The appointment of three new judges to the Federal Constitutional Court has degenerated into a political
tug-of-war between the Bundestag parties in recent months.
In particular, it was about the controversial SPD candidate Brosius-Gersdorf as a judge for the Federal Constitutional Court.
The election of the Intelligence Committee in July, which is tasked with monitoring the work of the Federal Intelligence
Service, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution and the Military
Counter-Intelligence Service, was a similar partisan tug-of-war.
Neither members of the AfD nor the Left Party chairwoman Heidi Reichinnek were elected to the committee.
This left only the Green Party deputy Konstantin von Notz as the only opposition MP on the committee.
Obviously there is a great struggle to ensure that these positions of separation of powers are only
filled by people from within the company's own ranks.
However, if party political interests have such a great influence on such decisions, the question arises as to what the overall
situation is regarding the separation of powers in Germany?
It is therefore more important than ever to take a closer look at the rule of law and the separation of powers in Germany.
The first question to be addressed is how this is currently regulated in Germany.
The basic principle is: The distribution of state power among several state organs serves the purpose
of limiting power and ensuring freedom and equality.
There is the legislature, the legislative power of the Bundestag and Bundesrat.
The executive, the executive power, i.e. the government down to the lowest level of the police.
And the judiciary, the judicial power, with the Federal Constitutional Court and the supreme courts.
The media is unofficially referred to as the fourth estate, as its actual task is to control these other powers.
Secondly, the question arises: How and by whom are these powers used in Germany?
The President of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution is appointed by the Federal Minister of the Interior
and the Intelligence Committee is elected by the Bundestag.
Half of the Constitutional Court is elected by the Bundestag and the other half by the Bundesrat.
This means that the currently elected politicians ultimately decide on all powers.
The media receive around 8.5 billion a year from the federal government, i.e. from those who should be watching them.
You also need to know that the public prosecutor's office in Germany is bound by instructions.
In concrete terms, this means that the public prosecutor's office, which is part of the executive branch, is subject to the
Ministry of Justice - i.e. the judiciary - which actually contradicts the principle of
separation of powers in the German constitution.
The judges are formally independent.
So much for the current situation in Germany.
But now the following question arises:
What happens when these control bodies increasingly weed out all people who deviate from the official politically correct view?
That would inevitably lead to the course being set towards dictatorship!
The definition of a dictatorship is a form of rule that is characterized by individual ruling persons,
the dictator, or a ruling group of persons with far-reaching to unlimited political power.
Here are a few recent examples in which people were either elevated to high office or removed
from office due to dissenting political opinions:
1. Stephan Harbarth
On May 15, 2020, Stephan Harbarth was elected President of the Federal Constitutional Court by the Bundesrat
with the votes of the CDU/CSU, SPD, FDP and the Greens in an almost cross-party consensus.
This happened even though Harbarth was involved in the biggest tax fraud in German history - the so-called cum-ex tax scandal.
According to various sources, banks cheated the German state out of up to 35 billion euros with the help of illegal share deals.
The former senior public prosecutor Anne Brorhilker was considered the most important investigator at the time.
Massive obstacles were placed in her way during the investigation.
In April 2024, she finally resigned from her position as a public prosecutor and joined the citizens' movement Finanzwende.
Her reasoning: she is no longer bound by political restraint.
She complained that financial crime was too often regarded as a trivial offense in Germany.
"But it's about billions that we are all missing and that we must finally get back," said Brorhilker.
The financial sector is a "large, very well-connected industry" that has a great interest in preventing
effective controls and prosecution of cum-cum transactions. Apparently they are getting away with it.
Brorhilker criticized the "blockade attitude" of the authorities concerned.
One has the impression "that the finance ministries are closer to the financial lobby than to the citizens".
2. Hans-Georg Maaßen
The former President of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution from 2012 to 2018 criticized
the media's lack of balance and manipulative reporting on the riots in Chemnitz in 2018.
A short time later, he was dismissed from his position as President of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution.
3rd Christian Dettmar
In a much-discussed decision, Weimar family court judge Christian Dettmar lifted the coronavirus rules at two schools.
He was given a two-year suspended prison sentence, dismissed from office and lost his pension.
4. Dr. Reiner Füllmich
The lawyer Dr. Reiner Füllmich was at the forefront of a project that became known as the second Nuremberg and
was a co-founder of the Corona Investigation Committee.
His committee interviewed around 150 scientists and experts from all over the world as well as
former employees of the World Health Organization.
Their findings showed them that the Covid measures were the first steps in a plan to destroy regional economies to make populations
dependent on global supply chains and that they were aimed at reducing population and
installing a world government led by the United Nations.
Dr. Reiner Füllmich was remanded in custody.
These were just a few examples in which dissenting political opinions resulted in immediate removal from office.
The German legal scholar Dr. Beate Sybille Pfeil, independent scholar, Council of Europe expert with a research focus on human
rights, rights of national minorities in Europe, state and constitutional law, summarizes the
current legal situation in Germany as follows:
"It is well known that public prosecutors in Germany are not independent, but are subject to instructions from the
responsible Ministry of Justice, which actually violates the principle of separation of powers in the Basic Law.
This is likely to play a major role in the crackdown on government critics.
The judges are formally independent. But the problem starts with the fact that judges are also human beings and
many of them, like the majority of people, are victims of propaganda and therefore violate the law.
Others are intimidated by judgments such as the one against the Weimar judge Christian Dettmar.
One could assume that the judiciary is politically occupied in individual leadership positions.
The Harbarth case speaks volumes here.
Since 2020, we can no longer rely on the Federal Constitutional Court actually ruling in accordance with the Basic Law.
The fish stinks from the head. Many simply run with it.
This does not mean that the justice system is now failing everywhere, but in the currently "hyped" areas."
But who is this stinking head that the legal scholar Dr. Beate Pfeil is talking about here?
Is there possibly - as described in a dictatorship as a form of rule - a group of people who are characterized by
far-reaching to unlimited political power? Yes, there is!
It is the global network of occult secret societies that have infiltrated all areas of society
and control them according to their interests.
As shown in detail in the documentary "Weltgefahr: Höchstgrad-Freimaurerei" ,
Freemasonry has a very strong influence on politics.
In their organizations, such as the World Economic Forum WEF or the Bilderberg Group, the highest minds in politics, media,
business and the financial elite meet behind closed doors, discuss global agendas and set the course for their implementation.
These secret meetings are attended by the biggest financial giants, such as BlackRock and
Vanguard, who dominate the global financial market.
The current Federal Chancellor Friedrich Merz, as well as Angela Merkel, Olaf Scholz and Annalena Baerbock were also invited.
Friedrich Merz was previously a member of the Supervisory Board at BlackRock from 2016 to 2020, and immediately
after taking up his post, he ran up huge debts for Germany.
Furthermore, the WEF's Young Global Leaders program also trains and develops young politicians who are then
elevated to the highest political positions with the aim of ensuring that they act in their spirit .
Obviously, this influence now also has far-reaching consequences for the judiciary and the
entire separation of powers - as you can see.
Therefore, the question of whether there is still a separation of powers in Germany must be answered with a clear "no".
The network of Freemasons uses politics in their interests and politics in turn uses the other powers such as
the Office for the Protection of the Constitution and the Constitutional Court in their interests.
Does such a system correspond to a functioning democracy?
Conclusion: Dear viewers, apparently the rule of law in Germany is in a very bad state.
It should therefore increasingly become the duty of every individual to observe and expose abuses of
power and bring them to the attention of the public.
At Kla.TV you can help at any time!
A functioning democracy needs people who do not silently tolerate undesirable political developments,
but actively and proactively demand accountability.
This is the only way to ensure that we are not ruled by a dictatorship whose threads end in a Masonic network.
After all, a well-known saying goes: "Those who sleep in democracy wake up in dictatorship".
A functioning constitutional state and a democratic society thrive on diversity of opinion, not on the dictatorship of opinion.
Especially not in the important areas of the separation of powers of politics,
constitutional protection, constitutional court and media.