[Sexual assaults among children in daycare centers are on the rise.
This was the headline of Bild in December 2024: Registered assaults in NRW: New
shock figures on violence in daycare centers:
Almost 2000 assaults ++ Sexual assaults more than doubled
The NW Nachrichten reported on September 13 of this year: Significantly more violence in
NRW daycare centers - assault and sexual assault
Since 2022, the number of reported cases has more than doubled.
In North Rhine-Westphalia, cases of sexual violence by children have almost tripled.
13.09.2025] These are just two representative headlines from the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia.
This dangerous development is no coincidence:
Since August 2024, every daycare center has been obliged to submit a so-called "violence protection concept".
Many facilities also integrate sex education concepts in this context.
"Body exploration rooms", "cozy corners" and the like are not uncommon.
The trends sold as educationally valuable are taken from WHO standards for sex education in Europe.
The content of these standards is highly disturbing.
For children aged 0 to 4, we recommend: "Pleasure and desire to touch your own body, early childhood masturbation" or "Pleasurable
experiences, physical closeness as part of human life"
- associated with the acquisition of sexual skills through so-called "doctor games".
4 to 6-year-olds should "talk about sexual topics"!
This has also been discussed here and there in the public media without, however, revealing the highly
problematic agenda of pedophile infiltration behind it.
The French social scientist Thibault Kerlirzin from the child protection organization "Mamans Louves" investigated sources for
the scientific recommendations of the WHO standards and came across authors from lobby
groups that are openly opposed to paedophilia.
Among them are people who have published in pedophile magazines and are deeply rooted in these milieus.
The educational brochure "Die schleichende Pädophilisierung" by the child protection organization Demo für alle states:
"Sexualized children are an Eldorado for pedophiles.
However, sexualization is not only lurking on dark pages on the internet, but also in seemingly
protected spaces such as schools and daycare centers."
"Tatort Kita" is an appeal to all parents, educators, employees of youth welfare offices and the rest of the justice system
to stop this state-sponsored endangerment of children's welfare.
To protect our children: spread the word about this important program!
Many thanks above all to the DemoFürAlle!
TRAILER
"So the term sex education concept was never mentioned."
These are disturbing reports.
"This one: 'State youth welfare office stops planned room for body exploration in the daycare center"
And there are more and more.
"That made me wonder whether the concept was so good."
What is happening in our daycare centers?
"Humans are sexual beings from the very beginning."
"Doctor games are part of normal child development. Whether they enjoy the touch or the play or not."
In this film we will show how a highly problematic current in sex education has taken over influential organizations.
"There's this infamous matrix."
"She has brought to light things that all parents and all political leaders need to know."
Their goal: A new dimension of sexualization of children.
But what does that do to the very youngest children?
"Then a lot of things happen in these cozy corners that we don't even dream of in our
nightmares, things that children do together."
"This is already an abuse."
"Yes!"
"I'm actually annoyed with myself that I didn't immediately shout out at that parents' evening
and say: 'No, I don't want that for my child'."
Things that are actually more a case for public prosecutors and youth welfare offices are to become the norm in daycare centers.
Crime scene daycare center. The woke attack on our children.
It has been a trend for decades: the sexualization of Western societies.
More and more, faster and faster, more and more rebellious and more and more often aimed at children.
She was actually supposed to do a reading for children at the Bargteheide public library today: "Dragqueen Veuve Noire"
"But of course that's also a sign of how important this form of educational work that we do is.
Because only if we really actively go to daycare centers, schools and vocational schools
will we actually manage to educate people."
Clarify? With what?
"In June, she wants to join drag king Eric Bigclit ..."
Munich, similar pictures, same subject:
"... host a reading for children aged 4 and up."
The trend towards earlier and earlier sexualization is not a German phenomenon.
Torrevieja, Spain: Young children in prostitute costumes dance at a gay parade.
Pedophilia on the open street.
Do children even belong at gay pride parades?
In Wroclaw, Poland, apparently already.
In London, the Pride parade now has its own family and children's area.
In this way, the British educational publisher "twinkl" glorifies the rainbow agenda ("equal rights for everyone").
And this caused a stir in the USA:
"We'll get your children," chanted participants at a gay parade in New York.
It was all just a misunderstanding, the initiators placated.
The slogan had been taken out of context.
Really?
Frankfurt am Main, July 2025:
It's "Christopher Street Day", or rather "Days".
What began as a gay parade is now a four-day event on the banks of the Main and children are also expressly welcome here.
The so-called CSD Mile advertises with its own youth and family area.
'Perfect for children to let off steam creatively,' say the organizers.
'Finally room for our little guests' they write on Instagram.
Ergo: carousels and bouncy castles next to fetish stalls.
Rainbow unicorns meet rainbow ideology.
Gays in leather outfits next to small children - as a matter of course at an event that
focuses on the total sexualization of adults.
There is no criticism, everyone joins in.
But while only a few parents take their children there voluntarily, there are other places
where all parents have to take their children.
Sexualization is already the order of the day in many schools.
But that's not all.
Now it is also starting in daycare centers.
What does that do to children?
What are the dangers and what are the parents' interests?
We spent months researching for this film, met experts, analyzed networks and came across some worrying background information.
Here we present the result.
Things that all parents should know - and all politicians anyway.
"This early sexualization of their children, now even in nurseries, is an issue that is
obviously affecting more and more parents."
"Yes, that's completely crazy.
All kinds of newspapers are reporting on it.
This one: State Youth Welfare Office stops planned room for body exploration in daycare centers.
That was in Hanover.
We have that here in Braunschweig: doctor games in kindergarten.
You have here: Kita thinks of room for sexual games.
In Kerpen: masturbation and doctor games.
So everywhere and you even have that in Catholic daycare centers.
Catholic daycare center cancels scandalous events on doctor games - in Cologne.
And Switzerland has it too: rooms for doctor play are normal in Swiss daycare centers.
"That's also an experience we have with the "Initiative Elternaktion".
We are receiving more and more letters from parents who are concerned that this type of sex
education is getting out of hand in daycare centers.
It ranges from: books are shown - to: assaults take place among peers or children.
There's a lot that comes to mind that is really very, very worrying."
It's disturbing news.
All this is extremely stressful, extremely personal for those affected , which is why not many
people want to talk about it in front of the camera .
Kerstin Kramer has an appointment with a couple of parents who have agreed to do just that.
At their request, we do not disclose the place of residence and identity of the persons concerned.
Just this much, our journey takes us to a small town somewhere in Bavaria.
And the story begins quite unspectacularly with a conversation between two mothers in kindergarten.
"And she told me about her sons, who laughed heartily at home about our daughter, or about what they had experienced together.
And the sons said that our daughter stuck her finger up her bottom, which they do all day long at home."
But the daughter of the mother concerned remembers it very differently.
"Then I spoke to her directly about it. What happened?
Is what my mom told me even true?
Yes, Mommy, that's true, but it wasn't at all like she told you.
It wasn't at all like the boys took my pants off.
Excuse me, what is it?
And then she said that yes, these boys took her pants off and allegedly several times,
not just once, that it happened regularly."
Yes, they contacted us, and I had already spoken to her on the phone beforehand and then she also told us in
the conversation that her daughter had been sexually assaulted by two boys several times.
So we're talking about children here.
The scene of the crime: A forest kindergarten with an ecological focus.
In the open area, there was a pipe that the children could crawl into.
"There's one outside on the premises, a pipe, a tunnel, where you can also hide."
What is not visible from the outside.
"If you don't look straight in."
This is apparently where the assaults took place.
Yes, and later it came out that the boys had forced and coerced her to take off her pants
in front of them and put things in her bottom.
The boys may also have stuck their fingers up her bottom.
What exactly happened remains unclear given the age of the children.
But it is clear that something has happened, and something serious at that.
"In fact, our daughter had injuries in the genital area during that time.
And I actually went to the pediatrician to show: What is it? What should I do? What is it like?
She looked at it, she saw it, she couldn't say anything.
And she also said that if nothing comes from the child, then I shouldn't follow up so
that I don't deepen the trauma if she has any."
All the more remarkable, however, is how the institution reacted to the incident.
"It's all just my daughter's story anyway.
And if they have any questions about sexuality, we clarify them.
Which also made me wonder, because as a mother - or as a father - we want to do that ourselves
and not necessarily get it from the institution.
And I also told them that I would like to see the protection concept.
Yes, yes, we have one - we have to have it too.
But it was never given to me.
They didn't want me to look in there."
And later it came out after the mother tried to talk to the daycare center management.
And everything was shifted onto the child.
According to the principle, it's all in your head.
And then later it came out that another child had experienced the same thing - with the same boys.
"And we're lucky that we found out relatively early because we were able to react immediately.
So I say we, but you reacted, yes, you mastered it.
We were able to act immediately to protect our child.
In this other family, they found out very late."
The daughter now goes to another daycare center.
Whether the child was traumatized by the events will only become clear in the distant future.
One thing is certain: as difficult as it is to reconstruct in detail what really happens in such "cuddly
caves" in daycare centers, the consequences can be serious.
And even without playing doctor or anything like that.
"There was also no exploration room in the true sense of the word.
The children were simply left alone."
But that's exactly the point.
This is exactly what is included in the sex education concepts of the daycare centers.
It is acceptable for children to explore each other unsupervised, touch their genitals
and stick things into each other's orifices.
Nobody notices.
And the children are also at an age where they don't necessarily communicate this openly.
"Yes, is that a coincidence?
What do experts who are familiar with child psychology and abuse actually say about this?
We have an interesting contact in Neubrandenburg. They are a married couple.
They are both child and adolescent psychotherapists and we'll see what they have to say about it."
So we're going on tour again. This time to Neubrandenburg.
Anja and Roman Göbeke welcome us to their practice.
They normally look after their patients here.
The psychotherapist and the behavioral therapist help children and young people to
overcome trauma or anxiety disorders, for example.
"So this is the room where behavioral therapy takes place."
Before that, Roman Göbeke worked in daycare centers for several years.
Professionally, he has always been concerned with the welfare of children.
"The parents are part of it, of course.
They are already taken into account in the application and there are these caregiver hours.
That means we need space for children and parents."
But the youngest are the focus here.
This also applies to Anja Göbeke's area of work.
"So, this is the room for depth psychology and play therapy.
It's a bit bigger than the other room because I also need enough toys here."
In short: you both know children and their psyche.
They also regularly treat victims of abuse.
We want to know what Anja and Roman Göbeke have to say about the trend towards ever earlier sexualization.
"I think that sexuality is something that should be integrated into an adult emotionality and a mature relationship activity.
So this is not something that can be considered in isolation, but should really be integrated.
And it should also be the case that the children have already completed their gender determination.
Yes, so that's sometime during puberty at the earliest.
So you're still very much in search of your identity, including your gender identity.
And this should be completed before any sexual activity actually takes place.
Anything else would be premature because children would be overwhelmed.
And because sexuality would then be something isolated within this framework and not yet integrated."
"I've always experienced and observed children to be interested in the fact that there are two kinds of people.
But that is limited to observation and the perception of: There are people who look different and have a different gender to me.
And that's actually the end of a child's curiosity horizon."
"In your opinion, when does a sense of shame begin to develop in children?
And what happens when it is disturbed, shamed or suppressed?
"On the one hand, I can clearly observe children's behavior when they go to the toilet.
The children regularly demand that the toilet is lockable.
This means that they have a natural impulse to set themselves apart.
So I can already see that at that age - kindergarten age usually begins at the age of 3 - the feeling of shame
and the need to define oneself, to perceive body boundaries as safe, is very clearly present."
"It is also the case that when a child has developed a good attachment, it
distinguishes between strangers and familiar people.
That is a sign of a good bond.
And then a child also becomes a stranger at a certain age, around 8 months.
This is a good sign because it shows that it can distinguish between strangers and familiar people.
And of course, if a child can tell the difference, it may not want to be touched by unfamiliar people.
It wants to keep a certain distance and certainly doesn't want to be touched in its private parts.
Yes, this is something a child would reject, usually if they have completed healthy development.
And attachment disorders, for example, are characterized by the fact that children are unable to do this.
So they can't distinguish between strangers and familiar people and would practically behave in a "distance-reduced" manner."
"And get in touch with random people."
"Going into contact or even going along with random people and perhaps not showing this fear, but that is a sign of
failed development and that a healthy bond has not been formed."
"This is of course in complete contradiction to what is always claimed in these sexual concepts.
The focus is always on so-called education.
But there is never any talk of commitment."
"It is also fitting that the same experts always have their say.
These are, for example, Uwe Sielert, Jörg Maiwald and Stefan Timmermanns. You don't hear much about others."
"But there are enough other voices.
For example, Professor Christian Schubert, who is a doctor and psychologist at the University Hospital in Innsbruck."
"Our next stop: Innsbruck in Austria.
Here we meet a scientist, university professor and psychologist who is also a critic of various - in his
view, undesirable - developments in modern medicine.
Taking a holistic view of body, mind and soul is his core thesis, which he also promotes in this non-fiction book.
First of all, we want to know: Would he have thought this development, which is now evident in daycare
centers, possible at the beginning of his career?"
"Yes, but would you have thought that we would be talking about cuddly caves and self-exploration rooms in daycare centers?
So where should children discover their sexual desire?"
"No, definitely not!
So at least not to discover their sexual desire, that's a far cry from what I could imagine."
"I have a quote here from Professor Jörg Maiwald, who is an honorary professor for children's rights and child
protection, and he writes in the newspaper "Kindheit":
The idea that children can grow up unencumbered by sexual feelings, thoughts and actions is an unrealistic fiction
that does not do them justice and can even cause them harm."
"Yes, I have a clear position on that.
I assume, I mean - I am psychoanalytically influenced, it has to be said - I am a psychodynamic psychotherapist, a medical
psychotherapist - who is of course also quite open to psychoanalytical considerations
on the psychosexual development of a child.
Of course there is something that is developing, there is no question about that.
But for me, other aspects are simply more important when it comes to child development.
And it's about bonding, it's about secure attachment, it's about a healthy, warm and secure home.
That comes first and foremost, that is a basis that a child needs, that every person needs, and
that is what I expect from healthy development.
I am a clear critic of this sexualization offensive that is being pursued.
Where it is assumed that there is a sexual energy in children - very early on after birth.
And that you make sure at a very early stage that this sexual energy can develop accordingly."
"Sexual energy is one of those core narratives that has been driven through the village for
decades as part of this sexualization offensive."
"Yes, that's right, I noticed that too, with Uwe Sielert, the "sex education pope".
In his "Introduction to Sex Education", he also speaks of libido as a life energy that provides strength against frustration.
Or in a 2013 lecture by Stefan Timmermanns.
He also talks about the sexual life energy that children would already have."
"Humans are sexual beings from the very beginning.
Sex education has a positive effect on children, because sexuality is a life energy."
"Doctor Stefan Timmermanns, one of the best-known representatives of this branch of sex education.
His presentation over 10 years ago seems like the blueprint for what is now finding its way into more and more daycare centers.
On this text panel, Timmermans listed the arguments for what he calls sex-friendly education.
For example: 'Discovering your own boundaries as a basis for respecting others'.
But doesn't that mean you have to deliberately cross these boundaries in order to discover them?
Listen and be amazed!
Exploring oneself and others are important learning experiences for children, and children today are
more likely to have them at daycare than at home.
Statistically, there's at most one other sibling at home and it's this balancing or testing of boundaries,
accepting boundaries - I don't want to be touched, I don't like that or I like that, I think that's nice.
They can learn this better in a larger group of children than if they only have one brother at home and then always the same one.
In short, because parents would not allow their children to explore the pubic boundaries of their
siblings, this is supposed to happen in daycare centers.
All to promote the alleged sexual energy.
If the child's sexual development is accompanied and supported, this benefits personality development, for
example the formation of an individual gender identity.
But is this really necessary for the development of young children?
Well, I don't see any need for it in the strict sense.
So for me it is fundamentally questionable to draw children's attention to the genital area.
Because they now have many opportunities to gain pleasure. And why should I eroticize that?
So that makes no sense at that developmental age, because it's not productive either.
I have no neurobiological equivalent for it.
I have no hormonal, no endocrine development that corresponds to this.
And so I don't have an intrapsychic framework in which I can integrate sexuality in the sense of gaining pleasure.
And so it is obvious that this sexualization is too much for the child's psyche.
I don't think it's necessary for development.
I mean, if you look at psychoanalysis, the child, the baby, the infant is in an oral phase at the beginning.
Then he enters, the child enters an anal phase.
It's all about the cleanliness education and so on, the defiant phase and so on.
And the genital phase comes at the very end, in adolescents.
And there is still a latency phase in between.
And I'm sure everyone knows that in the latency phase, girls and boys always say: "you boys", "you girls".
They have no interest at all in sexual contact at this age, on the contrary.
In fact, they fight it off quite strongly.
Girls would rather just be among girls and boys among boys, yes.
So I believe that there is an organic development of a human being.
And I think that there may indeed be a kind of sexuality early on, but it is far removed
from the way we look at sexuality as adults.
In other words, I would be very, very critical of adults taking the liberty of judging children's sexuality.
That's where it starts for me.
But that is exactly what is happening.
An increasingly sexual adult society is projecting its perspective onto the behavior of small children.
This was also the case for Timmermans in his 2013 lecture:
Because sexuality is a life energy, a life energy, a life energy.
Our story also began at that time.
From 2014, we took to the streets against education plans that introduced the sexualization offensive, especially in schools.
In 2016, Junge Freiheit conducted an interview with the sexologist Jakob Pastöter, then and now President
of the German Society for Social Science Sexual Research, on the fringes of our symposium in Stuttgart.
He was already complaining there at the time:
On the one hand, the DGSS has actually been opposing the content of what I call
"state-sponsored sex education" for about 15 years.
This has to do with the fact that it has been clear for around 15 years, probably longer, that those involved in sex education, who
on the one hand receive funding from the state, but on the other hand also receive publications distributed by
the state, have a very one-sided view of sex education.
The result looks like this, for example:
"Sina und Tim spielen Doktor", published by Zartbitter e.V., funded by the city of Cologne and the state of NRW.
One of many organizations that promote sexualization in daycare centres.
I feel much more like playing doctor.
Oh no.
Doctor, come on Tim, you can be the mom and have the baby too.
Oh well, doctor then.
Doctor games are part of the normal development of children.
Even very young girls and boys examine their genitals with age-appropriate curiosity and impartiality.
They enjoy touching and rubbing them and exchanging tender touches with other children.
Measure fever.
Doctor games are part of normal child development.
Whether they enjoy the touch or the game or not.
Exploring each other, enjoying being naked, the pleasure of showing off in front of others.
But also childish masturbation, which often leads to insecurity in adults.
It's about love and feelings and cuddling and kissing and girlfriends and doctor games
and how we can calm families who are upset.
And that's not all.
The trail of this agenda leads us even further to the very highest level.
This is exactly what the WHO standards for sexuality education for Europe say.
Yes, there is that infamous matrix and for zero to four-year-olds it says knowledge, pleasure and desire to touch your own body.
Early childhood masturbation or the pleasurable experience of physical closeness as part of human life.
In the case of skills, the focus is on expressing one's own needs, wishes and boundaries, for example when playing "doctor".
And the four to six-year-olds are then allowed to deal with sexual topics.
They should talk about sexual topics.
This is the political core of the sexualization offensive, published by the WHO in close cooperation
with the Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA).
Organizations that may seem reputable to many citizens, but this age matrix does not seem reputable.
As a physician, I can clearly say that I have a problem with diagnostic systems that are poured over everyone without taking
a close look, with schematizations, with templates, with rules.
As if everyone was the same.
As if there are certain patterns, age structures. You mentioned the matrix from the WHO.
In other words, where certain age groups are dealt with, so to speak.
From then on, it's good that you're already doing it.
No, this being is highly individual, highly complex, lives in a very specific psychosocial context and will ask questions
at some point, depending on its organic development, if you look at it sensitively enough and pay attention to it.
And I wait just as long with the child and won't come up with anything and impose it on him.
But that is exactly what is happening here.
The imposition of a very questionable template without any scientific evidence, over an entire continent.
And that doesn't just apply to Germany, but to the whole of Europe.
In France there is an organization called "Mamans Louves", they have also looked at the WHO standards and
commissioned a study that has shown spectacular results.
Our neighbouring country France is also familiar with the problem of sexualization at an ever earlier age.
There too, driven by progressive forces.
Regine Schäfer has arranged a video interview with Christelle Comet, a member of the "Mamans Louves" organization.
You have worked intensively on the WHO standards for Europe.
In view of the abuses we have observed at national level, we wanted to know what so-called scientific literature is the
basis of what is to be implemented in our schools nationwide?
The result is this sixty-page study published in 2024.
She has brought to light things that all parents and all political leaders need to know, at least those for
whom the welfare of children is the highest priority.
And that is what we are concerned with, respect for the child's welfare and parental rights.
Thibault Kerlirzin, the author of the study, explains what exactly is meant.
It came out that the WHO standards were created by a group of experts who were very biased.
This is because practically all of these experts belong to structures that are part of an offshoot
of the international Plant Parenthood Federation.
They therefore seem to be activists rather than scientists.
And the question arises as to why.
Who has an interest in this development?
Thibault came across a disturbing part of the answer in the bibliography of the WHO standards.
The bibliography has several appendices and already at appendix A I found 3 advocates of pedocriminality.
But the heart of the document, and at the same time its weak point, can be found in the scientific
literature on the psychosexual development of children.
Among the 50 or so references I found 15 that are either advocates or proponents of early sex education or even pedocriminality.
You will see that this includes people who belong to lobby groups that are openly opposed to pedophilia.
They call it intergenerational relationships.
Among them are people who have published in openly pedophile magazines.
The connections are shown in this animation on the website of "Mamans Louves".
Thibault has divided the WHO experts into 3 groups:
Green for unobjectionable, yellow for questionable, red for those circles that are clearly in favor of very early
sexual contact between children or even pedocriminality.
A German link to pedocriminal circles - Gunter Schmidt.
He worked with a certain Volkmar Sigusch, for example.
And Sigusch had claimed that childhood sexuality was not just a pleasure, but a necessity.
He worked for the journal "Archives of Sexual Behavior", which still exists today and was founded by Richard Green.
Richard Green was an advocate of pedophilia and he was a friend of Thomas O'Carroll.
He in turn was the founder and chairman of an organization called "Pedophile Information
Exchange" - an exchange platform for pedophiles.
This group was very controversial and called for the legalization of sexual contact between adults and children.
How pedophiles infiltrated the left and hijacked the fight for civil rights, the Guardian reported in 2014 on the
activities of the Pedophile Information Exchange in the 1970s.
There were also efforts to legalize paedophilia in the German left, especially in the 1968 movement.
Well-known examples: the Green politician Daniel Cohn-Bendit, the Green federal working group "Gays, Pederasts and Transsexuals"
or the German study and working group "Pedophilia", whose board of trustees briefly included Helmut Kentler.
He, in turn, is regarded as the founding father of this very branch of sex education.
We dealt with his pedophile activities in detail in our documentary "KentlerGate".
Kentler was followed in Germany by Uwe Sielert, Volker Siegusch and Gunter Schmidt.
The latter, for example, wrote in his foreword to the book "Male Intergenerational Intimacy" in the early 1990s:
"There are successful pedophilic relationships that help and encourage the child."
And further: "The threat to make all pedophile acts punishable by law is unjust and should be abolished, as it
involves the discrimination and persecution of a minority."
Ernst Bornemann expressed himself just as clearly in his book "Das Geschlechtsleben des Kindes", in which he claimed:
"Pedosexual, non-violent sexual acts do not necessarily have to have negative consequences for the child."
He also appears as a reference in the WHO standards with his book:
"Childhood Faces of maturity", in which he dealt with the alleged sexuality of under 8-year-olds.
The core statement of the book is: "that humans are sexual beings from the moment of conception.
This manifests itself in many ways in children - in their play, their rich imagination,
their need for touch and their masturbation.
This is exactly what is becoming the basis of more and more daycare concepts via the BZGA and WHO.
Ernst Bornemann and Gunter Schmidt - two of several examples that show that the WHO standards are not only based on
a very one-sided approach by experts, but are also sometimes deeply rooted in pedophile milieus.
And this is supposed to be the basis for raising our children?
Yes, so these pedophile entanglements are not really surprising, because the forefather of all this sex
education that is being advocated was Helmut Kentler.
And Helmut Kentler was an activist for pedophilia and he was actually also an abuser.
He was subsequently convicted of child abuse and his pupil was Uwe Silert.
And Uwe Silert's work at the BZGA was instrumental in setting the WHO standards for sexuality education in Europe.
Exactly, and these in turn have a direct impact on the education plans of the individual federal states here in Germany.
Almost every federal state, with the exception of Bremen, has a so-called education plan - orientation plan, which
directly specifies how sex education should take place in daycare centers and what it should include.
And the Berlin education plan contains precisely these things, which we then find in the sex education concepts:
"A little later, your own genitals are discovered and intensively explored."
"Sexual curiosity is just as much a part of healthy mental and physical development as enjoying
feelings of pleasure in your own body," says Berlin.
Or in North Rhine-Westphalia that means:
"The exchange of tenderness, touching each other, the informal and curious exploration of the body is necessary in
order to build an ego identity and become aware of one's gender.
This is usually done in a playful, intuitive and unbiased way. Daycare children!
So much for the theory. But what do such concepts mean in practice for those affected?
Two mothers, who both wish to remain anonymous, tell us how all of this found its way into their daycare center.
The 1st case takes place in a facility run by the Volkssolidarität organization in Saxony-Anhalt.
This is the first time I have heard of a sex education concept from alternative media.
It was more about the fact that such concepts exist deep in the south of Germany and I was actually surprised or shocked
that something like that existed and always thought to myself:
Oh, to us - in this village daycare center - so it will never come there or it won't come that far.
But far from it. One day, new concepts for the daycare center are announced at a parents' evening - without explaining them.
More details can be found on an information board.
At some point I was at this information board and read about this sex education concept
alongside room concepts or violence concepts.
And I pricked up my ears and asked our parents' council to look into the matter.
And that's what they did.
And only in this way does the content of the concept become known - namely exactly what is recommended by the WHO and BZGA.
And mind you, all of this was apparently to be introduced in secret, bypassing the parents.
So the term sex education concept was never mentioned.
I only read that on this board - in very small brackets.
I think such an important topic would have been worth a circular mail, or a parents' evening,
or yes, like an information letter or something.
Because that is an important thing.
After all - things were more transparent in the 2nd case.
This is set in a daycare center in Lower Saxony.
We had regular parents' evenings and we were always introduced to something new.
And then - that evening - the daycare center management and the teachers told us that there was a new concept and
that children had to be much more open about their sexuality.
And that this is why we would set up a corner in the kindergarten where the children can be on their own
- and where basically almost everything is allowed.
So the so-called doctor games - you wouldn't intervene much.
But the children would be told where the boundaries are.
They said, yes, you can be naked there, you can touch yourself and yes - you can explore yourself and also
the others - so both boys and girls - mixed together.
And yes, but I somehow thought we raised our child differently.
It won't stop there at all.
But things turned out differently.
So I came in the morning - took our youngest son to daycare and then a teacher asked if I could come for a chat in the afternoon.
There would have been an incident.
And then I went for a chat in the afternoon.
The head of the daycare center and a teacher were sitting there.
And what did they tell you about what happened?
Yes, and then they said: Our son didn't follow the rules.
It was probably not in this particular corner, but in the bathroom.
He would not have accepted another child's "no" and would have touched it.
And that would not have been what we wanted.
And then I was somehow completely perplexed at first and thought, can this really be?
And then I just said I'd talk to my son.
Well, he didn't tell me anything about it.
And then you talked to your son about it?
Exactly.
I took him with me straight away - it was already pick-up time.
Then we sat down quietly at home and I simply asked him: "Tell me, what happened there?
And then he got really small somehow and looked underneath him and said, "Mom, I didn't do anything.
I then also told him what he was accused of.
He says: Yes, I know, but I didn't touch the other child.
There was nothing at all.
But now it was testimony against testimony.
My son was suddenly an offender.
He is said to have touched some child who didn't want it.
And that somehow remained in the room - it couldn't be clarified.
And that is a fundamental problem.
It is also evident in cases of suspected abuse by adults, as described in this report by Hessischer Rundfunk.
A pedosexual perpetrator who works with young children has a very low risk of detection, according to
victim advocate Ulrich Warnke from the White Ring.
This is because there is a widespread assumption in the judiciary that the statements of
children under the age of 4 are not valid in court.
The reason: children cannot remember like adults and their statements could be
suggestively influenced by parents and other adults.
In view of the pedocriminal connections shown by the WHO experts, this is more than just food for thought.
So their testimony is not valid in court.
And the problem is that where we have abuse among the children, it's also testimony against testimony in the end.
One mother described it very impressively.
Her son is the alleged perpetrator, in quotation marks, and of course she believes her child.
Sexual assaults between children are also apparently encouraged by such concepts and cannot even be cleared up.
And he remembers, although it was many years ago, he still remembers it today and is ashamed of the whole
thing, although he maintains that he didn't do it at all.
Can small children be perpetrators at all or is the term forbidden here?
Aren't both children victims of the wrong framework conditions for which adults are responsible?
Well, a world is being created.
Children are transported into something, artificially transported into something and forced into it, where they end up in a
sexuality that is - in my opinion - artificial, i.e. not organically grown, as it would normally take place in the end.
As I said, again, on the basis of a good bond and healthy development, a healthy
sexuality will develop organically at some point.
That is the way.
Interference takes place here, very early on, in a human life that has nothing to do with sexuality in this form.
And then, of course, it may be brought into a development that is not healthy and that
ultimately may not be able to accept boundaries.
And then shame, disgust and the natural immune system may not develop well either.
And that, of course, opens the door to abuse.
So at the end of the day, I could well imagine that this actually leads to the exact opposite of what those who now think they have
to promote children's sexuality at an early age so that they can also set themselves apart at an early
age, I would say it's exactly the opposite that happens.
And that is now even statistically evident, at least in North Rhine-Westphalia.
There it came out that the number of sexual assaults among children in daycare
centers has risen dramatically in recent years.
The current police crime statistics also show an enormous increase, while the figures for petty theft, for
example, which would be more typical child behavior, have remained more or less the same over the years.
Well, when children experience such assaults, I have to assume that they are emotionally
overwhelmed and, in the worst case, traumatized.
And if we now know these connections from traumatology, then we are talking about a strong need for
repetition, i.e. a strong need to restage the triggering events.
You have to imagine it as a chain reaction.
If I have a certain number of children who could be described as affected and they are not receiving
therapeutic support or this trauma is not being resolved.
They will then pass on these traumatizing experiences to other children.
And that explains, at least to a certain extent, this statistical development.
That is also supported by the media.
I mean, if you remember, it used to be the case that content that had to do with sexuality was part of the evening program.
But children today have easy access to it.
And that's practically no problem at all for children to watch such scenes in movies or computer games or whatever.
And that is of course problematic when the pedagogical concepts that follow the same path and sexuality
is actually suggested to the children at every turn.
This has nothing at all to do with the child's free will.
When you see it over and over again in the media, when you hear it over and over again and are also told in
kindergarten, for example, 'Gee, now explore yourselves.
And if you do become sexually active, it's not something that the child decides for themselves. It is decided for the child.
It should do that.
That's the direction it's going in.
And then I have peer pressure that is difficult for the child to resist.
And if you then also send strangers who ultimately have nothing to do with psycho-neurotic development, with psychology, with
psychotherapy, with psychodiagnostics, i.e. daycare center aunts, for example, who are not trained at all to react
sensitively to this, which children are sent to these cuddly corners, where do they actually come from?
What did they actually experience at home?
Could it be that one of them, the boy or the girl, was confronted with a sick sexuality at home at an
early age and may have already had experiences of abuse?
So I'm putting two children on top of each other who are already developing personalities, who have already had their first
experiences of conflict and who may also develop into a conflictual personality, namely a personality that is
more easily abused. Another that is more easily abused.
And when two of them get together - I'm talking about power now, I'm talking about assault, then a lot of things happen
in these cuddly corners that we wouldn't even dream of in our nightmares about what children do to each other.
Nevertheless, these concepts are justified with abuse prevention of all things.
Of course, sex education is also about ensuring that children in dangerous situations are able to get
help, turn to someone and have a language for doing so.
The AWO, one of the largest daycare center operators in Germany, even publishes its version of the WHO agenda in a
brochure called "Protection concepts against sexual abuse of children and adolescents in facilities and services".
And in it we read what we are all too familiar with from Kentler to Timmermanns .
[And there are more and more of them.
Yes, here in a daycare center concept from Lower Saxony, for example, it says:
"Body exploration games, often also called doctor games, are one of the most common and
best-known forms of expression of children's sexuality.
To prevent boundary violations, it is important that parents and also educational assistants and specialists in
facilities discuss the following rules for body exploration games with the children again and again.
1. voluntariness - do all the children involved want to play the game?
2. you can say stop at any time. No means no!
3. no one is harmed.
4. nothing is inserted into body orifices.
5. similar age: the age gap should not be so great so that there is no power imbalance.
6. help may be called for at any time. Getting help is not tattling."
Well, these are typical rules and when I think about it, if you tell children these rules all
the time, they get the idea in the first place.
Yes, definitely! When you introduce these terms, you first get the children to see that there
is such a thing and then to investigate further.
And that is basically completely unnecessary for the children.
If it doesn't develop on its own, but only through this impulse.
The irony of the whole thing is that none of these sex education concepts would actually be mandatory for daycare centers.
It always sounds like that, but it's not at all.
The only thing they are obliged to do is to have a violence protection concept in place between 2021 and 2024
as a result of this Child and Youth Strengthening Act.
Every daycare center must have this in order to obtain an operating license or to be able to maintain it.
And as part of this violence protection concept, they are now implementing all these sex education concepts.
And everything is mixed up.
The prevention concepts are designed to prevent adults from offending children and to prevent sexual
abuse of children by adults in public institutions.
At the same time, they say, well, to make sure the children aren't abused, we make sex
education concepts so that the children can name things.
But that doesn't affect the children at all.
You have to address the adults in order to prevent sexual abuse.
Well, I think the situation in which a child has to say NO in order not to be exposed to
abusive behavior from other children is already abuse.
Yes, it has been thought through.
When we play, we don't hurt others. Nope, nope.
Do you say STOP ... - Yes, I know. - ...then we'll stop, that's okay
... Can children say no at all, or are adults being projected onto small children here too?
"I would simply say that it doesn't work.
Of course, children should be told that your body belongs to you and that nobody is
allowed to touch you if you don't want them to.
You have to and should tell children that.
You just can't expect them to be able to do that.
Not at that age, not at kindergarten age, there's no way they can do that.
They'll be able to do that later in adolescence - and many of them won't be able to do it then
either, yes. So you also have to learn to say NO.
But you can't expect children of kindergarten age to be able to do that.
That's the beginning of learning that I can set myself apart - but I won't be able to do that until much later, for sure."
Yes, let's hold on:
A niche of sex education with obvious links to paedophilia has occupied influential organizations and is using them to push
through a highly problematic agenda from the top down, with which things that are actually a case for public
prosecutors and youth welfare offices are to become part of everyday life in daycare centres - literally.
"The State Youth Welfare Office in Lower Saxony has stopped a "body exploration room" in a day care
center run by the Hanover Workers' Welfare Association.
The educational concept was classified by the Ministry of Education as endangering the welfare of the child."
The excitement was great in 2023, as if it all came as such a surprise.
But in reality, this is exactly what is happening in all our daycare centers.
And some left-wing media have long supported this agenda.
However, the "woke zeitgeist" is now threatening to prevail in the media, as can be seen
in this SAT regional report from April 2025:
"Doctor games or physical exploration in the nursery, masturbation ..."
Lower Saxony again, the same as in Hanover.
But instead of banning it, the Minister of Culture is now defending the concept with all the
half-truths and untruths that we have uncovered here.
"Every institution is obliged to define in its concepts how to deal with the development of children and thus also the discovery
of their own bodies, because this is crucial in order to ultimately protect children from assaults - and these are
based on pedagogical and scientific standards and are therefore closely monitored and checked by the state youth welfare office."
"If you only take a single passage out of the concept, say those responsible in
Bramsche, it can quickly lead to misunderstandings."
Misunderstandings? Not at all!
It is state-sponsored child endangerment, driven by left-wing ideologues in the media and politics.
[In addition to myths such as abuse prevention and science, there is another legal lever.
This can also be observed in Timmermann 2013: the alleged rights of the child.
"Of course also the right to a positive and individual development of sexuality, for the children ..."
In a nutshell: Because children have a right to sexual education, which their parents continually deny them,
the state must step in to enforce this alleged right.
And that is why, from the point of view of this ideology, this is the ideal: infant versus adult sexuality.
Anyone who denies that children are children and reinterprets them as sexual beings may welcome this development, but must
accept the question of whether it can be a coincidence that it originated in areas where children are nothing more than that:
Objects of sexual desire of pedophile adults.
And yet: embedded in the omnipresent "diversity mania", it is being carried out without restraint - with
such force that even on the conservative side, hardly any politician dares to contradict it.
"We have distributed this study to all Members of the European Parliament.
We had a list of 700 people and unfortunately only 3 of these 700 people replied.
To date, nothing has been done to question the credibility of this document.
This shows how interested politicians are in child protection these days.
People talk about a lot of topics, but it's rarely about the children."
"In view of the fact that both the expert group and the sources used are tendentious, I believe that
adherence to this type of sex education serves to completely divide children in their nature.
And if they get children used to having sexual relationships right from the start or see sexuality as something you eat like
sweets, like a consumer good, if they are used to having constantly changing partners, then the question
arises as to when this person will decide, for example, to start a family and enter into stable relationships?"
That's exactly what many parents feel. That's exactly why there's resistance and it's worth it.
Together with other parents, the mother from Saxony-Anhalt was able to stop the introduction of the
concept at her daycare center for the time being.
"In general, it bothered me that there is a sex education concept at all, because for me the terms sexuality and
childhood don't go together. They are mutually exclusive."
The mother from Lower Saxony, on the other hand, regrets not having protested immediately.
"I'm actually annoyed with myself that I didn't shout out immediately at that parents'
evening and say: No, I don't want that for my child!
I would advise everyone to look much more closely at the concept of the kindergarten to which I am
sending my child so that it is well looked after.
And if such a sexualized pedagogical concept appears, I would advise everyone to say NO.
And if the kindergarten doesn't stop this, I would actually advise giving the child somewhere else, taking him out!
Because I believe - and I can see this in my son after so many years - that he hasn't forgotten.
And I don't know how much he might suffer from this first sexual experience when he reaches puberty.
I can't even foresee that yet."
"If one imagines that this takes place regularly and normally during puberty, then one should also be able to prove
why this is too late under certain assumptions and perhaps even promotes unfavorable developmental trajectories.
But there is no proof of this.
So why should I set the sexual impulses in the childhood phase if children don't need that for healthy development?
So if this is missing, no one has yet proven that children then develop abnormally or conspicuously.
However, we have seen an increase in sexual assaults since such methods became popular and this connection is evident.
But I can't prove the reverse."
"Conclusion: These concepts are really a guide to assault and a real sexualization - from the very beginning."
"In addition, it is the parents' own responsibility to educate their children in these matters and
to answer any questions they may have at that age.
After all, it's not the children's focus that they are constantly dealing with sexuality without being asked.
"Yes, and it's also about parents being really vigilant.
The parents really have to be on the lookout and have it shown to them."
"These sex education concepts for day-care centers have to go.
That has no place in a daycare center. Children don't need that.
The children need bonding and not sexual education. This is madness!"
You too can become active.
Share this movie, inform your environment, spread information material.
Show others what is happening.
Because this is an aberration that our society cannot abandon quickly enough.
And in the end, it's up to us, the parents.
We are the last bastion against sexualization and the woken attack on our children on: "Crime scene daycare center
(The woke attack on our children)" A film project by "Demo for all".
If you would like to support our work, we would be delighted to receive your donation.
And don't forget to subscribe to the channel and newsletter.