[The real message is that we are here and we will not let up.
So we're not going to let you get away with what you've done, because (...)
We can only prevent something like this from happening in the future if we, as Michael Ballweg always says so beautifully,
bring it into the light, if we drag it into the public eye, shine the spotlight on it and say, this happened here and we won't stop
talking about it until it is clear that something like this must not happen and that it is
regulated, it must never happen again in the future.
Kla.TV is near Geneva today (18.9.25). We met for an exciting discussion group.
ZAAVV has submitted a parallel report to the UN.
ZAAVV is the Center for the Clarification, Reappraisal, Legal Prosecution and Prevention of Crimes against Humanity.
Who are we dealing with today? Would you please introduce yourself briefly, this is...
My name is Ralf Ludwig, I am a lawyer and founder of ZAAVV.
Michael Ballweg, entrepreneur, organizer of the lateral thinking demonstration in 2020.
Dr. Albrecht Jahn, I am a pediatrician, family therapist, and my specialty has always been vaccination.
I am not against vaccination, but I am very interested in the STIKO .
I am Volker Reusing, and my wife and I also played a very important role in the parallel report and have also
campaigned for coronavirus human rights in various other places.
My name is Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing, I am a human rights defender, a human rights activist and yes, for now.
Great. This parallel report, it was a parallel report to the report from the German government, why was it necessary at all?
What did he... what was the trigger to write such a report in the first place?
Yes, the serious human rights violations in the name of corona and these parallel reporting
proceedings are there to make abuses visible.
This is not yet about questions of guilt, but about remedying the shortcomings.
And in particular, the human right to health is being violated.
To give you an overview, here are some examples.
You can zoom in even closer afterwards.
On the one hand, we have all the deaths from the so-called corona vaccination, where it has only
been legalized to call such a thing a vaccination.
In what order of magnitude?
16.9 million is one of the most serious and well-developed estimates we know.
Worldwide? Worldwide. By Prof. Denis Rancourt. He has looked at excess mortality correlations.
What would be the normal mortality expectation after the years 2015 to 2019?
And what was it really like when the vaccination campaign started, i.e. in 2021 and 2022 in particular?
He looked at the excess mortality of 125 countries and then extrapolated this to the total number of
vaccinations and came to the conclusion - including an estimate - of 16.9 million deaths by the end of 2022.
And that on average every 787th injection was fatal.
In comparison, with a normal, conventional vaccination, on average one in a million people has
serious vaccine damage and there are even fewer deaths.
And every 787th person here has died.
And other important damage to health was caused by ventilation, which was invasive in many countries due to WHO
recommendations, where normally people with such values might be sent to the doctor, not even to hospital.
And overdoses of sedatives , especially in the early stages, meant that the people who died
from them were all counted as corona deaths.
That's why we had so many people in Alsace or Lombardy, for example, who were counted as corona deaths.
A more recent study by Professor Rancourt this year elaborated on this even further.
We also have a lot of people with health problems due to the lockdowns, especially the loneliness in
the homes, how many people have developed dementia.
But also through the shocks, which you can read in the book by Dr. Michael Nehls , from which we also quoted, on the subject of
"The indoctrinated brain", which he has worked out in an outstandingly groundbreaking way, that if you
constantly put people under shock, not only is the warning shifted and narrowed, but the memory is also reprogrammed.
May I briefly summarize? So human rights violations, which the Federal Government has not mentioned, you mention in your
parallel report, for example through coercive measures, medical coercive measures, that human rights have been violated there.
Yes, the human right to health, that's the vast majority of injuries, including the shocks, that the shocks were recorded.
In what way shocks?
Yes, people were frightened into modeling forecasts that were completely made up out of thin air.
Then the children in particular were made to fear that they would infect their parents and grandparents, who could then die.
There is also a study from the English-speaking world from as early as September 2020 that shows that
people were more afraid of this than of the shutdown.
Even if they were really starving, sometimes.
The fear for the family shocked so many people.
And hunger is of course also a violation of the right to health.
Before that, we had 135 million hungry people.
The number has more than doubled worldwide due to the shutdowns.
And this is of course also a violation of the human right to food.
Human right to work has been violated by the shutdowns.
How many businesses have been destroyed, how many jobs.
And certain sectors were also hit particularly hard because people could no longer have such close contact with each other.
For example, the restaurant trade, for example artists, for example the stationary retail trade.
These are sectors that have been hit particularly hard.
Yes. We also address the situation of artists in the parallel report.
They have been hit so hard - especially in Germany - where particularly deep encroachments on their
intellectual property rights have been permitted.
So on the Internet, how much you can quote from their works, up to 15 seconds, if you then want to cut your own pieces from it.
And so they were dependent on the live business.
And in Germany they were excluded for up to 21 months.
So there were the lockdowns plus the measures to force people into vaccination, that if they wanted to go to the concert,
they either had to have recovered status or be vaccinated.
This vaccination, which kills one in 787 people, according to the work of Prof. Rancourt .
Article 15: Intellectual property, cultural participation is also an important point.
We have highlighted one sector in particular that has been dealt with particularly harshly.
And then we also discussed Article 4. It's about proportionality.
All the statistical manipulations to drive up the lines, we've tackled all that accordingly with source references.
Why is that important? If you want to interfere with human rights, you need a legitimate reason.
And here the legitimate reason has not been proven enough.
And there is so much evidence to suggest that this reason, at least in the sense of something that
would be dangerous and spread rapidly, did not exist.
These were also the protocols of the Robert Koch Institute, which have been exposed and which also prove that
there was no medical requirement for the corona measures.
Would you like to say something about that, Dr. Jahn?
So it was clear to me as a paediatrician from the very beginning, back in the year 20, that this gene-based, experimental way of
vaccinating, i.e. either with the messenger RNA vaccine or the vector vaccines, could not really be a reason for
vaccinating children, because we have known about coronavirus as a viral disease in children for many years.
And after the study that Streeck conducted in Heinsberg , we also knew that the children were not the drivers of the infection.
There was never any reason to vaccinate children with a disease that does not affect them
badly and where they do not carry the disease.
That was clear to me from the start.
And I had seen no reason at all to research the vaccine.
I then asked what is actually planned?
Children should not have been tested for the vaccine in research. And that was the beginning.
And now, in the year 25, the situation is such that in the meantime, and this is also an issue for a pediatrician, we have
vaccinated a total of around 600,000 pregnant women in Germany in the years 21 and 22 on the recommendation of the STIKO.
And we know from this vaccine that it passes through the placental barrier.
It passes through the brain barrier, is detectable in breast milk and is made in such a way that it enters the cell.
Of course, it also passes through the placenta.
This means that it has been proven in several studies that the active vaccine was found in the umbilical
cord blood, i.e. in the blood, in the baby's circulation.
And that is simply a legal no-go.
We've never had that before. That was not discussed.
Okay, that would also be a violation of human rights?
There is no... Of course, it is a massive violation of human rights.
Neither were pregnant women told this when they were vaccinated, and they knew this.
And they didn't tell the vaccinating doctors either.
And the STIKO is essentially responsible for this, the STIKO professors who waved it through.
[Okay. And the whole thing was made possible, Ms. Hassel-Reusing, by the ethics that were practically imposed on people?
Yes, that actually has to do with vaccination, or rather with the debate about the measles vaccination, which
also led to compulsory vaccination. So for the children.
Yes. And that was a paper, so particularly important back in 2019, vaccination as a new social contract. Okay.
And that was the decisive study that led to the later propaganda, i.e. in the corona era. It was simply transferred there.
And the same thing was then done again, in that there was another study that said that masks are a social contract.
And it is very, very important to realize that politicians, when they hear social contract: What is a social contract?
Either it has something to do with a company or our social contract, which is something
similar to something with constitutional status.
I understand. Yes. And that's my guess, but it's very likely that that's what made it possible
to win over the politicians back then, in 2019.
Okay. So the social contract makes it possible for human rights to be undermined. Yes, please.
[I would like to say something about this:
So ethics is non-binding. Historically, ethics came before human rights.
And now that we have so many different sources of law, i.e. the constitutional order, the Union, the Council of Europe, the EU,
various human rights that are binding and enforceable, non-binding ethics can only fill
the gaps where there are still no human rights.
And here the focus was deliberately shifted to ethics in order to divert attention from human rights.
Because the human right to health - which exists at the UN, in the UN Social Covenant ,
among other things - includes informed consent.
The patient himself must be properly informed, and he decides.
And the same human right to physical integrity does not exist at the UN, but it does exist in the German Basic
Law, for example, or in the EU, where it is also included.
And people have distracted from this in order to create moral pressure for people to get vaccinated, and have concealed the
fact that it has only been legalized to call it vaccination in the case of corona, which is actually something completely
different, so that people don't notice the difference to a conventional vaccination because the same word has been used.
And this allowed governments to pretend that there was such a high level of acceptance for the measures, even
higher than there actually was, because people were in shock.
And could then keep politicians even longer to continue these measures, even if the
shock had perhaps already worn off themselves.
So it was a shock because the population was told that there was a very dangerous virus - which, by
the way, was not confirmed in the RKI protocols.
It's just something that people now have to deal with, you have to wear masks, you have to comply with the measures and
anyone who doesn't do that is a potential risk to the whole.
That's what ethics is all about and that's how these human rights could be restricted.
And the mask itself also causes damage to your health if you wear it for so long - including to your psyche.
Because every emotional state corresponds to breathing in a certain way.
And if you want to relax, you can also do this through your breath.
But if you are forced to wear the mask for so long, you can practically only breathe like someone who is sad or afraid.
And then there was all the propaganda. In combination, this ensured that the shock stayed with people for much longer.
That's why the anxiety disorders and depression have gone up so much.
Exactly. And it's important to point that out, to make people aware of it, to zoom in on what has
happened to us in order to avoid it in the future.
Mr. Ballweg, at some point you just blew a gasket.
When you witnessed all this, it spurred you on to take to the streets, to initiate and organize demonstrations.
How did it go for you? How did you experience the Corona period? How did you experience the human rights violations?
First of all, I have to say that I think it's very important that these things are documented, but I do my work forwards.
That's why I'm always glad that Ralf Ludwig and the ZAAVV take on this task, or that you do too.
And yes, I just looked at it in 2020, and vaccination was the only solution to the pandemic relatively early on.
I knew from earlier stages of vaccine development that it usually takes up to ten years for something to be
tested, and it seemed very strange to me, I would say.
How quickly did it happen?
Firstly, that there is only one solution.
I'm an entrepreneur, so I'm used to there always being lots of solutions.
Alternatives? Alternatives, exactly. And the second thing is that it should happen so quickly.
And then I registered demonstrations, first filed a complaint with the Federal Constitutional
Court, there was this general ban on assembly.
We may remember the post from the Bavarian police saying that reading a book on a park bench is not allowed.
Let's remember what happened back then. Many people no longer remember that.
Perhaps the story that FFP2 masks should be disinfected in the oven, which makes no sense at all, or
that old coffee filters should be converted into masks.
All of these highlights were simply so contradictory that we said we are the immune system of
democracy by doing everything that eliminates fear.
Namely to meet, exchange ideas, sing, dance and enjoy art together. After all, there were demonstrations ...
Everything that makes up being human.
Exactly, and perhaps that's also part of this shock strategy, banning art, because art opens the heart.
When the heart is open, people cannot be afraid and can inform themselves freely and absorb information better.
And that was actually the reason why I said I was initiating the demonstration.
They got bigger and bigger and bigger with the two big Berlin demonstrations.
They were then banned in 2021. I was arrested in 2022.
2025 I have now received the acquittal after 44 trial days.
But that's not the end of the story; it must of course also be dealt with so that people who stand up for human rights, for
fundamental rights, cannot be criminalized at will in the future.
Yes, if you study your case, Mr. Ballweg, there's no getting around the fact that it was a political trial, that
the public prosecutor's office was politically controlled.
That is quite significant and that there was simply a political interest in putting you aside.
But not only with you. There were quite a few doctors who felt the same way.
For example, Dr. Walter Weber , who has actually documented every single mask test he has written.
And after, I think, 40 days in court, he was finally sentenced to one year and ten months.
And the practical attempt to go to the next instance also failed.
And there was no legal reason for me to condemn him, because he worked cleanly and simply helped people
whose GPs didn't dare to fill out these certificates.
And that is... well, the number I know is over 1000 doctors who were convicted in the same way as Dr. Walter Weber.
And the patients who were given a mask, who were given a certificate stating that a mask was
not good for them, also had their homes searched.
And in this respect, there were - I estimate - 10,000 house searches around these mask protests.
And the police and the courts were paralyzed by these court cases.
And had no time left for other important things.
And that simply has to be dealt with.
We need to be made aware that something has gone very wrong.
And that it must never happen again.
And that these doctors and also the artists and also Michael Ballweg are rehabilitated, that simply such an unjust
condemnation, such an unjust persecution took place there.
Now to today, Mr. Ludwig, what is the result?
What are the next steps? What can we expect?
What is the potential for change that we would like to see?
Can you say something briefly about this?
First of all, it is perhaps important to note that it was good that we were here today at all.
To show that we are there. There were also two representatives from the Foreign Ministry, the German Foreign Ministry.
And as an organization or organizations that have resisted the coronavirus measures, we are showing that we are there.
We will not put up with this.
So what has happened here is not that Michael Ballweg, for example, has been rehabilitated by the acquittal, but the
acquittal has not only been a clear consequence, but these 44 days of trial alone, in other words also this presentation to the
public, like a criminal, although Michael Ballweg only defended himself against government measures that violated human rights.
So that means the most important point for me is first of all that we show that we are
here, that we have founded an organization.
This organization is a recognized NGO for individual human rights and as I experienced it today, there were, I don't know how many,
30, 40 German non-governmental organizations there today, some of which appeared together, not a
single one really stood up for individual human rights.
In any case, not for individual human rights as defensive rights against measures that the state has taken, for example in
relation to health, for example in relation to work, to life, to artistic freedom and to decisions that I make for my
life, but the non-governmental organizations that I experienced there essentially demanded money from the state.
So they more or less suggested to the UN that the UN should please urge the German government to make a little
more money available for various projects that they have.
Which I don't see as wrong per se.
But when we talk about the seventh state report, which falls exactly in the Corona period, where the Federal
Government has said zero - ZERO - on the subject of Corona.
The German government didn't even say that we had massively infringed human rights here, but in our view
it was justified. Instead, they completely ignored it.
They have completely ignored what they have done, that they have closed schools, closed kindergartens, which is part of it,
education, that they have criminalized doctors, that they have introduced mandatory vaccinations, that they have
introduced mandatory masks, that they have made lockdowns in companies, introduced home office and so on and so forth.
So they didn't even mention all these measures where they interfered with people's
civil liberties. They didn't even mention it.
And that is why it is a success for us, first of all, that we as a non-governmental organization, as the only
non-governmental organization, are standing here and working with the UN, which is a very heteronomous entity.
In other words, it is not the case that the UN is somehow, as it is unfortunately sometimes portrayed, the personification of evil
or something like that, but rather that the UN consists of many member states that have very different
interests and represent these interests in very different ways.
We first raised these points before the UN Social Affairs Committee and made it clear, for example, that
pregnant women in Germany are still being vaccinated with mRNA vaccines that cross the placental barrier.
Otherwise this will not be discussed, we will take a stand, we will say that we are there, we will make it clear that we are
there and we will not let up, we will continue to denounce these human rights violations
until they have been dealt with in Germany.
We will not let up. That was the message today.
Today was just the first step in presenting it.
Now the UN is turning it into the so-called List of Issues.
In other words, they are now looking to find out which of these points will be presented to the government so that
they can then discuss these issues, which we have named there, with the government at a second meeting in May.
That's basically the essence, but as I said, the real message is that we're here and we're not letting up.
So we're not going to let you get away with what you've done, because, as you said
earlier, one of our title themes is prevention.
We can only prevent something like this from happening in the future if we, as Michael Ballweg always says so
well: "Bring it out into the open - if we drag it into the public eye, shine the spotlight on it and say:
This has happened here and we will not stop talking about it until it is clear that something like this must not
happen and that it must never happen again in the future.
And what I would like to add, which the Federal Government has also not mentioned, is the massive
police violence that was used against the demonstrators.
There was the UN Special Rapporteur, Nils Melzer, who took up the issue.
Unfortunately, his successor no longer cares about this topic, so when she sees this program,
it is a small appeal to take up the topic again.
Yes, that was also a very strong topic, the way older demonstrators were treated, for example, as I experienced
myself from my own circle of friends - it's unbelievable.
Great. Viewers can keep themselves up to date on your ZAAVV? website.
Yes, you can keep up to date on the ZAAVV website , you can keep up to date on the website of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für
Medizinische Ethik , you can keep up to date on the website of Querdenken 7.11 , so we have
this information everywhere, it's not bundled now.
Of course you can also keep up to date on the Kla.TV website.
So it's important to inform yourself anyway and to get information in different places, but you can find everything at
zaavv.com, at slash uno you can find everything about the UN social report, and of course there are reports about
what we have experienced today and how things are going.
But all these topics are important, you should inform yourself about all these topics and if
you search, you will always find good information.
Great. I'd say we can conclude our conversation at this point.
I would like to thank you very much. Thank you for your participation, for your
commitment and for keeping us informed today!
And the viewer has realized that by shining a light on things, we can stop them, we can prevent future crimes.
Watch these things, continue to inform yourself and tell others about them, spread the word about this program!
Kla.TV the voice for clarity.