CO₂ is considered a greenhouse gas that is harmful to the climate and must therefore be drastically reduced - according
to the consistent voice in radio, television and print media.
The German government is also committed to this.
In order to achieve the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement, it is therefore necessary to
allow CO₂ to be stored in the ground in some areas.
As Germany has committed to becoming climate-neutral by 2045, the cabinet has now approved the draft
bill to amend the Carbon Dioxide Storage Act (KSpG).
This is intended to enable the capture and storage of carbon dioxide, i.e. CO₂, where it is produced to the greatest
extent, for example in the cement and lime industries, in areas of basic chemicals and in waste incineration.
The aim is to develop technologies for the capture, transportation and permanent storage
of carbon dioxide in deep geological layers.
Bill Gates takes a slightly different approach:
He not only wants to extract the CO₂ produced in technical systems, but also the CO₂ in the air.
To this end, he is investing 40 million dollars in the Canadian start-up company "Deep Sky" in Alberta.
The aim is to remove CO₂ from the air on an industrial scale and then bury it underground.
For this purpose, air is sucked in and then allowed to flow through a solid or liquid sorbent , which
absorbs the CO₂ and thus separates it from the air.
This filtered-out CO₂ is then bound by chemicals, removed from the sorbent and then
compressed into what scientists call a critical liquid.
This hazardous liquid is then stored in boreholes around three kilometers deep.
The disadvantages:
The method consumes a lot of energy, is expensive and the resulting liquid is harmful to the environment.
Who can and wants to invest in something so expensive, unsustainable and even environmentally damaging?
A look at the list of members of Bill Gates' company "Breakthrough Energy", which is happy to invest in risky climate rescue
projects, brings us one step closer to solving this puzzle:
In addition to Gates, Michael Bloomberg, George Soros, Richard Branson, Jack Ma and Mark Zuckerberg, among
others, also like to make "philanthropic" funds available for such supposedly "sustainable" projects.
As already reported in several other Kla.TV programs, the names mentioned do not really stand for philanthropic actions.
Unless you consider the self-enrichment of the aforementioned gentlemen to be "philanthropic".
Before returning to politics, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz was Chairman of the Supervisory
Board of BlackRock Asset Management in Germany.
BlackRock is the largest asset manager in the world with astronomical assets under management of 12 trillion US dollars.
Chancellor Merz is therefore well connected with high finance.
Could it be that the CO₂ storage planned by Merz and his German government is once again playing into the hands of his former
BlackRock colleagues and the billionaires involved in BlackRock?
The fact that the overwhelming majority of living beings on this planet are left out in the cold is shown in
the following film "Destruction of our CO₂ basis of life".
Here it is clearly shown that CO₂ is by no means harmful, but in fact essential for life!
Thus, depriving the air of the necessary quality - by removing CO₂ - is an attack on life itself.
So what comes across as "philanthropic" is in fact intended to serve the power and profit of a few and lead
the rest of humanity into dependency by rationing the basis of life and the common good CO₂.