Uwe Kranz is a police officer, former senior ministerial councillor and former president of the
Thuringia State Office of Criminal Investigation.
He was a national expert at Europol.
As an expert on security and terrorism issues, he regularly publishes in numerous media.
Uwe Kranz has been involved in the fight against organized crime, extremism and terrorism for over 50 years.
During his time in the service, he dedicated himself above all to protecting children.
This becomes clear when you look at the areas of activity in his career:
He worked as a commissioner for juvenile affairs, in crime prevention, in the fight against sexual violence against
children and against human and organ trafficking at national and international level, and in criminal policy association work.
On his own website, Uwe Kranz publishes articles on topics such as "Child Sexual Abuse" and "Mind Control".
As a criminalist, he provides insights into the "Deep State" and observes current world events in his retirement.
He also contributes his experience and knowledge as a member and speaker at press symposia of renowned
associations such as "Axion Resist" and MWGFD e.V. .
These were established with the aim of protecting the welfare of children, freedom and the rule of law.
Among other things, he spoke on the topics of paedocriminality, early sexualization and child trafficking.
It is a special honor for me to welcome this experienced criminalist, Uwe Kranz, here at the 22nd AZK.
The honor is all mine.
Nice to have you here.
Yes, you have half a century of criminal experience in the fight against the sexual abuse of children.
You were at the forefront of these investigations as a police officer, even as a senior ministerial councillor and
as head of the Thuringia Criminal Investigation Department.
In other words, cases were reported to you and you then investigated them. But what happened next?
The problem is that the evidence has to be presented first, so that the proceedings can also go to the public
prosecutor's office and be accepted there, reworked as an indictment and brought to court.
And unfortunately, there are many, many failures along the way.
It's frustrating when you arrest someone in the morning and then meet them again in the afternoon.
- I have visualized this: Caught in the morning, released at noon.
For example, we very often have the problem that the police very often arrive with a murder
charge and then start investigating a murder.
And then, on the way to the public prosecutor's office, the murder becomes an assault resulting in death.
Then you may end up with a completely different legal substance and completely different problems.
Or when, as in the recent case, you have to deal with the rapists who committed gang rape and then walk out of court
whistling happily because the judge doesn't want to rule out 100 percent that the girl might have participated after all.
So that's where the whole thing starts to become a bit questionable.
And there are a great many possibilities for discontinuing proceedings or converting them
into psychiatric hospitalization and so on.
So there's a break somewhere in the business and unfortunately that's the case.
These victims must be treated carefully and seriously.
You have every right in the world to be treated properly by the police and the judiciary.
Thank you for your statement. You also speak of so-called "pedocriminality" and of connections that are said to
reach into "high circles". What are your observations?
Yes, so let's assume the following: I always have the Dutroux case in my PowerPoint presentations.
You are no doubt familiar with the Dutroux case.
A Belgian child molester who killed eleven children and starved two to death while in prison.
Because he didn't reveal anything while he was in prison and then the children starved to death. It was a terrible case.
A whole series of witnesses have either had accidents or died in dubious circumstances or whatever.
And the Dutroux case has already shown that all levels of society were involved in these child abuse rings.
So it went right to the top in politics, right to the top in culture, television and the media.
The process was synonymous with what the core problem is.
Whether it's Epstein or not, it's exactly the same.
At Epstein, they also have connections right up to the top in politics, show business, public prosecutors -
hell knows what - high-ranking officials and politicians.
They did the same with "Diddy" Sean Combs, who is also well-known. He has now "caught" four years and two months.
This is actually a harmless conviction because the entire area of organized crime has simply been cut away.
They said, we'll stop this, now we're only sentencing him because of the one abuse of his girlfriend or his wife.
And the whole process was then reduced to a small section.
In many cases, therefore, such procedures are fragmented, deliberately fragmented.
In 1995, we had a major trial in England. That was also made possible by the bank,
politics, the media, big moguls and whatnot.
Over the years, the process has become smaller and smaller, and in the end there was nothing left.
In the end, these were small proceedings - they are picked apart and broken down into morsels, so to speak, into
legal morsels, and then there is not much substance left.
This naturally raises the suspicion that influence is being exerted here. That cannot be dismissed out of hand.
Did you then perceive this principle - as it happened with Epstein, Dutroux, P. Diddy and
so on - also in your region, these principles?
The principles are the same everywhere, regardless of the country.
You have to assume that this sexual abuse of young children, girls and teenagers is taking place all over Europe and the world.
If you look at NCMEC, for example - the American center for reporting missing and abused children - it
still had 50,000 cases here four or five years ago.
We now have 205,000 cases reported to us every year.
Madness!
But we are a small light.
If you compare what NCMEC reports to Asia, to India, to Pakistan, then we are almost in the millions.
So that clearly shows that it's a worldwide problem, not just a German problem, not just a Belgian problem or anything else.
I've also heard that there are many official studies on cult abuse.
Can you explain in a few sentences what the official side has come up with?
There are enough studies. Believe me, there are studies a dime a dozen in this area.
I myself wrote two studies for the European Parliament, 2020 and 2021, where I summarized the whole thing.
And I said "Okay, what could we do better? What can we make easier? Where can we start?"
- And exactly the opposite has been done.
Another center has been set up, a center to combat the sexual abuse of children. Zack.
Now we have a center next to Europol and, and, and.
We have commissioners everywhere and we have studies everywhere.
There was a wonderful study in 2011 on the introduction of EU directives to combat child sexual abuse.
And it was evaluated in 2016. It is a good study.
There was another study by WeProtect. (https://www.weprotect.org/)
It was also a good study that should have been updated and implemented.
You just had to make something of it!
They did a study, it was written, it was nice to read, nice pictures, nice graphics and tralala.
But implementation is usually a problem.
Not only is there a lack of dark field research, but there is also a lack of political
will to deal with these issues intensively.
There is not so much a lack of laws, there is certainly no lack of studies.
No, you have to do it! You have to do it and want to do it!
You also talk a lot about early childhood sex education in kindergartens and schools. What can you say about that?
Yes, early childhood sex education is a special area that really shocked me, because it was developed by the WHO ,
together with the "German Federal Centre for Health Education".
Since February 13 of this year (2025), it has been called the "Federal Institute of Public Health".
It has even more rights, even more opportunities and can do even more, especially when it comes to climate protection.
And these two have worked together to create these guidelines on how to "sexually educate" young children.
The basic idea behind this is actually that a child - after it can be aborted up to birth, that's one side of
it - is labeled a sexual being immediately after birth, which can also be abused at any time.
And that is so crazy that you can't even imagine it.
And the worst thing is that these BZgA guidelines from the WHO are based on scientific findings.
And now please take a look at the scientific findings and see where that comes from. It comes from Kinsey.
The man who wrote the infamous Kinsey Report in the 1960s on the liberation of men and women.
From then on, things actually went steadily downhill.
The term "sexual permissiveness" was coined back then.
Indifference towards children and sex with children is possible and common and is permitted.
Fecal language was introduced. And this person, Kinsey, carried out a series of tests.
And there's a series of tests I saw where a four-year-old child was maltreated for 24 hours to achieve 27 orgasms.
You have to imagine that. He described an orgasm whenever the child screamed, cried out, convulsed - torturing a four-year-old
child for 24 hours until some kind of physical reaction occurs - and then defining this physical reaction as an orgasm.
And then those who did it, who maltreated the children, some of them were pimps, some were prison inmates who got out.
You have to research and filter it all out.
And then you say to yourself: "Hello, what is this? Scientific knowledge?"
This is flawless child abuse, flawless sexual violence against children under the guise of research.
And he then had corresponding pupils.
Kinsey had the Kentler next. There was the Kentler Report.
Then there was Sielert. And then there was another one, now more recently.
They all come from the same ideological stable.
You have to think about it. Kinsey has started.
Then they "conquered" the universities and the universities of applied sciences and specialized training institutions.
And now generations of such social psychologists and cultural psychologists and whatever... They are being churned out one
after the other and occupying social welfare offices and school boards everywhere and
continuing to work in the spirit of this training.
Madness!
In my opinion, that is absolutely abstruse.
And if you then look at what these guidelines require - from zero to four years, the child must
learn sexual masturbation. From zero to four years!
I ask myself, of course, which educator does this and how does he do it?
And in Schwäbisch Hall we have just recently had 17 daycare centers set up personal body
exploration stations in the daycare center.
The parents were completely flabbergasted!
They didn't know anything about it. They weren't informed either.
So, if this is early childhood sex education, then it's basically nothing more than the destruction of the family.
This is a destruction of the family.
The core of a state, the ovum of a state, is a healthy family relationship.
There is a father, there is a mother, there is a child, that's it.
There are two genders, twice basta. I'm already right-wing extremist.
I know it. There is something even more beautiful, there is what Monika Gruber once said:
"And if we have a parent1 and a parent2, then we will soon have carcass1 and carcass2 for the grandfather and grandmother.
Is that perhaps also coming?" That's a joke, of course, but the fact is that it dehumanizes the whole thing.
Yes, exactly.
It is no longer a humane level and no dignity - certainly not for the child.
The child also has dignity. You also have to protect their rights.
And children really should be treated as legal subjects and not as something that can just be thrown on and off.
Yes! Thank you for your comments.
So there was a single positive approach in the whole business.
That was Bielefeld University.
She carried out a large-scale study on this Kinsey, Kentler and Co. and found that it was
child abuse across the board, sexual abuse.
It was a highly criminal organization that has since spread throughout the entire training facility,
where social psychologists, psychologists, school principals and the like have been trained.
And that perpetuates . So it becomes more and more frequent.
And that's why it's not surprising to read in parenting magazines today: It is quite normal for children to be
treated and trained in such a way that they have to have sexual contact from the age of six to nine.
And physically groping each other and secretly setting up little cuddly corners everywhere where the children can retreat.
That's all just another game that plays into the hands of the perpetrators.
[Yes... I'm sorry, I don't have any good news.
These are just negative experiences that I have had.
I really have spent most of my life fighting for sexual violence against children to become a criminal offense.
And this has finally, finally, finally been enforced in Germany in 2021 after years of fighting to make it a criminal offense.
And that lasted from 2021 to 2024. Then Mr. Buschmann, that was his name at the time, the liberal
Minister of Justice, came along and reversed it.
Now it's a misdemeanor again.
So that's no great gain either.
So all the formulations that the Ministry of Justice uses to explain why this crime has been
overturned are, in my opinion, an indictment.
Yes, that really is an indictment.
Thank you very much for your commitment to the children and, above all, for bringing these abuses to public attention.
That is so important.
That has to happen.
Thank you for taking this time, even though you're on the road right now.
Your statements have really helped us to get a clearer picture of this issue.
We wish you all the best for your future work, even in retirement.
You are still on the ball!
Thank you for your great educational work. We love you!
Thank you.