Hello Mr. Vrabel. I am very pleased that you have agreed to do this interview for Kla.TV.
If I may briefly introduce you to our viewers:
You are running for the party "The Czech Republic First (ČR1)" in the upcoming parliamentary elections in the Czech Republic.
I am very pleased that you have taken the time for this interview.
Perhaps you could also briefly introduce yourself to our viewers from Germany and other countries that you do not yet know.
First of all, thank you very much for the invitation.
I am a completely normal person who was born in the south of the Czech Republic.
I have been an activist in the fight against corruption since 2003, until I left school.
I dedicated myself to the fight against corruption sometime between 2003 and 2025.
I have also been involved in the fight against migration since around 2012.
And since 2022, i.e. during the coronavirus pandemic, I have of course also been fighting for
freedom and the rights of citizens and companies.
Since 2022, I have been organizing large demonstrations for freedom of speech and peace in Prague,
which you have probably also seen in your media.
Yes, we have been following that. Thank you. We at Kla.TV see it as our task to report on what the mass media conceal.
That is why we have invited you to this interview.
You are running in the 2025 parliamentary elections and have been politically active for a long time.
They organized large demonstrations in Prague for peace and freedom of expression.
How has the public media reacted to you since you stood for election?
First of all, I would like to say that after I organized these big demonstrations in the Czech Republic, which
were probably the biggest since the revolution, the media started writing bad things about me.
Of course they slander and defame me, but here in the Czech Republic the Ministry of the Interior has even set
up its own department responsible for working with the public in order to manipulate public opinion.
And exactly in this department "KRIT", as it is called, they have a special section about me.
And that's where psychologists working for the Home Office decided it was necessary to publicly condemn and shame me.
So that's what the media did in the first year.
After that, of course, I faced dozens of criminal proceedings by the state for financial crime and suppression of free speech.
When I spoke out against the government's measures to suppress freedom of speech, I ultimately
won in the Constitutional Court and was acquitted.
But I was arrested and preparations were made to take me into custody.
And now I'm facing another court case in which they will probably try to convict me of financial
crime, which of course is just speculation and fiction.
Since I started the political movement, the media has kept quiet about me when they can.
If they can't, like when I won at the Constitutional Court, of course they had to report on it because all the TV stations and
the police commented on it, because it was a really big judgment, the biggest in decades in the area of
freedom of expression. So the media had to report on me.
But otherwise they try to keep me quiet.
I was on Czech television the day before yesterday during the election campaign and our political
movement was given seven minutes for the entire campaign.
During those seven minutes, the moderator talked over me so I couldn't get a word in edgewise and asked me
questions that basically had nothing to do with the election program in order to shut me up as much as possible.
So this is actually the way the mass media influence the voting behavior of people in the Czech Republic, isn't it?
Yes.
Our topic today is the so-called controlled opposition.
In the mass media, we only hear about this in connection with countries such as China or Russia.
But what is the situation here in Western Europe, in countries that are committed to democratic values?
What is your assessment of this question, Mr. Vrabel?
Well, of course it's one thing what's shown in public.
This means that a controlled fake opposition appears in the media as the real opposition and a battle
between coalition and opposition is fought on television.
In reality, however, there is a so-called patriotic opposition in the Czech Republic, consisting of two groups.
Four parties on the right and five parties on the left.
And these two coalitions present themselves as genuine oppositions.
My problem is that when I was active in the fight against corruption, when I told you that I was active in the fight
against corruption, I uncovered financial fraud, links to European subsidies and the misappropriation of public funds and
sponsors of political parties, these patrons who work in our country, or oligarchs who work in our
country, who sponsor political parties and politicians.
I have uncovered some of them and stopped some of these transactions.
So since 2005, my real opponents have been the oligarchs, who are in the background and found political parties,
sponsor them so that the politicians of these parties can then award them public contracts.
The leaders of the political parties that claim to be the opposition are, so to speak, one step below.
My fight is against the people who actually sponsor them.
So when I organized these big demonstrations on Wenceslas Square and invited the entire opposition there, I expected them to unite
and assert the sovereignty of the Czech Republic, but I had no idea that behind them were the very oligarchs I
was fighting against, who were sponsoring the ruling party.
But suddenly I realized that the governing party, which is represented by the ODS in our country today, actually gave rise
to the new patriotic parties together with the ODS politicians.
It is therefore a kind of ODS-B that is being formed by the MPs of the party that now forms the government.
And of course, the sponsors who sponsored the ODS and to whom the ODS awarded public contracts in return, with money disappearing
from public budgets, which I have uncovered, are the same sponsors who sponsor the patriotic opposition today.
And of course these sponsors see me as a threat because I have ruined several deals for them.
Unfortunately, of course, the public doesn't know about it because it doesn't make it into the media.
Of course. To summarize: Those who are really powerful just stay in power.
How do you think it works in the Czech Republic?
Exactly what I just described.
We have two coalitions in the Czech Republic that have also committed a fraud, because when they started their election
campaign nine months ago, they said that there would be four political parties in total, but they would present
themselves as one, thereby lowering the electoral threshold.
Now the Constitutional Court is dealing with this and there is a threat in the Czech Republic that the majority of the votes of
patriots, of patriotic voters, will be declared invalid, that these mandates will expire, because these two
coalitions, both the left and the right coalition, both coalitions have committed fraud.
As I said, this is now being clarified by the courts. And that's exactly the situation.
And unfortunately, citizens today are experiencing the same or a similar fraud as in 1989, when they basically hope for a change
that will not come, because the people who today are symbolically the faces of this supposedly new opposition, this
change, are in reality old politicians who come from the same power structures as the ruling party.
Yes, we know that. In Germany, many people have lost all trust in politics due to unfulfilled election promises.
In some cases, the opposite of what was promised before the elections has actually happened after the elections.
We are familiar with this. One example of this is the current German Chancellor Merz, who promised before
the elections that he would not touch the debt brake.
Shortly after the elections, however, he put together a historic debt package worth billions.
You have developed a concept on this topic.
Could you please give us a brief introduction?
Of course, I reported on the case of the debt brake in Germany in the Czech Republic and also conducted an
interview with Petr Bystron, a member of parliament, on precisely this topic around the elections.
Of course, this is also a problem in the Czech Republic.
Unfortunately, the patriotic scene, as these patriots call themselves, who promised two years ago to push through the exit
from the EU and the exit from NATO and the sovereignty of the Czech Republic, have slowly moved on to
calling for a referendum on leaving the European Union.
And when they realized that this was not legally possible, they completely withdrew from pushing for the Czech
Republic's exit from the EU, so they basically abandoned their patriotic programmes even before the elections.
It was a little different with Friedrich Merz. He betrayed the German people shortly after the
elections, even before the new parliament was formed.
And I have a concept for this. We have prepared a plan called "Putting the Czech Republic First",
including the reforms needed to change the political system.
And one of these necessary changes is the recallability of politicians.
We need to pass a law that specifies how many signatures are required for each politician, depending on whether
it is a local, regional or national politician or whether it is a member of parliament or a minister.
And there must be a law that says that if a politician violates what he is about to implement, if he violates the program for
which he was actually elected, he must be able to be recalled.
I say it quite simply. When a politician stands for election, he has an election program.
And the voters give the politician their votes, which is like confirming an employment contract.
In this employment contract, in this election program, it is written what the politician will do.
And if this politician does something else after the elections, it's like breaking his
employment contract and should be fired from his job.
That is, if people realize that Friedrich Merz promised to keep the debt brake, and shortly after his election he convened
parliament, which basically no longer had a quorum, and broke the debt brake, then the citizens
of Germany would sign a petition under this law.
And if they had collected a sufficient number of signatures, they would go to court and present the evidence there.
The election program and the actual conduct of the politician and the court together with a jury of citizens - I would point out
that judicial reform is also necessary so that we have citizens' juries - this citizens' jury then assesses what
the politician has promised and what he then actually does.
And if it finds that the politician has promised something else and is doing something
else, the court decides that he loses his mandate.
Thank you very much. That's a good attitude. As we have just heard, unfulfilled election promises
are part of everyday life for people in Europe.
Is it possible that unfulfilled election promises are a deliberate strategy to frustrate and
discourage people and thus break their resistance?
I don't think so. I think that unkept promises serve to entice voters to vote for these fraudsters.
Unfortunately, citizens and voters quickly forget, so that, for example, former Prime Minister Andrej Babiš is currently the
favorite for the elections in our country, who ruled during Corona, had people beaten in the streets, forced
mRNA vaccines on them by force and today people vote for him again because he makes promises to them.
So in my opinion, this is a spectacle in which the citizens unfortunately always believe whoever the media
presents as having a chance of winning the elections.
And the media actually decide who plays this game.
It is not a question of all candidates having the same conditions.
No, the media choose who plays, line the players up against each other and then you can only
choose between one bad option and another bad option.
And the citizens forget that you don't have to choose the lesser of two evils, but that
you need a program that helps the country.
Yes. So that means your party's program is aimed at a clear change of course.
What is the difference? How can people recognize that you are not a controlled opposition?
And what measures have you taken against the infiltration of your party?
With the measures against infiltration it is of course difficult, because secret agents and police
officers are constantly coming, that cannot be avoided.
So we have an assessment of who is police and who is intelligence and try not to reveal confidential
information in front of them, but that's not always possible.
As far as the programme is concerned, we are of course completely different, because there is something here, a regime, namely the
globalist regime, this pyramid of power that leads from the FED in the United States via the EU, via non-profit
organizations and globalist capital, and opposite this is the liberation of the Czech Republic, i.e. sovereignty.
The basis for this is withdrawal from the EU, withdrawal from NATO, withdrawal from the WHO.
In other words, anyone with a little common sense understands that the controlled opposition pretends to be on the
side of the Czech people, on the side of the Czech fatherland.
But in the end it always says that a European solution must be found, that we must remain in the European Union, that the
European Union must be reformed, that we cannot leave the EU because then we would no
longer have any influence on what happens.
That we can't leave the EU because our companies would go bankrupt and similar nonsense.
So the controlled opposition always lures the voter with some kind of promise and then turns it around bit by bit.
One example of this was when I organized demonstrations on Wenceslas Square and was then replaced by another
colleague who was destined to overwrite my political career.
He took over the demonstrations on Wenceslas Square and the first thing he did when he greeted the people was to shout that nobody
here was against Russia, was against Putin, and basically started to turn the whole patriotic scene against the East,
against Russia, to participate in what the regime is doing.
He even denounced protesters because they had a sticker with the letter "Z" on it, and these people are convicted today, so ...
and unfortunately people are not able to see through this because they are fanatical and don't understand these things in depth.
But you can always recognize a false opposition by the fact that they say something else and then do something else.
At the beginning they say something different than they do later.
And now I am running for example with Dr. Miroslav Sládek, who was chairman of the Republicans and who said
what I am saying 35 years ago and he is saying it today.
He says it all the time, he's written it in all his books.
So if someone is a real opposition, they have that in their heart and they do it because they believe
in their country, because they believe in the future.
If someone is a controlled opposition, they always end up allying themselves with globalist capital.
Thank you very much for your interesting explanations and good luck with the elections. Goodbye.
Thank you very much. Thank you very much for the opportunity. I greet you in Germany and, of course, in all countries where this
interview is being translated, and I wish you all the best from the bottom of my heart so that we can free
ourselves from today's globalist, corporate fascism and find freedom in our countries. Thank you very much.
Yes, thank you too. Goodbye.
Goodbye.