but not at all from the public side.
So this is clearly being driven forward.
We also saw this with the introduction of the e-vaccination certificate after the National Council elections.
So you can't get out of it, everyone has their vaccination card, whether it's empty or what's in it doesn't matter.
Three vaccinations are currently mandatory for the medical profession.
And if you look at that and then the change to the Medicinal Products Act, paragraph 80 - 2022/23 it should
have been changed - where it says above it in the title:
The General Data Protection Regulation is being undermined in this respect.
This means that personal data - for example, what is in the vaccination record - is not only given to healthcare
institutions, but also to the Medical Association, which has nothing to do with it, the Veterinary
Association, the Pharmacists' Association, including veterinarians and pharmacists.
The authorities receive it, and it is basically none of their business, from authorities in other EU Member States to the WHO.
And if you then take a look at the IHR , which will be explained later, and the changes, you can imagine
that the next pandemic will be a real game changer.
So you can use it to create reprisals that are much, much more than the ones we experienced recently.
Exactly, that would have been my follow-up question.
Electronic vaccination certificate, as already mentioned mandatory since the last national elections in Austria, 30.09.2024.
You can't unsubscribe there either.
Do you already see a direct preparation for - as you call it - future pandemics or future global health crises?
Can you place it in such a strategic context?
If you look at the last few years, it's clear to me.
So I can't imagine what else it would be used for.
I mean, you say it's for statistics.
But I think the statistics could have been collected beforehand.
There is no need for a mandatory e-vaccination card, which is devoid of any democracy.
And that really is - to return to the topic of our event - another form of disenfranchisement.
So in terms of data protection, you've just called it the transparent patient.
And again, there is actually no way to wriggle out of the clutches of this system.
So if an mRNA vaccination for cancer or some kind of prophylaxis becomes mandatory sometime next year or
whenever, the same game will probably start all over again.
You have to fear that, yes?
Absolutely. So if all this comes into force, you'll have to stand on your hind legs to get out of it.
So that will be a lot more difficult than five years ago.
In this context, I would perhaps like to ask another personal question off-record .
How did that affect you personally as a doctor?
I mean, you entered the profession back then with, I'm sure, like all doctors, an idealistic aspiration.
Were you disillusioned by this time, or did what you experienced also have a strong psychological impact on you?
Well, I have to admit, it took me a year to internalize what was going on.
I was completely idealistic and believed in the professional associations.
I believed in the idealism of my colleagues and sat in front of the table every evening for a
year, reading TKB and then reading the studies.
And I thought to myself, there's no such thing, that's exactly the opposite of what the professional associations tell me.
And after a year I was ready and had to admit it to myself: You've been on the wrong track so far.
And this feeling of powerlessness - which you certainly also had as a doctor, not being able to defend yourself
against these windmills - is something that many professional groups describe to us at that time.
But most of them went with the flow.
Now the question: How did your colleagues from the professional world react to your commitment, that you positioned
yourself there as a courageous, I would say, dissident ?
What experiences have you had, both personally and professionally?
So my circle of friends has completely changed.
So I can't say that I was subjected to any defamation, not at all, when you see each other.
I am still in the professional association.
I am also sometimes on the road at congresses.
So they speak to me in a very friendly way.
I also get positive encouragement, even from those who were followers.
So actually neutral, or even rather positive.
But, how can I put it, it's a personal problem of mine that I can't deal with someone who vaccinates
hundreds of thousands of people against their will.
That's why I drew my own conclusions and withdrew a little from my previous
friendships, with one eye laughing and one eye crying.
Because, the smiling eye is because I met wonderful new people.
Of course the old friendships were worth something and it's a shame that it had to come to this.
Well, Ms. Tagwerker, thank you very much for these personal and very interesting insights.
And in the second part we will certainly hear a lot more about the solutions then. Thank you very much, yes.
And we'll start again with Ms. Tagwerker.
I can then ask them to come back to me.
Then, as I said, we go straight medias in res .
From your previous descriptions - Corona's mental and health problems and the damage.
How, if at all, can they be healed, especially with regard to the younger generation?
That is a very interesting question.
Of course, it depends on how far-reaching it was.
I am absolutely convinced that a great deal can be made good in humans, provided that no physical damage has been done.
Because humans are extremely flexible creatures, otherwise we wouldn't exist now and we wouldn't exist anywhere in the world.
So I'm very positive about that.
The problem I see is that we need to slowly move away from all of this now so that we can move into healing.
And responsibility is needed now.
So each of us, be it a media person, politician, doctor, whoever, should take responsibility for ourselves
and for our lives and for the lives of our children.
We were used to it ... So we grew up in a welfare state that has now become a nanny state.
And this nanny state has now actually become an authoritarian state.
And now it is up to us to put a stop to it.
And I am absolutely convinced that, if we manage to do this, we will be able to make up for a great deal.
And it is not only politically, socio-politically or socially that we have to take responsibility.
We also have to take responsibility for ourselves in terms of health - I mean, I'm a
doctor, I'm going to talk about health again.
And I am also a practitioner, so I am happy to provide a practical example.
There are studies of 1,800 terminal cancer patients.
And they fell out of conventional medicine, so they were out of treatment - but then overcame the disease and survived.
And then a doctor went and examined the 1,800, interviewed them and tried to find the common denominators.
And interestingly, there were only two physical aspects that changed all together.
And the rest was mindset .
And the most important mindset, they have taken responsibility for themselves.
And then they were even able to overcome cancer.
That doesn't mean that everyone can do it.
Of course, everyone has to decide for themselves which path to take and what to do.
But that was the general outline.
So that's the be-all and end-all.
So you could say that we have the courage to heal ourselves, to help ourselves.
Yes, exactly.
That would of course be more of a therapeutic approach from a medical point of view and of course also a
bit - let's say - almost from a spiritual point of view.
That probably applies to everyone who is seriously ill, that the inner attitude plays the biggest role.
But of course it's also about the political framework.
An incredible amount has to change politically.
And first of all, a proper reappraisal and awareness of the problem would have to be created.
And that's where I see - or how do you see it - huge hurdles.
Or is the impression deceptive?
No, there are huge hurdles, but the previous topic plays into it.
Each and every one of us must stand up and say: This is not how it works.
And it won't work any other way.
Unfortunately, I often hear this in practice: you can't change anything.
Yes, you can change something!
You only have to look around at the people sitting here,
have already changed.
Or how many are sitting here in the audience now.
That would not have been possible a few years ago.
And even back then during the corona period, some people went to the principal of the schools and said: "The
vaccination bus is coming, my child won't be going there.
Or my child is not wearing a mask.
And if more and more and more and more people do this, then you can very well cause a change.
If you are following this now as a medical professional.
I'm sure you've noticed all the things that have come to light with the RKI protocols and all the
narratives that have crumbled since then and so-called conspiracy theories have proven to be true.
Surely those who took part back then - you mentioned the principal, but of course also many of your doctor
colleagues - should actually have a rethink, apart from the fact that they should all be ashamed of themselves.
At least something like self-criticism, saying: Okay, we made a mistake, it must never happen again!
I can't say for Austria, but I have the feeling that we're miles away from that in Germany.
And wouldn't that, again the question, be the absolutely necessary prerequisite for these
effects that you have just mentioned to take effect?
That's all true, the individual must also have an impact.
But in the end, it won't work if the public sphere of media and politics crosses and sabotages it.
What can be done to break this up?
Yes, that was several questions in one, so to speak.
So as far as my colleagues are concerned, yes, it's difficult.
They are of course in a very, very difficult position.
On the one hand, they have participated, perhaps vaccinated themselves and their families and many other patients, and are
therefore under enormous, exorbitant psychological pressure.
Admitting this to yourself and then going one step further and saying it publicly:
Well, that was nonsense, what I did or what happened everywhere.
That is asking an insane amount.
Some people do it, and I think they are extremely brave.
Many have always been critical and have not dared to do so.
So that's what they sometimes tell me under the table.
And in a public setting, of course, it's something completely different to perform like that.
But I have the feeling that it doesn't really need much more.
It just seems to me, who is faster right now?
Are we faster with our enlightenment or are the others faster with their reprisals?
And the more of us there are, the sooner my colleagues will perhaps dare to go in the right direction,
and perhaps the legal system and the other media too.
So something keeps bubbling up in the media, but is then suppressed again - even if it is being picked up more and more.
But as I said, every single one of us counts.
The vision, if we want to take a look ahead now, is how society, including the healthcare
system in this case - you can't separate the two.
What do you think it will look like in five years' time, with regard to self-determination?
Do you think that a completely different self-confidence will have prevailed by then?
Do you believe that this development will be, shall we say, beneficial, or are you rather pessimistic?
Well, I'm completely optimistic.
It's such a hype and such a positive wave.
I am absolutely convinced that we will be in a completely different position in five years' time and - how can
I put it - I think we will be even better than before.
Because we are all aware of what has actually happened, what may even have happened in recent decades and centuries.
So I believe that if we assert ourselves, we will have much greater freedom than we have ever had.
That is my belief.
This is also about freedom from fear.
After all, you are also talking about the politics of fear, which must be ended.
This is what the previous speakers have also discussed.
I would also say that this emergency policy probably also needs to be broken so that a different awareness of
self-determination can be reintroduced here - I assume.
There are still aspects that affect you in your work.
We have not addressed this today.
I would like to go into this briefly.
You also talked about the microbiome earlier.
That probably also plays a role in connection with nutrition, with natural farming, everything.
Is there anything else you would like to say?
I think many people in the audience are also interested.
Yes, of course that's also in the course of the forced alternative therapies that I had to find for my children - I
found out about it - in relation to their susceptibility to infections or these extreme fears that they had developed.
And then I went on a search. What else is involved?
And then, of course, I came across huge nutritional deficiencies.
This also applies to very well nourished, organically fed children.
And then I started microbiome analyses.
I found out that up to four months old without risk, the microbiome conditions are disastrous.
So we are also being bullied here at this level, I would say.
And there is an urgent need to move in a different direction.
And that is already in flux.
So there are the solidarity-based farming communities, which are already making agriculture
very, very positive and healthy again for us.
They need to be encouraged as much as possible.
And the pollutants have to be removed from the environment, I mean CO2 - we all know that
this is terrible hype that has no meaning at all.
But the important issues must be addressed:
Glyphosate, the tiresome topic;
wheat with the highly cultivated gluten, which destroys our microbiome.
Other pollutants, arsenic and so on and so forth.
So these issues need to be tackled so that this no longer burdens us and our children.
I now see these burdens in the youngest children.
There are substances that are advertised in connection with vaccination, a bit like that in the alternative sector.
The elimination of spike proteins from the organism - among other things - promises,
whether it is really so, is now the question.
What do you personally think of this?
For example, something like nattokinase and things like that.
These are good tools.
The problem is that the modified messenger RNA can be incorporated into the genome and getting it out of there?
I think, yes, an idea always comes up.
But whether this will be affordable for everyone remains to be seen.
In principle, the spikes themselves can be removed.
I am convinced that situations can be improved.
You can bring people to the point where they can heal themselves again, with lots and lots of patience.
But the problem is, and this is of course the next problem, that those who are severely affected by vaccination or
Covid-19, long Covid, whatever, are running out of money.
Just as many others are running out of money.
And I see it relatively often.
I occasionally have special cases in my practice that can no longer afford the therapies.
And then they are faced with experts who issue them with false reports.
So that's always the case!
So they are not declared eligible for retirement or declared disabled, even though they are in miserable shape.
They do not recognize the findings that are made because they say: This is not recognized by conventional medicine.
So they don't recognize that you can detect spike protein.
They don't recognize that the person has immunodeficiency , i.e. HIV/AIDS or something.
It's a disaster what's going on at the moment.
But yes, you have to keep at it and we will all keep at it.
Could one say that in principle - because you mentioned this earlier - in the food industry, i.e. in industrial food
production, that similar structures prevail there, also a similar lobbying as in the pharmaceutical industry.
That the two are actually inseparable today?
Absolutely, I agree, completely.
And that means, if you look at it again in perspective - keyword Vision 2030 - that breaking up these
structures and combating the lobbyism involved is probably essential for the survival of society, yes?
Absolutely.
Would you agree with that, yes?
Right, yes.
I think that's exactly the topic you're dealing with.
And I think many viewers are also interested in this, as I have already heard from conversations. I mean, many people are
desperate because they feel powerless in the face of these cartels , in the face of this industry,
which is becoming more and more powerful in all areas.
In other words, that at some point something like vaccinations may also occur completely
involuntarily and unconsciously via the diet.
It doesn't have to be about flying insects or whatever.
But that you basically get what you shouldn't get into your body practically involuntarily through your diet.
That is why there is a parallel with compulsory vaccinations and so on.
And thus again a breach of this principle of self-determination.
Of course, that is probably the most important prerequisite of all, that there is more transparency in the
future and that these organizations are also broken up.
Absolutely, yes.
So, we're already that far along, aren't we?
Well, our microbiome is already
... So, we've actually reached the point where we can only survive healthily at the moment with a supply
of nutrients and really active intestinal treatment.
And we really must put a stop to this.
So, we definitely need healthy, nutritious food again.
And we need to get rid of these pollutants.
In other words, the right pollutants that pollute us and our children.
And people need to be aware of that.
So, I tell exactly these stories to everyone who comes to me with their child with their 100th infection.
Or I'll tell you about the chemtrails too, won't I?
Because I want people to be aware of it.
And the more people, the more we are.
So the more people know about it. And the others are few, the elites.
And we need to be aware of that.
Yes, good. So, I think we've definitely heard, let's say in the description, a cautious optimism
that things will change and hopefully improve -
- if we keep at it and continue to educate and each individual makes their own contribution.
In any case, thank you very much for your comments.
And see you later in the panel discussion, yes.
Dear viewers, further reports from this event in Dornbirn can already be seen on HOCH2.TV.
You will find the links under this program.
We would like to take this opportunity to thank HOCH2.TV for the excellent cooperation.