Shortly before the start of the coronavirus pandemic, the German Bundestag [Lower House of Parliament] passed the "Measles Protection Act" -
a de facto compulsory vaccination for children and employees in community and medical facilities.
Despite massive concerns about fundamental rights, the Federal Constitutional Court
declared the law to be constitutional in 2022.
The Society of Physicians and Scientists for Health, Freedom and Democracy (MWGFD for short)
has set up a "Measles Protection Act Working Group".
This group, consisting of doctors, scientists and lawyers, sees the law as an unconstitutional encroachment on
physical integrity and parental rights - and is calling for it to be repealed immediately.
Today, on November 15, 2025, the MWGFD is holding a press symposium here in Passau on the beautiful Danube.
The topic: "Measles Protection Act" under scrutiny.
Kla.TV is live on site and reports for you!
The following is a summary of the most important statements.
"Welcome to our press conference with the topic: The "Measles Protection Act" under scrutiny.
The vaccination we are scrutinizing today still belongs to the old class of vaccines, where a certain amount of an antigen, in the
case of measles an attenuated virus, is injected together with other dubious accompanying substances.
Here, too, we cannot know exactly how long and where this attenuated virus works in the body.
And strictly speaking, three or even four virus types are injected together in this MMR vaccination, because the measles
vaccine is no longer available here in Germany or in Europe as a single vaccine, but only in a triple combination, together with
mumps and rubella, or in a quadruple combination with chickenpox.
Incidentally, these conventional vaccines, which, as we will show you in a moment, are anything but harmless or free of side
effects, will also be converted to this modern, new mod-RNA technology, as used in the Covid
vaccines, at the instigation of the WHO in the near future.
And that, of course, must also be prevented by all possible means.
But now to the background to today's project.
In November 2019, shortly before the coronavirus pandemic, a law was rushed through the German Bundestag [Lower House of Parliament]
at the initiative of Health Minister Jens Spahn, coming into force in March 2020.
This so-called Measles Protection Act includes a de facto compulsory vaccination against measles for all children from
their first birthday who are cared for in daycare centers, kindergartens or schools and for all persons born after
1970 if they want to work in community or medical facilities.
According to the STIKO [Standing Vaccination Committee] recommendation measles should be administered twice, that means in children aged 11
and 15 months, and if immunity is lacking, it should then be repeated as the child grows older.
Every year, a birth cohort is affected - in Germany that's 650,000 to 700,000 parents with their young children -
which incidentally also generates annual profits in the multi-digit million range for the pharmaceutical companies.
And despite the fact that this law is accompanied by serious violations of important fundamental rights, such as the right to
physical integrity enshrined in Article 2 of the Basic Law, or the parental rights laid down in Article 6, this law was even
confirmed as supposedly constitutional in July 2022 by the highly questionable so-called Kita
decision of the Federal Constitutional Court.
The Measles Protection Act is therefore naturally also a good blueprint for any further mandatory vaccination that may
be considered, a scenario that could also quickly become reality as a result of the current machinations of the WHO.
And, to come straight to the point, that was probably also the reason why it was rushed through the Bundesrat [Upper House of Parliament] so quickly
at the end of 2019, because they wanted to have a legal template for a planned general coronavirus law and mandatory coronavirus
vaccination in the knowledge that the "plandemic" was coming soon.
And I think it is also thanks to our efforts on the part of the MWGFD that this law with mandatory
vaccination did not, thank God, find a majority among parliamentarians in the vote in April 2022.
However, when reviewing both the explanatory memorandum to the Measles Protection Act and the reasoning behind the Federal
Constitutional Court's decision on daycare centers, it becomes apparent that several medically and scientifically
untenable assumptions and assertions are being used as arguments for an allegedly necessary mandatory vaccination.
And that is why we have seen the need on the part of the MWGFD to set up this working group,
which is introducing itself to you here today.
Our goal is for this vaccination requirement to be lifted as quickly as possible.
And we have produced a detailed information letter with all the important facts about the childhood disease
measles, the measles vaccination, with all important facts and scientific sources.
And this morning we sent this letter to our staff, to all members of the Bundestag [Lower House of Parliament] and the federal state parliaments by e-mail, to some
groups also by post, and also to the judges of the Federal Constitutional Court, in order to substantiate the
arguments for the constitutional complaints pending there.
But now I am pleased to announce the first speaker contribution from our MWGFD Honorary Chairman Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi."
"At the beginning of the twentieth century, measles infections were quite dangerous.
The main cause of severe outbreaks was bacterial pneumonia, which, like the plague in the Middle Ages, spread like
wildfire, especially among malnourished and undernourished people living in cramped and unhygienic conditions.
The improvement in living conditions after the end of the First World War led to a
rapid decline in the number of measles victims.
And with the introduction of modern antibiotics to treat the underlying bacterial infections, measles has
finally lost its status as a dangerous infectious disease.
Conclusion: There is in fact no longer a need to vaccinate against measles today.
Is the live measles vaccine really safe, as experts, health politicians and the mass media assure us?
Ladies and gentlemen, are you aware that the introduction of a foreign substance deep into
your body is never completely risk-free?
This applies all the more to the introduction of functioning foreign genes. Do you know that nothing is really known?
Nothing about the many organs, including the brain, in which the virus multiplies?
Nothing about the duration of reproduction and of course nothing about possible consequences?"
"My presentation is not really so much about compulsory measles vaccination or even about vaccinations per se.
It's about what we can put up with, what we have to put up with as patients and what we don't have to put up with.
And it is really about the foundations of such ethical considerations and their significance in society.
The first principle is the principle of the right to physical integrity.
The patient has absolute sovereignty over his or her own body and physical integrity.
As a medical student, I learned that it is not even allowed to comb a patient's hair if they don't want it.
The second principle is the principle of informed consent. What does informed consent mean?
Informed consent, when informed, is a direct, personal relationship between doctor and patient.
The doctor must inform the patient verbally about the benefits, risks and side effects.
He can then give him something, something in writing.
But the decisive factor is this verbal explanation, where the patient also has the opportunity to ask questions
and actually, if you read the German law, also has time to consider whether he wants this or not.
And then we come to the third, and that is the core principle: First, do no harm!
What it means is that for the individual patient in front of you, the doctor has to be sure that
this treatment will do them more good than harm.
This means that the focus is on the individual patient, not on society, not on the community.
The problem we have now is that we have this very, very intimate, very fragile relationship between doctor and patient,
and now the state is coming in and intervening, so to speak.
Well, in my opinion at least, compulsory measles vaccination is essentially about socio-political and
ethical issues that could not be more fundamental.
The first question is: Who is in control of our bodies and our children's bodies?
Do we decide or does the state decide?
The second point is: To whom does the doctor have a duty?
Does the doctor have a duty to his patients - as he should? Or does he have a duty to the state?
Thirdly, if the doctor is then the extended arm of the state, where is the trust?
And where does that leave the doctor-patient relationship?
Because if a doctor works in such a system, then you have to ask the question: Is he still a doctor at all?
Or is he merely a medical technician on a government contract? - which is (something) quite different."
"And now let's take a look at whether there is actually a contraindication for the measles
vaccination for all healthy children in Germany.
An absolute contraindication for a measles vaccination, for example, would be a severe congenital
immunodeficiency, where no live viruses may be vaccinated because the person would become seriously ill.
A relative contraindication is a medical measure whose potential harm or risk is greater than the benefit.
Next, let's take a look at whether the measles vaccination actually contains a relative contraindication.
And you simply have to weigh up the benefits of vaccination against the harms of vaccination.
There were no deaths in 2023/24. There have been 14 reported measles deaths in Germany
since the start of mandatory measles reporting.
However, we do not know in detail whether the people died with or from measles.
Yes, the serious complications - figures of between one in a thousand and one in ten
thousand are quoted - are ultimately extremely rare.
They have been virtually non-existent in Germany for decades.
This means that the risk of being harmed by measles is very manageable.
So the risk of contracting measles in Germany, if you convert it to a percentage, so to speak, is 0.0006 percent.
And the risk of suffering a serious measles complication is, yes, let's put another three zeros
in there, because it's roughly one in a thousand.
And the lifetime risk, well, if we multiply that by 80, then we are still at 0.0005 percent.
The risk of contracting or dying from measles is negligible.
There is no epidemic emergency that would justify a restriction of fundamental rights.
And compulsory measles vaccination is therefore clearly incompatible with the Basic Law.
Does the measles vaccination prevent deaths? It's very doubtful.
Sucharit Bakhdi has already said that. These are now figures from the USA.
The measles mortality rate was actually still relatively high at the beginning of the 20th century.
By the 1960s, however, it had fallen to virtually zero.
And vaccination was only introduced in the USA in 1963 and in Germany in 1973.
So the vaccination definitely came too late here.
It can no longer prevent deaths because the deaths have already been prevented.
Is the measles vaccine harmful? There is a Cochrane review on this.
And it is quite clear that vaccination has the potential to cause harm.
So the most important side effects are aseptic meningitis.
Sucharit Bhakdi has already said that.
These are living viruses, they spread throughout the body, they also enter the nerve tissue,
they also enter the brain, they also multiply.
They do not cause such an obvious disease as measles, the wild virus.
But this is a virus that is injected and multiplies in the body and also causes damage - for example in the brain and
nerve tissue. It leads to febrile convulsions and epilepsy.
It leads to autoimmune diseases such as ITP, which is idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, a deficiency of blood platelets where
the immune system breaks down its own blood platelets, and Schönlein-Henoch purpura, which
is an autoimmune disease of the blood vessels.
There are also possible indications of inflammatory bowel diseases - that is ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease,
retarded development in childhood, dermatitis, eczema, type 1 diabetes, allergies, asthma, autism spectrum disorders.
These are the reports to the Paul Ehrlich Institute from 2001 to 2012.
There were almost 1,700 suspected reaction reports with 5,300 vaccination reactions, including
1,300 suspected reaction reports with severe side effects.
Permanent damage is reported in 3.4 percent of reports and a fatal outcome in 0.9 percent.
And the PEI itself considers a causal link to be probable or possible in around half of these reported cases.
The conclusion is quite clear: the benefit-harm ratio from the point of view of the individual child, and that is the
issue, is definitely negative, because the risk of contracting measles or suffering a measles complication is virtually zero.
And the risk of suffering a serious vaccination side effect with 1.2 million vaccinations per year - and I have now halved the 110
serious reports that the Paul Ehrlich Institute receives, because the Paul Ehrlich Institute only sees causality in half of the
cases - the risk of damage is still 0.005 percent and therefore ten times higher than the risk of contracting
measles and a hundred times higher than the lifetime risk of a serious measles complication.
In addition, it can be assumed that vaccine injuries are underreported by a factor of 10 to 20.
This is a relative contraindication for the measles vaccination for every healthy German child at the individual level and
therefore a reason to issue a vaccination exemption in accordance with Section 20 (9) of the Infection Protection Act."
"I deliberately decided to work on only one topic.
And this issue is precisely the key point, how an individual medical decision can be transformed into a social compulsion.
And the question is, does this herd protection, this herd immunity that is repeatedly mentioned, even exist?
And if so, is the term even applicable when it comes to vaccinations?
The term is very popular with the WHO.
And when Mr. Tedros says something like that, alarm bells should ring.
He addresses it a little differently and says: "No one is safe, until everyone is safe".
And this argument is of course based on a huge oversimplification.
Especially when you go here and say that it's not the individual animal, the individual living being, that matters, but the herd.
And this means that the individual right - as Paul Cullen has already explained today - is completely set aside.
However, we now know from vaccinations, for example, that even if you believe in this vaccination principle, no single
vaccination provides lasting protection for even a short time.
But that is the prerequisite for this topic of herd protection.
However, the whole thing applies to one hundred percent immunity.
For example, it only exists if someone has had a disease such as measles, against which they have then developed immunity.
Where does this term "herd protection" actually come from?
It was first mentioned in 1923 by a British bacteriologist, but not at all in relation to vaccinations.
And then this concept was adopted in 1933 by an American physician who observed a measles epidemic in Baltimore and
found that when around 55 percent of the children had contracted the disease, the epidemic had come to a standstill.
But that presupposes, as in the 1933 case, that immunity has actually developed as a result of contracting measles.
And in the 1960s, the pharmaceutical industry then simply adopted this idea, this experience of the American doctor from 1933, and
said, then we'll take this term herd protection and herd immunity and simply use it, because we say that a vaccination is
just as good as undergoing a natural disease that leads to immunity - which of course is not legitimate at all.
Herd immunity should not be used at all in connection with vaccination coverage rates and vaccination of the population.
This only has something to do with going through natural illnesses.
So that means that vaccinations and herd immunity have nothing to do with each other.
And so it is not at all legitimate to use the term on the one hand and to exert pressure on the other with the argument that an
individual decision can be played off against a group benefit."
"Once upon a time there was a mother who loved her child.
She was looking for the doctor who would bring her the truth.
He said: "Your son is as healthy as a tree.
But without vaccination... - then that remains a dream."
But the mother asked: "Where does it say in black and white that vaccinated people are healthier and what is the price?
Give me proof from studies, just give me one piece - blind faith alone does not bring happiness in life."
The doctor, he stuttered, looked at his watch, spoke of smallpox and polio, horror without cure.
But he did not name any studies that prove this."
"Basically, this song is actually about my path to clarity on the vaccination issue.
And it starts with admitting that you are allowed to ask this question in the first place.
And secondly, that the burden of proof is not on us parents, but on those who claim that you must allow this bodily harm.
So this is a very important step before you even get to grips with the subject.
What was interesting for me was the statement based on many inquiries with the authorities -
nobody claims that antibodies guarantee immunity.
A very clear statement from both the RKI and the Paul Ehrlich Institute.
What does this mean for measles vaccinations?
The Freedom of Information Act came into force in 2006, and this has given my requests more weight with the federal authorities.
I have made around 200 inquiries to date, not all of which have actually been published.
The answers, if you really probe, are often circular.
If you really follow up and then involve a lawyer and then go to the Administrative Court, with moderate
success, the answer at the end is often: "It's true because that's what the textbooks say."
And that's no joke and I was really shocked, it can't be.
It's all about asking the right questions in the right place and not being fobbed off.
And that is a big challenge for many parents.
My message to all parents: If you remain isolated, you will perish.
Network with like-minded parents who don't patronize you but are in the same situation,
exchange experiences and strengthen each other.
We are not prepared for what is yet to come.
That's what's keeping me very busy at the moment.
Yes, the measles vaccination requirement is wrong, must be dropped, absolutely!
But what is coming towards us is a tsunami at the speed of sound.
There are more, far more than 100 gene vaccines in the pipeline. The pharmaceutical mafia is now going all out.
In my opinion, the Achilles heel of the pharmaceutical manufacturers, the vaccine manufacturers, is the liability issue.
Surely it cannot be that vaccine manufacturers of all people are exempt from liability.
And I believe that we must tackle this issue together, the entire anti-vaccination movement
together, and bring it to the public's attention.
Because even vaccination advocates should actually be of the same opinion:
Yes, we will have better vaccines if the manufacturers have to assume liability."
"Parents are forced to make decisions that deeply affect their conscience.
Parents who already have a child with a severe vaccination reaction are faced with a choice: the risk of
recurrence or exclusion from kindergarten or school.
This is what happened to Sabrina, a young mother, for example.
She herself had developed severe neurodermatitis and asthma after vaccinations as a child, which is why she did not
have her son Timo vaccinated and he was bursting with health.
When Timo was due to go to kindergarten at the age of four - Sabrina had to work part-time to earn money -
she was asked for a measles vaccination certificate.
Otherwise he would not be accepted.
The pediatrician insistently urged her to get him vaccinated at every check-up anyway.
He then confidently administered the MMR vaccination, the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination.
Timo was weak for days afterwards and after nine days had a very, very high fever of up
to 41 degrees and then also had a seizure.
The emergency doctor then took Timo to hospital, where he was diagnosed with abacterial meningitis.
Timo died three years later from aspiration pneumonia, that is severe pneumonia - he had choked.
Since this vaccination incident, he has been 100 percent disabled and autistic.
The pediatrician and also other doctors and authorities naturally deny a connection with
the vaccinations, they say: "Pure coincidence."
But where do the doctors get the certainty that it was a pure coincidence, especially since bacterial or
abacterial meningitis is even mentioned in the package inserts.
A state that pretends to protect its citizens from a harmless childhood disease under
duress must not forget its own fundamental values.
Human dignity, physical integrity and parental rights are not a luxury, they are a right for all of us, they
are the foundation of our free and democratic basic order.
It's time for us to look again. Time for politicians and lawyers to gain the courage to question
this Measles Protection Act and abolish it."
"Yes, very briefly a few observations I have made as a general practitioner with measles and with the measles vaccination.
It is well known that measles deaths were practically zero at the time I opened my practice.
And this decline was not due to the vaccinations.
This has all happened independently of the vaccinations. It was the living conditions.
So better hygiene, better nutrition, absence of war and fear. These are the things that were important.
You would need three factors - Hans Tolzin has just illustrated this very nicely - to be in favor of vaccination:
A necessity, a benefit and few risks.
And all of this must be properly investigated. And none of the three are given.
Nevertheless, pediatricians have always urged vaccination - and continue to do so today.
In some cases, parents have been literally expelled from the pediatrician's office or kicked out and
vilified as freeloaders or as anti-social fellow citizens.
That is simply a disaster. You should never say something like that as a doctor.
And we have side effects from the vaccination - I'll keep this short now.
But we also benefit from measles - I don't want to leave that unmentioned.
Children who have had measles have better health later in life.
Children who have had measles are much less likely to have cancer later on, much less likely to have
diabetes, much less likely to have autoimmune diseases.
So then all I can really say is: bring on the measles!
Well, I had measles cases in my practice. What did I do with them?
Point one: The most important thing is to take away the parents' fear!
Measles has a high fever and a stupid rash.
That looks pretty "shitty" - sorry.
And then the first thing I have to do is go after the mother.
The mother's fear is transferred one-to-one to the child.
Point two: Do not reduce the high temperature! Fever is a welcome helper in an infectious disease to cope with the infection.
If you take away the weapon, the immune system can no longer work.
Then bed rest was always important to me.
And that is: Bed rest is called bed REST and not: Sofa with TV on, yes. Bed REST
After that, even if the child is no longer contagious after four days, I would still keep it at home. One or even two weeks.
And if the parents say that's not possible for us, we're both working, then I immediately disagree. That's not true.
We have a statutory guarantee of continued pay, 15 days per year per parent."
"Psychoneuroimmunology deals with the interactions between the psyche, nervous system and immune system, In recent decades, it
has been able to show very clearly that overriding factors in our everyday lives, psychological factors, social
factors, relationship factors and even societal factors, have a significant influence on our immune activity.
And there is clear evidence from psychoneuroimmunology that shows that conventional vaccinations are not at all successful
and are associated with high side effects when people are under chronic stress and/or feel compelled to be vaccinated.
Because we also know from psychoneuroimmunology that people who are abused, who are under pressure and coercion,
develop autoimmune reactions and that there was also an effect in relation to all the vaccinations.
What does all this have to do with the measles vaccination?
Well, we know from the above that vaccination has to be seen in a wider context.
And what has been in place for a few years now, namely compulsory vaccination for measles, should be viewed very,
very sceptically and criticized for the reasons mentioned."
"Yes, I actually decided very spontaneously this year to write this book, "Measles Vaccination and Measles Protection Act".
It has been on the market for three months and my title today based on these findings is: 10
reasons why the Measles Protection Act is an unjust law.
That was my conclusion at the end of 464 pages.
The Measles Protection Act will thus go down in the legal history of the 21st century.
And as an impressive example of how this law was intended to quietly establish a health and vaccination tyranny.
And this under the pretense of science and health protection, under unscrupulous abuse of the law with the blessing of the
Federal Constitutional Court and under shameless abuse of the trust of bona fide citizens, but
probably also of the health authorities and courts.
Why do I believe that the Measles Protection Act is an unjust law?
Because the goals supposedly pursued by this law are either contradictory or unattainable or have
already been achieved and are therefore hypocritical.
The assertion of a serious, dangerous disease, as Prof. Sönnichsen also said earlier, is therefore incorrect.
I call it a brazen and shameless lie.
Measles was eliminated in Germany in 2020, in 21, in 22 and in 23.
It no longer existed according to WHO criteria.
So why make vaccination compulsory if the disease has already been eliminated anyway?
So why make vaccination compulsory? What is this really about?
Certainly not to protect patients, but at best to protect the revenues of the two vaccine manufacturers.
It's about the goal of the vaccinated citizen at the command of the state.
Finally, the legislator claims that compulsory vaccination protects vulnerable patients who allegedly cannot be vaccinated.
As for infants, you've already said it, dear Ronny, the protection they actually get when their mothers go through
measles naturally is reduced by the vaccination, and so the legislator produces the vulnerability of the infants themselves.
Pregnant women: here too, there is not a single study according to which pregnant mothers are particularly at risk from measles.
In the case of immunosuppressed people , it is easy to imagine that they should not be vaccinated, as is also
stated in the information for healthcare professionals.
A case from my practice: An employee of a subcontractor of Münster University Hospital requires
dialysis and is therefore definitely immunosuppressed.
He was forced to be vaccinated by Münster University Hospital, although the titer was already
very borderline and has even been proven today.
The man is in his early 50s, so he still belongs to the group that probably had the measles.
He was forced to be vaccinated, he was fined and banned from entering the premises.
So much for the group of immunosuppressed patients who are supposedly to be protected, that they have to be vaccinated
in order to protect this patient, who in turn is forced to be vaccinated. Münster University Hospital, it's shameful!
There is not a single evidence-based comparative study between vaccinated and unvaccinated people - we already
had here - in which the necessity, efficacy and safety of measles vaccination has been proven.
What is there? There are manufacturer studies that compare their old vaccine with the newer variant and -
great (we have also published them here) the manufacturers who compare their vaccines:
GlaxoSmithKline compared its vaccine with Merck's, and there wasn't much difference.
Because if I do that and accept the side effects that the first vaccine has, then that is window dressing.
So the claim that measles vaccines are effective and safe is a life-threatening lie, as I see it here, it has to be said,
with a high criminal potential. Let's just put it this way!
Figures and statistics show a much higher mortality rate after measles vaccination than after measles.
So then mandatory vaccination for all children with this deadly risk-benefit ratio is also no longer constitutional,
which the Federal Constitutional Court claims, but criminal.
The state is forcing its own citizens to risk life and limb with a completely unnecessary and pointless measles vaccination.
I will conclude. Human dignity is absolutely inviolable and even eternally guaranteed by the Basic Law.
Nevertheless, this principle was trampled underfoot by the unspeakable daycare decision
of the Federal Constitutional Court in 2022.
In particular, the exclusion of healthy kindergarten children from kindergarten - simply because they do not have a measles vaccination -
is unbelievable discrimination, an inexcusable violation of the human dignity of these children and at the same
time a violation of the parental right to education and care and thus to medical self-determination.
Nothing can justify this violation.
If the Federal Constitutional Court nevertheless considers compulsory measles vaccination to be constitutional, then it is
clearly no longer protecting the rights of children and citizens, but solely the greed for profit of the pharmaceutical companies.
Ladies and gentlemen, after many months of working on my latest book and summarizing my meticulous medical
legal research - on 464 pages, with more than 700 references - I have come to the conclusion:
Due to the intolerable contradictions to truth and justice and the violation of human dignity, the Measles
Protection Act is an unjust law - and therefore null and void!
I call on the Bundestag [Lower House of Parliament] to repeal this unjust law better today than tomorrow, just as quickly and quietly as it
quietly passed this law in the shadow of the Corona staging.
Until then, until this law is repealed, the health authorities, school administrators and day-care center directors,
especially the courts, must refuse to obey this unjust law.
Do not tolerate any more obvious inconsistencies and human rights violations!
Stop being harnessed by dubious interests and actively contribute to the restoration of law and order, science,
clean medicine and genuine health protection! Thank you."
"I would now like to introduce you to a website.
I was invited a week ago last Saturday to the AZK, the Anti-Censorship Coalition Conference in
Switzerland, with the Kla.TV team around the Sasek family.
And I was also impressed by Elias Sasek, one of the editors responsible, who presented a completely new
project, a platform on which you can actively participate.
It's a kind of encyclopedia of uncensored and uncolored truth, you could say.
And I would like to strongly recommend it to you. You can access it via vetopedia.org.
And if you go there, you will see on the homepage that certain categories are dealt with here.
Vaccine damage, mobile phone damage, freemasonry foundations, ritual violence, crisis profits.
21 languages can be viewed simultaneously.
All articles are translated into these languages. Sensational!
But let's take a look, let's click on "Vaccine damage".
And then you see that there are already the stories of 64,507 aggrieved witnesses.
If you look, you have 805 study articles listed on specific vaccinations.
There can always be more. Anyone can enter something.
And the editors are still checking whether everything can be published like this before publication. I think it's sensational.
And if you take a look: studies and facts can be seen at the top left, 805 study articles, and you
can have them translated into the different languages.
So everyone is called upon to help ensure that this page is really filled and continues to be used.
I think it's sensational what a great encyclopedia can be created here that will serve us all."
"So how can you support our campaign to repeal the Measles Protection Act and the vaccination obligation formulated therein?
So, please take a look at the website that has been made available as of today: https://masernschutzgesetz.mwgfd.org.
And on this website you will be kept up to date on all our activities and results.
Please also fill in the contact form there!
Very, very important, so that we can really keep all those who take part in petitions on
the ball if things somehow come to nothing.
We will keep at it, and the more addresses we have, the more we can ask people to take action and inform them.
What have we done so far? As a team, we have created a nine-page information letter with all the important sources.
This can also be downloaded from this website.
Anyone can download it, print it out and bring it with them when they go to the vaccination center.
Please also give it to your vaccinators and so on.
We have prepared a flyer, including our working group, which you can distribute and which can be used for
signature campaigns, campaigns throughout Germany are best. This flyer can be downloaded.
And you can also download the signature collection sheets.
And it is important that our petition demands, which I have now also submitted to the
Bundestag [Lower House of Parliament], should always be on the signature sheet.
So talk to your MPs, talk to the politicians! We must exert pressure from below!
Talk to your doctors, talk about it with friends and colleagues!
Talk to affected families, to all young families!
This affects 700,000 people a year. And bring the issue to the public!
And incidentally, other countries in Europe are also affected by compulsory vaccination, some of which goes beyond compulsory measles
vaccination, for example Italy, France, Slovenia, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Latvia and Poland.
And I also call on these countries - I think that we might then broadcast to these countries via Kla.TV.
Because even in these countries there is a fundamental right to physical integrity.
This means that wherever vaccination is compulsory, the fundamental right to physical integrity
and parental rights are being trampled underfoot.
We cannot accept this. Let's create a common European movement!
I call on everyone to join us!"