Supervisory complaint against the Paul Ehrlich Institute
In 2025, two studies were published, both of which showed a massively increased risk of cancer
after injection of so-called mRNA vaccinations.
After the responsible Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) failed to respond promptly, contrary to legal requirements, the
biologist and pharmaceutical expert Dr. Jürgen O. Kirchner filed a supervisory complaint against the PEI.
Dr. Kirchner assumes that the cancer risk is due to the DNA impurities identified in several publications.
Due to the enormous importance of this step for public health, Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi
calls for support for Dr. Kirchner in a video.
The aim is for the PEI to fulfill its legal mandate.
Incidentally, according to Dr. Kirchner, the vaccine manufacturers are not exempt from liability because of the DNA
contamination, but are to be charged under Section 314 of the German Criminal Code "Poisoning
dangerous to the public". Now listen to Prof. Dr. Bhakdi:
"Ladies and gentlemen, Dr. Jürgen Kirchner has made an advance that we consider so important that we would like
to make the information available to the general public.
The core content is a supervisory complaint addressed to Minister Nina Warken.
I will read out this supervisory complaint.
Mr. Kirchner has given me permission.
The use of the text of the attached supervisory complaint is subject to compliance with the following requirements:
First, the authorship of Mr. Kirchner must be specifically named - I hereby do so.
It should be explicitly stated that the contents of the supervisory complaint
originate from his research as a book author.
The book in question, "Tested and confirmed", must be mentioned and its title clearly displayed.
The text of the supervisory complaint may not be changed.
Finally, if downloadable documents are attached to the video, it must be ensured that the version of the supervisory complaint
attached here as Annex 2 is also made available in the same way.
If the video is aimed at viewers who do not speak German, the English-language version of the supervisory
complaint attached here as Annex 3 must also be added. We are doing this as a precaution.
Ladies and gentlemen, I will now read out the letter to Minister Nina Warken."
Registered mail delivery on October 12, 2025
Imminent danger: Supervisory complaint against the employees of the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut who are responsible for the fact that
two very large and valid cohort studies are not taken into account in the legally prescribed manner in terms of the drug
safety of mRNA and other gene vaccines with regard to significant cancer risks, although this endangers
public health in Germany in an unprecedented manner.
Dear Minister, The so-called Pescara Study, a prospective cohort study with almost 300,000 participants - all residents of the
Italian province of Pescara aged 11 years and older - was published as a
peer-reviewed scientific publication on July 1, 2025.
The study investigated whether vaccination with Covid-19 gene vaccines (BioNTech, Moderna, AstraZeneca and
Johnson&Johnson, the Paul Ehrlich Institute refers to them as "genetic vaccines") entails an increased risk of cancer.
The results were alarming: (among other things) 54% significantly increased risk of hospitalization for breast cancer
and a 23% increased general risk of cancer hospitalization.
This means, for example, that one in three vaccinated women diagnosed with breast cancer is only affected
because of one or more genetic vaccinations received.
In total, one out of every five people affected by cancer who received a gene vaccination was a victim of
the previous gene vaccinations, regardless of gender.
A summary of this study can be found in my book "GEPRÜFT & BESTÄTIGT", on pages 170
to 172, which is enclosed with this letter.
The fact that the Pescara study is methodologically unassailable can be seen in Appendix 2 attached here.
In addition, a retrospective cohort study from South Korea was published on September 24, 2024, which is based on data from 8.4
million South Korean health insurance policy holders and confirms the results of the Pescara study with the
numerical deviations to be expected due to different lifestyle habits and country-specific genetics.
The details of the Korea study can be found in Appendix 3.
In my opinion, there have never been such well-founded cohort studies on adverse drug reactions and never before has such
a high proportion of the population been affected in Germany.
Nevertheless, the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut is not fulfilling its legal obligation to take measures.
You will find detailed information on the corresponding obligation of the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut in my book "GEPRÜFT
& BESTÄTIGT", enclosed with this letter on pages 56 to 73.
In addition to the Pescara and Korea study, a further peer-reviewed study (Speicher et al. 2025) was published on
September 6, which is important in the given context and shows with impressive breadth and depth what had already been published
several times before in a simple form with peer review, namely that the mRNA vaccines are massively contaminated
with DNA, which in principle entails a cancer risk (Annex 5).
A summary of the Speicher et al. 2025 study can be found in my book "GEPRÜFT & BESTÄTIGT", on
pages 159 to 162, which is enclosed with this letter.
As explained in Appendix 5, it is generally reasonable to assume that the massive DNA impurities in the mRNA
vaccines are the cause of the increased cancer risk found in the Pescara and Korea studies.
However, the SV40 promoter enhancer contained in very large quantities as a DNA impurity in Comirnaty is
likely to play a role in particular due to its specific risks of causing cancer in humans.
Detailed information on the cancer risk posed by the SV40 promoter enhancer in Comirnaty can be found in Appendix 4.
Having said this, I hereby lodge a supervisory complaint against the responsible employees of the
Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, who have failed for months now to enforce the Pescara study as required by law.
It is obvious that there is imminent danger, particularly with regard to mRNA vaccines, in the sense of a very serious and
unprecedented threat to public health due to adverse drug reactions, so that there is no alternative to immediate action in
the sense of suspending the authorizations for mRNA vaccines.
Subsequently, the extent to which vaccinated persons have been harmed must be comprehensively examined and those affected
must be informed of how redress or compensation can be obtained.
With regard to liability, I would like to point out that the manufacturers are liable for DNA contamination,
even if the Federal Republic of Germany has contractually assumed liability for other vaccine damage.
In my view, Section 314 of the German Criminal Code (Gemeingefährliche Vergiftung) applies in
this sense, as can be read on pages 255 to 261 of my enclosed book "GEPRÜFT & BESTÄTIGT", .
If I do not receive a satisfactory answer from you by November 10, 2025, I reserve the right to file criminal charges
and further supervisory complaints against all those responsible, including those of your ministry if necessary.
Otherwise, you should also know that the essential facts are already available to the Central Department of
the Chancellery and thus also in the Chancellor's antechamber, so to speak. Yours sincerely
Ladies and gentlemen, I call on you to stand up now, not only for yourselves, but for your nearest and
dearest, for our children, our children's children, and to stand by Mr. Kirchner and help him.
Goodbye to you! All the best to you!